Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Administrative Review
Federal RegisterNov 8, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-822]
Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is extending the time limit for the
final results of the fifth review of the antidumping order on certain
helical spring lock washers from the People's Republic of China. The
period of review is October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998. This
extension is made pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 8, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Hastings or Annika O'Hara,
Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3464 or (202) 482-3798,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because it is not practicable to complete
this review within the original time limit mandated by section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act (``the Act''), (i.e., November 10, 1999), the Department
of Commerce (``that Department'') is extending the time limit for
completion of the final results until May 8, 2000.
This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: October 29, 1999.
Richard W. Moreland,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 99-29199 Filed 11-5-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.