Rio Sabana Day Use Picnic Area, Caribbean National Forest, Naguabo, Puerto Rico; Revised Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

Federal RegisterDec 28, 1998

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Rio Sabana Day Use Picnic Area, Caribbean National Forest,

Naguabo, Puerto Rico; Revised Notice of Intent To Prepare an

Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revised Notice; extension of time for submitting scoping

comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the passing of Hurricane Georges over the island of

Puerto Rico, on September 21st, 1998, the Forest Service is extending

the time for submitting scoping comments concerning the environmental

analysis for the Rio Sabana Day Use Picnic Area, on the Carribean

National Forest. Additionally, this notice corrects the location of the

proposed project site, as published in the Federal Register on Friday,

September 18th, 1998, Vol. 63, No. 181. The location of project site

should read as follows: from entrance gate at Highway #191, Km. 21.3 to

project site, Km. 20.0, in the Cubuy sector of the Municipality of

Naguabo.

DATES: (a) Comments to be incorporated into the draft environmental

impact statement should be received by January 8th 1999 to ensure

timely consideration. (b) Comments to be incorporated into the final

environmental impact statement should be received 45 days following the

publication of Notice of Availability of the draft environmental impact

statement, approximately the first week of March 31, 1999.

ADDRESSES: Send written comment to Abigail Rivera, Team Leader;

Caribbean National Forest, P.O. Box 490, Palmer, Puerto Rico 00721.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Abigail Rivera, Rio Sabana Picnic Area EIS Team Leader, 787 888-5643.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Caribbean National Forest is proposing:

(a) to develop a day use picnic area located in the vicinity of the Rio

Sabana Bridge, on the southern end of Highway #191, at Km. 20.0, in the

Cubuy Sector of the Municipality of Naguabo; (b) the rehabilitation of

2.5 miles of the Rio Sabana Trail #6 and trailhead; (c) repair and

reconstruction of 0.8 miles of entrance road, located on Hwy. #191, Km.

21.3, to project site, Km. 20.0; Currently, the area has not been

developed for recreation but receives heavy use. This use, coupled with

a sensitive ecosystem in which it is located, gives rises to a

potential conflict between the need to protect and conserve natural

resources and the need to provide a well managed natural setting where

our customers can enjoy a satisfying recreational experience.

On April 13, 1992, U.S. District Judge Guierbolini permanently

enjoined and restrained the U.S. Forest Service and the Federal Highway

Administration from proceeding with construction activities on the

closed portion of Highway P.R. #191, from Km. 13.5 to Km. 20, until

completion of an environmental impact statement. The proposed project

is located on a segment of Hwy. #191 that is outside of the area under

court order.

The proposed action would meet the objectives of: (a) Correcting

the current managerial situation and social settings in relation to the

physical setting and actual use; (b) protect the natural resources in

the vicinity; (c) increase Forest Service presence on the southern end

of the Forest, which currently is minimal.

The EIS will be prepared in accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Forest Management Act

(NFMA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The U.S. Forest Service

will be the lead agency and the Puerto Rico Department of Public

Transportation (DTOP) will be a cooperating agency.

Public participation will be especially important at several points

during analysis. The first point is when scoping officially begins (40

CFR 1501.7). The Forest Service will be seeking information, comments,

and assistance from Federal, State and local agencies, and other

individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected by

the proposed action. Comments must be received by January 8th 1999.

This input will be used in preparation of the draft environmental

impact statement (DEIS). The scoping process will include: (1)

Identifying potential issues; (2) Identifying issues to be analyzed in

depth; (3) Eliminating insignificant issues or those which have been

covered by a relevant previous environmental process; (4) Exploring

additional alternatives; (5) Identifying potential environmental

effects of the proposed action and alternatives (i.e. direct, indirect,

and cumulative effects and connected actions). Public participation

will include notifying interested and affected publics of the proposed

action in person and/or by mail. News releases will be used to provide

general notice to the public.

The following preliminary issues have been identified through

internal scoping: (1) Possible effects of development of picnic area

and reconstruction of Rd. #191 on the threatened and endangered species

identified in the project area; (2)

[[Page 71442]]

Possible effects on natural resources due to an increase in visitors to

picnic area and trail; (3) Reconstruction of the historic CCC Rio

Sabana Trail, which connects with the Tradewinds/El Toro Trial, may

generate greater use than is allowed in the proposed Wilderness

Management Area; (4) Security issues in the area in relation to 24-hour

presence of Forest Service hosts of volunteers; (5) Potential hazards

to Forest users caused by a nearby water impoundment and transmission

facility, located on private land.

A draft environmental impact statement is expected to be available

for public review, for 45 days, in February 1999.

It is very important that those interested in this proposed action

participate at that time. Upon release of the draft environmental

impact statement, projected for February 1999 reviewers should

structure their participation in the environmental review of the

proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the

reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.

v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, (1978). Also, environmental objections that

could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage but

that are not raised until after completion of the final environmental

impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of

Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin

Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). It

is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the

draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft

environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives

formulated and discussed in the statement. (Reviewers may wish to refer

to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing

the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at

40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.)

After the comments period on the draft environmental impact

statement ends, the comments will be analyzed, considered, and

responded to by the Forest Service in preparing the final environmental

impact statement. The final environmental impact statement is scheduled

to be completed by May 1999. The Responsible Official will consider the

comments, responses, environmental consequences discussed in the final

environmental impact statement, and applicable laws, regulations, and

policies in making a decision. The Responsible Official will document

the decision and rationale for the decision in a Record of Decision.

The decision will be subject to appeal in accordance with 36 CFR 215.

The Responsible Official is: Pablo Cruz, Forest Supervisor,

Caribbean National Forest, P.O. Box 490, Palmer, Puerto Rico 00721.

Dated: December 18, 1998.

Pablo Cruz,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 98-34247 Filed 12-24-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.