Deductions for Transfers for Public, Charitable, and Religious Uses; In General Marital Deduction; Valuation of Interest Passing to Surviving Spouse

Federal RegisterDec 3, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 20

[TD 8846]

RIN 1545-AV45

Deductions for Transfers for Public, Charitable, and Religious

Uses; In General Marital Deduction; Valuation of Interest Passing to

Surviving Spouse

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the

effect of certain administration expenses on the valuation of property

that qualifies for either the estate tax marital deduction under

section 2056 of the Internal Revenue Code or the estate tax charitable

deduction under section 2055. The regulations distinguish between

estate transmission expenses, which reduce the value of property for

marital and charitable deduction purposes, and estate management

expenses, which generally do not reduce the value of property for these

purposes.

EFFECTIVE DATES: These regulations are effective on December 3, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Ryan, (202) 622-3090 (not a

toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On December 16, 1998, the Treasury Department and the IRS published

in the Federal Register (63 FR 69248) a notice of proposed rulemaking

(REG-114663-97) relating to the effect of certain administration

expenses on the valuation of property which qualifies for the estate

tax marital or charitable deduction. The proposed regulations were

issued in response to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United

States in Commissioner v. Estate of Hubert, 520 U.S. 93 (1997) (1997-2

C.B. 231). Written comments responding to the notice of proposed

rulemaking were received, and a public hearing was held on April 21,

1999, at which time oral testimony was presented. This Treasury

decision adopts final regulations with respect to the notice of

proposed rulemaking. A summary of the principal comments received and

revisions made in response to those comments is provided below.

The proposed regulations set forth the substantive provisions as

applied to the estate tax marital deduction in Sec. 20.2056(b)-4(a).

For the estate tax charitable deduction, the proposed regulations

(under Sec. 20.2055-1(d)(6)) merely cross-reference the rules for the

marital deduction.

Several commentators suggested that the regulations under section

2055 should contain specific rules relating to the charitable

deduction, rather than just a cross-reference. The Treasury and the IRS

agree with this suggestion. The final regulations contain rules under

Sec. 20.2055-3 specifically addressing the effect of administration

expenses on the valuation of property when all or a portion of the

interests in property qualify for the estate tax charitable deduction.

Several commentators stated that the distinction between estate

transmission expenses and estate management expenses was not clearly

made in the proposed regulations and requested more concrete

definitions of each type of expense. In response to these comments, the

final regulations characterize estate transmission expenses as those

expenses that would not have been incurred except for the decedent's

death. Although the amount of these expenses cannot be calculated with

any degree of certainty on the date of the decedent's death, they are

expenses that are incurred because of the decedent's death. Estate

management expenses, on the other hand, are characterized in the final

regulations as expenses that would be incurred with respect to the

property even if the decedent had not died; that is, expenses incurred

in investing, maintaining, and preserving the property. These are

expenses that typically would have been incurred with respect to the

property by the decedent before death or by the beneficiaries had they

received the property on the date of death without any intervening

period of administration. In order to be certain that all expenses are

classified as either transmission expenses or management expenses,

transmission expenses are defined to include all expenses that are not

management expenses.

Three commentators stated that the different treatment accorded to

estate transmission expenses and estate management expenses under the

proposed regulations creates a new federal standard for allocating

expenses that may be contrary to the manner in which the expenses must

be charged under state law. However, the Treasury and the IRS believe

that the allocation of administration expenses based on the distinction

between transmission and management expenses provides the most accurate

measure of the value of the property which passes to the surviving

spouse or to the charity at the moment of the decedent's death for

federal estate tax marital and charitable deduction purposes.

Transmission expenses that are charged to the property passing to the

surviving spouse or to the charity reduce the amount of that property

as of the date of the decedent's death because the expenses, as well as

the transfer to the surviving spouse or to charity, are a consequence

of, and arise as a result of, the decedent's death. In contrast,

management expenses do not generally

[[Page 67764]]

reduce the amount of the property passing from the decedent as of the

date of the decedent's death because these expenses are incurred in

producing income and preserving and maintaining the property between

the date of the decedent's death and the date of distribution. These

expenses are the ongoing, year-to-year expenses incurred in the

investment, preservation, and maintenance of property by property

owners.

In response to other comments, the final regulations illustrate the

application of these rules to pecuniary bequests to the surviving

spouse. If, under the terms of the governing instrument or applicable

local law, the recipient of a pecuniary bequest is not entitled to

income earned until distribution, the income is not included in the

definition of the marital or charitable share. Thus, the amount of the

property passing to the surviving spouse or charity for which a marital

or charitable deduction is allowable will not be reduced even if estate

transmission or estate management expenses are paid out of the income

earned by assets that will be used to satisfy the pecuniary bequest.

