Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,085 results
2.99s
Agency decision · Agency decision
Ramirez, 482 F.2d 807 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1070 (1973). … See U.S. ex rel. Zaffarano v. Corsi, 63 F.2d 757 (2 Cir. 1933); U.S. ex rel. Robinson v. Day, 51 F.2d 1022 (2 Cir. 1931); Bisaillan v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
substitute for return under section 6020(b) before determining a 1 A “dummy return” is generated to open an account for the taxpayer on the master file and normally consists of a first page of a Form 1040, U.S … United States, 423 U.S. 161, 174 (1976); Schiff v. United States, supra; Roat v. Commissioner, supra. B.
United States Tax CourtThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
.— Determination of Issue Price in the Case of Certain Debt Instruments Issued for Property (Also Sections 42, 280G, 382, 467, 468, 482, 483, 1288, 7520, 7872.) Rev. … PO—Possession of the U.S. PR—Partner. PRS—Partnership. i PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption. Pub. L.—Public Law. REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure. Rev. Rul.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
United States, 318 U.S. 423, 432 (1943)). Still, we can't use this canon "to create favor- able rules" for them. Jourdain v. … United States, 318 U.S. 423, 432 (1943).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 765 (1980)). 39 40 Id. … Co., 482 F.3d at 1096 (five-part factor analysis “is not mechanical.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
Memo. 1994-549, affd. without published opinion 68 F.3d 482 (9th Cir. 1995); Baratelli v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-484; David v. Commissioner, T.C. … Commissioner, 105 T.C. 166, 208 (1995), revd. on other grounds and remanded 119 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 1997); Estate of Schwartz v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 943, 952 (1984).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 Rule 142(a) (1); INDOPCO, 84 .(1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. (1934). … Riddell, 383 U.S. United States, 569, 572 Malat v. (1966); Biedenharn Realty Co. v. 526 F.2d 409, 422-423 (5th Cir. 1976)'.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 Rule 142(a) (1); INDOPCO, 84 .(1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. (1934). … Riddell, 383 U.S. United States, 569, 572 Malat v. (1966); Biedenharn Realty Co. v. 526 F.2d 409, 422-423 (5th Cir. 1976)'.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
- 3 In response to respondent's request that petitioner admit that he received wages from the U.S. … Memo. 1985-482. In our opinion, such a penalty is appropriate in this case. Under these circumstances, we award a penalty in the amount of $1,000 to the United States.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Rept. 91-552, at 247 (1969), 1969-3 C.B. 423, 597. … Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 114 (1933); see also Lilly v. Commissioner, 343 U.S. 90, 93 (1952).
United States Tax CourtThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
For American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, the population figures for the 2023 calendar year are the 2022 midyear population figures in the U.S. … I.R.B. 505 2023-18, 2023-10 I.R.B. 508 2023-20, 2023-10 I.R.B. 523 2023-19, 2023-11 I.R.B. 560 2023-21, 2023-11 I.R.B. 563 2023-22, 2023-12 I.R.B. 569 Proposed Regulations: REG-100442-22, 2023-3 I.R.B. 423
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 570-571 (1965); Crane v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1947); Texaco Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 571, 575 (1993), aff'd, 98 F.3d 825 (5th Cir. 1996); Rome I, Ltd. v. … Commissioner, 40 T.C. 474, 482 (1963). Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary 303 (1984) defines the term "construct" as "[t]o put together by assembling parts" or to "build".
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 429 U.S. 569, 577-578 (1977). … Commissioner, 70 T.C. 482, 485-487 (1978), aff'd without published opinion, 633 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1980); Smoker v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2013-56. III.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Petitioner filed Amended U.S. … Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, v. Commissioner, 397 U.S. 572, 575 84 (1970); United States v. 042 Hilton Hotels Corp., 397 U.S. 580 (1970).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
As the U.S. … Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 437 (1934) 4 Respondent relies on Poorbaugh v. United States, 423 F.2d 157 (3d Cir. 1970).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
the District Director. denying the visa petition fled by the United States citizen petitioner on behalf of the beneficiary as his son under section 203(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S … See Matter of P-, 4 I&N Dee. 610 (A.G. 1952; BIA 1952); Matter of Freeman, 11 I&N Dec. 482 (BIA 1966).
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
United States, 435 U.S. 561, 573 (1978). … Helvering, 293 U.S. at 470. 4.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Emory, 314 U.S. 423, 433 (1941)). We granted certiorari, 521 U. … United States v.Moore, 423 U.S., at 81. 16 at 80.
Internal Revenue ServiceCite as 25 I&N Dec. 114 (BIA 2009)
Agency decision · Agency decision
Cyr, 533 U.S. at 321-25. … Gonzales, 482 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. 2007). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Abebe v.
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Memo. 1998-423 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CERAND & COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 2767-97. Filed November 24, 1998. Gerard A. … Estate Nor is any one factor determinative or relevant in each case due to the countless factual circumstances possible. 326 U.S. 521, 530 (1946). John Kelley Co. v.
United States Tax Court
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.