Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Sassafras River, Georgetown, MD
Federal RegisterNov 10, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD05-99-006]
RIN 2115-AE47
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Sassafras River, Georgetown, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the regulations that govern the
operation of the Maryland Route 213 drawbridge across the Sassafras
River, Mile 10.0, at Georgetown, Maryland. This change will restrict
drawbridge openings from November 1 through March 31, from midnight to
8 a.m., by requiring a six-hour advance notice for drawbridge openings.
This change will eliminate the need to have the bridge constantly
manned during times of minimal use while still providing for the
reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: This rule is effective December 10, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD05-99-006 and are available for inspection or
copying at the office of the Commander (AOWB), Fifth Coast Guard
District, Federal Building, 4th Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
Virginia 23704-5004, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann B. Deaton, Bridge Administrator,
Fifth Coast Guard District, at 757-398-6222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 14, 1999, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations:
Sassafras River, Georgetown, MD'' in the Federal Register (64 FR
26349). We received no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No
public hearing was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The Maryland Route 213 Sassafras River drawbridge across the
Sassafras River, Mile 10.0, at Georgetown, Maryland, is currently
required to open on signal year-round. The Maryland Department of
Transportation (MDOT) has requested that the Coast Guard change the
operating schedule for the drawbridge by requiring a six-hour
[[Page 61207]]
advance notice to open the bridge from November 1 to March 31, from
midnight to 8 a.m. Review of MDOT's bridge logs from 1993 to 1997
reveals a total of 29 bridge openings for the five year period during
the months from November 1 through March 31, an average of 1.2 openings
per month. Due to the low number of openings that have occurred during
the November through March time period, we believe this change will not
unduly restrict navigation.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments on the NPRM. Since no comments
were received and we believe the change is warranted based on our
findings, the final rule is being implemented without change.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26,
1979). The Coast Guard reached this conclusion based on the fact that
the proposed changes will not prevent mariners from transiting the
bridge, but merely require mariners to adhere to the new operation
procedures during transits of the bridge.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This conclusion is based on the fact that this rule will only
effect drawbridge openings during periods of little or no usage by
vessel operators.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. This was
accomplished through the solicitation of comments from local waterway
users and marinas during a Coast Guard conducted field study, and
through publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register in which
comments were solicited.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12612, and have
determined that this rule does not have sufficient implications for
federalism to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) and
E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership, (58 FR 58093,
October 28, 1993) govern the issuance of Federal regulations that
require unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that
requires a State, local, or tribal government or the private sector to
incur direct costs without the Federal Government's having first
provided the funds to pay those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will
not impose an unfunded mandate.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under E.O. 13045, Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an
economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental
risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect
children.
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule
and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e) of Commandant
Instruction M16475.1C, this rule is categorically excluded from further
environmental documentation. This rule only deals with the operating
schedule of an existing drawbridge and will have no impact on the
environment. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulation
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Section
117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. Add Sec. 117.570 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.570 Sassafras River.
The draw of the Sassafras River (Route 213) bridge, mile 10.0 at
Georgetown, Maryland, shall open on signal; except that from November 1
through March 31, from midnight to 8 a.m., the draw need only open if
at least a six-hour advance notice is given.
Dated: October 27. 1999.
Thomas E. Bernard,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 99-29364 Filed 11-9-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.