Two commentators requested guidance in applying the regulations to

estates that are intended to be nontaxable. Accordingly, the final

regulations add two examples, one involving a formula designed to

produce zero estate taxes and the other involving a pecuniary bequest

designed to utilize the applicable exclusion amount under section 2010.

Many of the comments concerned the special rule of Sec. 20.2056(b)-

4(e)(2)(ii) of the proposed regulations. Under the special rule, the

value of the deductible property interest is not increased as a result

of the decrease in the federal estate tax liability that is

attributable to the deduction of estate management expenses as expenses

of administration under section 2053 on the federal estate tax return.

A similar rule would have applied for purposes of the estate tax

charitable deduction.

Several of these commentators argued that the special rule is

inconsistent with sections 2056(a) and 2055(c), because the value of

the property passing to the surviving spouse or charity should be

reduced only by the estate taxes actually paid. Thus, an estate should

be permitted the full benefit of deducting management expenses on the

federal estate tax return, including an increase to the marital or

charitable deduction based on the resultant decrease in tax payable

from the marital or charitable share.

Conversely, other commentators asserted that the special rule does

not conform with section 2056(b)(9). Section 2056(b)(9) provides that

nothing in section 2056 or any other estate tax provision shall allow

the value of any interest in property to be deducted for federal estate

tax purposes more than once with respect to the same decedent. These

commentators pointed out that if estate management expenses paid from

the marital or charitable share are deducted on the federal estate tax

return, and no reduction is made to the allowable amount of the marital

or charitable deduction, then the same property interest is deducted

twice in violation of section 2056(b)(9).

After considering these comments, the Treasury and the IRS have

eliminated the special rule of the proposed regulations. The final

regulations provide that estate management expenses attributable to,

and payable from, the property interest passing to the surviving spouse

or charity do not reduce the value of the property interest. However,

pursuant to section 2056(b)(9), the allowable amount of the marital or

charitable deduction is reduced by the amount of these management

expenses if they are deducted on the Federal estate tax return.

The Treasury and the IRS believe that the principles which apply

for determining the value of the marital and charitable deductions

should also apply for determining the value of property that passes

from one decedent to another when calculating the amount of the credit

for tax on prior transfers under section 2013. Therefore, the final

regulations amend Sec. 20.2013-4(b) by adding a cross reference to

Sec. 20.2056(b)-4(d).

Effective Dates

The regulations under sections 2055 and 2056 are applicable to

estates of decedents dying on or after December 3, 1999. The

regulations under section 2013 are applicable to transfers from estates

of decedents dying on or after December 3, 1999.

Effect on Other Documents

The following publications are obsolete as of December 3, 1999.

Rev. Rul. 66-233 (1996-2 C.B. 428)

Rev. Rul. 73-98 (1973-1 C.B. 407)

Rev. Rul. 80-159 (1980-1 C.B. 206)

Rev. Rul. 93-48 (1993-2 C.B. 270)

Special Analyses

This rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined in

Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not

required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to

these regulations, and, because the regulations do not impose a

collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility

Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of

the Internal Revenue Code, these regulations were submitted to the

Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for

comment on their impact on small business.

Drafting information. The principal author of these regulations is

Deborah Ryan, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and

Special Industries). However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury

Department participated in their development.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 20

Estate taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Amendments to the Regulations

Accordingly, 26 CFR part 20 is amended as follows:

PART 20--ESTATE TAX; ESTATES OF DECEDENTS DYING AFTER AUGUST 16,

1954

Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 20 continues to read

in part as follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

Par. 2. Section 20.2013-4 is amended by:

1. Removing ``and'' at the end of paragraph (b)(2).

2. Redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (b)(4).

3. Adding a new paragraph (b)(3).

The addition reads as follows:

Sec. 20.2013-4 Valuation of property transferred.

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(3)(i) By the amount of administration expenses in accordance with

the principles of Sec. 20.2056(b)-4(d).

(ii) This paragraph (b)(3) applies to transfers from estates of

decedents dying on or after December 3, 1999; and

* * * * *

Par. 3. Section 20.2055-3 is amended by:

1. Revising the section heading.

2. Adding a paragraph heading for paragraph (a).

3. Redesignating the text of paragraph (a) following the heading

and paragraphs (b) and (c) as paragraph (a)(1) and paragraphs (a)(2)

and (a)(3), respectively.

4. Adding a new paragraph (b).

[[Page 67765]]

The revision and additions read as follows:

Sec. 20.2055-3 Effect of death taxes and administration expenses.

