Financial Statements and Periodic Reports for Related Issuers and Guarantors

Federal RegisterMar 5, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 210, 228 and 240

[Release Nos. 33-7649; 34-41118 International Series No. 1187; File No.

S7-7-99]

RIN: 3235-AH52

Financial Statements and Periodic Reports for Related Issuers and

Guarantors

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are proposing financial reporting rules for issuers and

guarantors of guaranteed securities. We also are proposing an exemption

from periodic reporting for subsidiary issuers and guarantors of these

securities. These proposals would codify, in large part, the positions

the staff has developed through Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 53, later

interpretations, and the registration statement review process. We

intend for these rules to eliminate any uncertainty about which

financial statements and periodic reports subsidiary issuers and

guarantors must file.

DATES: We must receive your comments on or before May 4, 1999.

ADDRESSES: Please submit comment letters in triplicate to Jonathan G.

Katz, Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Mail Stop 6-

9, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You also may submit

comment letters electronically to the following e-mail address: rule-

[email protected]. All comment letters should refer to File No. S7-XX-

99. If e-mail is used, include this file number on the subject line.

All comments received will be available for public inspection and

copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room at the same address.

Electronically submitted comments will be posted on

[[Page 10580]]

the Commission's Internet web site (http://www.sec.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding proposed Rule 12h-5, Michael

Hyatte, Julie Hoffman, or Kristina Schillinger at (202) 942-2900;

regarding the Regulation S-X and Regulation S-B proposals, Craig

Olinger at (202) 942-2960, both in the Division of Corporation Finance.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are proposing amendments to Rule 3-10 \1\

of Regulation S-X \2\ and Item 310 of Regulation SB.\3\ We are also

proposing new Rule 3-16 \4\ of Regulation S-X and new Rule 12h-5 \5\

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.\6\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 17 CFR 210.3-10.

\2\ 17 CFR 210.1-01 through 12-29.

\3\ 17 CFR 228.310.

\4\ 17 CFR 210.3-16.

\5\ 17 CFR 240.12h-5.

\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Executive Summary

Over the past two decades, it has become increasingly common for a

parent company to raise capital through:

Offerings of its own securities that are guaranteed by one

or more of its subsidiaries; and

Offerings of securities by a subsidiary that are

guaranteed by the parent, and sometimes, one or more of the parent's

other subsidiaries.

Absent an exemption, the Securities Act of 1933 \7\ requires the

offering of both the guaranteed security and the guarantee to be

registered. Securities Act registration requires the disclosure of both

financial and non-financial information about the issuer of the

guaranteed security as well as any guarantors. Moreover, due to the

registration of the offer and sale of the guaranteed securities and the

guarantees, both the issuer and the guarantors become subject to

Section 15(d) \8\ of the Exchange Act of 1934. Section 15(d) requires

all Securities Act registrants to file Exchange Act periodic reports

for at least the fiscal year during which the Securities Act

registration statement became effective.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.

\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(d).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are circumstances, however, where full Securities Act and

Exchange Act disclosure by both the issuer and the guarantors may not

be useful to an investment decision and, therefore, may not be

necessary. For example, if a subsidiary with no independent assets or

operations issues debt securities guaranteed by its parent, full

disclosure of the subsidiary's financial information would be of little

value. Instead, investors would look to the financial status of the

parent which guaranteed the debt to evaluate the likelihood of payment.

As this example demonstrates, subsidiary issuers and guarantors

raise a number of practical issues under the Securities Act and the

Exchange Act. Included among these issues are:

What financial information must issuers of guaranteed

securities provide to potential investors;

What financial information must guarantors provide to

potential investors; and

What financial information must those issuers and

guarantors continue to provide to the secondary market.

In 1983, the staff addressed these issues in Staff Accounting

Bulletin No. 53.\9\ In the 15 years since we published SAB 53,

guaranteed securities have become significantly more complex. While the

basic analysis of SAB 53 remains sound, the staff has had to expand on

this analysis in response to registration statements and interpretive

requests that involve new and complex offering structures. In addition,

the staff has responded to an increasing number of requests for

exemptions from Exchange Act reporting. In 1997, nearly half of all

interpretive, no-action, or exemptive requests acted on by the Division

of Corporation Finance involved SAB 53.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ Securities Act Release No. SAB-53. 48 FR 28230 (June 13,

1983).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The staff's interpretive structure has been effective in addressing

these issues. This approach was designed to properly balance the

issuer's obligation to disclose material information fully with the

investor's need for this information. We believe that the staff's

analysis will adapt well to future developments.

Therefore, we propose to codify, in large part, the staff's current

analysis regarding the obligations of issuers and guarantors. We

believe these rule proposals are needed because they would:

Eliminate uncertainty regarding financial statement

requirements;

Eliminate uncertainty regarding on-going reporting;

Eliminate the burden on these subsidiaries to seek

interpretive guidance regarding these requirements; \10\ and

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\10\ If we adopt today's proposals, issuers of guaranteed

securities and guarantors could still request an interpretive

position from the Division of Corporation Finance if proposed Rule

3-10 does not address their situation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simplify the staff's interpretive structure by applying

one standard condensed consolidating financial information instead of

the current approach that requires more or less financial disclosure

based solely on the existence of non-guarantor subsidiaries.

We propose to revise Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X to require

condensed consolidating financial information in all situations

involving a subsidiary issuer or subsidiary guarantor that is not a

finance subsidiary.\11\ This condensed financial information would be

included in Securities Act registration statements on a combined basis,

instead of being presented in separate financial statements for each

subsidiary. We also propose Exchange Act Rule 12h-5, which would exempt

from Exchange Act reporting requirements those subsidiary issuers and

guarantors that may omit financial statements under revised Rule 3-10.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ In connection with the proposed revision to Rule 3-10, we

also propose:

New Note 3 to Item 310 of Regulation S-B requiring small

business issuers to present financial information in accordance with

proposed Rule 3-10 for the fiscal periods they are required to

present; and

To move the financial statement requirement of affiliates whose

securities collateralize a registered issue from current Rule 3-10

and put it in proposed new Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. The Structure of This Release

We have separated this release into five main sections.

First, we describe how the Securities Act registration requirements

apply to offerings of guaranteed securities.

Second, we describe the current financial statement requirements

for issuers of guaranteed securities and guarantors. This description

begins with the basic requirements of Regulation S-X and addresses the

purpose and effect of SAB 53. It also discusses the positions the staff

has taken in interpreting basic issues regarding SAB 53, such as the

meaning of ``wholly owned subsidiary'' and ``full and unconditional

guarantee.'' \12\ Finally, we present the developments in the staff's

analysis that deal with complex securities and complex corporate

structures.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\12\ This release discusses the meanings of a number of terms,

including ``finance subsidiary,'' ``debt security,'' ``wholly-owned

subsidiary,'' and ``full and unconditional guarantee,'' in the

context of SAB 53 and proposed Rule 3-10. Given the unique purpose

of SAB 53 and proposed Rule 3-10, the discussion in this release

applies only to today's proposals.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Third, we describe the Exchange Act reporting obligations of

subsidiary issuers of guaranteed securities and guarantors. This

description addresses the statutory requirement of Section 15(d), the

SAB 53 discussion regarding Exchange Act reporting, and the staff's

current analysis.

Fourth, we describe our rule proposals regarding the financial

[[Page 10581]]

information and Exchange Act reporting requirements for subsidiary

issuers of guaranteed securities and guarantors.

Fifth, we include appendices at the end of this release to

demonstrate how the proposed rules would apply to a number of different

fact patterns. We hope that these appendices will increase your

understanding of the proposals and assist you in commenting on them.

III. Securities Act Registration Requirements for Offerings of

Guarantees

Guarantees of securities are securities themselves for purposes of

the Securities Act. As a result, offers and sales of both the

guaranteed security and the guarantee must either be registered under

the Securities Act or exempt from registration.

IV. Current Financial Statement Requirements for Subsidiary

Guarantors and Subsidiary Issuers of Guaranteed Securities

A. Regulation S-X Requirements

1. Guarantors

Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X identifies which financial statements

guarantors must include in Securities Act registration statements,

Exchange Act registration statements, and Exchange Act reports.\13\

Rule 3-10 currently requires all guarantors to include the same

financial statements they would have to include if they were the

issuers of the guaranteed securities. Rule 3-10 applies equally to

parent guarantors and subsidiary guarantors.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\13\ Rule 3-10 also prescribes financial statement requirements

for affiliates of reporting issuers when the securities of such

affiliates are the collateral for any class of the issuer's

registered securities. These requirements are outside the scope of

today's proposal. See Section VI.G. for a more complete discussion

of those requirements.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Subsidiary Issuers of Guaranteed Securities

Regulation S-X requires subsidiary issuers of guaranteed securities

to file the same financial statements as any other issuer of

securities.

B. Modified Financial Statement Requirements in Staff Accounting

Bulletin No. 53

1. Purpose and Application of SAB 53

In 1983, in response to questions arising from the increased number

of guaranteed securities offerings, the Commission published Staff

Accounting Bulletin No. 53. The objective of SAB 53 was to elicit full

and fair disclosure regarding issuers and guarantors in a format that

was:

Meaningful to investors; and

Not unduly burdensome to registrants.

SAB 53 did not amend Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. Instead, it

described the approach the staff would take in its review of

registration statements for two types of offerings of guaranteed debt

securities:

Securities issued by a subsidiary that are guaranteed by

the parent of that subsidiary; and

Securities that are issued by a company and guaranteed by

a subsidiary of that company.

SAB 53 and the staff interpretations that followed recognize that

there is no need for complete financial statements from both the issuer

of the guaranteed security and the guarantor when:

The issuer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent

guarantor; and

The guarantee is full and unconditional.

In this type of issuer/guarantor relationship, there is a unity of

financial risk between the two entities. As a result, the need for

separate financial disclosure is removed or reduced. We discuss these

two conditions below.

a. Meaning of ``Wholly-Owned'' in SAB 53. A subsidiary is ``wholly-

owned'' within the meaning of SAB 53 if all of its voting shares and

any outstanding securities convertible into its voting shares are

owned, directly or indirectly, by its parent.\14\ This meaning differs

from the general definition of ``wholly-owned subsidiary'' in Rule 1-

02(aa) of Regulation S-X.\15\ Regulation S-X regards a subsidiary as

wholly-owned if substantially all of its voting shares are held by its

parent.\16\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\14\ A subsidiary may have outstanding securities convertible

into its voting shares if its parent owns all of the convertible

securities. Citizens Utilities Company (May 20, 1996).

\15\ 17 CFR 210.1-02(aa).

\16\ All securities of a subsidiary that confer the right to

elect directors or their functional equivalent annually, whether or

not those securities are equity or debt, must be held by the parent

to satisfy the ``wholly-owned'' test. This test is unaffected by the

existence of other securities that grant the right to vote in the

event of special circumstances, such as a default. See 17 CFR 210.1-

02(z) for the definition of ``voting shares.''

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Satisfaction of the stricter requirement under SAB 53 ensures that

there is no competing interest to the parent's ownership. Any outside

voting interest in the subsidiary breaks the financial unity between

the subsidiary and its parent that is needed to justify the special

relief granted in SAB 53.

b. Meaning of ``Full and Unconditional Guarantee'' in SAB 53.

