Approval of Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator State Plan For Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Indiana
Federal RegisterDec 17, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[IN 109-1a; FRL-6507-5]
Approval of Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator State
Plan For Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Indiana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving Indiana's State Plan for Hospital/Medical/
Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI), submitted on September 30, 1999.
The State Plan adopts and implements the Emissions Guidelines (EG)
applicable to existing HMIWIs. This approval means that EPA finds the
State Plan meets Clean Air Act (Act) requirements. Once effective, this
approval makes the State Plan federally enforceable.
DATES: This rule is effective on February 15, 2000, unless EPA receives
adverse written comments by January 18, 2000. If adverse written
comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule
in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not
take effect.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
You can inspect copies of the State Plan submittal at the following
address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
(We recommend you contact Ryan Bahr, Environmental Engineer, at (312)
353-4366 before visiting the Region 5 Office).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Bahr, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353-4366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'',
``us'', or ``our'', are used we mean EPA. The supplemental information
is organized in the following order:
I. What is EPA approving in this action?
II. The HMIWI State Plan Requirement.
What is an HMIWI State Plan?
Why are we requiring Indiana to submit an HMIWI State Plan?
Why do we need to regulate HMIWI emissions?
What criteria must an HMIWI State Plan meet to be approved?
III. The Indiana HMIWI State Plan.
Where are the Indiana HMIWI requirements codified?
Who is affected by the State Plan?
Who is exempt from the State Plan?
What does the State Plan require?
When must the State Plan requirements be met if you plan to
continue operation of your HMIWI?
What must you do to obtain an extended compliance schedule if
you plan to install control equipment or make process changes and
continue operation?
What must you do if you intend to permanently shut down?
What are the permit application deadlines?
What else does the State Plan include?
What public review opportunities were provided?
IV. Review and Approval of the Indiana HMIWI State Plan.
Why is the Indiana HMIWI State Plan approvable?
V. EPA Rulemaking Action.
VI. Administrative Requirements.
A. Executive Order 12866
B. Executive Orders 13132
C. Executive Order 13045
D. Executive Order 13084
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
F. Unfunded Mandates
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
H. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
I. Petitions for Judicial Review
[[Page 70596]]
I. What is EPA approving in this action?
We are approving the September 30, 1999, Indiana State Plan
submission which implements the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129
of the Act for existing HMIWIs. This approval, once effective, will
make the Indiana HMIWI rules included in the plan federally
enforceable.
II. The HMIWI State Plan Requirement.
What Is an HMIWI State Plan?
An HMIWI State Plan is a plan to control air pollutant emissions
from existing incinerators which burn hospital waste or medical/
infectious waste. The plan also includes source and emission
inventories of these incinerators in the State.
Why Are We Requiring Indiana to Submit an HMIWI State Plan?
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act require States to submit State
Plans to control emissions from existing HMIWIs in the State. The State
Plan requirement was triggered when we published the Emissions
Guidelines (EG) for HMIWIs on September 15, 1997 (see 62 FR 48348). The
EG is codified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce.
Section 129, we are requires us to promulgate EGs for several types
of existing solid waste incinerators. These EGs establish the Maximum
Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards that States must adopt
to comply with the Act. The HMIWI EG also establishes requirements for
monitoring, operator training, permits, and a waste management plan
that must be included in State Plans.
The intent of the State Plan requirement is to reduce several types
of air pollutants associated with waste incineration.
Why Do We Need to Regulate HMIWI Emissions?
The State Plan establishes control requirements which reduce the
following emissions from HMIWIs: particulate matter, sulfur dioxide,
hydrogen chloride, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium,
mercury, dioxin, and dibenzofurans.
These pollutants can cause adverse effects to the public health and
the environment. Dioxin, lead, and mercury bioaccumulate through the
food web. Serious developmental and adult effects in humans, primarily
damage to the nervous system, have been associated with exposures to
mercury. Exposure to dioxin and furans can cause skin disorders,
cancer, and reproductive effects such as endometriosis. Dioxin and
furans can also affect the immune system. Acid gases affect the
respiratory tract, as well as contribute to the acid rain that damages
lakes and harms forests and buildings. Exposure to particulate matter
has been linked with adverse health effects, including aggravation of
existing respiratory and cardiovascular disease and increased risk of
premature death. Nitrogen oxide emissions contribute to the formation
of ground level ozone, which is associated with a number of adverse
health and environmental effects.
