Section 8 Housing Certificate Fund Rule; Notice of Establishment of Negotiated Rulemaking Committee and Notice of First Meeting

Federal RegisterApr 26, 1999

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Chapter IX

[Docket No. FR-4459-N-03]

Section 8 Housing Certificate Fund Rule; Notice of Establishment

of Negotiated Rulemaking Committee and Notice of First Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian

Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Establishment of Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee and

notice of first meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the establishment of a negotiated

[[Page 20233]]

rulemaking advisory committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

The establishment of the committee is required by the Quality Housing

and Work Responsibility Act of 1998, which requires issuance of

regulations under the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990. The purpose of

the Committee is to discuss and negotiate a rule that would change the

current method of distributing funds to public housing agencies (PHAs)

for purposes of renewing assistance contracts in the tenant-based

Section 8 program. The committee will consist of persons representing

stakeholder interests in the outcome of the rule. This notice announces

the committee members and the dates, location, and agenda for the first

committee meeting.

DATES: The first committee meeting will be held on April 27 and 28,

1999. On both days, the meeting will begin at approximately 9:00 am and

conclude at approximately 5:00 pm.

ADDRESSES: The first committee meeting will take place at the Hyatt

Dulles Hotel (Concorde Ballroom), 2300 Dulles Corner Boulevard,

Herndon, VA 22701.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dalzell, Senior Program

Advisor, Office of Public and Assisted Housing Delivery, Office of

Public and Indian Housing, Room 4204, Department of Housing and Urban

Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-0500;

telephone (202) 708-1380 (this telephone number is not toll-free).

Hearing or speech-impaired individuals may access this number via TTY

by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-

877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On October 21, 1998, the Congress enacted the Quality Housing and

Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-276, 112 Stat. 2461) (the

``1998 Act''). The 1998 Act made significant changes to HUD's public

and assisted housing programs. These changes include the addition of a

new section 8(dd) to the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C.

1437 et seq.).

The new section 8(dd) specifies the method to be used by HUD in

calculating assistance provided to public housing agencies (PHAs) to

renew Section 8 tenant-based rental and voucher contracts.

Specifically, section 8(dd) directs HUD to establish an allocation

baseline amount of assistance (budget authority) to cover the renewals,

and to apply an inflation factor (based on local or regional factors)

to the baseline.

Section 556(b) of the 1998 Act requires HUD to implement section

8(dd) through notice not later than December 31, 1998, and to issue

final regulations on this subject that are developed through the

negotiated rulemaking process no later than October 21, 1999. On

December 30, 1998, HUD issued Public and Indian Housing (PIH) Notice

98-65, which advised PHAs on how HUD is calculating the amount of

assistance available for purposes of Section 8 tenant-based rental

certificate and voucher contract renewals. On February 18, 1999 (64 FR

8188), HUD published a notice in the Federal Register providing, for

the benefit of the public, the contents of PIH Notice 98-65.

On March 19, 1999 (64 FR 13531), HUD published a notice of intent

to establish an advisory committee to discuss and negotiate a proposed

rule that would implement new section 8(dd). The basic concept of

negotiated rulemaking is to have the agency that is considering

drafting a rule bring together representatives of affected interests

for face-to-face negotiations that are open to the public. The give-

and-take of the negotiation process is expected to foster constructive,

creative and acceptable solutions to difficult problems. The March 19,

1999 notice: (1) Advised the public of HUD's intent to establish the

negotiated rulemaking committee; (2) solicited public comments on the

proposed membership of the committee; and (3) explained how persons

could be nominated for membership on the committee.

II. The Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee

This notice announces HUD's establishment of the Negotiated

Rulemaking Advisory Committee on Section 8 Tenant-Based Contract

Renewal Allocation. As noted above, the March 19, 1999 notice

tentatively identified a list of possible interests and parties to be

represented on the negotiated rulemaking committee, and requested

public comment on the proposed committee membership. The public comment

period on the March 19, 1999 notice closed on April 19, 1999. HUD has

carefully considered the 10 comments received on the proposed committee

membership.