(i) Guarantor's Payment Obligations Must be the Same as the

Issuer's. A guarantee is ``full and unconditional'' when the payment

obligations of the issuer and guarantor are essentially identical. When

an issuer fails to make a payment called for by the security, the

guarantor is obligated to make the scheduled payment immediately and,

if it doesn't, the holder of the security may take legal action

directly against the guarantor for payment. A guarantee is not full if

the amount of the guarantor's liability is less than the issuer's or,

should the issuer default, the guarantor's payment schedule differs

from the issuer's payment schedule. There can be no conditions, beyond

the issuer's failure to pay, to the guarantor's payment obligation. For

example, the holder cannot be required to then exhaust its remedies

against the issuer before seeking payment from the guarantor.

(ii) Guarantee Still May be Full and Unconditional Even if it Has a

Fraudulent Conveyance ``Savings Clause''. A guarantee can be full and

unconditional even if it includes a ``savings'' clause related to

bankruptcy and fraudulent conveyance laws. These savings clauses

prevent the guarantor from making an otherwise required payment if the

money needed to make that payment is first recoverable by other

creditors under bankruptcy or fraudulent conveyance laws. However, if

any clause places a specific limit on the amount of the guarantor's

regular payment obligation to avoid application of bankruptcy or

fraudulent conveyance laws, it is the staff's position that the

guarantee is not full and unconditional.

For example, the following savings clauses would not defeat the

full and unconditional nature of the guarantee:

The guarantor's obligation under the guarantee is limited

to ``the maximum amount that can be guaranteed without constituting a

fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer under applicable

insolvency laws.''

The guarantee is enforceable ``to the fullest extent

permitted by law.''

The following savings clauses would defeat the full and

unconditional nature of the guarantee:

The guarantee is enforceable ``up to $XX.''

The guarantor guarantees the indebtedness ``up to $XX.''

The guarantee is ``limited to $XX, in order to prevent the

guarantor from violating applicable fraudulent conveyance or transfer

laws.''

The guarantee is enforceable ``up to XX% of the

guarantor's current assets.''

The guarantee is ``limited to XX% of the guarantor's

current assets in order to prevent the guarantor from violating

applicable fraudulent conveyance or transfer laws.''

[[Page 10582]]

The guarantee is enforceable ``so long as it would not

result in the subsidiary having less than $XX in net assets (or other

financial measure).''

(iii) Guarantee Still May Be Full and Unconditional Even if it has

Different Subordination Terms Than the Guaranteed Security. A guarantee

can be full and unconditional despite different subordination terms

between the guaranteed security and the guarantee.\17\ Although

different subordination terms mean security holders have different

rights in the priority of payment, both the issuer and the guarantor

remain fully liable to holders for all amounts due under the guaranteed

security.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\17\ Williams Scotsman, Inc. (March 19, 1998).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Modified Financial Statements Described in SAB 53

As we discussed above, SAB 53 indicated the staff's acceptance of

modified financial information for subsidiary issuers when:

The subsidiary issuer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the

parent guarantor; and

The guarantee is full and unconditional.

If either of these conditions is not met, full financial statements

for subsidiary issuers of guaranteed securities must be included in the

registration statement.

If both of these conditions are met, SAB 53 states that the amount

of required financial information regarding the subsidiary issuer will

depend on whether the subsidiary has independent operations.

a. Subsidiary Issuer ``Essentially has no Independent

Operations''In this situation, SAB 53 states that the subsidiary is not

required to provide any separate financial statements because ``the

investor's investment decision is based on the credit worthiness of the

guarantor.'' This category was intended for finance subsidiaries. These

typically are subsidiaries that function as special purpose divisions

of the parent to raise capital or conduct financing. They typically

have no operations or assets other than those associated with their

financing activities.\18\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\18\ This definition in consistent with the definition in Rule

3a-5 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, which provides that the

primary purpose of a finance subsidiary is to finance the business

operations of the parent or a company controlled by the parent.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Subsidiary Has ``More than Minimal Independent Operations''. SAB

53 requires summarized financial information when the subsidiary issuer

has ``more than minimal independent operations.'' This summarized

financial information must meet the requirements of Rule 1-02(bb)(1) of

Regulation S-X.\19\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\19\ 17 CFR 210.1-02(bb)(1).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Evolution of SAB 53 Analysis

As companies have developed new structures for subsidiary issued

and guaranteed securities, the staff has expanded the analysis of SAB

53 through its processing of registration statements and exemptive

requests.\20\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\20\ SAB 53 applies to both financial statement requirements in

Securities Act registration statements and the Exchange Act

reporting obligations of subsidiary guarantors and subsidiary

issuers of guaranteed securities. The staff applies the same

analysis to each of these situations. With regard to the Exchange

Act reporting obligations of these subsidiaries, SAB 53 instructs

issuers to file exemptive applications under Section 12(h) of the

Exchange Act. Early in the development of SAB 53 issues, the staff

began accepting these exemptive requests as ``no-action'' letters

instead of exemptive applications. this process continues today.

Throughout this release, when we discuss ``exemptive requests'' we

refer to both exemptive applications and ``no-action'' requests.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Expansion of SAB 53 to Securities Other Than Debt

a. Preferred Equity Securities. SAB 53 only speaks of guaranteed

debt securities. However, the same principles used under SAB 53 apply

to preferred equity securities when the preferred securities have

payment terms substantially the same as debt--that is, the payment

terms mandate redemption and/or dividend payments. Like debt

securities, these preferred equity securities usually lack voting

rights.\21\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\21\ Preferred equity securities normally carry very limited

voting rights, such as the right of holders to vote on matters

affecting their rights as shareholders or business combinations. The

right to elect directors is normally conferred only when the issuer

has failed to declare or pay a dividend required by the security.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In order for a guarantor of preferred securities to be eligible for

SAB 53 relief, it must fully and unconditionally guarantee all of the

issuer's payment obligations under the certificate of designations or

other instrument that governs the preferred securities. The guarantor

must guarantee the payment, when due, of:

All accumulated and unpaid dividends that have been

declared on the preferred stock out of funds legally available for the

payment of dividends;

The redemption price, on redemption of the preferred

stock, including all accumulated and unpaid dividends; and

Upon liquidation of the issuer of the preferred stock, the

aggregate stated liquidation preference and all accumulated and unpaid

dividends, whether or not declared, without regard to whether the

issuer has sufficient assets to make full payment as required on

liquidation.

Some preferred stock guarantees limit the guarantor's redemption

and liquidation payments to the amount of funds or assets that are

legally available to the issuer of the preferred stock. These

guarantees would not be full and unconditional. For example, guarantees

that contain the following provisions would not be full and

unconditional:

The guarantor guarantees, on redemption of the preferred

stock, the redemption price, including all accumulated and unpaid

dividends, from funds legally available therefor under the (governing

instrument).

Upon liquidation of the issuer of the preferred stock,

guarantor agrees to pay the lesser of:

The aggregate stated liquidation preference and all

accumulated and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared; and

The amount of assets of the issuer of the preferred stock

legally available for distribution to holders of the preferred stock in

liquidation.

b. Trust Preferred Securities/Income Preferred Securities. In

recent years the markets have developed complex instruments called

trust preferred securities.\22\ Trust preferred securities generally

are issued by a special purpose business trust created by its

parent.\23\ The trust exists only to issue the preferred securities and

hold debt securities issued by its parent. Payment obligations of the

trust are ensured not by a single agreement called a guarantee, but

through several agreements and the terms of the debt securities it

holds. The agreements normally include a guarantee and an expense

undertaking from the parent, the trust indenture for the debt

securities the trust holds, and the trust declaration of the trust

itself.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\22\ Other names for these securities include ``monthly income

preferred securities'' or ``quarterly income preferred securities.''

These securities generally are sold under proprietary names such as

MIPs or TOPRs.

\23\ These securities typically are issued by a business trust

but also may be issued by a limited partnership or a limited

liability corporation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The staff has agreed with the view that the bundle of rights

provided by these several agreements and the debt securities held by

the trust, usually called ``back-up undertakings,'' is the equivalent

of a full and unconditional guarantee of the trust's payment

obligations. Because the ``back-up undertakings'' place the investor in

the same position as if the parent company had fully and

unconditionally guaranteed the trust's payment obligations on the

preferred securities, the staff has agreed that the SAB 53 principles

may be applied.

[[Page 10583]]

2. Parent Issuer and Subsidiary Guarantor

Under the reasoning of SAB 53, any subsidiary guarantor would be

required to file full financial statements.\24\ As parent-issuer/

subsidiary-guarantor structures became more widely used, the staff

revised this position. The staff's response to a 1987 exemptive request

states that the staff would treat subsidiary guarantors the same as it

treats subsidiary issuers.\25\ Based on this position, a subsidiary

guarantor's financial reporting obligations could be modified in the

same manner as a subsidiary that issues debt securities that are

guaranteed by its parent.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\24\ SAB 53 states: In the relatively infrequent situations

where a registration statement covers the issuance by a parent of a

security that is guaranteed by its subsidiary, the staff has

concluded that, as a general rule, financial statements for both

issuers would be material to the investment decision.

\25\ Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (April 2, 1987).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Use of Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

As stated above, the SAB 53 analysis does not require separate

financial statements if the subsidiary issuer or subsidiary guarantor

has no independent operations or assets, but it requires summarized

financial information when the subsidiary has more than minimal

independent operations or assets.\26\ Over time, the usefulness of

summarized financial information decreased as the corporate structures

used in offerings of guaranteed securities evolved and became more

complex.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\26\ Summarized financial information, generally, consists of

summarized information as to the assets, liabilities and results of

operations of the entity. See 17 CFR 210.1-02(bb) for the specific

requirements of summarized financial information.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

For example, more complex guarantee structures raised the question

of how to deal with multiple guarantors. Some interpretive requests

involved more than 100 subsidiary guarantors. Other structures

presented to the staff involved a subsidiary issuer, a parent

guarantor, multiple subsidiary guarantors, and multiple subsidiaries

that were not guarantors.

The limited SAB 53 structure did not adequately accommodate these

new complexities. In some cases, strict application of the SAB 53

standard would have required more than 100 different sets of summarized

financial statements. Not only would that disclosure have been

burdensome on the registrant to provide, but it is unlikely to have

been useful to investors.

The summarized financial information requirement in Regulation S-X

was originally intended to inform investors about a registrant's equity

investments in unconsolidated affiliates. This type of financial

information is appropriate when the investment decision is based solely

on the financial condition of the parent company. The limited data will

show the general, indirect effect of the subsidiaries on that parent

company's financial condition. However, in adopting SAB 53, the staff

did not contemplate the widespread use of summarized data as the

primary financial information for decisions about the credit-worthiness

of a subsidiary's guarantee of registered debt. The staff also did not

contemplate more complex parent-subsidiary structures where investors

must assess the subsidiary's financial condition more completely and

independently of its parent company and of that parent's other

subsidiaries. For example, we believe investors focus on cash flow

information in credit decisions, but summarized financial information

includes no cash flow information.

