Even Start Family Literacy Program for Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations; Inviting Applications for New Awards Using Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Funds

Federal RegisterFeb 12, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 1999)]

[Notices]

[Pages 7430-7456]

From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

[FR Doc No: 99-3341]

[[Page 7429]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IX

Department of Education

_______________________________________________________________________

Even Start Family Literacy Program for Federally Recognized Indian

Tribes and Tribal Organizations; Inviting Applications for New Awards

Using Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Funds; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 1999 /

Notices

[[Page 7430]]

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[CFDA No.: 84.258]

Even Start Family Literacy Program for Federally Recognized

Indian Tribes and Tribal Organizations; Inviting Applications for New

Awards Using Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Funds

AGENCY: Department of Education.

Note to Applicants: This notice is a complete application package.

Together with the statute authorizing the program and the Education

Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), the notice

contains all of the information, application forms, and instructions

needed to apply for a grant under this competition.

Purpose of Program: The Even Start Family Literacy Program for

Indian tribes and tribal organizations is designed to help break the

cycle of poverty and illiteracy by improving the educational

opportunities of low-income families by integrating early childhood

education, adult literacy or adult basic education, and parenting

education into a unified family literacy program for federally

recognized Indian tribes and tribal organizations.

Eligible Applicants: Federally recognized Indian tribes and tribal

organizations.

Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 30, 1999.

Available Funds: The Department estimates that there will be

sufficient FY 1999 funds for three new projects after funding

continuation awards in FY 1999.

Estimated Range of Awards: $100,000--$250,000.

Estimated Average Size of Awards: $175,000.

Estimated Number of Awards: 3.

Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this

notice.

Project Period: Up to 48 months.

Applicable Regulations: The Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows:

(1) 34 CFR Part 75 (Direct Grant Programs).

(2) 34 CFR Part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department

Regulations).

(3) 34 CFR Part 80 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants

and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments).

(4) 34 CFR Part 81 (General Education Provisions Act--Enforcement).

(5) 34 CFR Part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).

(6) 34 CFR Part 85 (Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension

(Nonprocurement) and Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free

Workplace (Grants)).

Description of Program: Under the authority of section

1202(a)(1)(C) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), the

Assistant Secretary of Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant

Secretary) awards grants to eligible applicants for projects that--

(1) Improve the educational opportunities of low-income families by

integrating early childhood education, adult literacy or adult basic

education, and parenting education into a unified family literacy

program for federally recognized Indian tribe and tribal organization

projects;

(2) Are implemented through cooperative activities that build on

existing community resources to create a new range of services for

federally recognized Indian tribe and tribal organization projects;

(3) Promote achievement of the National Education Goals one, three,

five, and eight that address school readiness, student achievement, and

parent involvement in the education of their children; and

(4) Assist children and adults to achieve to challenging State

content standards and challenging State student performance standards.

Eligible participants. Eligible participants are children and their

parents who also meet the following conditions specified in section

1206(a) of the ESEA:

(1) The parent or parents must be eligible for participation in

adult education and literacy activities under the Adult Education and

Family Literacy Act; or

(2) For a parent or parents within the State's compulsory school

attendance age range, a local educational agency must provide (or

ensure the availability of) the basic education component; and

(3) The child or children must be younger than eight years of age.

(Note: Family members of eligible participants described in

paragraphs one through three, above, also may participate in Even

Start Family Literacy Program activities when appropriate to serve

Even Start purposes. In addition, section 1206(b) of the ESEA

generally permits families to remain eligible for Even Start Family

Literacy services until all family members become ineligible for

participation. For example, in the case of a family in which the

parent or parents have become ineligible due to educational

advancement, eligibility would continue until all children in the

family reach age eight. If all children in a family have reached the

age of eight, the family continues to be eligible for two more

years, or until the parents no longer are eligible for adult

education and literacy activities under the Adult Education and

Family Literacy Act, whichever occurs earlier.)

Budget period. Under 34 CFR 75.112 and 75.117, an eligible

applicant must propose a project period of up to four years and provide

budgetary information for each year of that proposed project period in

its initial application. The budgetary information provided should

include, for each year, an amount for all key project components with

an accompanying breakdown of any subcomponents. A written justification

for all requested amounts should be provided.

An applicant is also required under 34 CFR Sec. 75.112(b) to

describe how and when, in each budget period of the project, it plans

to meet each objective of the project.

(Note: This information will be used by the Assistant Secretary,

in conjunction with the grantee's annual performance report required

under 34 CFR 75.118(a), to determine whether to make a continuation

award for the subsequent budget year. Under 34 CFR 75.253 a grantee

can receive a continuation award only if it demonstrates that it

either has made substantial progress toward meeting the objectives

of the approved project, or has received the Assistant Secretary's

approval of changes in the project to enable it to meet the

objectives in the succeeding budget periods.)