(a) Death taxes. * * *

(b) Administration expenses--(1) Definitions--(i) Management

expenses. Estate management expenses are expenses that are incurred in

connection with the investment of estate assets or with their

preservation or maintenance during a reasonable period of

administration. Examples of these expenses could include investment

advisory fees, stock brokerage commissions, custodial fees, and

interest.

(ii) Transmission expenses. Estate transmission expenses are

expenses that would not have been incurred but for the decedent's death

and the consequent necessity of collecting the decedent's assets,

paying the decedent's debts and death taxes, and distributing the

decedent's property to those who are entitled to receive it. Estate

transmission expenses include any administration expense that is not a

management expense. Examples of these expenses could include executor

commissions and attorney fees (except to the extent of commissions or

fees specifically related to investment, preservation, and maintenance

of the assets), probate fees, expenses incurred in construction

proceedings and defending against will contests, and appraisal fees.

(iii) Charitable share. The charitable share is the property or

interest in property that passed from the decedent for which a

deduction is allowable under section 2055(a) with respect to all or

part of the property interest. The charitable share includes, for

example, bequests to charitable organizations and bequests to a

charitable lead unitrust or annuity trust, a charitable remainder

unitrust or annuity trust, and a pooled income fund, described in

section 2055(e)(2). The charitable share also includes the income

produced by the property or interest in property during the period of

administration if the income, under the terms of the governing

instrument or applicable local law, is payable to the charitable

organization or is to be added to the principal of the property

interest passing in whole or in part to the charitable organization.

(2) Effect of transmission expenses. For purposes of determining

the charitable deduction, the value of the charitable share shall be

reduced by the amount of the estate transmission expenses paid from the

charitable share.

(3) Effect of management expenses attributable to the charitable

share. For purposes of determining the charitable deduction, the value

of the charitable share shall not be reduced by the amount of the

estate management expenses attributable to and paid from the charitable

share. Pursuant to section 2056(b)(9), however, the amount of the

allowable charitable deduction shall be reduced by the amount of any

such management expenses that are deducted under section 2053 on the

decedent's federal estate tax return.

(4) Effect of management expenses not attributable to the

charitable share. For purposes of determining the charitable deduction,

the value of the charitable share shall be reduced by the amount of the

estate management expenses paid from the charitable share but

attributable to a property interest not included in the charitable

share.

(5) Example. The following example illustrates the application of

this paragraph (b):

Example. The decedent, who dies in 2000, leaves his residuary

estate, after the payment of debts, expenses, and estate taxes, to a

charitable remainder unitrust that satisfies the requirements of

section 664(d). During the period of administration, the estate

incurs estate transmission expenses of $400,000. The residue of the

estate (the charitable share) must be reduced by the $400,000 of

transmission expenses and by the Federal and State estate taxes

before the present value of the remainder interest passing to

charity can be determined in accordance with the provisions of

Sec. 1.664-4 of this chapter. Because the estate taxes are payable

out of the residue, the computation of the estate taxes and the

allowable charitable deduction are interrelated. See paragraph

(a)(2) of this section.

(6) Cross reference. See Sec. 20.2056(b)-4(d) for additional

examples applicable to the treatment of administration expenses under

this paragraph (b).

(7) Effective date. The provisions of this paragraph (b) apply to

estates of decedents dying on or after December 3, 1999.

Par. 4. Section 20.2056(b)-4 is amended by:

1. Removing the last two sentences of paragraph (a).

2. Redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (e).

3. Adding a new paragraph (d).

The addition reads as follows:

Sec. 20.2056(b)-4 Marital deduction; valuation of interest passing to

surviving spouse.

* * * * *

(d) Effect of administration expenses--(1) Definitions--(i)

Management expenses. Estate management expenses are expenses that are

incurred in connection with the investment of estate assets or with

their preservation or maintenance during a reasonable period of

administration. Examples of these expenses could include investment

advisory fees, stock brokerage commissions, custodial fees, and

interest.

(ii) Transmission expenses. Estate transmission expenses are

expenses that would not have been incurred but for the decedent's death

and the consequent necessity of collecting the decedent's assets,

paying the decedent's debts and death taxes, and distributing the

decedent's property to those who are entitled to receive it. Estate

transmission expenses include any administration expense that is not a

management expense. Examples of these expenses could include executor

commissions and attorney fees (except to the extent of commissions or

fees specifically related to investment, preservation, and maintenance

of the assets), probate fees, expenses incurred in construction

proceedings and defending against will contests, and appraisal fees.