Through interpretive requests and the review and comment process,

the staff developed a bifurcated approach to address the presentation

of useful financial information for guaranteed securities and the

guarantees. The first part of this approach relies on the inclusion of

``condensed consolidating financial information'' in lieu of summarized

financial information in situations where the presentation of financial

statements of the entities would be useful to an investor.\27\

Condensed consolidating financial information provides a more complete,

meaningful basis for investors to assess the debt-paying ability of

subsidiary issuers and guarantors.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\27\ The staff has applied this standard to those situations

that do not involve a single subsidiary issuer or guarantor or that

do not involve a finance subsidiary issuer with the parent as the

sole guarantor involving finance subsidiaries. The staff first

accepted condensed consolidating financial information in connection

with its case-by-case review of registration statements for

offerings of securities with this structure. Consistent with the

earlier development of SAB 53 interpretation, the staff applied the

same analysis to exemptive requests for Exchange Act reporting.

Chicago & North Western Acquisition Corp. (February 6, 1990); EPIC

Properties, Inc. (March 13, 1992).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Condensed consolidating financial information requires the columnar

presentation of each category of parent and subsidiary as issuer,

guarantor, or non-guarantor.\28\ These presentations more clearly

distinguish the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash flows

of the entities that are legally obligated under the indenture from

those that are not. Summarized financial information may obscure these

distinctions, particularly if subsidiary guarantors themselves have

consolidated operating subsidiaries that are not guarantors.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\28\ The staff permits subsidiary guarantors to combine

financial information in one column if their guarantees are joint

and several.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Condensed consolidating information provides the same level of

detail about the financial position, results of operations, and cash

flows of subsidiary issuers and guarantors that investors are

accustomed to obtaining in interim financial statements of a

registrant. It facilitates analysis of trends affecting subsidiary

issuers and guarantors and the understanding of relationships among the

various components of a consolidated organization.

However, SAB 53 itself requires summarized financial information,

not condensed consolidating information. As we described above, the

staff developed the requirement for condensed consolidating financial

information through interpretive requests because summarized financial

information was not adequate financial disclosure for the new financing

structures not contemplated when the SAB was created. The second part

of the staff's approach to the presentation of financial statements

relies on the use of summarized financial information only in those

increasingly less frequent situations in which the SAB specifically

contemplated that financing structure.

V. Current Exchange Act Periodic Reporting Requirements

A. Exchange Act Reporting Requirements

The registration of an offering of a guarantee under the Securities

Act obligates the guarantor to file periodic reports with the

Commission. Exchange Act Section 15(d) requires separate annual and

interim reports from both the issuer and the guarantor of securities

offered under an effective Securities Act registration statement.

B. Modification of Exchange Act Reporting Requirements for Subsidiary

Guarantors and Subsidiary Issuers of Guaranteed Securities

SAB 53 only briefly addresses the Exchange Act reporting

obligations of subsidiary issuers of parent-guaranteed securities. In a

footnote, SAB 53 states:

Where the parent guarantor of an issuer subsidiary in either the

first [finance subsidiary issuer-no separate financial statements]

or second [operating subsidiary issuer-summarized financial

statements] category is a reporting company under the Exchange Act,

upon application to the Commission such a subsidiary would be

conditionally exempted pursuant to Section 12(h) of the Exchange Act

from reporting obligations under such Act.

[[Page 10584]]

Since the issuance of SAB 53, the staff of the Division of

Corporation Finance has responded to an increasing number of requests

for exemptions from Exchange Act reporting. The staff's analysis of

Exchange Act exemptive requests parallels its analysis under the

Securities Act of the financial statement requirements for subsidiary

guarantors and subsidiary issuers of guaranteed securities. If a

subsidiary issuer or guarantor need not include separate financial

statements under the SAB 53 analysis, an exemption from separate

reporting under the Exchange Act should also be available. Instead of

separate reporting for the subsidiary issuer or guarantor, the parent

will present in its annual and quarterly reports the same modified

information regarding the subsidiary as it presented in its Securities

Act registration statement.

VI. The Rule Proposals

We believe that the requirements for subsidiary issuer and

guarantor financial information should be set forth in Regulation S-X.

We also believe that the exemption from Exchange Act reporting should

be set forth in a rule that parallels the financial statement

requirements. We propose to codify, in large part, the staff's current

approach in these areas. We believe the proposals will provide

investors with meaningful and comparable financial information about

subsidiary issuers and guarantors.

We believe our proposals will provide significant benefits to

subsidiary issuers and guarantors of securities. First, they would

remove uncertainty about financial statement requirements. Second, they

should greatly reduce the number of exemptive requests registrants must

make to the Division of Corporation Finance. This would lessen the

administrative burden to registrants and the Division alike.

A. Application of Proposed Rule 3-10

As we discuss in Section IV.C.1. above, the staff has applied SAB

53 to debt and to preferred securities that have payment terms that are

substantially the same as debt. We propose the same scope for Rule 3-

10. These preferred securities would include trust preferred securities

and income preferred securities, as we describe in Section IV.C.1.b.

above.\29\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\29\ See Example #23 of Appendix A for the information the

proposed rule would require the parent to include in its financial

statements with respect to these securities.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We request your comment on the scope of the rule. Should it apply

to preferred securities with payment terms substantially the same as

debt or only to debt securities? Are there any other securities,

similar to debt, to which the proposed rule should apply? Are there any

categories of debt securities to which the rule should not apply?

Should it not apply to trust preferred securities and income preferred

securities such as MIPs and TOPRs? If so, is the level of disclosure

set forth in Exhibit A appropriate? Should we treat the parent's back-

up undertakings as a full and unconditional guarantee? Should the

parent's financial statements include any more or less disclosure about

the preferred securities?

B. Modified Financial Statement Reporting Requirements

First, we propose to restate the general rule that all issuers or

guarantors of registered securities must include full financial

statements. We then propose to allow modified financial information in

registration statements and periodic reports for five issuer/guarantor

situations:

A finance subsidiary issues securities that its parent

guarantees;

An operating subsidiary issues securities that its parent

guarantees;

A subsidiary issues securities that are guaranteed by its

parent and one or more other subsidiaries of its parent;

A parent issues securities that one of its subsidiaries

guarantees; and

A parent issues securities that are guaranteed by more

than one of its subsidiaries.

In these five situations, we propose the following two-part

analysis to determine whether modified financial information may be

provided for subsidiary issuers and guarantors. If the answer to both

questions is yes, modified financial information would be allowed:

Is the subsidiary issuer or guarantor wholly-owned by its

reporting parent?

Are all of the guarantees full and unconditional?

We propose to include in Rule 3-10 the same definitions of

``wholly-owned'' and ``full and unconditional guarantee'' that the

staff applies under SAB 53. The interpretations of wholly-owned in

Section IV.B.1.a. and Appendix C, and of full and unconditional in

Section IV.B.1.b. would be applied to these definitions.

We seek comment on whether the five categories listed above are

appropriate. Are there other categories of parent/subsidiary

relationships that we should separately address? We also seek comment

on the proposed definition of ``wholly-owned.'' Are there circumstances

in which the parent does not own 100% of the voting shares of its

subsidiary that should qualify for special treatment under proposed

Rule 3-10? For example, what if a foreign country requires directors to

own a certain percentage of a company's voting shares? \30\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\30\ See, e.g., Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (March 10,

1997). The staff agreed to a no-action request from a subsidiary

organized in the Republic of France even though it had more than one

voting shareholder. French law required the subsidiary to have a

total of seven shareholders and also required each director to own

at least one share. The staff noted that the subsidiary was wholly-

owned, except to the minimum extent necessary to satisfy the laws of

its home country.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

What if a subsidiary has outstanding securities convertible into

its voting shares not owned, directly or indirectly, by its parent?

What if those securities have been issued but are not yet exercisable?

What if a subsidiary has granted options to its employees that are

exercisable for its voting shares? What if the options have been

granted but are not yet exercisable?

We also request comment on the definition of ``wholly-owned'' as it

applies to subsidiaries that are trusts, limited partnerships, or

limited liability companies. Is there a more appropriate standard than

the direct or indirect ownership of 100% of the voting shares of the

subsidiary? ``Voting shares,'' as defined in Rule 1-02(z) of Regulation

S-X,\31\ include ``the sum of all rights, other than as affected by

events of default, to vote for election of directors and/or the sum of

all interests in an unincorporated person.'' Is this the proper

definition of voting shares and, therefore, ``wholly-owned,'' for these

types of subsidiaries?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\31\ 17 CFR 228.1-02(z).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We also request comment on whether the proposed definition of

``full and unconditional'' is appropriate. Should a guarantee be

considered full and unconditional when it contains a general fraudulent

conveyance savings clause that is not limited to a specific dollar or

percentage amount? Are there some circumstances in which a guarantee

should be considered full and unconditional even when it contains a

limitation of a specific dollar amount or percentage? Are there other

limitations on preferred stock guarantees that we have not mentioned

that would cause a guarantee not to be full and unconditional? Should

we treat the ``back-up undertakings'' that guarantee trust preferred

securities and income preferred securities as a full and unconditional

guarantee? Should different subordination terms between a guaranteed

security and the guarantee call into question the full and

unconditional character of the guarantee?

[[Page 10585]]

If either the guarantee is not full and unconditional or the

subsidiary issuer/guarantor is not wholly owned by its reporting

parent, then modified financial information would not be allowed. In

subsections 1 through 6, below, we assume that each of these conditions

has been met.

1. Finance Subsidiary Issuers

We propose to amend Rule 3-10 to codify SAB 53's treatment of

finance subsidiary issuers of securities that are guaranteed by the

parent company. Specifically, subsidiary issuers would not be required

to include any financial statements if:

The subsidiary has no independent assets or operations

other than those associated with the financing activities;

The parent of the issuer guarantees the securities;

No other subsidiaries of the parent guarantee the

securities;

The parent company's financial statements are filed for

the periods specified by Rules 3-01 and 3-02 of Regulation S-X; and

The parent company's financial statements include a

footnote stating that the issuer is a wholly-owned finance subsidiary

of the parent with no independent assets or operations and the parent

has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the securities.

2. Operating Subsidiary Issuers

We propose to amend Rule 3-10 to address specifically the structure

where the parent of a subsidiary with independent assets or operations

guarantees the securities issued by that subsidiary. Under SAB 53 and

current staff interpretations, this issuer may disclose only summarized

financial information instead of a full financial presentation.

Consistent with our view that condensed financial information is more

informative, we propose that these issuers need not include separate

financial statements if:

No subsidiaries of the parent guarantee the securities;

The parent company's financial statements are filed for

the periods specified by Rules 3-01 and 3-02 of Regulation S-X; and

The parent company's financial statement footnotes include

condensed consolidating financial information with a separate column

for:

The parent company,

The subsidiary issuer,

Any other subsidiaries of the parent on a combined basis,

Consolidating adjustments, and

The total consolidated amounts.

3. Subsidiary Issuer of Securities Guaranteed by Its Parent and One or

More Other Subsidiaries of That Parent

We propose to codify current staff interpretations for the

structure where a subsidiary issues securities and both its parent and

one or more other subsidiaries of the parent are guarantors. We propose

that these subsidiary issuers and guarantors need not include separate

financial statements if:

The guarantees are joint and several;

The parent company's financial statements are filed for

the periods specified by Rules 3-01 and 3-02 of Regulation S-X; and

The parent company's financial statement footnotes include

condensed consolidating financial information with a separate column

for:

The parent company,

The subsidiary issuer,

The guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

The non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

Consolidating adjustments, and

The total consolidated amounts.