Federal and local funding. An Even Start Family Literacy project's

funding is comprised of both a Federal portion of funds (Federal share)

and a portion contributed by the eligible applicant (local project

share). The local share of the project may be provided in cash or in

kind and may be obtained from any source, including other Federal

programs. The Federal share of the project may not exceed--

90 percent of the total cost of the project in the first

year;

80 percent in the second year;

70 percent in the third year;

60 percent in the fourth year; and

50 percent in any subsequent year.

The Federal share for any grantee receiving a grant for a second

grant cycle may not exceed 50 percent. Any grantee that wishes to

reapply for a second grant cycle at the end of its first project period

(up to 48 months) must recompete for funding with new applicants.

Indirect costs. Even Start Family Literacy Program funds generally

may not be used for the indirect costs of a project. Recipients of an

Even Start Indian tribe and tribal organization grant may request the

Secretary to waive this requirement. To obtain a waiver, however, the

recipient must demonstrate to the Secretary's satisfaction that the

recipient otherwise would not be able to participate in the Even Start

Family Literacy Program.

[[Page 7431]]

National Evaluation: The Department is conducting a national

evaluation of Even Start Family Literacy projects. Grantees are

required to participate in the Department's national evaluation and to

conduct a separate, annual independent local evaluation consistent with

the grantee's responsibilities under 34 CFR 75.590 and section 1205(10)

of the ESEA.

The Secretary suggests that each applicant budget $10,000 for

evaluation activities. These funds will be used for expenditures

related to the project's independent local evaluation and for

collection and aggregation of data required for the Department's

national evaluation. The Secretary also recommends that projects budget

for the cost of travel to Washington, DC, and two nights' lodging for

the project director and the project evaluator, for their participation

in annual evaluation meetings.

Selection Criteria

The Secretary uses the following selection criteria to evaluate

applications for grants under this competition.

(1) The maximum composite score for all of these criteria is 100

points.

(2) The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in

parentheses.

(a) Meeting the purposes of the authorizing statute. (10 points).

The Secretary considers how well the project will meet the purpose of

the Even Start Family Literacy Program for federally recognized Indian

tribes and tribal organizations, which under sections 1201 and

1202(a)(1)(C) of the ESEA is to help break the cycle of poverty and

illiteracy by awarding grants for projects that--

Improve the educational opportunities of low-income

families by integrating early childhood education, adult literacy or

adult basic education, and parenting education into a unified family

literacy program for federally recognized Indian tribe and tribal

organization projects;

Are implemented through cooperative projects that build on

existing community resources to create a new range of services for

Indian tribe and tribal organization projects;

Promote achievement of the National Education Goals; and

Assist children and adults from low-income families to

achieve to challenging State content standards and challenging State

student performance standards.

(b) Need for project. (15 points). The Secretary considers the need

for the proposed project. In determining the need for the proposed

project, the Secretary considers the following factors:

(i) The magnitude of the need for the services to be provided or

the activities to be carried out by the proposed project.

(ii) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,

infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be

addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude

of those gaps or weaknesses.

(Note: The Secretary invites applicants to address such factors

as the following: the number of families in the area who need Even

Start services, the lack of availability of comprehensive family

literacy services for that population, other resources that will be

used to benefit project participants, and any other factors that the

applicant considers relevant to the extent of need for the project.)

(c) Significance. (10 points). The Secretary considers the

significance of the proposed project. In determining the significance

of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the proposed project involves the

development or demonstration of promising new strategies that build on,

or are alternatives to, existing strategies.

(ii) The potential replicability of the proposed project or

strategies, including, as appropriate, the potential for implementation

in a variety of settings.

(iii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely

to be attained by the proposed project.

(d) Quality of the project design. (15 points). The Secretary

considers the quality of the design of the proposed project. In

determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the

Secretary considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the design of the proposed project includes

a thorough, high-quality review of the relevant literature, a high-

quality plan for project implementation, and the use of appropriate

methodological tools to ensure successful achievement of project

objectives.

(ii) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is

appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target

population or other identified needs.

(iii) The extent to which the proposed project will be coordinated

with similar or related efforts, and with other appropriate community,

State, and Federal resources.

(Note: Concerning design of the project, an eligible applicant

must propose a project that incorporates, at a minimum, the

following program elements required by section 1205 of the ESEA:

(A) Identification and recruitment of families most in need of

services provided under the Even Start Family Literacy Program, as

indicated by a low level of income, a low level of adult literacy or

English language proficiency of the eligible parent or parents, and

other need-related indicators.

(B) Screening and preparation of parents, including teenage

parents and children, to enable those parents to participate fully

in the activities and services provided under the Even Start Family

Literacy Program, including testing, referral to necessary

counseling, other developmental and support services, and related

services.

(C) Design that accommodates the participants' work schedule and

other responsibilities, including the provision of support services,

when those services are unavailable from other sources, but are

necessary for participation in the activities assisted under the

Even Start Family Literacy Program, such as--

Scheduling and location of services to allow joint

participation by parents and children;

Child care for the period that parents are involved in

the project; and

Transportation to enable parents and their children to

participate in the project.

