Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe From Taiwan, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Time Limit
Federal RegisterMar 17, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-815]
Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe From Taiwan, Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; Time Limit
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the
time limit for the final results of the 1995-1996 administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on welded stainless steel pipe from
Taiwan. The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject
merchandise to the United States, Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Company, Ltd.,
and the period December 1, 1995 through November 30, 1996.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 17, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert M. James at (202) 482-5222 or
John Kugelman at (202) 482-0649, AD/CVD Enforcement, Office Eight,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because it is not practicable to complete
this review within the time limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
of 1994, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of
the final results until July 8, 1998. See Memorandum from Joseph A.
Spetrini to Robert S. LaRussa, on file in Room B-099 of the Main
Commerce Building.
This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: February 25, 1998.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 98-6895 Filed 3-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.