This proposal would apply the same requirement for condensed

consolidating financial information to finance subsidiary issuers and

operating subsidiary issuers that are part of this structure.

4. Subsidiary Guarantor of Securities Issued by Its Parent

We propose to codify the current staff interpretation for the

structure where a parent company issues securities and one of its

subsidiaries guarantees those securities. We propose that the

subsidiary guarantor need not include separate financial statements if:

No other subsidiaries of that parent guarantee the

securities;

The parent company's financial statements are filed for

the periods specified by Rules 3-01 and 3-02 of Regulation S-X; and

The parent company's financial statement footnotes include

condensed consolidating financial information with a separate column

for:

The parent company,

The subsidiary guarantor,

Other subsidiaries of the parent on a combined basis,

Consolidating adjustments, and

The total consolidated amounts.

This proposal would apply the same requirement for condensed

consolidating financial information to finance subsidiary guarantors

and operating subsidiary guarantors that are part of this structure.

5. Multiple Subsidiary Guarantors of Securities Issued by Their Parent

We propose to codify the staff's position that when a parent

company issues securities and more than one of its subsidiaries

guarantees the securities, the subsidiary guarantors need not include

separate financial statements if:

The guarantees are joint and several;

The parent company's financial statements are filed for

the periods specified by Rules 3-01 and 3-02 of Regulation S-X; and

The parent company's financial statement footnotes include

condensed consolidating financial information with a separate column

for:

The parent company,

The subsidiary guarantors on a combined basis,

The non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

Consolidating adjustments, and

The total consolidated amounts.

C. Recently Acquired Subsidiary Issuers or Guarantors

A special issue in the financial statement disclosure for issuers

and guarantors is the treatment of recently acquired subsidiaries.

Because these subsidiaries generally are not included in the

consolidated results of the parent company for all periods, condensed

consolidating financial information does not effectively present all

material information about these subsidiaries to investors.\32\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\32\ Currently, Rule 3-10 and SAB 53 provide no relief for a

subsidiary issuer or guarantor for periods prior to its acquisition.

Literal application of Rule 3-10 would require three years of

audited financial statements, regardless of the significance of the

acquired subsidiary. The staff has administratively permitted

registrants to apply the significance tests in Rule 3-10(b) by

analogy, but that practice has provided limited relief and created a

number of implementation issues.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We propose to require pre-acquisition financial statements for

significant, recently acquired subsidiary issuers and guarantors until

the condensed consolidating financial information would adequately

reflect their cash flows and results of operations. Specifically, we

propose to require separate audited financial statements for

significant, recently acquired subsidiary issuers and guarantors for

the subsidiary's most recent fiscal year. Unaudited financial

statements also must be filed for any interim period specified by Rules

3-01 and 3-02 of Regulation S-X.\33\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\33\ 17 CFR 210.3-01 and 17 CFR 210.3-02.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We propose to require pre-acquisition financial statements in

registration

[[Page 10586]]

statements only. We would not require them in Exchange Act periodic

reports.

This proposed treatment for recently acquired subsidiaries would

apply to any subsidiary issuer or guarantor:

That has not been included in the audited consolidated

results of the parent company for at least a nine-month period; and

Whose net book value or purchase price, whichever is

greater, equals 20% or more of the shareholders' equity of the parent

company on a consolidated basis.\34\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\34\ This significance test would be computed by using amounts

for the subsidiary and parent as of the most recent fiscal year end

before the acquisition.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We propose to measure the significance of recently acquired issuers

and guarantors by comparison to shareholders' equity of the parent

company rather than to the amount of the debt being registered. The

proposed measure is more consistent with the staff's overall approach

to analyzing issuer/guarantor structures, which focuses on the

relationship of subsidiary financial information to the parent

company's consolidated financial statements. The proposed measure

should be a more relevant indicator of the recently acquired

subsidiary's relative importance to the parent company. The proposed

measure should not cause financial statements to be filed for small

guarantors acquired by well-capitalized companies that issue relatively

small amounts of debt. Conversely, the proposed measure should result

in greater financial disclosure where the parent company is thinly

capitalized.

Is 20% of consolidated shareholders' equity the correct measure for

requiring the financial statements of a recently acquired subsidiary

that issues guaranteed securities or guarantees securities? Would a

larger percentage, such as 30%, 40%, 50%, be more appropriate? Would a

smaller percentage, such as 15%, 10%, or 5%, be more appropriate? Is

shareholders' equity the correct test for applying the requirement?

Should other factors be considered instead of, or in addition to,

shareholders' equity? If so, what other factors should be considered?

Is nine months the proper length of time for this analysis? Should it

be shorter, such as three or six months? Should it be longer, such as a

full fiscal year or two fiscal years?

D. Instructions for Condensed Consolidating Financial Information Under

Proposed Rule 3-10

To help ensure meaningful, consistent presentation of the condensed

consolidating financial information, we propose thirteen instructions

on how to prepare them. We propose to include these instructions in new

paragraph (i) of Rule 3-10. The proposed instructions are:

1. Present the financial information in sufficient detail to allow

investors to determine the assets, results of operations, and cash

flows of each of the consolidating groups.

2. Follow the general guidance in Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for

the form and content for condensed financial statements.

3. The financial information should be audited for the same periods

that the parent company financial statements are audited.

4. The parent company column should present investments in all

subsidiaries under the equity method.

5. All subsidiary issuer or guarantor columns should present

investments in non-guarantor subsidiaries under the equity method.

6. Provide separate columns for each guarantor by legal

jurisdiction if differences in domestic or foreign laws affect the

enforceability of the guarantees.

7. Include the following disclosures:

Each subsidiary issuer and/or guarantor is wholly owned by

the parent company;

All guarantees are full and unconditional; and

Where there is more than one guarantor, all guarantees are

joint and several.

8. Disclose any significant restrictions on the ability of the

parent company or any guarantor to obtain funds from its subsidiaries

by dividend or loan.

9. Provide the disclosures prescribed by Rule 4-08(e)(3) with

respect to the guarantors.

10. Disclose additional financial and narrative information about

each guarantor if the information would be material for investors to

evaluate the sufficiency of the guarantee.

11. The financial information shall include sufficient disclosures

to make the information presented not misleading.

12. Disclosure that would substantially duplicate disclosure

elsewhere in the parent's financial statements is not required.

13. Where the parent company's consolidated financial statements

are prepared on a comprehensive basis other than U.S. Generally

Accepted Accounting Principles, reconcile the information in each

column to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to the same

extent specified by Item 17 of Form 20-F.

We request comment as to whether these instructions provide

sufficient guidance to prepare the financial statements. For example,

are the instructions too general or specific? Would further guidance be

helpful? Also, do the instructions elicit the appropriate level of

disclosure?

E. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

Our proposals today adopt the first part of the staff's current

approach to the presentation of useful financial information: condensed

consolidating financial information. We propose to require condensed

consolidating financial information in all situations not involving a

finance subsidiary, as described above. We request comment on this

proposal. Is condensed consolidating financial information adequate for

current financing structures of guaranteed securities and guarantees?

Will condensed consolidating financial information adapt to the

developing financing structures? Are there situations in which

summarized financial information is adequate? Is there another type of

financial presentation that would be better suited for guaranteed

securities and guarantees than either condensed consolidating or

summarized financial information?

We propose to amend Item 310 of Regulation S-B to require small

business issuers to include the same financial information requirements

as in proposed Rule 3-10. We request comment on this proposal. Is it

appropriate to propose the same requirements, regardless of the size of

the issuer? Should there be different standards for small business

issuers? Is the corporate structure of small business issuers less

complex and, if so, do investors not need condensed consolidating

information?

F. Exchange Act Reporting

Currently, subsidiary issuers or guarantors that are not required

to include separate financial statements may seek an exemption from the

Exchange Act reporting requirements. As noted above, the volume of

these exemptive requests is significant. The staff's consideration of

these exemptive requests requires the same analysis we use in

determining the level of financial information required.

We propose new Rule 12h-5 to eliminate the need for these exemptive

requests and to remove uncertainty regarding the availability of an

exemption from Exchange Act reporting. As proposed, Rule 12h-5 would

exempt from Exchange Act reporting:

[[Page 10587]]

Any subsidiary issuer or subsidiary guarantor permitted to

omit financial statements by Rule 3-10; and

Any recently acquired subsidiary issuer or subsidiary

guarantor that would be permitted to omit financial statements by Rule

3-10, but for the requirement to provide pre-acquisition financial

statements under paragraph (g) of that rule.

As required by Rule 3-10, the parent company periodic reports would

include condensed consolidating financial information about the

subsidiary issuers and/or guarantors.\35\ The parent company periodic

reports must contain this information:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\35\ In the case of finance subsidiaries, the parent company

financial statements would include the narrative information

required by proposed Rule 3-10(b)(4).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

For as long as the issuer and any guarantors would be

subject to reporting under Section 15(d) as a result of the securities

offering; and

If the guaranteed securities are registered under Section

12, for as long as the issuer and any guarantors would be subject to

reporting obligations under Section 13(a) as a result of the

registration of the guaranteed securities under Section 12.

These exemptions are the same as the staff currently provides in

its responses to exemptive requests. The staff grants these exemptions

because investors should be provided one source for all of the

necessary information regarding investment in those securities--the

parent company's periodic reports--and condensed information regarding

the subsidiaries within those reports is sufficient for a complete

understanding of the investment.

Under proposed Rule 12h-5, these subsidiary issuers and subsidiary

guarantors would be exempted automatically from Exchange Act reporting

requirements. As a result, there would be no need for them to request

exemptive relief from the Commission's staff.

We request comment on proposed Rule 12h-5. Should there be

additional requirements for the exemption from Exchange Act reporting?

For example, would it be appropriate to require the subsidiary to file

a Form 15 to inform us that it is not required to file Exchange Act

reports due to the Rule 12h-5 exemption? Would it be appropriate for

the subsidiary to file a Form 15 filing as a condition to the

exemption's availability? Would such a filing be useful information for

the public? Would such a filing be an undue burden on the subsidiary?

What should be required of subsidiaries that no longer qualify for the

exemption from Exchange Act reporting under proposed Rule 12h-5 because

they no longer satisfy the requirements of Rule 3-10 (for example, if

the guarantee is no longer full and unconditional or the subsidiary is

no longer wholly-owned)? For example, should they be required to file a

report on Form 8-K to notify investors that they will resume their

reports under the Exchange Act? Should some other form of notification

be required?

G. Financial Statements of Affiliates Whose Securities Collateralize

Registered Securities--Proposed Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X

The financial statement requirements for affiliates whose

securities collateralize registered securities currently are combined

with the requirements for guarantors in Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. We

do not propose to amend the financial statement requirements for these

affiliates. Because our proposed amendments to Rule 3-10 would change

significantly the structure of that rule, we propose to move the

requirements for these affiliates into a rule that applies only to

them. This will avoid confusion and make the requirements easier to

understand. This proposed rule would be new Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-

X.\36\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\36\ Under current Rule 3-10, the staff frequently is presented

with registration statements in which the registrants did not

recognize that the financial statement requirements for guarantors

may differ from the requirements for affiliates whose securities

collateralize the registered securities. This misunderstanding

causes significant issues in structuring securities and considering

on-going disclosure responsibilities.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VII. Request for Comment

A. Request Regarding Specific Proposals

The Commission requests comments on all aspects of the proposed

amendments.