What Criteria Must an HMIWI State Plan Meet To be Approved?
The following Table summarizes the criteria for approving an HMIWI
State Plan:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirement Elements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections 111(d) and 129: State Plan must --Applicability.
be at least as protective as the EG. --Emission Limits.
--Compliance Schedules.
--Performance Testing.
--Monitoring/Inspection.
--Operator Training/
Certification.
--Waste Management Plan.
--Recordkeeping/Reporting.
40 CFR part 60, subpart B: Criteria for an --Demonstration of Legal
approvable section 111(d) plan. Authority
--Enforceable Mechanism.
--Evidence of public
hearing.
--Source and Emission
Inventories.
--State Progress Report
Commitment.
Section 129(e): Title V permit requirement State Plans must ensure that
affected HMIWI facilities
submit Title V permit
applications to the State
by September 15, 2000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We issued a guidance document describing in more detail the
requirements for an approvable HMIWI State Plan, entitled ``Hospital/
Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator Emission Guidelines: Summary of
the Requirements for Section 111(d)/129 State Plans,'' published
November 1997. Indiana used this document to develop its State Plan.
III. The Indiana HMIWI State Plan
Where Are the Indiana HMIWI Requirements Codified?
Indiana's State Plan requirements for HMIWIs are codified at 326
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 11-6. Indiana adopted the rule on
September 2, 1998. Indiana published the rule in the Indiana Register
on March 1, 1999, and it became effective on March 11, 1999.
Who Is Affected By the State Plan?
Consistent with the EG, Indiana's HMIWI rules cover existing
HMIWIs, with the exception of certain exempt HMIWIs, which only need to
meet certain recordkeeping and certification requirements. The table
below summarizes the Indiana HMIWI applicability criteria and
associated requirements:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HMIWI for which construction commenced on Subject to control
or before June 20, 1996. requirements specified in
the EG.
Co-fired combustor........................ Not subject to control
requirements specified in
the EG but:
Must have an enforceable
requirement (e.g. a permit
condition) limiting
operation to co-fired
combustor status; and,
Must keep records on weight
of wastes and fuels burned
on a calendar quarter
basis.
HMIWIs which combust only these wastes: Not subject to control
requirements specified in
the EG but:
--pathological........................ Must keep records on a
calendar quarter basis
demonstrating that only
exempt wastes are burned;
and,
--low-level radioactive...............
--chemotherapeutic.................... Must provide State and EPA
certification that the
HMIWI burns only these
wastes.
Hospitals that send waste to an off-site Not subject to control
HMIWI. requirements specified in
the EG.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For an HMIWI to be considered a ``co-fired combustor,'' it must be
subject to an enforceable condition limiting combustion of hospital or
medical infectious waste to 10% or less of total waste burned, by
weight, on a calendar quarter basis. For purposes of the co-fired
combustor exemption, pathological waste, chemotherapeutic waste, and
low-level radioactive wastes are considered ``other'' wastes when
calculating the percentage of hospital waste and medical/infectious
waste combusted.
HMIWIs which combust pathological wastes, low-level radioactive
waste, or
[[Page 70597]]
chemotherapeutic wastes part of the time can be exempt from control
requirements during those periods if they notify Indiana pursuant to
this operating scenario.
Who is exempt from the State Plan?
Incinerators that would otherwise meet the HMIWI definition are
completely exempt from the rule if they meet any of the following
criteria:
You are exempt if:
You are a combustor required to have a permit under Section 3005 of
the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6925;
You are a municipal waste combustor subject to 40 CFR part 60,
subparts Cb, Ea or Eb;
You are a pyrolysis unit (i.e., a unit that uses endothermic
gasification to treat hospital waste or medical/infectious waste in
order to render such waste harmless);
You are a cement kiln firing hospital waste or medical/infectious
waste; or,
You are an HMIWI subject to the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for HMIWIs, 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ec.