(iii) Marital share. The marital share is the property or interest

in property that passed from the decedent for which a deduction is

allowable under section 2056(a). The marital share includes the income

produced by the property or interest in property during the period of

administration if the income, under the terms of the governing

instrument or applicable local law, is payable to the surviving spouse

or is to be added to the principal of the property interest passing to,

or for the benefit of, the surviving spouse.

(2) Effect of transmission expenses. For purposes of determining

the marital deduction, the value of the marital share shall be reduced

by the amount of the estate transmission expenses paid from the marital

share.

(3) Effect of management expenses attributable to the marital

share. For purposes of determining the marital deduction, the value of

the marital share shall not be reduced by the amount of the estate

management expenses attributable to and paid from the marital share.

Pursuant to section 2056(b)(9), however, the amount of the allowable

marital deduction shall be reduced by the amount of any such management

expenses that are deducted under section 2053 on the decedent's Federal

estate tax return.

(4) Effect of management expenses not attributable to the marital

share. For purposes of determining the marital deduction, the value of

the marital share shall be reduced by the amount of the estate

management expenses paid from the marital share but attributable to a

property interest not included in the marital share.

[[Page 67766]]

(5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of

this paragraph (d):

Example 1. The decedent dies after 2006 having made no lifetime

gifts. The decedent makes a bequest of shares of ABC Corporation

stock to the decedent's child. The bequest provides that the child

is to receive the income from the shares from the date of the

decedent's death. The value of the bequeathed shares on the

decedent's date of death is $3,000,000. The residue of the estate is

bequeathed to a trust for which the executor properly makes an

election under section 2056(b)(7) to treat as qualified terminable

interest property. The value of the residue on the decedent's date

of death, before the payment of administration expenses and Federal

and State estate taxes, is $6,000,000. Under applicable local law,

the executor has the discretion to pay administration expenses from

the income or principal of the residuary estate. All estate taxes

are to be paid from the residue. The State estate tax equals the

State death tax credit available under section 2011.

During the period of administration, the estate incurs estate

transmission expenses of $400,000, which the executor charges to the

residue. For purposes of determining the marital deduction, the

value of the residue is reduced by the Federal and State estate

taxes and by the estate transmission expenses. If the transmission

expenses are deducted on the Federal estate tax return, the marital

deduction is $3,500,000 ($6,000,000 minus $400,000 transmission

expenses and minus $2,100,000 Federal and State estate taxes). If

the transmission expenses are deducted on the estate's Federal

income tax return rather than on the estate tax return, the marital

deduction is $3,011,111 ($6,000,000 minus $400,000 transmission

expenses and minus $2,588,889 Federal and State estate taxes).

Example 2. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that,

instead of incurring estate transmission expenses, the estate incurs

estate management expenses of $400,000 in connection with the

residue property passing for the benefit of the spouse. The executor

charges these management expenses to the residue. In determining the

value of the residue passing to the spouse for marital deduction

purposes, a reduction is made for Federal and State estate taxes

payable from the residue but no reduction is made for the estate

management expenses. If the management expenses are deducted on the

estate's income tax return, the net value of the property passing to

the spouse is $3,900,000 ($6,000,000 minus $2,100,000 Federal and

State estate taxes). A marital deduction is claimed for that amount,

and the taxable estate is $5,100,000.

Example 3. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that

the estate management expenses of $400,000 are incurred in

connection with the bequest of ABC Corporation stock to the

decedent's child. The executor charges these management expenses to

the residue. For purposes of determining the marital deduction, the

value of the residue is reduced by the Federal and State estate

taxes and by the management expenses. The management expenses reduce

the value of the residue because they are charged to the property

passing to the spouse even though they were incurred with respect to

stock passing to the child. If the management expenses are deducted

on the estate's Federal income tax return, the marital deduction is

$3,011,111 ($6,000,000 minus $400,000 management expenses and minus

$2,588,889 Federal and State estate taxes). If the management

expenses are deducted on the estate's Federal estate tax return,

rather than on the estate's Federal income tax return, the marital

deduction is $3,500,000 ($6,000,000 minus $400,000 management

expenses and minus $2,100,000 in Federal and State estate taxes).

Example 4. The decedent, who dies in 2000, has a gross estate of

$3,000,000. Included in the gross estate are proceeds of $150,000

from a policy insuring the decedent's life and payable to the

decedent's child as beneficiary. The applicable credit amount

against the tax was fully consumed by the decedent's lifetime gifts.