In addition, we request comment on the following questions:

If we adopt today's proposals, should there be a phase-in

period for parent companies that currently include only summarized

financial information? If so, why would such a phase-in be needed? How

long should that phase-in period be? Should it begin with the beginning

of the first fiscal year after adoption of the proposals?

A significant benefit that we seek in today's proposals is

the certainty issuers receive by having the disclosure and reporting

standards in Commission rules. Is there any additional means by which

we could provide this certainty? Are there any means by which

subsidiaries could be certain that they have met the standards in

proposed Rule 3-10 and, therefore, may rely upon the exemption in

proposed Rule 12h-5?

Today's proposals do not address the situation where a

parent company and one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries are co-obligors

on a debt or preferred security. In responses to the infrequent

exemptive requests on this issue, the staff has treated this as if it

were a subsidiary issuer/parent guarantor situation. Because this

situation may present unique issues, we would continue to have these

issuers contact the staff and request exemptive relief. Should we

include the co-obligor situation in Rule 3-10? Is the information

required by proposed Rule 3-10 sufficient in a co-obligor situation?

Should reporting relief be available when a guaranteed

security is in default? Should additional disclosures be required in

these circumstances?

Should there be an exception from condensed consolidating

information for subsidiary guarantors where:

(1) The parent company issuer has no independent assets or

operations,

(2) Substantially all assets and operations are in guarantor

subsidiaries, and

(3) The non-guarantor subsidiaries are inconsequential?

Should parent company only financial statements be permitted in these

circumstances instead of condensed consolidating information? Should

the parent company be the only Exchange Act reporting company in these

circumstances?

We request comment as to how the proposed rule should

apply to Foreign Private Issuers. For example, in reports on Form 6-K

that include interim period financial statements about the parent

company, should we require Foreign Private Issuers to include condensed

consolidating information about subsidiaries of the type that we would

require the parent to include in its annual report on Form 20-F? What

if the parent were required to file a Form 6-K due to financial

reporting requirements in its home country but the subsidiary did not

have a corresponding reporting obligation? Should the parent's reports

on Form 6-K still include condensed consolidating financial information

about the subsidiary in that event?

If we adopt today's proposals, will there be a need for

SAB 53? If so, for what purpose would SAB 53 be used? If not, should

SAB 53 be rescinded?

[[Page 10588]]

B. General Request Regarding Debt Offerings

Current rules and staff practices related to debt offerings focus

on the existence of registered guarantees. An issuer of debt securities

that are guaranteed by subsidiaries generally must provide additional

financial information about those subsidiaries. However, an issuer of

unguaranteed debt is generally not required to provide separate

financial information about its subsidiaries, even where substantially

all of the assets and operations of the consolidated group are held by

the subsidiaries. Current rules require narrative disclosure of the

nature and extent of material restrictions on the ability of the

subsidiaries to distribute funds to the parent company, but do not

require separate financial information about the subsidiaries or the

parent on an unconsolidated basis unless restricted net assets of the

subsidiaries exceed a specified level.\37\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\37\ See Rule 4-08 of Regulation S-X (17 CFR 210.4-08) and Rule

12-04 of Regulation S-X [17 CFR 210.12-04].

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some believe that the current rules and practices place a

disproportionate burden on issuers that attempt to provide additional

protection to debt holders through guarantees, in comparison to issuers

of unguaranteed debt. Others believe that narrative disclosures

regarding subsidiaries' ability to distribute funds to the issuer are

not sufficient to allow investors to interpret the issuer's

consolidated financial statements. Additional financial disclosure such

as condensed consolidating information or parent-only financial

statements would, they argue, enhance investors' ability to evaluate

the issuer's debt-paying capacity.

We are requesting comment on whether additional financial

disclosures should be required for offerings of debt that are not

guaranteed. Are the current requirements adequate? Should condensed

consolidating information, or parent-only information as contemplated

by Rule 12-04 of Regulation S-X, be required for all debt issuers that

have subsidiaries with assets and operations, even if there are no

subsidiary guarantors? Should other types of disclosure be required in

these circumstances?

We invite any interested persons to submit comments. Please submit

comment letters in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, U.S.

Securities and Exchange Commission, Mail Stop 6-9, 450 Fifth Street,

N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You also may submit comment letters

electronically to the following e-mail address: [email protected].

All comment letters should refer to File No. S7-XX-99. If e-mail is

used, include this file number on the subject line. The Commission will

consider these comments in complying with its responsibilities under

Sections 2(b) and 19(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 3(f) and

12(h) of the Exchange Act.

VIII. Costs and Benefits of the Proposed Rule Changes and Their

Effects on Efficiency, Competition, and Capital Formation

We are proposing financial reporting rules for issuers and

guarantors of guaranteed securities. We are also proposing an exemption

from periodic reporting for subsidiary issuers and guarantors of these

securities. Our rule proposals would, for the most part, codify the

positions the staff has developed through Staff Accounting Bulletin No.

53, later interpretations, and the registration statement review

process. The rule proposals deviate from current practice only in the

following two situations:

A subsidiary with more than minimal operations issues

securities, its parent guarantees the securities, and no subsidiary

guarantees the securities; and

A parent issues securities, a subsidiary with more than

minimal operations guarantees the securities, and no other subsidiary

guarantees the securities.

Those registrants currently are permitted to provide summarized

financial information instead of full financial statements. Under our

proposals, those registrants would be required to provide condensed

consolidating financial information instead of summarized financial

information.

Because the proposed rules are essentially codifying staff

position, we do not believe the proposed rules would impose substantial

regulatory costs on registrants. To illustrate this point, we note the

additional burdens these proposals would have on registrants who were

granted no-action relief in calendar year 1997. The Division provided

641 written responses to requests for no-action letters in 1997.

Shareholder proposal requests pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8

accounted for 343 of these responses. Of the 298 non-shareholder

proposal no-action responses, 140 were requests concerning SAB 53. Of

the 140 SAB 53 no-action responses the Division issued, 29 were

permitted to provide summarized financial statements. Under our

proposals, those 29 registrants would be required to provide condensed

consolidating financial information. We have estimated the average cost

of providing condensed consolidating information instead of summarized

financial information for each of those registrants to be approximately

$1000.\38\ Therefore, we estimate that the aggregate additional annual

cost to all registrants will be approximately $29,000 (29 registrants

x $1000 per registrant). We request your comments on the

reasonableness of our estimates.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\38\ Depending on the number of subsidiaries, the complexity of

the financing structure, and other factors, the time required to

provide condensed consolidating financial information instead of

summarized financial information could vary significantly. Based on

consultation with an outside consultant, we estimate that, on

average, it would take an additional 16 hours to provide condensed

consolidating financial information in lieu of summarized financial

information. Assuming that the corporate staff preparing this

information are compensated at the rate of $63 per hour, we estimate

the cost of providing condensed consolidating information to be

approximately $1008 per registrant ($63 per hour x 16 hours).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The costs of the proposed rules are counter-balanced by the

benefits to registrants and investors. First, we intend for these rules

to eliminate uncertainty about which financial statements and periodic

reports subsidiary issuers and guarantors must file. Second, the

proposed rules require financial information that is more helpful to an

investor in the two areas where summarized financial statements are

permitted today.\39\ Finally, because registrants would be required to

provide condensed consolidating financial information in all situations

in which they must provide separate financial information, the

investors will be able to compare the financial information among all

offerings.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\39\ Condensed consolidating financial information requires the

columnar presentation of each category of parent and subsidiary as

issuer, guarantor, or non-guarantor. This more clearly distinguishes

the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash flows of the

entities that are legally obligated under the indenture from those

that are not, particularly if subsidiary guarantors themselves have

consolidated operating subsidiaries that are not guarantors. Another

important element of credit decisions is cash flow information.

Condensed consolidating financial information requires this

information while summarized financial information does not.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The proposed codification of current staff positions would also

benefit companies by eliminating the need to create, submit, and obtain

a no-action letter response from the Division. As stated above, in

1997, the Division issued responses to 140 requests for SAB 53 no-

action positions. Based on discussions with external legal counsel who

prepare no-action requests, we estimate that, on average, it takes 35

hours to prepare a request for a no-action letter. Assuming that the

external professional help costs $175 per hour,

[[Page 10589]]

the total cost for preparing a request for a no-action position is

approximately $6100 per request. Applying these figures to the number

of no-action letter requests to which we respond annually, we estimate

the number of attorney hours spent annually on creating a request for a

SAB 53 no-action position to be 4900 hours and the annual savings to

registrants to be approximately $850,000. We request your comment on

the reasonableness of our estimates.

Section 23(a) of the Exchange Act \40\ requires us to consider the

impact any new Exchange Act rule would have on competition. We do not

believe that the proposed rules would have any anti-competitive effects

since the proposed rules, to a large extent, simply codify the

reporting requirements to which registrants are already subject. In the

two situations in which the proposed rules require more than the

current staff positions, we do not believe the proposed requirement to

provide condensed consolidating financial information instead of

summarized financial information would cause any anti-competitive

effect. We request comment on whether the proposals, if adopted, would

have an adverse effect on competition or would impose a burden on

competition that is neither necessary nor appropriate in furthering the

purposes of the Exchange Act. In addition, Section 3(f) of the Exchange

Act requires us to consider adopting rules that require a public

interest finding to consider whether the proposed rule will promote

efficiency, competition and capital formation. We believe that the

proposed rule amendments will have a positive, but unquantifiable,

effect on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. We seek

comment on the intended benefits and how these changes would affect

competition, capital formation and market efficiency.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\40\ 15 U.S.C. 78w(a)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

For purposes of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness

Act of 1996, we also request information regarding the potential impact

of the proposals on the economy on an annual basis. Would the

amendments, if adopted, result or be likely to result in:

An annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more;

A major increase in costs or prices for consumers or

individual industries; or

Significant adverse effects on competition, investment, or

innovation?

Commentators should provide empirical data to support their views.

Commenters are encouraged to provide views and data relating to any

costs or benefits associated with the rule proposal. In particular,

please identify any costs or benefits associated with the rule proposal

relating to the preparation of condensed consolidating financial

information instead of summarized financial information. Will the

proposal have no substantial effect as anticipated, or will the

proposal result in additional costs and benefits? Please describe and,

if possible, quantify any foreseeable significant effects.

IX. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5

U.S.C. 605(b), the Chairman of the Commission has certified that the

proposal would not, if adopted, have a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities. The proposed rules largely codify

the positions the staff has developed through Staff Accounting Bulletin

No. 53, later interpretations and the registration statement review

process. The rule proposals deviate from current practice only in the

following two situations:

A subsidiary with more than minimal operations issues

securities, its parent guarantees the securities, and no subsidiary

guarantees the securities; and

A parent issues securities, a subsidiary with more than

minimal operations guarantees the securities, and no other subsidiary

guarantees the securities.

Today, those registrants currently are permitted to provide

summarized financial information instead of full financial statements.

Under our proposals, those registrants would be required to provide

condensed consolidating financial information instead of summarized

financial information. As we discussed in our analysis of the costs and

benefits of the proposed rule changes above, the burden to provide

condensed consolidating information instead of summarized financial

information would not have a substantial effect on any registrant.