(D) High-quality, intensive instructional programs that promote

adult literacy and empower parents to support the educational growth

of their children, developmentally appropriate early childhood

educational services, and preparation of children for success in

regular school programs.

(E) Special training of staff, including child care staff, to

develop the skills necessary to work with parents and young children

in the full range of instructional services offered through the Even

Start Family Literacy Program.

(F) Providing and monitoring of integrated instructional

services to participating parents and children through home-based

programs.

(G) Operation on a year-round basis, including the provision of

some program services, instructional or enrichment, during the

summer months.

(H) Coordination with--

Programs assisted under other parts of Title I and

other programs under the ESEA;

Any relevant programs under the Adult Education and

Family Literacy Act, the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act, and the Job Training Partnership Act; and

The Head Start program, volunteer literacy programs,

and other relevant programs.

(I) Ensuring that the proposed project will serve those families

most in need of the activities and services provided by the Even

Start Family Literacy Program.

(J) An independent evaluation of the project.)

(e) Quality of project services. (20 points). The Secretary

considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed

project. In determining the quality of the services to be provided by

the proposed project, the Secretary

[[Page 7432]]

considers the quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal

access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members

of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race,

color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the

Secretary considers the following factors:

(i) The likelihood that the services to be provided by the proposed

project will lead to improvements in the achievement of students as

measured against rigorous academic standards.

(ii) The likely impact of the services to be provided by the

proposed project on the intended recipients of those services.

(Note: An eligible applicant must propose a project that has

``high-quality, intensive instructional programs'' in the three core

instructional areas (early childhood education, adult education and

parenting education), as required by section 1205(4) of the ESEA.

Concerning the quality of project services, the Secretary invites

applicants to describe the level of intensity in these three core

instructional services that the applicant believes sufficient to

produce positive and sustainable outcomes for families, and how the

project will provide that level of intensity of services.)

(f) Quality of project personnel. (5 points). The Secretary

considers the quality of the personnel who will carry out the proposed

project. In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary

considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for

employment from persons who are members of groups that have

traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national

origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,

of key project personnel.

(ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and

experience, of project consultants or subcontractors.

(g) Adequacy of resources. (5 points.) The Secretary considers the

adequacy of resources for the proposed project. In determining the

adequacy of resources for the proposed project, the Secretary considers

the following factors:

(i) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment,

supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization or the

lead applicant organization.

(Note: Applicants may address this criteria in any way that is

reasonable. An eligible applicant must provide an increasing local

project share over the grant period (at least the following amounts:

10% in the first year, 20% in the second year, 30% in the third

year, and 40% in the fourth year), as required by section 1204(b) of

the ESEA. In addressing adequacy of resources, the Secretary invites

applicants to describe the resources that they will use to increase

the amount of the local project's share over the four years of the

grant, which will contribute to the applicant's ability to sustain

the project at the end of the Federal funding.)

(ii) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to

the objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed

project.

(iii) The potential for the incorporation of project purposes,

activities, or benefits into the ongoing program of the agency or

organization at the end of Federal funding.

(h) Quality of the management plan. (10 points). The Secretary

considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project.

In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed

project, the Secretary considers the following factors:

(i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives

of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly

defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing

project tasks.

(ii) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and

continuous improvement in the operation of the proposed project.

(iii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project

director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are

appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed

project.

(iv) How the applicant will ensure that a diversity of perspectives

are brought to bear in the operation of the proposed project, including

those of parents, teachers, the business community, a variety of

disciplinary and professional fields, recipients or beneficiaries of

services, or others, as appropriate.

(i) Quality of project evaluation. (10 points). The Secretary

considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed

project. In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use

of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the

intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and

qualitative data to the extent possible.

(ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide

performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward

achieving intended outcomes.

Instructions for Transmittal of Applications

(a) If an applicant wants to apply for a grant, the applicant

shall--

(1) Mail the original and two copies of the application on or

before the deadline date to: U.S. Department of Education, Application

Control Center, Attention: Laura Chow (CFDA #84.258), Compensatory

Education Programs, Room 3633, Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D

Streets, SW, Washington, DC 20202-4725 or

(2) Hand deliver the original and two copies of the application by

4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time) on or before the deadline date to: U.S.

Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: Laura

Chow (CFDA #84.258), Compensatory Education Programs, Room 3633,

Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D Streets, SW, Washington, DC

20202-4725.

(b) An applicant must show one of the following as proof of

mailing:

(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.

(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the

U.S. Postal Service.

(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial

carrier.

(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary.

(c) If an application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service,

the Secretary does not accept either of the following as proof of

mailing:

(1) A private metered postmark.

(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.

Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a

dated postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should

check with its local post office.

(2) The Application Control Center will mail a Grant Application

Receipt Acknowledgment to each applicant. If an applicant fails to

receive the notification of application receipt within 15 days from

the date of mailing the application, the applicant should call the

U.S. Department of Education Application Control Center at (202)

708-9494.

