Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
0.78s
Agency decision · Agency decision
The contract included a base period of performance beginning August 1, 2017, and ending July 31, 2018, with four oneyear option periods. … We see no evidence that the VA acted in bad faith, abused its discretion, or acted out of bias. We deny appellant’s summary judgment motion.
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
Delta Air Lines, Inc., ARB No. 2019-0087, ALJ No. 2018-AIR-00041, slip op. at 5 (ARB Aug 26, 2020) (quoting Klipsch Grp., Inc. v. ePRO E-Commerce Ltd., 880 F.3d 620, 627 (2d Cir. 2018)). 48 49 29 C.F.R … Doing so entitled her to have her claim adjudicated in accordance with the Act and its accompanying regulations.
Department of LaborCase 14-4626, Document 54, 02/06/2015, 1432420, Page1 of 72
Agency decision · Agency decision
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. … See also In re Air Cargo Shipping Servs.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
This case arises under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA or the Act), as amended, and its implementing regulations.1 1 (2021). 49 U.S.C. § 31105 (2007), and its implementing regulations … The driver records the dates of the absence or tardy, whether the absence was related to Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) or Oregon Family Leave Act (OFLA) leave, and whether the absence or tardy was
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
After the Commission proposed to ban noncompetes, the Commission received more than 26,000 comments. … Id. at 38344-45, 38389-94. 7 The comments are available and searchable by state at Regulations.gov, https://www.regulations.gov/document/FTC-2023-0007-0001/comment. 8 89 Fed.
Federal Trade CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The allowance could include periodic transportation between the post and the school chosen by the employee. … At issue here is the air travel between Hartford and Salt Lake City.
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
Burrell, Acting Chief Administrative Appeals Judge and ,James.-\. Haynes and Heather C. … D. & 0. at 47~18. 8 l'omplaints over a seven-year period with nu repercussions.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
been certified by a licensed health care practitioner as being unable to perform at least two activities of daily living - 5 (eating, toileting, transferring, bathing, dressing, and continence) for a period … health of an individual, such as an expenditure for a vacation, is not an expenditure for medical care. 3 Sec. 1.213-1(e)(1)(ii), Congress added sec. 213(d)(11) to the Health Insurance Portability Act
United States Tax CourtDISMISSED IN PART: October 18, 2016
Agency decision · Agency decision
Orr had to sign and that the Government’s act of forcing Mr. … Orr had not had an opportunity to comment upon the performance evaluation before it was provided to her CBCA 5299 20 and because she recognized that procedural defect, she never acted upon the performance
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
Air Cent., Inc., ARB No. 2007-0113, ALJ No. 2006-AIR-00009, slip op. 11-12 (ARB May 21, 2009) (allowing offset for unemployment compensation). 75 See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)(1); OFCCP, U.S. … “The mitigation of damages doctrine requires that a wrongfully discharged employee not only diligently seek substantially equivalent employment during the interim period but also that the employee act
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
and ROLFE and WARREN, Administrative Appeals Judges DECISION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS ROLFE, Administrative Appeals Judge: This case arises under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act … Superior Air Charter LLC, ARB No. 2017-0061, ALJ No. 2015-AIR-00028, slip op. at 6 (ARB May 28, 2021) (citation omitted). 42 43 Smith v. Serv. Master Corp., 592 F.
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
The Board has jurisdiction over this timely-filed appeal pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613, as amended (CDA). … The contractor did not act reasonably.
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
TAES had crews to clean and maintain the house, and employees were provided with meals inside the house, although petitioner would occasionally buy his own food. … The accuracy-related penalty is not imposed with respect to any portion of the underpayment as to which the taxpayer shows that he or she acted with reasonable cause and in good faith.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
been certified by a licensed health care practitioner as being unable to perform at least two activities of daily living - 5 (eating, toileting, transferring, bathing, dressing, and continence) for a period … health of an individual, such as an expenditure for a vacation, is not an expenditure for medical care. 3 Sec. 1.213-1(e)(1)(ii), Congress added sec. 213(d)(11) to the Health Insurance Portability Act
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
On tbsi basis of this application on August 27, 1964 he was granted an extension of his stay in the 'United States as a visitor for business fora period to expire April 14, 1965. … Considerable difficulty has been experienced in the past in arriving at a clean and workable definition of "business" within the contemplation of the statute (Gordon and Rosenfeld, Immigration Law and
Executive Office for Immigration ReviewAgency decision · Agency decision
Air Force. At the time Dr. Alexander was on active duty in San Antonio, Texas, he was a - 13 [*13] professor of plastic surgery at the Air Force medical training center. Dr. … Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, in view of the fact that the proposed revenue procedure is not final and because the comment period under the notice only recently closed." See also Cutler v.
United States Tax CourtFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (1981)
Agency decision · Agency decision
The Commission also sought a preliminary injunction enforcing the 20day waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Red i no Act ·ill 1.1 The fifth annual report covers the period from January 1, 1981, through … -iether the waiting periods defined by Section 7A(b) (1) of the Act, and the extensions thereof permitted by Section 7.A{e) (2) of the Act, provide aaequate ·time for Commiss.ion and Justice Department
Federal Trade CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Comments and suggestions. We welcome your comments about this publication and suggestions for future editions. You can send us comments through IRS.gov/FormComments. … • UPS Next Day Air Early A.M., UPS Next Day Air, UPS Next Day Air Saver, UPS 2nd Day Air, UPS 2nd Day Air A.M., UPS Worldwide Express Plus, and UPS Worldwide Express.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
of 1933, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, Securities Act Rel. … File No. 3-21140); Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, Securities Act Rel.
Securities and Exchange CommissionIn the Matter of JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX AND UNION COUNTIES,
Agency decision · Agency decision
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121–5207 (2018), the applicant, the Joint Meeting of Essex and Union Counties, New Jersey, seeks public assistance (PA … Its list of eligible activities for the safe opening and operating of facilities included only the purchase and distribution of PPE, cleaning and disinfection, COVID-19 testing, screening and temperature
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.