More specifically, we do not believe that our proposed rules would

have a substantial impact on small entities. In the last ten years, the

Division has responded to only one SAB 53 request in which the related

offering was registered on a small business issuer form, and that

company would not meet the definition of small business entity for

Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes.\41\ We include the certification

in this release as Attachment D and encourage written comments relating

to it. Commenters should describe the nature of any impact on small

entities and provide empirical data to support the extent of the

impact.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\41\ In order to qualify to use small business issuer forms to

register an offering, the issuer must, among other things, have less

than $25 million in assets and no more than $25 million in public

float. Small business issuers who qualify to use small business

issuer registration forms may also elect to use standard

registration forms.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

X. Paperwork Reduction Act

We have submitted the proposals to the Office of Management and

Budget for review in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Current Rule 3-10 requires full financial

statements for all guarantors or securities and for all affiliates of

those guarantors whose securities constitute a substantial portion of

the collateral. For those registrants who qualify, we anticipate that

proposed Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X would reduce or eliminate the

existing information collection requirements that are associated with

current Rule 3-10. This information would potentially be required to be

presented in several Securities Act registration statements and

Exchange Act reports to assist investors in the determination of the

credit worthiness of a security.

The proposed rules will affect the inclusion of information in

Securities Act registration Forms S-1, F-1, S-4 and F-4 (OMB control

numbers 3235-0065, 3235-0258, 3235-0324, and 3235-0325, respectively).

We estimate that the proposed rules will increase the average burden

per form by approximately five minutes.\42\ The proposed rules also

will affect the inclusion of information in Exchange Act Forms 10-K and

10-Q (OMB control numbers 3235-0063 and 3235-0070). We estimate the

proposed rules will increase the average burden per form by

approximately three minutes and one minute, respectively.\43\

[[Page 10590]]

We estimated the increased burden hours for each form by dividing the

estimated aggregate increased burden for all forms, whether or not the

filers would be required to report under Rule 3-10, by the estimated

total number of filers. The burden for Regulation S-X (OMB control

number 3235-0009) will remain unchanged.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\42\ To arrive at this number, we divided the estimated number

of companies that will have to provide condensed consolidating

financial information in lieu of summarized financial information

per year (29) by the estimated number of filings on these forms per

year (5653) and multipled that quotient (.00513) by the estimated

number of hours to convert financials (16).

\43\ To arrive at this number for Form 10-K, we divided the

estimated number of companies that will have to provide condensed

consolidating financial information in lieu of summarized financial

information per year (29) by the estimated number of filings on

these forms per year (10,329) and multipled that quotient (.00279)

by the estimated number of hours to convert financials (16). To

arrive at this number for Form 10-Q, we divided the estimated number

of companies that will have to provide condensed consolidating

financial information in lieu of summarized financial information

per year (29) by the estimated number of filings on these forms per

year (29,551) and multipled that quotient (.0009814) by the

estimated number of hours to convert financials (16).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The proposed changes would not affect the retention period. The

filing of financial statements, as described in this release, is

mandatory. They are not kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of

information unless it displays a correctly valid control number.

In accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(B), the Commission solicits

comments to:

Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is

necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,

including whether the information shall have practical utility;

Evaluate the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the

burden of the proposed collection of information;

Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information to be collected; and

Minimize the burden of collection of information on those

who are to respond, including through the use of automated collection

techniques or other forms for information technology.

Persons desiring to submit comments on the collection of

information requirements should direct them to the following persons:

Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,

Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503; and

Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450

Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and refer to File No. S7-7-

99. The Office of Management and Budget is required to make a decision

concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after

publication of this release in the Federal Register, so a comment to

OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within

30 days of this publication.

XI. Statutory Bases

We propose the rule changes explained in this release pursuant to

sections 7,\44\ 10,\45\ and 19(a) \46\ of the Securities Act and

sections 12,\47\ 13,\48\ and 15(d) \49\ of the Exchange Act.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\44\ 15 U.S.C. 77g.

\45\ 15 U.S.C. 77j.

\46\ 15 U.S.C. 77t.

\47\ 15 U.S.C. 78l.

\48\ 15 U.S.C. 78m.

\49\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(d).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Subjects in 17 CFR Parts 210, 228 and 240

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

Text of the Proposed Rules

For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Securities and

Exchange Commission proposals to amend title 17, chapter II of the Code

of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 210--FORM AND CONTENT OF AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS, SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF

1934, PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935, INVESTMENT

COMPANY ACT OF 1940, AND ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1975

1. The authority citation for Part 210 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77s, 77z-2, 77aa(25),

77aa(26), 78j-i, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o(d), 78u-5, 78w(a), 78ll(d),

79e(b), 79j(a), 79n, 79t(a), 80a-8, 80a-20, 80a-29, 80a-30, 80a-

37(a), unless otherwise noted.

2. Section 210.3-10 is revised to read as follows:

Sec. 210.3-10 Financial statements of guarantors, certain issuers of

guaranteed securities registered or being registered.

(a)(1) General rule. As a general rule, every issuer of a

registered security that is guaranteed and every guarantor of a

registered security must file the financial statements required for a

registrant by Regulation S-X.

(2) Operation of this rule. Paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f)

of this section are exceptions to the general rule of paragraph (a)(1)

of this section. Paragraph (g) of this section is a special rule for

recently acquired issuers or guarantors that overrides each of these

exceptions. Only one paragraph can apply to a single issuer or

guarantor. Paragraph (h) of this section defines some of the terms used

in this section. Paragraph (i) of this section states the requirements

for preparing the condensed consolidating financial information

required by paragraphs (c), (d), (e), and (f) of this section.

(b) Finance subsidiary issuer of securities guaranteed by its

parent. When a company with no independent assets or operations issues

securities and its parent guarantees those securities, the registration

statement, annual report, or quarterly report need not include

financial statements of the issuer if:

(1) The issuer is wholly-owned by the parent guarantor;

(2) The guarantee is full and unconditional;

(3) No other subsidiaries of the parent guarantee the securities;

and

(4) The parent company's financial statements are filed for the

periods specified by Sec. Sec. 210.3-01 and 210.3-02 and include a

footnote stating that the issuer is a wholly-owned finance subsidiary

of the parent with no independent assets or operations and the parent

has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the securities.

(c) Operating subsidiary issuer of securities guaranteed by its

parent. When a company with independent assets or operations issues

securities and its parent guarantees those securities, the registration

statement, annual report, or quarterly report need not include

financial statements of the issuer if:

(1) The issuer is wholly-owned by the parent guarantor;

(2) The guarantee is full and unconditional;

(3) There are no subsidiaries of the parent that guarantee those

securities; and

(4) The parent company's financial statements are filed for the

periods specified by Secs. 210.3-01 and 210.3-02 and include, in a

footnote, condensed consolidating information for the same periods with

a separate column for the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, any

other subsidiaries of the parent on a combined basis, consolidating

adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

(d) Subsidiary issuer of securities guaranteed by its parent and

one or more other subsidiaries of that parent. When a company issues

securities and both its parent and one or more other subsidiaries of

that parent guarantee those securities, the registration statement need

not include financial statements of the issuer or the subsidiary

guarantor(s) if:

(1) The issuer and each of the subsidiary guarantors are wholly-

owned by the parent guarantor;

(2) The guarantees are full and unconditional;

(3) The guarantees are joint and several; and

(4) The parent company's financial statements are filed for the

periods specified by Secs. 210.3-01 and 210.3-02

[[Page 10591]]

and include, in a footnote, condensed consolidating financial

information for the same periods with a separate column for the parent

company, the subsidiary issuer, the guarantor subsidiaries on a

combined basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

(e) Subsidiary guarantor of securities issued by the parent of that

subsidiary. When a parent company issues securities and one subsidiary

of that issuer guarantees those securities, the registration statement

need not include financial statements of the subsidiary guarantor if:

(1) The subsidiary guarantor is wholly-owned by the parent issuer;

(2) The guarantee is full and unconditional;

(3) There are no other subsidiaries of that parent that guarantee

the securities; and

(4) The parent company's financial statements are filed for the

periods specified by Secs. 210.3-01 and 210.3-02 and include, in a

footnote, condensed consolidating financial information for the same

periods with a separate column for the parent company, the subsidiary

guarantor, any other subsidiaries of the parent on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

(f) Subsidiary guarantors of securities issued by the parent of

those subsidiaries. When a parent company issues securities and more

than one subsidiary of that issuer guarantees those securities, the

registration statement need not include financial statements of the

subsidiary guarantors if:

(1) Each of the subsidiary guarantors is wholly-owned by the parent

issuer;

(2) The guarantees are full and unconditional;

(3) The guarantees are joint and several; and

(4) The parent company's financial statements are filed for the

periods specified by Secs. 210.3-01 and 210.3-02 and include, in a

footnote, condensed consolidating financial information for the same

periods with a separate column for the parent company, the subsidiary

guarantors on a combined basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a

combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated

amounts.

(g) Recently acquired issuers or guarantors. (1) The registration

statement of the parent company must include the financial statements

specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this section for any subsidiary that

otherwise would meet the conditions in paragraph (c), (d), (e), or (f)

of this section for omission of separate financial statements if:

(i) The subsidiary has not been included in the audited

consolidated results of the parent company for at least a nine month

period; and

(ii) The net book value or purchase price, whichever is greater, of

the subsidiary exceeds 20% of the shareholders' equity of the parent

company on a consolidated basis.

Instruction to paragraph (g)(1): The significance test of

paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section should be computed using

amounts for the subsidiary and parent as of the most recent fiscal

year end preceding the acquisition.

(2) Financial statements required--

(i) Audited financial statements for a subsidiary described in

paragraph (g)(1) of this section must be filed for at least the

subsidiary's most recent fiscal year. In addition, unaudited financial

statements must be filed for any interim periods specified in

Secs. 210.3-01 and 210.3-02.

(ii) The financial statements should conform to the requirements of

Regulation S-X, except that supporting schedules need not be filed.

(3) Acquisitions of a group of subsidiary issuers or guarantors

that are related prior to their acquisition shall be aggregated for

purposes of applying the 20% test in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this

section. Subsidiaries shall be deemed to be related prior to their

acquisition if:

(i) They are under common control or management;

(ii) The acquisition of one subsidiary is conditioned on the

acquisition of each subsidiary; or

(iii) The acquisition of each subsidiary is conditioned on a single

common event.

(4) Information required by this paragraph (g) of this section is

not required to be included in an annual report or quarterly report.

(h) Definitions. For the purposes of this section--

(1) A subsidiary is wholly-owned if all of its outstanding voting

shares are owned, either directly or indirectly, by the parent company.

If the subsidiary is not in corporate form, it is ``wholly-owned'' if

all of its outstanding ownership interests are owned, either directly

or indirectly, by the parent company.

(2) A guarantee is full and unconditional, if, when an issuer of a

guaranteed security has failed to make a scheduled payment, any holder

of the guaranteed security may immediately bring suit directly against

the guarantor for payment of all amounts due and payable.

(3) Annual report refers to annual reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-

KSB, or Form 20-F (Sec. Sec. 249.310, 249.310b, or 249.220f of this

chapter).

