Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersagency

6,243 results

0.24s

  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    We sustain it without further comment. See Rules 142(a)(1), 149(b). D. Rental Income Respondent determined in Ms. … We sustain it without further comment. See Rules 142(a)(1), 149(b). D. Rental Income Respondent determined in Ms.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    As a result, the 90-day period for appeal of the stipulated decision under Fed. R. App. … Commissioner, 633 F.3d 616 (7th Cir. 2011) (three-year period of limitation for assessing tax was applicable rather than six-year period under secs. 6229(c)(2) and 6501(e)(1)(A)), rev'g T.C.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Reaves' recorded comments confirm that Lawson had been giving him an unspecified amount of cash. During the call, Mr. Reaves said that if respondent's agents asked Lawson what Mr. … He gave no convincing reason why he waited after the period of limitations had run to act. Mr. Reaves testified that an unnamed law enforcement official administered lie detector tests to Mr.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On the other hand, through that period Oil Coming was credited with $13,031, its pro rata share of net revenue from production associated with the Milstead leasehold wells. … As one commentator has suggested, that authority does not exist in the case of a partner's failure to file a notice of inconsistent treatment arising (under section 6222(b)(1)(A)(ii)) solely from the

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On the other hand, through that period Oil Coming was credited with $13,031, its pro rata share of net revenue from production associated with the Milstead leasehold wells. … As one commentator has suggested, that authority does not exist in the case of a partner's failure to file a notice of inconsistent treatment arising (under section 6222(b)(1)(A)(ii)) solely from the

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On the other hand, through that period Oil Coming was credited with $13,031, its pro rata share of net revenue from production associated with the Milstead leasehold wells. … As one commentator has suggested, that authority does not exist in the case of a partner's failure to file a notice of inconsistent treatment arising (under section 6222(b)(1)(A)(ii)) solely from the

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Irwin does claim that the costs to prepare the land could “probably double” if the fallow period was 4 or 5 years. It seems unlikely, however, that the lessee (continued... … Memo. 1998-251, and to comment on the position of Judges Beghe and Ruwe, who make interesting and worthwhile points, especially in light of the increasing use of family partnerships.

    United States Tax Court
  • Division of Investment Management

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    If you have any questions or comments about this report, please contact: IM-Analytics with subject line “Money Market Fund Statistics (June 2025)”. 1 June 2025 Analytics Office Contents 1 Number of … Therefore, this summary is purposefully not a comprehensive list of all changes made to Form N-MFP over the time period shown.

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Turner commented in an email to Mr. Thomas and Mr. Snouffer: "[0]ur firm is required to open up a trust account into which the closing proceeds will be deposited. … Acts ch. 125 sec. 2. - 37 [*37] assignment of an insurance policy as not fraudulent).

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Turner commented in an email to Mr. Thomas and Mr. Snouffer: "[0]ur firm is required to open up a trust account into which the closing proceeds will be deposited. … Acts ch. 125 sec. 2. - 37 [*37] assignment of an insurance policy as not fraudulent).

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Turner commented in an email to Mr. Thomas and Mr. Snouffer: "[0]ur firm is required to open up a trust account into which the closing proceeds will be deposited. … Acts ch. 125 sec. 2. - 37 [*37] assignment of an insurance policy as not fraudulent).

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITEI STATES TAX CÓURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On Sept. 7, 2006, Resources entered into an employment agreement with P to have Holdings transfer a 2% interest in Holdings to P if P served as chief executive officer (CEO) of Resources for a period of … - 14 partnerships and their partners were enacted by Congress in the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L.

    United States Tax Court
  • Division of Investment Management

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    If you have any questions or comments about First Calendar Quarter 2024 Private Fund Statistics, please contact: Tim Dulaney, PhD, FRM, Tim Husson, PhD, FRM, or Trevor Tatum at FormPF@sec.gov with subject … Exempt reporting advisers are advisers that rely on the exemptions from SEC registration in Advisers Act section 203(l) for venture capital fund advisers and section 203(m) for advisers managing less than

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Turner commented in an email to Mr. Thomas and Mr. Snouffer: "[0]ur firm is required to open up a trust account into which the closing proceeds will be deposited. … Acts ch. 125 sec. 2. - 37 [*37] assignment of an insurance policy as not fraudulent).

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. … When a C corporation converts to an S corporation, a corporate-level tax applies to any net recognized built-in gain during the recognition period. 26 The recognition period generally extends for 10 years

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITEI STATES TAX CÓURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On Sept. 7, 2006, Resources entered into an employment agreement with P to have Holdings transfer a 2% interest in Holdings to P if P served as chief executive officer (CEO) of Resources for a period of … - 14 partnerships and their partners were enacted by Congress in the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L.

    United States Tax Court
  • T .C . Memo . 2009-6 8

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    "The bank deposits method assumes that all money deposited in a taxpayer's bank account during a given period constitutes taxable income, but the Government must take into account any nontaxable source … - 36 There is an exception to the . section .6662(a) penalty when a taxpayer can demonstrate (1) reasonable cause for the 11 underpayment and (2) that . the taxpayer acted in good faith with respect

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. … When a C corporation converts to an S corporation, a corporate-level tax applies to any net recognized built-in gain during the recognition period. 26 The recognition period generally extends for 10 years

    United States Tax Court
  • Division of Investment Management

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    If you have any questions or comments about Fourth Calendar Quarter 2023 Private Fund Statistics, please contact: Tim Dulaney, PhD, FRM, Tim Husson, PhD, FRM, or Trevor Tatum at FormPF@sec.gov with subject … Exempt reporting advisers are advisers that rely on the exemptions from SEC registration in Advisers Act section 203(l) for venture capital fund advisers and section 203(m) for advisers managing less than

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    We will allow petitioners to deduct $105,776 without further comment.¹³ iii. 2006 Petitioners argue that they may deduct for 2006 taxes and licenses expenses of $18,584. … Commissioner has met the burden of production, as he has here, the taxpayer must come forward with persuasive evidence that the imposition of a penalty is inappropriate because, for example, the taxpayer acted

    United States Tax Court

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.