Applicable State law requires the child to pay any estate taxes

attributable to the life insurance policy. Pursuant to the

decedent's will, the rest of the decedent's estate passes outright

to the surviving spouse. During the period of administration, the

estate incurs estate management expenses of $150,000 in connection

with the property passing to the spouse. The value of the property

passing to the spouse is $2,850,000 ($3,000,000 less the insurance

proceeds of $150,000 passing to the child). For purposes of

determining the marital deduction, if the management expenses are

deducted on the estate's income tax return, the marital deduction is

$2,850,000 ($3,000,000 less $150,000) and there is a resulting

taxable estate of $150,000 ($3,000,000 less a marital deduction of

$2,850,000). Suppose, instead, the management expenses of $150,000

are deducted on the estate's estate tax return under section 2053 as

expenses of administration. In such a situation, claiming a marital

deduction of $2,850,000 would be taking a deduction for the same

$150,000 in property under both sections 2053 and 2056 and would

shield from estate taxes the $150,000 in insurance proceeds passing

to the decedent's child. Therefore, in accordance with section

2056(b)(9), the marital deduction is limited to $2,700,000, and the

resulting taxable estate is $150,000.

Example 5. The decedent dies after 2006 having made no lifetime

gifts. The value of the decedent's residuary estate on the

decedent's date of death is $3,000,000, before the payment of

administration expenses and Federal and State estate taxes. The

decedent's will provides a formula for dividing the decedent's

residuary estate between two trusts to reduce the estate's Federal

estate taxes to zero. Under the formula, one trust, for the benefit

of the decedent's child, is to be funded with that amount of

property equal in value to so much of the applicable exclusion

amount under section 2010 that would reduce the estate's Federal

estate tax to zero. The other trust, for the benefit of the

surviving spouse, satisfies the requirements of section 2056(b)(7)

and is to be funded with the remaining property in the estate. The

State estate tax equals the State death tax credit available under

section 2011. During the period of administration, the estate incurs

transmission expenses of $200,000. The transmission expenses of

$200,000 reduce the value of the residue to $2,800,000. If the

transmission expenses are deducted on the Federal estate tax return,

then the formula divides the residue so that the value of the

property passing to the child's trust is $1,000,000 and the value of

the property passing to the marital trust is $1,800,000. The

allowable marital deduction is $1,800,000. The applicable exclusion

amount shields from Federal estate tax the entire $1,000,000 passing

to the child's trust so that the amount of Federal and State estate

taxes is zero. Alternatively, if the transmission expenses are

deducted on the estate's Federal income tax return, the formula

divides the residue so that the value of the property passing to the

child's trust is $800,000 and the value of the property passing to

the marital trust is $2,000,000. The allowable marital deduction

remains $1,800,000. The applicable exclusion amount shields from

Federal estate tax the entire $800,000 passing to the child's trust

and $200,000 of the $2,000,000 passing to the marital trust so that

the amount of Federal and State estate taxes remains zero.

Example 6. The facts are the same as in Example 5, except that

the decedent's will provides that the child's trust is to be funded

with that amount of property equal in value to the applicable

exclusion amount under section 2010 allowable to the decedent's

estate. The residue of the estate, after the payment of any debts,

expenses, and Federal and State estate taxes, is to pass to the

marital trust. The applicable exclusion amount in this case is

$1,000,000, so the value of the property passing to the child's

trust is $1,000,000. After deducting the $200,000 of transmission

expenses, the residue of the estate is $1,800,000 less any estate

taxes. If the transmission expenses are deducted on the Federal

estate tax return, the allowable marital deduction is $1,800,000,

the taxable estate is zero, and the Federal and State estate taxes

are zero. Alternatively, if the transmission expenses are deducted

on the estate's Federal income tax return, the net value of the

property passing to the spouse is $1,657,874 ($1,800,000 minus

$142,106 estate taxes). A marital deduction is claimed for that

amount, the taxable estate is $1,342,106, and the Federal and State

estate taxes total $142,106.

Example 7. The decedent, who dies in 2000, makes an outright

pecuniary bequest of $3,000,000 to the decedent's surviving spouse,

and the residue of the estate, after the payment of all debts,

expenses, and Federal and State estate taxes, passes to the

decedent's child. Under the terms of the applicable local law, a

beneficiary of a pecuniary bequest is not entitled to any income on

the bequest. During the period of administration, the estate pays

estate transmission expenses from the income

[[Page 67767]]

earned by the property that will be distributed to the surviving

spouse in satisfaction of the pecuniary bequest. The income earned

on this property is not part of the marital share. Therefore, the

allowable marital deduction is $3,000,000, unreduced by the amount

of the estate transmission expenses.

(6) Effective date. The provisions of this paragraph (d) apply to

estates of decedents dying on or after December 3, 1999.

* * * * *

Robert E. Wenzel,

Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Approved: November 22, 1999.

Jonathan Talisman,

Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.

[FR Doc. 99-31094 Filed 12-2-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.