Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Federal RegisterFeb 11, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 164-0112b; FRL-6227-3]

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans;

California State Implementation Plan Revision, San Joaquin Valley

Unified Air Pollution Control District, Sacramento Metropolitan Air

Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) which concern the control of oxides of

nitrogen (NOX) emissions from solid fuel fired boilers,

steam generators and process heaters within the San Joaquin Valley

Unified Air Pollution Control District and from stationary gas turbine

operations within the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management

District.

The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to

regulate emissions of NOX in accordance with the

requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, the EPA is

approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior

proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision

amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for

this approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse

comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is

contemplated in relation to this rule. If EPA receives adverse

comments, the direct final rule will not take effect and all public

comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on

this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on

this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action

should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received by March 15, 1999.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: Andrew Steckel,

Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report of each

rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office

during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules are also

available for inspection at the following locations:

California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1999

Tuolumne Street, Suite 200, Fresno, CA 93721.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, 8411 Jackson

Road, Sacramento, CA 95826

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office

(AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,

75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, Telephone: (415)

744-1185.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document concerns San Joaquin Valley

Unified Air Pollution Control District's (SJVUAPCD) Rule 4352, Solid

Fuel Fired Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters, and

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District's (SMAQMD) Rule

413, Stationary Gas Turbines. The SJVUAPCD rule was submitted by the

California Air Resources Board (CARB) to EPA on March 26, 1996 and the

SMAQMD rule was submitted on May 18, 1998. For further information,

please see the information provided in the direct final action which is

located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Dated: January 14, 1999.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator, Region 9.

[FR Doc. 99-3144 Filed 2-10-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.