Revocation of Class D and Class E Airspace, Crows Landing, CA; Correction

Federal RegisterDec 2, 1998

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-AWP-12]

Revocation of Class D and Class E Airspace, Crows Landing, CA;

Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date and

correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final

rule which revokes the Class D and Class E airspace areas below 1200

feet above ground level (AGL) associated with Crows Landing, CA and

changes the name from Crows Landing NALF to NASA Crows

[[Page 66424]]

Landing in the legal description of the remaining controlled airspace

as published in the direct final rule. The correction amends the

latitude of the Class E airspace area (E5) from 1200 feet and above,

which was published incorrectly in the direct final rule; request for

comments. The correct latitude is 37 deg.38'00''.

DATES: The direct final rule published in 63 FR 45394 is effective at

0901 UTC, December 3, 1998. This correction is effective on December 3,

1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Debra Trindle, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Specialist, AWP-520.10,

Federal Aviation Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale,

California 90261; telephone: (310) 725-6613.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 26, 1998, the FAA published in the

Federal Register a direct final rule; request for comments which

revoked the Class D and Class E airspace areas below 1200 feet AGL

associated with Crows Landing Airport, CA. (FR Document 98-22749, 63 FR

45394, Airspace Docket No. 98-AWP-12). An error was subsequently

discovered in the publication of the docket. The latitude of the Class

E5 airspace area was incorrectly stated in the direct final rule;

request for comments. This error was typographical only and the FAA did

not intend to revise the dimensions of the existing Class E5 airspace

area. After review of all available information related to the subject

present above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public

interest require adoption of the rule. The FAA has determined that this

correction will not change the meaning of the action nor add any

additional burden on the public beyond that already published. This

action corrects the error and confirms the effective date of the direct

final rule.

The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a

noncontroversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no

adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that

no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse

comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse

comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would

become effective on December 3, 1998. No adverse comments were

received, therefore this document confirms that this direct final rule

will become effective on that date.

Correction

In rule FR Doc. 98-22749 published in the Federal Register on

August 26, 1998, 63 FR 45394, make the following correction to the

airspace description;

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700

feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 NASA Crows Landing, CA [Revised]

NASA Crows Landing CA

(Lat. 37 deg.24'29''N, long. 121 deg.06'34''W)

That airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface

bounded on the north by lat. 37 deg.38'00''N, on the east by the

west edge of V-109, on the southwest by the northeast edge of V-107

and on the west by long. 121 deg.31'04''W.

Issued in Los Angeles, California on November 19, 1998.

Leonard A. Mobley,

Acting Manger, Air Traffic Division, Western Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 98-32132 Filed 12-1-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.