(3) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and--if not

provided by the Department--in Item 10 of the Application for

Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) the CFDA number--and suffix

letter, if any--of the competition under which the application is

being submitted.

Application Instructions and Forms

The appendix to this notice contains the following forms and

instructions, plus a statement regarding estimated public reporting

burden, a notice to applicants regarding compliance with section 427 of

the General Education Provisions Act, and various assurances and

certifications.

[[Page 7433]]

a. Instructions for the Application Narrative.

b. Estimated Public Reporting Burden Statement.

c. Notice to all Applicants.

d. Objectives and Performance Indicators for the Even Start Family

Literacy Program.

e. Application for Federal Assistance (ED 424 (OMB No. 1875-0106,

Expires 6/30/01)) and instructions.

f. Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs (ED Form No. 524)

and instructions.

g. Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424).

h. Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and

Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED

80-0013).

i. Certification regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and

Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED 80-0014, 9/90)

and instructions. (NOTE: ED 80-0014 is intended for the use of grantees

and should not be transmitted to the Department.)

j. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL) (if

applicable) and instructions. This document has been marked to reflect

statutory changes. See the notice published in the Federal Register (61

FR 1413) by the Office of Management and Budget on January 19, 1996.

An applicant may submit information on photostatic copies of the

application, budget forms, assurances, and certifications. However, the

application form, assurances, and certifications must each have an

original signature. No grant may be awarded unless a completed

application form, including the signed assurances and certifications,

have been received.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Chow, Compensatory Education

Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW (FOB 6, 3W208), Washington, DC

20202-6132. Telephone (202) 260-2683. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8

p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an

alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer

diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding

paragraph.

Individuals with disabilities may obtain a copy of the application

package in an alternate format, also, by contacting that person.

However, the Department is not able to reproduce in an alternate format

the standard forms included in the application package.

Electronic Access to This Document

Anyone may view this document, as well as all other Department of

Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or

portable document format (pdf) on the World Wide Web at either of the

following sites:

http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm

http://www.ed.gov/news html

To use the pdf you must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader Program with

Search, which is available free at either of the previous sites. If you

have questions about using the pdf, call the U.S. Government Printing

Office toll free at 1-888-293-6498.

Anyone may also view these documents in text copy only on an

electronic bulletin board of the Department. Telephone (202) 219-1511

or, toll free, 1-800-222-4922. The documents are located under Option

G-Files/Announcements, Bulletins and Press Releases.

Note: The official version of a document is the document

published in the Federal Register.

Program authority: 20 U.S.C. section 6362(a)(1)(C).

Gerald N. Tirozzi,

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.

Instructions for Part III: Application Narrative

Before preparing the Application Narrative an applicant should read

carefully the description of the program and the selection criteria the

Secretary uses to evaluate applications.

The narrative should encompass each function or activity for which

funds are being requested and should--

1. Begin with a one-page Abstract summarizing the proposed project;

2. Describe the proposed project in light of the selection criteria

in the order in which the criteria are listed in this application

package; and

3. Provide the following in response to the attached ``Notice to

all Applicants'': (1) a reference to the portion of the application in

which information appears as to how the applicant is addressing steps

to promote equitable access and participation, or (2) a separate

statement that contains that information.

4. Provide a copy of the signed set of assurances specified in

section 14306(a) of the ESEA (20 USC 8856(a)) that the applicant has

filed with its SEA and that is applicable to this grant application.

5. Include any other pertinent information that might assist the

Secretary in reviewing the application.

The Secretary strongly requests the applicant to limit the

Application Narrative to no more than 20 double-spaced, typed pages (on

one side only). The Department has found that successful applications

for similar programs generally meet this page limit.

Instructions for Estimated Public Reporting Burden

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are

required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a

valid OMB control Number. The valid OMB control number for this

information collection is 1810-0540 (Expiration Date: 3/31/1999). The

time required to complete this information collection is estimated to

average 15 hours per response, including the time to review

instructions, search existing data resources, gather and maintain the

data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you

have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate or

suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department

of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4651.

If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your

individual submission of this form, write directly to: Patricia McKee,

Compensatory Education Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary

Education, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW (FOB

6, Area 3 West), Washington D.C. 20202-6132.

Notice to All Applicants

The purpose of this enclosure is to inform you about a new

provision in the Department of Education's General Education Provisions

Act (GEPA) that applies to applicants for new grant awards under

Department programs. This provision is Section 427 of GEPA, enacted as

part of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-382).

To Whom Does This Provision Apply?

Section 427 of GEPA affects applicants for new grant awards under

this program. All applicants for new awards must include information in

their applications to address this new provision in order to receive

funding under this program.

What Does This Provision Require?

Section 427 requires each applicant for funds (other than an

individual person) to include in its application a description of the

steps the applicant

[[Page 7434]]

proposes to take to ensure equitable access to, and participation in,

its Federally-assisted program for students, teachers, and other

program beneficiaries with special needs.

