Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersagency

6,243 results

0.60s

  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.

    United States Tax Court
  • BUSINESSES AND POLICYMAKERS

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The comment period on the Proposed Rulemaking ran through December 23, 2011, and the Commission is currently reviewing the comments received.23 Additionally, the Commission has hosted public workshops … Many commenters supported a phase-out period for legacy data systems, giving priority to systems that contain sensitive data.163 Another commenter suggested that 157 Comment of Intel Corp., cmt. #00246

    Federal Trade Commission
  • T .C . Memo . 2009-22 7

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    We therefore find that Schneide r controlled everything to do with the Angles' deal and used Provence only to lend an air of legitimacy to AmeriNational's . involvement--which was ultimately just to act … for them was to charge fees--and the record shows tha t 8 To compute the required minimum annual distribution of an annuity, one divides the annuitant's account balance by the .applicable distribution period

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    On September 30, 2015, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 … The Commission received no comments on the Plan during the comment period.

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Retirement Plans Reporting and Disclosure Requirements

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    season election period … plan’s qualification; • The specific dates by which a comment must be received; • The number of interested parties needed for the DOL to comment; and • A description of a reasonable procedure whereby

    Internal Revenue Service
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Myers cannot be present to supervise the work at a site, he assigns an experienced and responsible construction worker of petitioner to act as foreman of the work crew.3 On workdays during peak periods … Memo. 1997-495 (taxpayer specialized in constructing complex projects such as hospital operating rooms, robotics facilities, high-quality glass-making plants, and industrial “clean rooms”).

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    1934, Securities Act Rel. … by sending an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. 3 Order Establishing a Fair Fund, Appointing a Fund Administrator and Setting Administrator's Bond Amount, Exchange Act Rel.

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r). h. Applicant Contact: Shawn C. Puzen, Environmental Consultant, Integrys Business Support, LLC, 700 North Adams Street, P.O. … The Director’s Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of protests.

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Department of Energy, pursuant to the authority vested on the Deputy Secretary by sections 301(b), 302(a), 402(e), 641, 642, 643 and 644 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (Pub. … DE–PM–75– 85SW00117, as amended, effective for the period of January 1, 2007 through September 30, 2010.

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • U.S. Department of Labor

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Elsethagen commented that CSC USDOL/OALJ REPORTER PAGE 4 is working on the problem and reinforced CSC’s commitment to safety. Id. … Ameristar Airways, Inc., ARB No. 08-067, ALJ No. 2004-AIR-011 (ARB May 26, 2010).

    Department of Labor
  • Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2008 / Notices

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    for that period. … Comment Date: February 1, 2008.

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2008 / Notices

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    for that period. … Comment Date: February 1, 2008.

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Bulletin No. 2021–17

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    of 2020 (Act), enacted as Division EE of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. … We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to

    Internal Revenue Service
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The Commission received one comment during the comment period (the “Comment Letter”). … No. 94380 (Mar. 8, 2022). 3 Exchange Act Rel.

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    I am 15 Bill Blumenthal, and as the clean-up hitter, I suppose 16 I'm going to reshape my comments a little bit to address 17 some of the things that were said by the three earlier 18 batters. … KWOKA: Two comments.

    Federal Trade Commission

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.