Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,645 results

0.10s

  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    The ANPRM invites public comments "regarding these standards." Id. at 3461. … We find that he so acted. Respondent's counsel, Mr.

    United States Tax Court
  • United States Tax Court

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    See Taxpayer First Act, Pub. L. No. 116-25, § 1001, 133 Stat. 981, 983 (2019). … Budget Control Act of 2011, Pub. L.

    United States Tax Court
  • T .C . Memo . 2008-3 4

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    B air v . Commissioner , 300 U .S . 5, 12-14 (1937) (Federal income tax liability follows ownership) ; Salvatore v . Commissioner , T . Memo . 1970-30, affd . 434 F .2d 600 (2d Cir . 1970) . C. … Althoug 4 th e period of bona fide residence must include an entire taxabl~ year , the entire uninterrupted period of residence may includ e fractional parts of a taxable year .

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    After completing his calculations, Rosenbach would send them back to Clark for comments. … By its terms Pan American agreed to reimburse policyholders for "losses of 'property' and 'expenses' resulting directly from an 'act of terrorism' occurring during the Indemnity Period."

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Similarly, petitioner was acting to preserve its good name with alumni. In Oregon State Univ. Alumni Association, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. … Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1601(a), 100 Stat. 2085, 2766. - 22 - U.S. 304, 313 (1960).

    United States Tax Court
  • T.C. Summary Opinion 2003-61

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    arrangement and signed what appeared to be a standard form employment agreement with Techmatics (the agreement).3 The purpose of the agreement was stated as follows: This Agreement sets forth certain acts … The work he did at home included long distance conference calls to discuss technical issues, receiving and reviewing documents, and faxing documents back and forth to his colleagues with comments.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    During that time period, Dart was in the process of expanding and positioned itself in the “high service just-in-time” segment of the truckload carrier industry. … - 6 Oren also acted as the treasurer of the company, and Mrs. Oren acted as vice president/secretary during 1993, 1994, and 1995. Mr. Oren and Mrs. Oren were the only directors of HS.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Foote, who acted as petitioner's chief financial officer, testified that he had "no idea" or "not a clue" about petitioner's inventory at cost in 2007. J. … (This suggestion may have been based on a comment by the Court during pretrial discussions in which the parties were urged to compromise the compensation and costs of goods sold issues or perhaps submit

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount

    United States Tax Court
  • United States Tax Court

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    We commented on the harshness of this rule in Scudder v. … Act of January 12, 1971, Pub. L. No. 91-679, 84 Stat. 2063 (codified at § 6013(e)). Relief got a little easier in 1984, see Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L.

    United States Tax Court
  • United States Tax Court

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    We commented on the harshness of this rule in Scudder v. … Act of January 12, 1971, Pub. L. No. 91-679, 84 Stat. 2063 (codified at § 6013(e)). Relief got a little easier in 1984, see Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    McWade selected "clean" cases; i.e., cases that did not include issues other than Kersting interest deductions. Mr. … The stated grounds were the expiration of the period of limitations for criminal prosecution of any acts of wrongdoing by Messrs. Sims and McWade and the OIG's prior investigation and report. J.

    United States Tax Court
  • United States Tax Court

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    the period required. . . . … Period for Filing Petition Extended in Certain Cases. (a) Period Extended.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    the following: New entry for 2.25 hours devoted to forwarding this Court’s Notice of Filing of Notice of Appeal to the test case petitioners; 2 additional hours for “transcript search” for the Court’s comments … The 758.19 hours claimed for this period include 192.07 fee request hours, and the 88.575 hours disallowed for this period include 53.91 fee request hours. c. 2006 Izen’s time entries for 2006 amount

    United States Tax Court
  • T .C . Memo . 2006-216

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Commissioner , docket No . 20336-04L, which involves a similar issue . 3 Act of 1982, Pub . L . 97-248, sec . 402(a), 96 Stat . 648 . … Petitioners conclude that any consents signed by Hoy t to extend the periods of limitation were invalid, which in turn means that the Court lacks jurisdiction because the applicable periods of limitation

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    As part of its statutory conversion under sec. 1012(a) and (b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Pub. L. 103-66, sec. 13261(g), 107 Stat. 312, 540.

    United States Tax Court
  • United States Tax Court

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Further, disaggregating SIHP’s portfolio to that of only the Swiss Equities, while ignoring its other indexes, is contrary to Treasury’s Decision, made in response to comments received, which states, in … value of taxpayer’s stock holdings acts as the denominator.

    United States Tax Court
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Read was acting in the interest of Mr. … There is no occasion to comment on how that issue should be decided if Mr. Read had raised it in a timely fashion. 4 It is understood that Mr.

    United States Tax Court

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.