The list of committee members includes representatives from PHAs,

public interest groups, national/regional PHA associations, independent

accounting firms, and HUD. Additionally, five members of the Consensus

Building Institute, Inc. will serve as facilitators. The list of

members for the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory Committee on Section 8

Tenant-Based Contract Renewal Allocation is as follows:

Housing Agencies

1. Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development,

Boston, MA

2. New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, Trenton, NJ

3. Southeastern Minnesota Multi-County Housing and Redevelopment

Authority, Wabasha, MN

4. Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency, Oklahoma City, OK

5. Fort Worth Housing Authority, Fort Worth, TX

6. Minneapolis Metropolitan Council Housing and Redevelopment Agency,

Saint Paul, MN

7. Santa Cruz County Housing Authority, Santa Cruz, CA

8. Burlington Housing Authority, Burlington, VT

9. Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Lansing, MI

10. New York City Housing Authority, NYC, NY

11. Atlanta Housing Authority, Atlanta, GA

12. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority, Cincinnati OH

13. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

14. Stillwater Housing Authority, Stillwater, OK

15. Spokane Housing Authority, Spokane, WA

16. Jacksonville Housing Authority, Jacksonville, FL

17. FCHA, Bay County, FL

18. Alameda County Housing Authority, Alameda, CA

19. Housing Authority of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA

20. Stustman County Housing Authority, Stustman County, ND

Public Interest Groups

1. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington, D.C.

2. New Community Corporation, Newark, NJ

3. Disability Rights Action Coalition for Housing

4. Section 8 Residents Council of New Orleans, Inc., New Orleans, LA

Independent Accounting Firms

1. Fenton, Ewald & Associates, PC

2. Orion Consulting, Inc.

National/Regional PHA Associations

1. National Leased Housing Association (NLHA)

2. National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO)

3. Council of Large Public Housing Authorities (CLPHA)

[[Page 20234]]

4. Public Housing Authority Directors Association (PHADA)

Federal Government

1. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

In addition to the list of committee members noted above, HUD has

identified the following two organizations as possible alternate or

additional members of the negotiated rulemaking committee:

1. Southeast Regional Section 8 Housing Association (SERSHA)

2. Richmond Better Housing Coalition, Richmond, VA

III. First Committee Meeting

The first meeting of the negotiated rulemaking committee will be

held on April 27 and April 28, 1999. On both days, the meeting is

expected to start at 9 am and run until approximately 5 pm. On both

days, the meeting will take place at the Hyatt Dulles Hotel (Concorde

Ballroom), 2300 Dulles Corner Boulevard, Herndon, VA 22701.

The agenda planned for the meeting includes: (1) orienting members

to the negotiated rulemaking process; (2) establishing a basic set of

understandings and ground rules (protocols) regarding the process that

will be followed in seeking a consensus; and (3) discussion of the

issues relating to the development of regulations implementing new

section 8(dd).

The meeting will be open to the public without advance

registration. Public attendance may be limited to the space available.

Members of the public may make statements during the meeting, to the

extent time permits, and file written statements with the committee for

its consideration. Written statements should be submitted to the

address listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION section of this document.

Summaries of committee meetings will be available for public inspection

and copying at the address in the same section.

In accordance with the General Services Administration (GSA)

regulations implementing the Federal Advisory Committee Act, HUD

normally publishes a Federal Register meeting document at least 15

calendar days before the date of an advisory committee meeting (see 41

CFR 105-54.301(i)). The GSA regulations, however, also provide that an

agency may give less than 15 days document if the reasons for doing so

are included in the Federal Register meeting document. (See 41 CFR 105-

54.301(j).) Given the strict statutory deadline for implementation of

new section 8(dd), HUD believes it is imperative that the negotiations

for development of the regulations begin as soon as possible. Failure

to publish the final rule on a timely basis will delay the provision of

Section 8 tenant-based renewal funding to PHAs. Accordingly, rather

than defer the start of the negotiations, HUD has decided to proceed

with the committee meeting announced in the March 19, 1999 notice.

Dated: April 21, 1999.

Harold Lucas,

Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.

[FR Doc. 99-10461 Filed 4-23-99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-33-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.