Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
63 results
4.76s
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 2022
needs and clean energy goals. … needs while also achieving clean energy goals to address the climate crisis.
87 FR 56868Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Nov 25, 1998
On the one hand, one commenter argued that subsidies provided shortly before, and in preparation for, the sale, such as debt forgiveness, asset revaluations, tax breaks, and other measures to ``clean up … The commenters argued that, because of the concessionary grace/deferral period, the Department is diluting the annual benefit by including this period in the allocation period.
63 FR 65348Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Mar 25, 2024
Furthermore, although some commenters characterized a three-year period as “arbitrary,” notably none of the commenters provided a useful alternative period. … With respect to the allegation that the allocation period of a subsidy benefit must be specific to the subject merchandise, the commenters cite no provision in the Act to support such a claim.
89 FR 20766Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2011
Law, the WTO Agreements, and Cash Deposits During the Provisional Measures Period Several commenters assert that section 703(d)(l)(B) and 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act provide the Department discretion to collect … With regard to the comment about new shipper reviews, unlike in investigations, bonding in new shipper reviews is required by the Act.
76 FR 61042Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAntidumping and Countervailing Duties
Federal Register · Rule · May 11, 1995
See Supplementary Information section for discussion on comments. ADDRESSES: Address written comments to Susan G. … Because new shipper reviews are a new procedure, the ITA did not consider it appropriate to establish a standard review period without first obtaining public comment.
60 FR 25130Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAntidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties
Federal Register · Rule · May 19, 1997
Extended period of time: Several commenters made suggestions regarding the ``extended period of time'' criterion for below-cost sales under section 773(b)(1)(A) of the Act. … (See section 773(b) of the Act.) This section clarifies the meaning of the term ``extended period of time'' as used in the Act. (b) Extended period of time.
62 FR 27296Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Feb 14, 2012
The Department has determined that a further or separate comment period is not justified. … The Department does not find that a separate notice and comment period is necessary.
77 FR 8101Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationSteel Import Monitoring and Analysis System
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 15, 2013
Response to Comments Submissions received during the public comment period established in the proposed rule have been considered in preparing this final rule. … Comment 5: Commenters propose shortening the period of time for which the licenses are valid, suggesting that applying for the licenses closer to the date of importation would increase the accuracy of
78 FR 11090Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Sep 2, 2011
The Department will consider all relevant comments regarding the supplemental interim final rule that are received before the close of the comment period. … Since this is a supplement to the interim final rule, the public will have an opportunity to comment on this supplement until the end of the comment period.
76 FR 54697Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAmended Regulation Concerning the Revocation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 22, 1999
Since the revocation standards in the two WTO agreements are identical, and since at least one party commented on this issue during the public comment period, we conclude that the public was on notice … Paperwork Reduction Act This rule contains no new collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
64 FR 51236Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Feb 10, 2011
The Department will consider all comments received before the close of the comment period. … Section 782(b) of the Act.
76 FR 7491Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Jul 17, 2013
Because some parties encountered technical difficulties in filing comments electronically during the rebuttal comment period, the Department reopened the public comment period for the submission of rebuttal … See section 782(b) of the Act.
78 FR 42678Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System: Effective Date and Response to Comments
Federal Register · Rule · May 21, 2021
period to solicit public comment on all aspects of the Final Rule, the AIM system, and part 361. … The comment period closed on February 26, 2021.
86 FR 27513Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationSteel Import Monitoring and Analysis System
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 11, 2020
for a longer period of time. … Response: With respect to the first item, Commerce will not adopt the commenter's proposed 15-day validity period because reducing the validity period from 75 to 15 days would require importers to obtain
85 FR 56162Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Dec 16, 2024
Under section 771(5B)(G)(ii) of the Act, the provision for Green Box subsidies no longer applied at the end of the nine-year period beginning on January 1, 1995. … Because the Act does not specify the precise period of time that the Secretary should examine in an antidumping or countervailing duty investigation, this section sets forth rules regarding the period
89 FR 101694Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationSteel Import Licensing and Surge Monitoring
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 31, 2002
Comments on Proposed Rules: Comments received during the public comment period set forth in the proposed rule are considered in this final rule. … Response: Based on the comments received, we have extended the filing period.
67 FR 79845Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Apr 22, 2014
Section 777A(d)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). … The commenter argues that the real difficulty is that sale prices may differ by purchaser, region or time period as a result of normal commercial practices.
79 FR 22371Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationAluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 23, 2020
This commenter requested that the AIM system therefore include a method for periodic consultations with the Government of Mexico. … Paperwork Reduction Act This rule contains a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 (PRA).
85 FR 83804Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationSteel Import Monitoring and Analysis System
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 5, 2005
The Department intends to add certain downstream steel products, identified during the comment period. … Comments Submissions received during the public comment period established in the interim final rule have been considered in preparing this final rule.
70 FR 72373Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Jan 22, 2001
Within 30 days of the end of the period for receiving public comments regarding requested modification or modifications, the Department will make a determination whether the limitations should be modified … (b) Not later than 30 calendar days after the end of the comment period provided for in § 340.4(a), and on the basis of its consideration of the market conditions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section
66 FR 6459Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.