What does the State Plan require?
If you are an HMIWI subject to control requirements under the
Indiana HMIWI rule, you must comply with the requirements summarized
below:
-----------Summary of the Indiana HMIWI Control Requirements -----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emission Limitations...................... --dioxins/furans.
Separate limits are established for three --hydrogen chloride.
categories of HMIWIs: --sulfur dioxide.
--small --oxides of nitrogen.
--medium --lead.
--large --cadmium.
--mercury.
--particulate matter.
--opacity.
--carbon monoxide.
Compliance provisions..................... --performance testing.
--operating parameter
monitoring.
--operating parameter
compliance.
--recordkeeping and
reporting.
Operator provisions....................... --Training.
--Certification.
--On-site Operator Manual.
Permit.................................... --Must apply for a Part 70
permit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waste Management Plan Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facilities Incinerating Hospital, Medical Prepare a plan that
or Infectious Waste. identifies ways to reduce
the amount and toxicity of
incinerated waste, and
provides an implementation
schedule where feasible.
Submit the plan at the same
time the initial
performance test results
are reported.
Submit annual waste
management progress
reports.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like to know the emission limit applicable to small,
medium and large HMIWIs, please reference 326 IAC 11-6-4.
The Indiana rule also prescribes various criteria and
considerations in developing the plan, and specifies the components
which the plan must include.
When must the State Plan requirements be met if you plan to continue
operation of your HMIWI?
Under the Indiana HMIWI rule, a subject HMIWI must be in compliance
with the rule requirements by March 11, 2000, unless the source meets
the requirements for an extended compliance schedule. HMIWIs who plan
to install air pollution control equipment and who comply with the
requirements to obtain an extended schedule must comply by March 31,
2002.
However, even if a source has an extended schedule, the Indiana
rule requires compliance with the rule's operator training and
certification provisions by March 11, 2000.
What must you do to obtain an extended compliance schedule if you plan
to install control equipment or make process changes and continue
operation?
HMIWIs seeking an extended compliance schedule must have submitted
a control plan on or before June 30, 1999, which contained a plan for
the HMIWI to meet the rule's increments of progress. Indiana's rule
requires compliance with the following measurable and enforceable
increments of progress:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increments of progress Due date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit a final control plan to the Indiana June 30, 1999.
Department of Environmental Management.
Award contracts for emission control March 31, 2000.
systems or for process modifications, or
issuance of orders for the purchase of
component parts to accomplish emission
control or process modifications.
Initiate on-site construction or March 31, 2001.
installation of emission control
equipment or process change.
Complete on-site construction or September 30, 2001.
installation of emission control
equipment or process change.
Be in final compliance.................... March 31, 2002.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
What must you do if you intend to permanently shut down?
For all HMIWIs that intend to permanently shut down, the source
must shut down by March 11, 2000, unless the source is installing
alternative control technology and the State approves its petition for
an extension. If a source petitions the State for an extension, the
source must submit its petition by November 11, 1999. The petition must
include an analysis that:
(1) Demonstrates that additional time is needed,
(2) considers the option of transporting the waste off-site, and
(3) includes a detailed compliance plan with measurable and
enforceable increments of progress that assure final compliance by
March 31, 2002.
What are the permit application deadlines?
The Indiana HMIWI rule requires all HMIWIs subject to the rule's
emission limits to submit a part 70 permit application by March 11,
2000. Each source's application needs to address the provisions of 326
IAC 11-6. This means that all HMIWI that have not previously applied
for a part 70 permit must submit their application by March 11, 2000.
For those HMIWI whose original application did not address the
provisions of 326 IAC 11-6, they must now update their application by
March 11, 2000, to include Indiana's rule 326 IAC 11-6.
What else does the State Plan include?
The State Plan includes: a demonstration of legal authority to
implement the EG, documentation of public hearing, comments and
responses, a source and emissions inventory, and a provision for State
progress reports to EPA. These materials were submitted to satisfy the
section
[[Page 70598]]
111(d) requirements under 40 CFR part 60, subpart B.
What public review opportunities were provided?