This provision allows applicants discretion in developing the

required description. The statute highlights six types of barriers that

can impede equitable access or participation: gender, race, national

origin, color, disability, or age. Based on local circumstances, you

should determine whether these or other barriers may prevent your

students, teachers, etc. from such access or participation in, the

Federally-funded project or activity. The description in your

application of steps to be taken to overcome these barriers need not be

lengthy; you may provide a clear and succinct description of how you

plan to address those barriers that are applicable to your

circumstances. In addition, the information may be provided in a single

narrative, or, if appropriate, may be discussed in connection with

related topics in the application.

Section 427 is not intended to duplicate the requirements of civil

rights statutes, but rather to ensure that, in designing their

projects, applicants for Federal funds address equity concerns that may

affect the ability of certain potential beneficiaries to fully

participate in the project and to achieve to high standards. Consistent

with program requirements and its approved application, an applicant

may use the Federal funds awarded to it to eliminate barriers it

identifies.

What are Examples of How an Applicant Might Satisfy the Requirement of

This Provision?

The following examples may help illustrate how an applicant may

comply with section 427.

(1) An applicant that proposes to carry out an adult literacy

project serving, among others, adults with limited English proficiency,

might describe in its application how it intends to distribute a

brochure about the proposed project to such potential participants in

their native language.

(2) An applicant that proposes to develop instructional materials

for classroom use might describe how it will make the materials

available on audio tape or in braille for students who are blind.

(3) An applicant that proposes to carry out a model science program

for secondary students and is concerned that girls may be less likely

than boys to enroll in the course, might indicate how it intends to

conduct ``outreach'' efforts to girls, to encourage their enrollment.

We recognize that many applicants may already be implementing

effective steps to ensure equity of access and participation in their

grant programs, and we appreciate your cooperation in responding to the

requirements of this provision.

Estimated Burden Statement for GEPA Requirements

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are

required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a

valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this

information collection is 1801-0004 (Exp. 8/31/2001). The time required

to complete this information collection is estimated to vary from 1 to

3 hours per response, with an average of 1.5 hours, including the time

to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather and

maintain the data needed, and complete and review the information

collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the

time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write

to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC 20202-4651.

Objectives and Performance Indicators for the Even Start Family

Literacy Program

For your information, following are objectives and performance

indicators for the Even Start Family Literacy Program (Part B of Title

I of the ESEA) that the Department has developed in accordance with the

Government Performance and Results Act.

Objective 1. The literacy of participating families will improve.

1.1 Adult literacy achievement. By fall 2001, 40 percent of Even

Start adults will achieve significant learning gains on measures of

math and 30 percent of adults will achieve such gains on measures of

reading skills. In 1995-96, 24% of adults achieved a moderate-to large-

sized gain between pretest and posttest of math achievement, and 20% on

a test of reading achievement.

1.2 Adult educational attainment. By fall 2001, 25 percent of

adult secondary education (ASE) Even Start participants will obtain

their high school diploma or equivalent. In 1995-96, 18% of all ASE/GED

participants earned a GED.

1.3 Children's language development and reading readiness. By fall

2001, 60 percent of Even Start children will attain significant gains

on measures of language development and reading readiness. In 1995-96,

81% of children made better than expected gains on a test of school

readiness, and 50% achieved moderate to large gains on a test of

language development.

1.4 Parenting skills. Increasing percentages of parents will show

significant improvement on measures of parenting skills, home

environment, and expectations for their children. In 1995-96, 41% of

parents scored 75% or higher correct on the posttest measuring the

quality of cognitive stimulation and emotional support provided to

children in the home.

Objective 2. Even Start projects will reach their target population

of families that are most in need of services.

2.1 Recruitment of most in need. The projects will continue to

recruit low-income, disadvantaged families with low literacy levels. In

1996-97, 90% of families had incomes at or substantially below the

federal poverty level and 45% of parents had less than a ninth grade

education at intake.

Objective 3. Local Even Start projects will provide comprehensive

instructional and support services of high quality to all families in a

cost-effective manner.

3.1 Service hours. By fall 2001, half of the projects will offer

at least 60 hours of adult education per month, at least 20 hours of

parenting education per month, and at least 65 hours of early childhood

education per month. In 1995-96, half of the projects offered 32 hours

or more of adult education per month, 13 hours or more of parenting

education per month, and 34 hours or more of early childhood education

per month.

3.2 Participation, retention and continuity. Projects will

increasingly improve retention and continuity of services. By fall

2001, at least 60 percent of all families will stay in the program for

more than one year. Of all families participating in Even Start in

1994-95, 38 percent stayed in the program for more than one year. Of

new families entering in 1995-96, 41 percent stayed for more than one

year.

Objective 4. The Department of Education will provide effective

guidance and technical assistance and will identify and disseminate

reliable information on effective approaches.

4.1 Federal technical assistance. An increasing percentage of

local project directors will be satisfied with technical assistance and

guidance.