(4) Quarterly report refers to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or

Form 10-QSB (Sec. Sec. 249.308a or 249.308b of this chapter).

(i) Instructions for preparation of the condensed consolidating

financial information required by paragraphs (c), (d), (e), and (f) of

this section.

(1) Present the financial information in sufficient detail to allow

investors to determine the assets, results of operations, and cash

flows of each of the consolidating groups;

(2) Follow the general guidance in Sec. 210.10-01 for the form and

content for condensed financial statements;

(3) The financial information should be audited for the same

periods that the parent company financial statements are audited;

(4) The parent company column should present investments in all

subsidiaries under the equity method;

(5) All subsidiary issuer or guarantor columns should present

investments in non-guarantor subsidiaries under the equity method;

(6) Provide separate columns for each guarantor by legal

jurisdiction if differences in domestic or foreign laws affect the

enforceability of the guarantees;

(7) Include the following disclosures:

(i) Each subsidiary issuer and/or guarantor is wholly owned by the

parent company;

(ii) All guarantees are full and unconditional; and

(iii) Where there is more than one guarantor, all guarantees are

joint and several;

(8) Disclose any significant restrictions on the ability of the

parent company or any guarantor to obtain funds from its subsidiaries

by dividend or loan;

(9) Provide the disclosures prescribed by Sec. 210.4-08(e)(3) with

respect to the guarantors;

(10) Disclose additional financial and narrative information about

each guarantor if the information would be material for investors to

evaluate the sufficiency of the guarantee;

(11) The financial information shall include disclosures sufficient

so as to make the information presented not misleading;

(12) Disclosure that would substantially duplicate disclosure

elsewhere in the parent's financial statements is not required; and

(13) Where the parent company's consolidated financial statements

are

[[Page 10592]]

prepared on a comprehensive basis other than U.S. Generally Accepted

Accounting Principles, reconcile the information in each column to U.S.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to the same extent specified

by Item 17 of Form 20-F (Sec. 249.220f of this chapter).

3. Section 210.3-16 is added to read as follows:

Sec. 210.3-16 Financial statements of affiliates whose securities

collateralize an issue registered or being registered.

(a) For each of the registrant's affiliates whose securities

constitute a substantial portion of the collateral for any class of

securities registered or being registered, there shall be filed the

financial statements that would be required if the affiliate were a

registrant and required to file financial statements. However,

financial statements need not be filed pursuant to this section for any

person whose statements are otherwise separately included in the filing

on an individual basis or on a basis consolidated with its

subsidiaries.

(b) For the purposes of this section, securities of a person shall

be deemed to constitute a substantial portion of collateral if the

aggregate principal amount, par value, or book value of the securities

as carried by the registrant, or the market value of such securities,

whichever is the greatest, equals 20 percent or more of the principal

amount of the secured class of securities.

PART 228--INTEGRATED DISCLOSURE SYSTEM FOR SMALL BUSINESS ISSUERS

4. The authority citation for part 228 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77e, 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77k, 77s, 77z-2,

77aa(25), 77aa(26), 77ddd, 77eee, 77ggg, 77hhh, 77jjj, 77nnn, 77sss,

78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78u-5, 78w, 78ll, 80a-8, 80a-29, 80a-30, 80a-37,

and 80b-11, unless otherwise noted.

5. Section 228.310 is amended by redesignating Note 3 as Note 4 and

adding new Note 3 to read as follows:

Sec. 228.310. (Item 310) Financial Statements.

Notes:

* * * * *

3. Financial statements for a subsidiary of a small business

issuer that issues securities guaranteed by the small business

issuer or guarantees securities issued by the small business issuer

should be presented as required by Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X (17

CFR 210.3-10), except that the periods presented are those required

by paragraph (a) of this item.

* * * * *

PART 240--GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF

1934

6. The authority citation for part 240 continues to read, in part,

as follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77z-2, 77eee,

77ggg, 77nnn, 77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78d, 78f, 78i, 78j, 78j-1, 78k,

78k-1, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78p, 78q, 78s, 78u-5, 78w, 78x, 78ll(d),

78mm, 79q, 79t, 80a-20, 80a-23, 80a-29, 80a-37, 80b-3, 80b-4, and

80b-11, unless otherwise noted.

* * * * *

7. Section 240.12h-5 is added to read as follows:

Sec. 240.12h-5 Exemption for subsidiary guarantors and subsidiary

issuers of guaranteed securities.

(a) Any issuer of a guaranteed security or guarantor of a security

that is permitted to omit financial statements by Sec. 210.3-10 of

Regulation S-X of this Chapter is exempt from the requirements of

Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).

(b) Any issuer of a guaranteed security or guarantor of a security

that would be permitted to omit financial statements by Sec. 210.3-10

of Regulation S-X of this Chapter, except for the operation of

paragraph (g) of that section, is exempt from the requirements of

Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)).

Dated: February 26, 1999.

By the Commission.

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

Note: Appendices A, B, C, and D to the preamble will not appear

in the Code of Federal Regulations.

Appendix A--Applying the Proposed Rule to Specific Fact Patterns

In each of the following examples, assume that:

All guarantees are full and unconditional;

All guarantees are joint and several; and

All subsidiaries are wholly-owned.

Examples 1-3: Parent Issuer With No Operations

Example Number 1: All Subsidiaries Guarantee Securities

Parent company issues securities. The parent company is a

holding company with no independent operations. All of the parent

company's subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(f). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantors on a combined

basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated

amounts.

Example Number 2: More Than One, but not All, of the Subsidiaries

Guarantee the Securities

Parent company issues securities. The parent company is a

holding company with no independent operations. More than one, but

not all, of the parent company's subsidiaries guarantee the

securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(f). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantors on a combined

basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis;

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 3: One Subsidiary Guarantees the Securities

Parent company issues securities. The parent company is a

holding company with no independent operations. One of the parent

company's subsidiaries guarantees the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(e). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantor, the non-guarantor

subsidiaries on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Examples 4-6: Parent Issuer With Operations

Example No. 4: All Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

Parent company issues securities. In addition to its

subsidiaries, the parent company has independent operations. All of

the parent company's subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(f). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantors on a combined

basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated

amounts.

Example No. 5: More Than One, but not All, of the Subsidiaries

Guarantee the Securities

Parent company issues securities. In addition to its

subsidiaries, the parent company has independent operations. More

than one, but not all, of the parent company's subsidiaries

guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(f). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantors on a combined

basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 6: One Subsidiary Guarantees the Securities

Parent company issues securities. In addition to its

subsidiaries, the parent company has independent operations. One of

the parent company's subsidiaries guarantees the securities.

[[Page 10593]]

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(f). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantor, the non-guarantor

subsidiaries on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Examples 7-10: Finance Subsidiary Issuer. Parent Guarantees the

Securities and Has No Operations

Example No. 7: No Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. The parent company

has no independent operations. None of the parent company's other

subsidiaries guarantee the securities. Required financial

information: In accordance with proposed Rule 3-10(b), the only

required financial information would be the financial statements of

the parent company. Those financial statements would include a

footnote stating that the issuer is a wholly-owned finance

subsidiary of the parent with no independent assets or operations

and the parent has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the

securities.

Example No. 8: All Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. The parent company

has no independent operations. All of the parent company's other

subsidiaries guarantee the securities. Required financial

information: Condensed consolidating financial information prepared

in accordance with proposed Rule 3-10(d). That financial information

would include a separate column for: the parent company, the

subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary guarantors on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 9: More than one, but not all, of the other subsidiaries

guarantee the securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. The parent company

has no independent operations. More than one, but not all, of the

parent company's other subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantors on a combined basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a

combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total

consolidated amounts.

Example No. 10: One Other Subsidiary Guarantees the Securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. The parent company

has no independent operations. One of the parent company's other

subsidiaries guarantees the securities. Required financial

information: Condensed consolidating financial information prepared

in accordance with proposed Rule 3-10(d). That financial information

would include a separate column for: the parent company, the

subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary guarantor, the non-guarantor

subsidiaries on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Examples 11-14: Finance Subsidiary Issuer. Parent Guarantees the

Securities and Has Operations

Example No. 11: No Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. In addition to its

subsidiaries, the parent company has independent operations. None of

the parent company's other subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: In accordance with proposed Rule

3-10(b), the only required financial information would be the

financial statements of the parent company. Those financial

statements would include a footnote stating that the issuer is a

wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the parent with no independent

assets or operations and the parent has fully and unconditionally

guaranteed the securities.

Example No. 12: All Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. In addition to its

subsidiaries, the parent company has independent operations. All of

the parent company's other subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantors on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 13: More Than One, but not All, of the Other Subsidiaries

Guarantee the Securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. In addition to its

subsidiaries, the parent company has independent operations. More

than one, but not all, of the parent company's other subsidiaries

guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantors on a combined

basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 14: One Other Subsidiary Guarantees the Securities

A finance subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent of

that finance company guarantees those securities. In addition to its

subsidiaries, the parent company has independent operations. One of

the parent company's other subsidiaries guarantees the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantor, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

Examples 15-18: Operating Subsidiary Issuer. Parent Guarantees the

Securities and Has No Operations

Example No. 15: No Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating subsidiary guarantees those securities. The parent

company has no independent operations. None of the parent company's

other subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(c). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, any other

subsidiaries on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 16: All Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating subsidiary guarantees those securities. The parent

company has no independent operations. All of the parent company's

other subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantors on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 17: More Than One, But Not All, of the Other Subsidiaries

Guarantee the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating subsidiary guarantees those securities. The parent

company has no independent operations. More than one, but not all of

the parent company's other subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantors on a combined basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a

combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total

consolidated amounts.

Example No. 18: One Other Subsidiary Guarantees the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating

[[Page 10594]]

subsidiary guarantees those securities. The parent company has no

independent operations. One of the parent company's other

subsidiaries guarantees the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantor, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

Examples 19-22: Operating Subsidiary Issuer. Parent Guarantees the

Securities and Has Independent Operations

Example No. 19: No Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating subsidiary guarantees those securities. In

addition to its subsidiaries, the parent company has independent

operations. None of the parent company's other subsidiaries

guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with Rule 3-10(c). That

financial information would include a separate column for: the

parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the non-guarantor

subsidiaries on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 20: All Other Subsidiaries Guarantee the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating subsidiary guarantees those securities. In

addition to its subsidiaries, the parent company has independent

operations. All of the parent company's other subsidiaries guarantee

the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantors on a combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the

total consolidated amounts.

Example No. 21: More Than One, But Not All, of the Other Subsidiaries

Guarantee the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating subsidiary guarantees those securities. In

addition to its subsidiaries, the parent company has independent

operations. More than one, but not all, of the parent company's

other subsidiaries guarantee the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantors on a combined basis, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a

combined basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total

consolidated amounts.

Example No. 22: One Other Subsidiary Guarantees the Securities

An operating subsidiary issues securities. The ultimate parent

of that operating subsidiary guarantees those securities. In

addition to its subsidiaries, the parent company has independent

operations. One of the parent company's other subsidiaries

guarantees the securities.

Required financial information: Condensed consolidating

financial information prepared in accordance with proposed Rule 3-

10(d). That financial information would include a separate column

for: the parent company, the subsidiary issuer, the subsidiary

guarantor, the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis,

consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated amounts.

