Roller Chain, Other Than Bicycle From Japan: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Intent To Revoke Finding, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, and Termination of Scope Inquiry
Federal RegisterOct 27, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-028]
Roller Chain, Other Than Bicycle From Japan: Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Intent To
Revoke Finding, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews,
and Termination of Scope Inquiry
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of initiation and preliminary results of changed
circumstances review and intent to revoke finding, rescission of
antidumping administrative reviews, and termination of scope inquiry.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In response to a request from the petitioner, the American
Chain Association (``ACA''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') is initiating a changed circumstances review and issuing
this notice of preliminary changed circumstances review results and
intent to revoke the antidumping finding on roller chain from Japan.
Moreover, because the petitioner is no longer interested in maintaining
the finding after April 1, 1997, we have preliminarily determinated to
revoke the finding retroactive to this date. In addition, in response
to the petitioner's and respondents' withdrawal requests for the
ongoing 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 administrative reviews, the Department
is rescinding these administrative reviews of the finding. Finally, we
are terminating a scope inquiry associated with the 1997-1998 Sugiyama
Chain Company, Ltd., administrative review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 27, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor or Tom Futtner, AD/CVD
Enforcement Group II, Office 4, Import Administration-Room B099,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482-4114 or (202) 482-3814, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Applicable Statute and Regulations
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (``the Act''), are references to the provisions
effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to
the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless
otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are
to the regulations codified at 19 CFR Part 351 (April 1998).
Background
On October 13, 1999, the ACA requested that the Department conduct
a changed circumstances review to revoke the antidumping finding on
roller chain from Japan retroactive to April 1, 1997. The petitioner
stated that circumstances have changed such that the petitioner no
longer has an interest in maintaining the antidumping finding.
Additionally, the petitioner indicated that it represents virtually all
roller chain producers in the United States accounting for over 90
percent of the U.S. roller chain production.
[[Page 57864]]
The petitioner also requested that, given the pendency of the
ongoing administrative review of the finding, the Department initiate
and complete the changed circumstances review on an expedited basis.
Futhermore, on October 13, 1999, the petitioner filed a withdrawal
of its request for administrative reviews covering the periods of April
1, 1997, through March 31, 1998, and April 1, 1998, through March 31,
1999. Between October 14-18, 1999, Daido Kogyo Company, Ltd. Daido
Tsusho Company, Ltd, Daido Corporation, Enuma Chain Manufacturing
Company, Sugiyama Chain Company, Ltd., Izumi Chain Manufacturing
Company, Ltd., Oriental Chain Company, R.K. Excel Company, Ltd., and
Tsubakimoto Chain Company, Ltd., the respondents in this proceeding,
also filed a withdrawal of their requests for administrative reviews
covering the above-mentioned periods. Additionally, Sugiyama Chain
Company, Ltd., requested a termination of a scope inquiry associated
with its 1997-1998 administrative review. Given that the petitioner's
and respondents' withdrawal and rescission requests were filed after
the 90-day period for withdrawing a request for a review, the parties
asked the Department to exercise its regulatory discretion under 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1) to rescind the above-mentioned reviews.
Scope of Review
The merchandise subject to this review is roller chain, other than
bicycle, from Japan. The term ``roller chain, other than bicycle,'' as
used in this review, includes chain, with or without attachments,
whether or not plated or coated, and whether or not manufactured to
American or British standards, which is used for power transmissions
and/or conveyance. This chain consists of a series of alternately-
assembled roller links and pin links in which the pins articulate
inside from the bushings and the rollers are free to turn on the
bushings. Pins and bushings are press fit in their respective link
plates. Chain may be single strand, having one row of roller link, or
multiple strand of roller links. Such chain may be either single or
double pitch and may be used as power transmission or conveyor chain.
This review also covers leaf chain, which consists of a series of link
plates alternately assembled with pins in such a way that the joint is
free to articulate between adjoining pitches. This review further
covers chain model numbers 25 and 35. Roller chain is currently
classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheading 7315.11.00 through 7619.90.00. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the
written description remains dispositive.
On March 24, 1998, the Department determined that certain models of
silent timing chain produced and exported by Kaga for use in
automobiles are outside the scope of the antidumping finding. (See
Final Scope Ruling: Kaga's Request for Scope Ruling on Automotive
Silent Timing Chain, March 24, 1998, on file in the Central Records
Unit (CRU) in room B-099 of the Main Commerce Building).
Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review
and Intent To Revoke Finding
Pursuant to section 751(d)(1) of the Act, the Department may
revoke, in whole or in part, an antidumping findings based on a review
under section 751(b) of the Act (i.e., changed circumstances review).
Section 751(b)(1) of the Act requires a changed circumstances review to
be conducted upon receipt of a request containing sufficient
information concerning changed circumstances.
The Department's regulations at 19 CFR 351.216(d) require the
Department to conduct a changed circumstances review in accordance with
19 CFR 351.221, if the Department determines that there exist changed
circumstances sufficient to warrant a review. Section 782(h) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(10(i) provide further that the Department may
revoke a finding, in whole or in part, if it concludes that the finding
under review is no longer of interest to producers accounting for
substantially all of the production of the domestic like product. In
addition, in the event that the Department concludes that expedited
action is warranted, 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii) permits the Department to
combine the notices of initiation and preliminary results.
The ACA is a domestic interested party as defined by section
771(9)(E) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b) and was the petitioner in
the less-than-fair-value (``LTFV'') investigation of this proceeding.
Based on the ACA's October 13, 1999, submission, we preliminarily
determine that the ACA represents producers accounting for
substantially all of the production of the domestic like product. In
light of the affirmative statement by the ACA of no interest in the
continued application of the antidumping finding on roller chain from
Japan, we are initiating this changed circumstances review. Further,
based on the request by the petitioner and its affirmative statement of
no interest dating back to April 1, 1997, we have determined that
expedited action is warranted, and have combined our notices of
initiation and preliminary results. Moreover, we have preliminarily
determined that there are changed circumstances sufficient to warrant
revocation of the finding in whole. Consequently, we are hereby
notifying the public of our intent to revoke in whole the antidumping
finding on roller chain from Japan retroactive to April 1, 1997.
If final revocation of the finding occurs, we intend to instruct
the Customs Service to end the suspension of liquidation and to refund
any estimated antidumping duties collected for all unliquidated entries
of roller chain from Japan on or after April 1, 1997, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.222(g)(4). We will also instruct the Customs Service to
pay interest on such refunds in accordance with section 778 of the Act.
The current requirement for a cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties will continue until publication of the final results of this
changed circumstances review.
Rescission of Administrative Reviews and Scope Inquiry
On October 13, 1999, and between October 14-18, 1999, respectively,
the petitioner and respondents withdrew their requests for
administrative reviews for the periods April 1, 1997, through March 31,
1998 and April 1, 1998 through March 31, 1999. These withdrawal
requests cover all requests received for administrative reviews during
the 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 review segments. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding these reviews because the parties
withdrew their requests for reviews and no other interested party
requested that the Japanese respondents be reviewed. Although parties
to the proceeding did not file their withdrawal requests within 90 days
of the publication of initiation of the requested review, we are
exercising the Department's discretion to rescind a review after 90
days because it is reasonable to do so. In this case, the petitioner
concomitantly has filed a request for a changed circumstances review
and revocation of the finding based on a lack of domestic interest
dating back to April 1, 1997, the month the requests were filed for the
1997-1998 administrative review. Given the lack of domestic interest
prior to the date of initiatives of the 1997-1998 review, we have
determined that it is reasonable to rescind both reviews based on the
petitioner's and respondents' requests for terminations of these
reviews. Finally, we are
[[Page 57865]]
terminating a scope inquiry associated with the 1997-1998
administrative review of Sugiyama Chain Company, Ltd.
Public Comment
Any interested party may request a hearing within 10 days of
publication of this notice. Any hearing, if requested, will be held no
later than 28 days after the date of publication of this notice.
Written comments from interested parties may be submitted not later
than 14 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal
comments to written comments, limited to issues raised in those
comments, may be filed not later than 21 days after the date of
publication of this notice. All written comments shall be submitted in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. Persons interested in attending the
hearing should contact the Department for the date and time of the
hearing. The Department will publish the final results of this changed
circumstances review, including the results of its analysis of issues
raised in any written comments.
This notice is in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.216 and 351.222.
Dated: October 21, 1999.
Richard W. Moreland,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 99-28061 Filed 10-26-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.