BILLING CODE X000-01-P

[[Page 7435]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.000

[[Page 7436]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.001

[[Page 7437]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.002

[[Page 7438]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.003

[[Page 7439]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.004

[[Page 7440]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.005

[[Page 7441]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.006

[[Page 7442]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.007

[[Page 7443]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.008

[[Page 7444]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.009

[[Page 7445]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.010

[[Page 7446]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.011

[[Page 7447]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.012

[[Page 7448]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.013

[[Page 7449]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.014

[[Page 7450]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.015

[[Page 7451]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.016

[[Page 7452]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.017

BILLING CODE 4000-01-C

[[Page 7453]]

OMB Control No. 1801-0004 (Exp. 8/31/2001)

Notice To All Applicants

The purpose of this enclosure is to inform you about a new

provision in the Department of Education's General Education Provisions

Act (GEPA) that applies to applicants for new grant awards under

Department programs. This provision is Section 427 of GEPA, enacted as

part of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-382).

To Whom Does This Provision Apply?

Section 427 of GEPA affects applicants for new grant awards under

this program. ALL APPLICATIONS FOR NEW AWARDS MUST INCLUDE INFORMATION

IN THEIR APPLICATIONS TO ADDRESS THIS NEW PROVISION IN ORDER TO RECEIVE

FUNDING UNDER THIS PROGRAM.

(If this program is a State-formula grant program, a State needs to

provide this description only for projects or activities that it

carries out with funds reserved for State-level uses. In addition,

local school districts or other eligible applicants that apply to the

State for funding need to provide this description in their

applications to the State for funding. The State would be responsible

for ensuring that the school district or other entity has submitted a

sufficient section 427 statement as described below.)

What Does This Provision Require?

Section 427 requires each applicant for funds (other than an

individual person) to include in its application a description of the

steps the applicant proposes to take to ensure equitable access to, and

participation in, its Federally-assisted program for students,

teachers, and other program beneficiaries with special needs.

This provision allows applicants discretion in developing the

required description. The statute highlights six types of barriers that

can impede equitable access or participation: gender, race, national

origin, color, disability, or age. Based on local circumstances, you

should determine whether these or other barriers may prevent your

students, teachers, etc. from such access or participation in, the

Federally-funded project or activity. The description in your

application of steps to be taken to overcome these barriers need not be

lengthy; you may provide a clear and succinct description of how you

plan to address those barriers that are applicable to your

circumstances. In addition, the information may be provided in a single

narrative, or, if appropriate, may be discussed in connection with

related topics in the application.

Section 427 is not intended to duplicate the requirements of civil

rights statues, but rather to ensure that, in designing their projects,

applicants for Federal funds address equity concerns that may affect

the ability of certain potential beneficiaries to fully participate in

the project and to achieve to high standards. Consistent with program

requirements and its approved application, an applicant may use the

Federal funds awarded to it to eliminate barriers it identifies.

What are Examples of How an Applicant Might Satisfy the Requirement of

This Provision?

The following examples may help illustrate how an applicant may

comply with Section 427.

(1) An applicant that proposes to carry out an adult literacy

project serving, among others, adults with limited English proficiency,

might describe in it application how it intends to distribute a

brochure about the proposed project to such potential participants in

their native language.

(2) An applicant that proposes to develop instructional materials

for classroom use might describe how it will make the materials

available on audio tape or in braille for students who are blind.

(3) An applicant that proposes to carry out a model science program

for secondary students and is concerned that girls may be less likely

than boys to enroll in the course, might indicate how it intends to

conduct ``outreach'' efforts to girls, to encourage their enrollment.

We recognize that many applicants may already be implementing

effective steps to ensure equity of access and participation in their

grant programs, and we appreciate your cooperative in responding to the

requirements of this provision.

Estimated Burden Statement for GEPA Requirements

The time required to complete this information collection is

estimated to vary from 1 to 3 hours per response, with an average of

1.5 hours, including the time to review instructions, search existing

data resources, gather and maintain the data needed, and complete and

review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning

the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this

form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC

20202-4651.

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P

[[Page 7454]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12FE99.018

BILLING CODE 4000-01-C

[[Page 7455]]

Executive Order--Intergovernmental Review

The Education Department General Administrative Regulations

(EDGAR), 34 CFR 79, pertaining to intergovernmental review of Federal

programs, apply to the program included in this application package.

Immediately upon receipt of this notice, all applicants, other than

federally recognized Indian Tribal Governments, must contact the

appropriate State Point of Contact to find out about, and to comply

with, the State's process under Executive Order 12372. Applicants

proposing to perform in more than one State should contact, immediately

upon receipt of this notice, the Single Points of Contact for each

State and follow the procedures established in those States under the

Executive Order. A list containing the Single Point of Contact for each

State is included in the application package for this program.

In States that have not established a process or chosen a program

for review, State, area wide, regional, and local entities may submit

comments directly to the Department.

