Certain Iron Metal Castings From India: Postponement of Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
Federal RegisterMay 4, 1999
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-063]
Certain Iron Metal Castings From India: Postponement of
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of extension of time limits for preliminary results of
countervailing duty administrative review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is extending by no
longer than 120 days the time limit of the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain iron
metal castings from India (C-533-063), covering the period January 1,
1997, through December 31, 1997, since it is not practicable to
complete this review within the time limits mandated by the Tariff Act
of
[[Page 23823]]
1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675 (a)(3)(A)).
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson or Michael Grossman,
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Enforcement, Group II, Office
Six, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone (202) 482-4406 and (202) 482-2305,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicable Statute
Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are
references to the provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) effective January 1, 1995 (the
Act). In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the
Department's regulations are to the regulations as codified at 19
C.F.R. Part 351 (April 1998).
Background
On November 30, 1998, the Department initiated an administrative
review of the countervailing duty order on certain iron metal castings
from India, covering the period January 1, 1997, through December 31,
1997 (63 FR 65748). In our notice of initiation, we stated our
intention to issue the final results of this review no later than
October 31, 1999. The preliminary results of review are currently due
no later than July 5, 1999. Due to the number of producers/exporters of
the subject merchandise covered by this review, the Department has
determined that it is not practicable to complete this review within
the time limits mandated by the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675 (a)(3)(A)).
Postponement of Preliminary Results of Review
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act requires the Department to make a
preliminary determination within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order/finding for which a review is requested
and a final determination within 120 days after the date on which the
preliminary determination is published. However, if it is not
practicable to complete the review within the time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) allows the Department to extend this time period to a
maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively.
We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary
results of this review within the original time frame. See Memorandum
from Bernard Carreau to Robert S. LaRussa, ``Extension of Preliminary
Results: Certain Iron Metal Castings from India (C-533-063),'' dated
April 27, 1999.
The deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this review is
now no later than November 2, 1999, which is the full amount of time
the Department can extend the preliminary results under section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675 (a)(3)(A)).
Dated: April 28, 1999.
Bernard Carreau,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Group II.
[FR Doc. 99-11160 Filed 5-3-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.