The Indiana Department of Environmental Management held public
hearings on the HMIWI rule on May 6, 1998, and September 2, 1998. IDEM
did not receive any comments on the rule. IDEM published public notices
on June 30, 1999, in newspapers throughout the state opening a comment
period on the State Plan and providing the opportunity for a public
hearing. IDEM did not receive a request for a hearing nor any comments
on the plan materials.
IV. Review and Approval of the Indiana HMIWI State Plan.
Why is the Indiana HMIWI State Plan approvable?
We compared the Indiana HMIWI rule 326 IAC 11-6 to our HMIWI EG. We
find the Indiana rule to be at least as stringent as the EG. Also, the
Indiana State Plan satisfies the requirements for an approvable section
111(d) plan under subparts B and Ce of 40 CFR part 60. For these
reasons, we are approving the Indiana HMIWI State Plan.
V. EPA Rulemaking Action.
We are approving, through direct final rulemaking action, Indiana's
sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan for HMIWIs. The EPA is publishing
this action without prior proposal because EPA views this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. However,
in a separate document in this Federal Register publication, the EPA is
proposing to approve the state plan revision should adverse written
comments be filed. This action will be effective February 15, 2000
without further notice unless EPA receives relevant adverse written
comment by January 18, 2000. Should the Agency receive such comments,
it will publish a final rule informing the public that this action will
not take effect. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this action will be effective on February 15, 2000.
VI. Administrative Requirements.
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, entitled
``Regulatory Planning and Review.''
B. Executive Order 13132
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) revokes and replaces E.O.
12612 (Federalism) and E.O. 12875 (Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership). E.O. 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism implications'' is
defined in the E.O. to include regulations that have ``substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' Under E.O.
13132, EPA may not issue a regulation that has federalism implications,
that imposes substantial direct compliance costs, and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by State and
local governments, or EPA consults with State and local officials early
in the process of developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not
issue a regulation that has federalism implications and that preempts
State law unless the Agency consults with State and local officials
early in the process of developing the proposed regulation.
This final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in E.O. 13132. Thus, the
requirements of section 6 of the E.O. do not apply to this rule.
C. Executive Order 13045
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O.
12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA
has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children.
If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate
the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on
children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered
by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not involve
decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or safety risks.
D. Executive Order 13084
Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is unfunded,
EPA must provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the
regulation.
In addition, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to develop an effective
process permitting elected and other representatives of Indian tribal
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development
of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or uniquely affect
their communities.'' Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely
affect the communities of Indian tribal governments. Accordingly, the
requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
This final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because approvals under section 111(d) of the
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve
requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the
Federal approval does not create any new requirements, I certify that
this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under
the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal
[[Page 70599]]
inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air
Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning state plans on such
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
F. Unfunded Mandates
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate;
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
H. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing
technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with
NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards''
(VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies
unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's
action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to
the use of VCS.
I. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 15, 2000. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Hospital/medical/
infectious waste incinerators, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 30, 1999.
Francis X. Lyons,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 62 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7642.
Subpart P--Indiana
2. A new center heading and sections 62.3640, 62.3641, and 62.3642
are added to subpart P to read as follows:
Metals, Acid Gases, Organic Compounds and Nitrogen Oxide Emissions
From Existing Hospital/Medical Infectious Waste Incinerators
Sec. 62.3640 Identification of plan.
Indiana submitted, September 30, 1999, a State Plan for
implementing the Emission Guidelines affecting Hospital/Medical
Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI). The enforceable mechanism for
this plan is 326 Indiana Administrative Code 11-6. The rule was adopted
by the Indiana Pollution Control Board on September 2, 1998. The rule
was published in the Indiana Register on March 1, 1999, and became
effective on March 11, 1999.
Sec. 62.3641 Identification of sources.
The Indiana State Plan for existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious
Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) applies to all HMIWIs for which construction
commenced either on or before June 20, 1996.
Sec. 62.3642 Effective Date.
The Federal effective date of the Indiana State Plan for existing
Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators is February 15, 2000.
[FR Doc. 99-32176 Filed 12-16-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.