Any State Process Recommendation and other comments by a State

Point of Contact and any comments from State, area wide, regional, and

local entities must be mailed or hand-delivered by the date in the

Program announcement for Intergovernmental Review to the following

address: The Secretary, E.O. 12372-CFDA #84.200, U.S. Department of

Education, FB-10, Room 6213, 600 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington,

DC 20202.

In those States that require review for this program, applications

are to be submitted simultaneously to the State Review Process and the

U.S. Department of Education.

Proof of mailing will be determined on the same basis as

applications.

Please note that the above address is not the same address as the

one to which the applicant submits its completed application.

Do not send applications to the above address.

State Single Points of Contact

Arizona

Ms. Janice Dunn, Arizona State Clearinghouse, 3800 North Central

Avenue, Fourteenth Floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, Telephone: (602)

280-1315

Arkansas

Ms. Tracie L. Copeland, Manager, State Clearinghouse, Office of

Intergovernmental Service, Department of Finance and Administration,

P.O. Box 3278, Little Rock, Arkansas 72203, Telephone: (501) 682-

1074

California

Mr. Glenn Staber, Grants Coordinator, Office of Planning &

Research, 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, California 95814,

Telephone: (916) 323-7480

Colorado

State Single Point of Contact, State Clearinghouse, Division of

Local Government, 1313 Sherman Street, Room 520, Denver, Colorado

80203, Telephone: (303) 866-2156.

Connecticut

Mr. Willliam T. Quigg, Intergovernmental Review Coordinator,

State Single Point of Contact, Office of Policy and Management,

Intergovernmental Policy Division, 80 Washington Street, Hartford,

Connecticut 06106-4459, Telephone: (203) 566-3410

Delaware

Ms. Francine Booth, State Single Point of Contact, Executive

Department, Thomas Collins Building, Dover, Delaware 19903,

Telephone: (302) 739-3326

District of Columbia

Mr. Rodney T. Hallman, State Single Point of Contact, Office of

Grants Management & Development, 717 14th St. N.W., Suite 500,

Washington, DC 20005, Telephone: (202) 727-6551

Florida

Florida State Clearinghouse, Intergovernmental Affairs Policy

Unit, Executive Office of the Governor, Office of Planning &

Budgeting, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001, Telephone:

(904) 488-8114

Georgia

Charles H. Badger, Administrator, Georgia State Clearinghouse,

270 Washington Street, S.W., Room 534A, Atlanta, Georgia 30334,

Telephone: (404) 656-3855

Illinois

Mr. Steve Klokkenga, State Single Point of Contact, Office of

the Governor, State of Illinois, 107 Stratton Building, Springfield,

Illinois 62706, Telephone: (217) 782-1671

Indiana

Ms. Jean S. Blackwell, Budget Director, State Budget Agency, 212

State House, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, Telephone: (317) 232-5610

Iowa

Mr. Steven R. McCann, Division for Community Progress, Iowa

Department of Economic Development, 200 East Grand Avenue, Des

Moines, Iowa 50309, Telephone: (515) 281-3725

Kentucky

Mr. Ronald W. Cook, Office of the Governor, Department of Local

Government, 1024 Capitol Center Drive, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601,

Telephone: (502) 564-2382

Maine

State Single Point of Contact, Attn: Joyce Benson, State

Planning Office, State House Station #38, Augusta, Maine 04333,

Telephone: (207) 289-3261

Maryland

Mary Abrams, Chief, Maryland State Clearinghouse, Department of

State Planning, 301 West Preston Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201,

Telephone: (301) 225-4490

Massachusetts

Ms. Karen Arone, State Clearinghouse, Executive Office of

Communities and Development, 100 Cambridge Street, Room 1803,

Boston, Massachusetts 02202, Telephone: (617) 727-7001

Michigan

Richard S. Pastula, Director, Michigan Department of Commerce,

Office of Federal Grants, P.O. Box 30225, Lansing, Michigan 48909,

Telephone: (517) 373-7356

Mississippi

Ms. Cathy Mallette, Clearinghouse Officer, Office of Federal

Grant, Management and Reporting, Department of Finance and

Administration, 301 West Pearl Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39203,

Telephone: (601) 949-2174

Missouri

Ms. Lois Pohl, Federal Assistance Clearinghouse, Office of

Administration, P.O. Box 809, Room 430, Truman Building, Jefferson

City, Missouri 65102, Telephone: (314) 751-4834

Nevada

Department of Administration, State Clearinghouse, Capitol

Complex, Carson City, Nevada 89710, Attn: Ron Sparks, Clearinghouse

Coordinator, Telephone: (702) 687-4065

New Hampshire

Mr. Jeffrey H. Taylor, Director, New Hampshire Office of State

Planning, Attn: Intergovernmental Review Process/James E. Bieber, 2

\1/2\ Beacon Street, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, Telephone: (603)

271-2155

New Jersey

Gregory W. Adkins, Acting Director, Division of Community

Resources, New Jersey Department of Community Affairs. Please direct

all correspondence and questions about intergovernmental review to:

Andrew Jaskolka, State Review Process, Division of Community

Resources, CN 814, Room 609, Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0814,

Telephone: (609) 292-9025

New Mexico

Mr. George Elliott, Deputy Director, State Budget Division, Rm.