Example 23: Trust Preferred Securities

A wholly-owned special purpose business trust with no

independent operations issues trust preferred securities. The trust

loans the proceeds of the offering of the trust preferred securities

to its ultimate parent and the parent issues debentures to the

trust. The ultimate parent guarantees the trust preferred securities

through a series of ``back-up undertakings.'' In this situation, the

trust would be treated as a finance subsidiary under Rule 3-10(b),

so the only required financial information would be a narrative

discussion of the trust and the securities.

Required financial information: Parent would present the

preferred securities as a separate line item on its balance sheet

entitled ``Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred

Securities of Subsidiary Trust Holding Solely Debentures of the

Company.''

Parent would include, in a footnote to its financial

statements, disclosure that the sole assets of the trust are the

parent's debentures.

Parent would specify in a footnote to its financial

statements the principal amount, interest rate and maturity date of

the debentures held by the trust.

Parent would include in an audited footnote to its

audited financial statements disclosure:

1. That the trust is wholly-owned;

2. That the sole assets of the trust are the parent's

debentures;

3. Of the principal amount, interest rate and maturity date of

the parent's debentures held by the trust; and

4. That, considered together, the ``back-up undertakings''

constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the parent of the

trust's obligations under the preferred securities.

Appendix B--Applying the Proposed Rules to Subsidiary Guarantors That

Are Added or Deleted in the Future

The analysis regarding the financial information required in a

Securities Act registration statement is based solely on the

securities that are offered under that registration statement. You

should look at the registrants and the securities required to be

listed on the cover page of the registration statement when you

determine which financials statements you must include. A common

question involves how to treat guarantors that you add after the

registration statement becomes effective. The answer will relate to

three areas:

Securities Act treatment of the ``later-added''

guarantees;

Financial statement requirements for ``later-added''

guarantors; and

The separate Exchange Act reporting obligations of

those ``later-added'' guarantors.

The following examples involve the application of the proposed rules

to these three areas. In each of the following examples, assume

that:

All guarantees are full and unconditional;

All guarantees are joint and several; and

All subsidiaries are wholly-owned.

Example No. 1. Parent company registers an offering of its debt

securities under the Securities Act. More than one, but not all, of

its subsidiaries guarantee the securities. The indenture states that

the parent company may, without the approval of the debt holders,

add or delete subsidiary guarantors in the future. The securities

offering is not a shelf offering.

Financial information required in the Securities Act

registration statement: The registration statement would include

condensed consolidating financial information prepared in accordance

with proposed Rule 3-10(f). That financial information would include

a separate column for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantors

as of the date the registration statement became effective on a

combined basis, the subsidiaries that were not guarantors as of the

date the registration statement became effective on a combined

basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated

amounts.

Treatment of future guarantees under the Securities Act: There

would be no Securities Act event at the time future guarantors are

added or deleted. The decision to add or delete guarantors would not

involve an investment decision by the debt holders. Therefore, there

would be no need to amend the registration statement after it became

effective.

Exchange Act reporting requirements of existing and future

guarantors: Proposed Rule 12h-5 would exempt the existing guarantors

from separately reporting under the Exchange Act. Because future

guarantors would not be registrants on a Securities Act registration

statement, they would have no separate reporting obligation under

Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Therefore, there would be no need

to provide an exemption for these future guarantors from the

requirements of Section 15(d).

Financial statement requirements in parent company's Exchange

Act reports: The financial statements in the parent company's

periodic reports would be the same as in the Securities Act

registration statement and there would continue to be condensed

consolidating financial information with the same columns of

information. However, as the companies that comprise each column

would change, the parent company would revise the makeup of that

column of information. For example, the guarantor subsidiaries

column and the non-guarantor subsidiaries column may reflect

different subsidiaries, depending on which

[[Page 10595]]

subsidiaries were in each category at that time. In each of its

Exchange Act reports, the parent company would look to which of its

subsidiaries was a guarantor as of the end of the period reflected

in that periodic report. A footnote to the condensed consolidating

financial information should discuss any changes in the composition

of the guarantors that comprise the guarantor column.

Example No. 2. Parent company files a Securities Act

registration statement relating to a shelf offering of its debt

securities. The registration statement states that more than one,

but not all, of its subsidiaries will guarantee the securities. The

registration statement includes each of the current subsidiary

guarantors as a co-registrant. The indenture states that the parent

company may, without the approval of the debt holders, add or delete

subsidiary guarantors in the future.

Financial information required in the Securities Act

registration statement: The registration statement would include

condensed consolidating financial information prepared in accordance

with proposed Rule 3-10(f). That financial information would include

a separate column for: the parent company, the subsidiary guarantors

as of the date the registration statement became effective on a

combined basis, the subsidiaries that were not guarantors as of the

date the registration statement became effective on a combined

basis, consolidating adjustments, and the total consolidated

amounts.

Treatment of future guarantees under the Securities Act: You

will have different answers depending on whether the guaranteed

securities have already been offered or whether they will be offered

after guarantors are added or deleted. For purposes of this

analysis, assume:

That the shelf registration statement registered the

offer and sale of $500 million in debt securities;

That the parent company sold $200 million of those

securities after the registration statement became effective; and

After that sale, the parent company elected to add or

delete subsidiary guarantors, both with respect to the $200 million

of securities it has sold and the $300 million of securities that it

may sell in the future.

For the same reasons as we discussed in Example No. 1, there

would not be a Securities Act registration event with respect to the

$200 million of securities that were already sold. However, the

registration statement would have to be updated to properly reflect

the subsidiary guarantors with respect to any offers or sales of the

remaining $300 million of securities. If new guarantors were added

to the registration statement, this update would relate to offers

and sales of guarantees that were not registered originally.

Therefore, this update could not be done through a post-effective

amendment. Instead, a new registration statement would be filed to

reflect the new guarantors. The parent company and the continuing

guarantors could rely on Rule 429 to combine this registration

statement with the original shelf registration statement. There

would be no additional fee. This new registration statement would

have to be filed before any offers of those guarantees could be made

and would have to be effective before any sales. Also, the new

registration statement would continue to include condensed

consolidating financial information in accordance with proposed Rule

3-10(f). However, because the companies that comprise each column

would have changed, the parent company would revise the makeup of

that column. For example, the guarantor subsidiaries column and the

non-guarantor subsidiaries column would reflect different

subsidiaries, depending on which subsidiaries were in each category

at that time. A footnote to the condensed consolidating financial

information should discuss any changes in the composition of the

guarantors that comprise the guarantor column.

Exchange Act reporting requirements of existing and future

guarantors: Proposed Rule 12h-5 would exempt the existing guarantors

from separately reporting under the Exchange Act. Because future

guarantors on the $200 million of securities that were already sold

would not be registrants on a Securities Act registration statement,

they would have no separate reporting obligation at that time.

Therefore, there would be no need to provide an exemption for these

future guarantors. However, if future guarantors were added to the

registration statement with respect to offers and sales of the $300

million of securities remaining on the registration statement, they

would have a separate reporting obligation when the registration

statement that included them as registrants became effective.

Proposed Rule 12h-5 would exempt these guarantors from the

requirements of Section 15(d).

Financial statement requirements in parent company's Exchange

Act reports: The financial information in the parent company's

periodic reports would be the same as in the Securities Act

registration statement and there would continue to be condensed

consolidating financial information with the same columns of

information. However, as the companies that comprise each column

would change, the parent company would revise the makeup of that

column of information. In each of its Exchange Act reports, the

parent company would look to which of its subsidiaries was a

guarantor as of the end of the period reflected in that periodic

report. A footnote to the condensed consolidating financial

information should discuss any changes in the composition of the

guarantors that comprise the guarantor column.

Appendix C--What does ``wholly-owned'' mean under proposed Rule 3-10?

Example No. 1. Parent company own 100% of the voting shares of

SubA. SubA owns 100% of the voting shares of Sub1.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Is Sub1 a wholly-owned subsidiary of SubA? Yes.

Is Sub1 an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent

company? Yes.

Example No. 2. Parent company own 100% of the voting shares of

SubA. SubA owns 99% of the voting shares of Sub1. The remaining 1%

of the voting shares of Sub1 is owned by a party that is not a

wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Is Sub1 a wholly-owned subsidiary of SubA? No.

Is Sub1 an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent

company? No.

Example No. 3. Parent company owns 99% of the voting shares of

SubA. The remaining 1% of the voting shares of SubA are owned by a

party that is not a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company.

SubA owns 100% of the voting shares of Sub1.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.

Is Sub1 a wholly-owned subsidiary of SubA? Yes.

Is Sub1 an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent

company? No.

Example No. 4. Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of

SubA and 100% of the voting shares of SubB. SubA owns 60% of the

voting shares of Sub1 and SubB owns 40% of the voting shares of

Sub1.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Is SubB a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Is Sub1 a wholly-owned subsidiary of SubA? No.

Is Sub1 a wholly-owned subsidiary of SubB? No.

Is Sub1 an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent

company? Yes.

Example No. 5. Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of

SubA.

Parent company also owns 60% of the voting shares of Sub1. SubA

owns 40% of the voting shares of Sub1.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Is Sub1 a wholly-owned subsidiary of SubA? No.

Is Sub1 an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent

company? Yes.

Example No. 6. Parent company owns 99% of the voting shares of

SubA. As required by the law in its home country, a director of SubA

owns the remaining 1% of the voting shares of SubA. SubA owns 100%

of the voting shares of Sub1.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.

Is Sub1 a wholly-owned subsidiary of SubA? No.

Is Sub1 an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent

company? No.

Note: This position is different than current staff

interpretations.

Example No. 7. Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of

SubA. SubA has outstanding securities convertible into its voting

shares. These convertible securities are held by a party that is not

a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.

Example No. 8. Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of

SubA. SubA has outstanding securities convertible into the parent

company's voting shares. These convertible securities are held by a

party that is not a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent.

[[Page 10596]]

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Example No. 9. Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of

SubA. SubA has outstanding options exercisable into its voting

shares. These options are held by a party that is not a wholly-owned

subsidiary of the parent.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.

Example No. 10. Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of

SubA. SubA has outstanding options exercisable into the parent

company's voting shares. These convertible securities are held by a

party that is not a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Example No. 11. Parent company owns 100% of the common stock of

SubA. SubA has a class of preferred stock outstanding. That

preferred stock is 100% owned by a party that is not a wholly-owned

subsidiary of the parent company. The common equity has full voting

rights. The preferred stock is non-voting.

Is SubA a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.

Appendix D--Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

I, Arthur Levitt, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange

Commission, hereby certify pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that proposed

amendments to Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X and Item 310 of Regulation

S-B, as well as new Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X and new Exchange Act

Rule 12h-5, if adopted, will not have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities. The amendments and new

rules largely codify the positions the staff has developed through

Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 53, later interpretations and the

registration statement review process. Since the registrants already

follow these standards, the proposed amendments would not impose a

significant impact. Additionally, a review of Division responses to

SAB 53 exemptive requests over the last ten years indicates that

only one request related to an offering that was registered on a

small business form, and that company would not meet the definition

of small business entity for Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes.

Accordingly, the proposed amendments and new rules would not have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small

entities.

Dated: February 26, 1999.

Arthur Levitt,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 99-5444 Filed 3-4-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-U

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.