Documents

United States v. Jier Shin Korea Co., Ltd., et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 17, 2020

All comments received during this period will be considered by the U.S. … to a 60-day comment period, after which the Court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(1).

Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement; United States v. Signature Flight Support Corp., et al.

Federal Register · Notice · Jul 12, 2001

The proposed Final Judgment is subject to approval by the Court after the expiration of the statutory sixty-day public comment period and compliance with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 … Public comment is invited within the statutory sixty-day comment period. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court.

United States v. Hyundai Oilbank Co., Ltd., et al.; Proposed Final Judgments and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Mar 27, 2019

Army, Navy, Marine, and Air Force installations in South Korea, including PC&S contracts, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. D. … subject to a 60-day comment period, after which the court shall determine whether entry of the proposed Final Judgment “is in the public interest.” 15 U.S.C. § 16(e)(1).

Immigration User Fee; Remittance Requirements

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Sep 28, 1994

Record Retention Period Three commenters addressed the proposed 5-year record-retention period. … In view of the comments received, the current 2-year retention period will remain in effect.

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

Federal Register · Notice · Sep 17, 2018

Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1344, to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into … all comments by October 10, 2018.

Securing the Border

Federal Register · Rule · Jun 7, 2024

Circuit, for example, has cautioned against construing “consistent with” too narrowly in a Clean Air Act case. Envtl. Def. Fund, Inc. v. EPA, 82 F.3d 451, 457 (D.C. … Courts have explained that notice-and-comment rulemaking may be impracticable, for instance, where air travel security agencies would be unable to address threats, Jifry, 370 F.3d at 1179, if “a safety

Inmate Discipline Rules: Subpart Revision and Clarification

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 26, 2005

You may also comment via the Internet to BOP at BOPRULES@BOP.GOV or by using the http://www.regulations.gov comment form for this regulation. … We will consider comments we receive during the comment period before we take final action. We will try to consider comments we receive after the end of the comment period.

United States v. Baroid Corp., Baroid Drilling Fluids, Inc., DB Stratabit (USA) Inc., and Dresser Industries, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jan 18, 1994

Public comment on the proposed Final Judgment is invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. … The APPA provides a period of at least 60 days preceding the effective date of the proposed Final Judgment within which any person may submit to the United States written comments regarding the proposed

Notice of Lodging of Consent Judgment Under the Clean Water Act

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 16, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Judgment Under the Clean Water Act In accordance both with a court order dated November 19, 1996, and Department Policy, 28 C.F.R. … The proposed Consent Decree concerns alleged violations of section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.

Inmate Discipline Program: Disciplinary Segregation and Prohibited Act Code Changes

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 1, 2024

of your comment. … from “Time period for prior offense (same code)” to “Time period for Prior Offense (same severity level).”

Amended Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water Act

Federal Register · Notice · May 1, 2012

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Amended Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water Act On April 24, 2012, at Federal Register /Vol. 77, No. 79, pages 24515-24516, notice was given … The Decree represents a settlement of claims against the City of Memphis under Section 301, 309, and 402 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1319, and 1342; and Tenn. Code Ann.

Notice of Lodging of Two Consent Decrees

Federal Register · Notice · May 22, 2012

The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the proposed Consent Decrees. … During the public comment period, the Consent Decrees may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

United States v. Regal Cinemas, Incorporated; Response to Public Comments on the Proposed Final Judgment

Federal Register · Notice · Oct 21, 2008

Public comment was invited within the statutory 60-day comment period. … The sixty-day comment period ended on July 28, 2008. Two comments, described below, were received. II.

Notice of Lodging of Consent Judgment Under the Clean Water Act

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 23, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Judgment Under the Clean Water Act In accordance both with a Court order dated November 19, 1996, and Department Policy, 28 C.F.R. … The proposed Consent Decree concerns alleged violations of section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

Federal Register · Notice · Mar 30, 2015

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed against the United States by Thomas Lloyd Herberg, Bruce Allen Herberg, and D & G Drainage, Inc., pursuant to the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 … , et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551, et seq., to challenge an Administrative Order for Compliance issued to Plaintiffs for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 13, 2009

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against The Port of Astoria pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief … from and to impose civil penalties against the Port of Astoria for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants in violation of a permit into waters of the United States near Astoria, Oregon

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 16, 2024

Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United States. … The Clean Water Act violations concern filling, grading, and excavation activities conducted in Lincoln County, Nebraska, along a braided channel of the Platte River.

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 9, 2005

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against California Olive Ranch pursuant to section 309(b) and (d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain … injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendant for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into the waters of the United States.

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

Federal Register · Notice · Mar 25, 2004

This proposed Partial Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Brian Chuchua, Al Julian, and Joe Weber III pursuant to section 309(b) and (d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C … . 1319(b) and (d), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

Federal Register · Notice · Jun 9, 2004

This proposed Partial Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against Brian Chuchua, Al Julian, and Joe Weber III pursuant to section 309(b) and (d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C … . 1319(b) and (d), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United