190, Bataan Memorial Building, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503,

Telephone: (505) 827-3640

New York

New York State Clearinghouse, Division of the Budget, State

Capitol, Albany, New York 12224, Telephone: (518) 474-1605

North Carolina

Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director, Office of the Secretary of Admin.,

N.C. State Clearinghouse, 116 West Jones Street, Raleigh, N.

Carolina 27603-8003, Telephone: (919) 733-7232

North Dakota

North Dakota State Single Point of Contact, Office of

Intergovernmental Assistance, Office of Management & Budget, 600

East Boulevard Avenue, Bismarck, N. Dakota 58505-0170, Telephone:

(701) 224-2094

Ohio

Mr. Larry Weaver, State Single Point of Contact, State/Federal

Funds

[[Page 7456]]

Coordinator, State Clearinghouse, Office of Budget & Management, 30

East Broad Street, 34th Floor, Columbus, OH 43266-0411, Telephone:

(614) 466-0698

Rhode Island

Mr. Daniel W. Varin, Associate Director, Statewide Planning

Program, Department of Administration, Division of Planning, 265

Melrose Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02907, Telephone: (401)

277-2656. Please direct correspondence and questions to: Review

Coordinator, Office of Strategic Planning

South Carolina

Ms. Omeagia Burgess, State Single Point of Contact, Grant

Services, Office of the Governor, Room 477, 1205 Pendleton Street,

Columbia, South Carolina 29201, Telephone: (803) 734-0494

South Dakota

Ms. Susan Comer, State Clearinghouse Coordinator, Office of the

Governor, 500 East Capitol, Pierre, South Dakota 57501, Telephone:

(605) 773-3212

Tennessee

Mr. Charles Brown, State Single Point of Contact, State Planning

Office, 500 Charlotte Avenue, 309 John Sevier Building, Nashville,

Tennessee 37219, Telephone: (615) 741-1676

Texas

Mr. Tom Adams, Governor's Office of Budget and Planning, P.O.

Box 12428, Austin, Texas 78711, Telephone: (512) 463-1778

Utah

Utah State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Budget, Attn:

Ms. Carolyn Wright, Room 116, State Capitol, Salt Lake City, Utah

84114, Telephone: (801) 538-1535

Vermont

Mr. Bernard D. Johnson, Assistant Director, Office of Policy

Research and Coordination, Pavilion Office Building, 109 State

Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05602, Telephone: (802) 828-3326

West Virginia

Mr. Fred Cutlip, Director, Community Development Division, West

Virginia Development Office, Building #6, Room 553 Charleston, West

Virginia 2305, Telephone: (304) 348-4010

Wisconsin

Mr. William C. Carey, Section Chief, Federal/State Relations

Office, Wisconsin Department of Administration, 101 South Webster

Street, P.O. Box 7864, Madison, Wisconsin 53707, Telephone: (608)

266-0267

Wyoming

Ms. Sheryl Jeffries, State Single Point of Contact, Herschler

Building, 4th Floor, East Wing, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002, Telephone:

(307)-777-7574

Territories

Guam

Mr. Michael J. Reidy, Director, Bureau of Budget and Management

Research, Office of the Governor, P.O. Box 2950, Agana, Guam 96910,

Telephone: (671) 472-2285

Northern Mariana Islands

State Single Point of Contact, Planning and Budget Office,

Office of the Governor, Saipan, CM, Northern Mariana Islands 96950

Puerto Rico

Norma Burgops/Jose E. Caro, Chairman/Director, Puerto Rico

Planning Board, Minillas Government Center, P.O. Box 41119, San

Juan, Puerto Rico 00940-9985, Telephone: (809) 727-4444

Virgin Islands

Mr. Jose George, Director, Office of Management & Budget, #41

Norregade Emancipation Garden Station, Second Floor, St. Thomas,

Virgin Islands 00802. Please direct correspondence to: Linda Clark

Telephone: (809) 774-0750.

In accordance with Executive Order #12372, ``Intergovernmental

Review Process,'' this listing represents the designated State

Single Points of Contact. Upon request, a background document

explaining the Executive Order is available. The Office of

Management and Budget point of contact for updating this listing is:

Donna Rivelli (202) 395-5090. The States not listed no longer

participate in the process. These include, Alabama; Alaska; Kansas;

Hawaii; Idaho; Louisiana; Minnesota; Montana; Nebraska; Oklahoma;

Oregon; Pennsylvania; Virginia; and Washington. This list is based

on the most current information provided by the States. Information

on any changes or apparent errors should be provided to the Office

of Management and Budget and the State in question. Changes to the

list will be made only upon formal notification by the State.

[FR Doc. 99-3341 Filed 2-11-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.