Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
1.12s
Agency decision · Agency decision
Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7622. … Complainant later amended his complaint to add a claim under the whistleblower protection provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
See, e.g., Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. Envtl. Prot. … The provisions of STAA and AIR 21 are particularly close.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
It - 136 comments on the runs . In his expert report Dr . … Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, Pub . L . 109-432, div .
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Air Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of protected activity under the Clean Air Act in employment decisions by the Federal Government. … Air Act (CAA), Pub.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
As at least one commentator has noted, perhaps “[t]he appropriate distinction would have been between a contract for commercial services and a contract for noncommercial services.” Vernon J. … Accordingly, the USFS acted appropriately in applying FAR 52.212-4. CBCA 7283 IV. 11 ATI’s Failure to Provide Janitorial Services A.
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
II Government's sovereign immunity under 42 U.S.C.A. § 7622 (Thomson/West 2003) of the Clean Air Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of protected activity under the Clean Air Act in employment … Air Act (CAA), Pub.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
Before we discuss each item of expenditure, we must briefly comment on the history of this litigation. … The Court notes that the only records obtained by petitioners during this entire period and submitted in evidence were 15 canceled checks for the period June 26, 1990, through July 12, 1990. a.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
when it discharged him.1 In 1988 the parties entered into a 1 Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U .S.C . § 5851 (1994) (ERA ); the C lean Air A ct, 42 U.S .C. § 7622 (1994) (CA A); the … JURISDICTION We have jurisdiction to issue final orders under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622(b) (1994) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 49 U.S.C. § 9610
Department of LaborIn the Matter of LEE ETHEL EDWARDS
Agency decision · Agency decision
For travel to claimant’s new duty station, all modes of transportation were CBCA 5446-RELO 2 authorized: rail, air, and privately owned conveyance (POC). … The regulation describes the scope of this component as “applicable to lodging, meals (including tips), laundry, cleaning and pressing expenses in temporary quarters for employee and each member of family
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. … We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9610. 128 29 C.F.R. § 24.110(b); Evans v. … (42 U.S.C. § 300j-9(i)), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1367), the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. § 6971), the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7622), and the Comprehensive Environmental
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
Nicholas Servs., LLC, ARB No. 2025-0027, ALJ No. 2023-AIR-00012, slip op. at 2 (ARB Jan. 31, 2025) (citing Kim v. … Air Act].
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
During Complainant’s first delivery assignment, he reported an air brake defect in Truck No. 30 to Respondent’s dispatcher after the truck’s air system lost all pressure, causing the emergency brakes to … concerns about driving similarly maintained vehicles.8 Following this exchange, Complainant took about a thirty-to-forty-minute break and did not wash out the truck.9 Generally, drivers are responsible for cleaning
Department of LaborThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
A qualified commercial clean vehicle under § 45W(c) includes (1) a vehicle that is treated as a motor vehicle for purposes of title II of the Clean Air Act and is manufactured primarily for use on public … ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of comment period.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Lacey's brief comments as follows on Tank Truck Rentals, Inc.: "The standard here is easily met since the expense itself was an illegal act and it rendered impossible the income generating activity in … Act fines.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Boeing-South Carolina, ARB No. 2011-0067, ALJ No. 2011-AIR-00009, slip op. at 9 (ARB Dec. 10, 2012) (citing Tracy v. Consol. … Delta Air Lines, ARB No. 2016-0077, ALJ No. 2015-AIR-00026, slip op. at 5 (ARB Oct. 5, 2017)); Sch. Dist. of Allentown, 657 F.2d at 21 (3d Cir. 1981) (same)). 78 79 D. & O. at 7-9.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
In some instances the extended warranties have shorter periods, such as 24 months or 24,000 miles. … The statutes applicable include the Magnuson-Moss Federal Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. secs. 2301-2312 (1994), the Clean Air Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. secs. 7521(d), 7541(a) (1994), the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. sec
United States Tax CourtThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
The No Surprises Act also added provisions to title XXVII of the PHS Act in a new part E15 that apply to health care providers, facilities, and providers of air ambulance services, such as prohibitions … Interested parties will be provided with a period to submit public comments on the proposals, and the Departments will consider all comments submitted within the comment period in developing the final
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Respondent noted that appellant’s architectural comments on respondent’s proposed restoration were the first comments received from appellant although respondent had sent appellant a set of restoration … If you reconfigure the floor plan, you’re not going to be getting sufficient cool or warm air in there. You’re not going to get air regenerated. . . .
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
If your business was not in existence for the entire 3-year period, base your average annual gross receipts on the period your business existed. … months in the short period.
Internal Revenue Service
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.