Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review
Federal RegisterOct 15, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Requests (ICRs) abstracted below have been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICRs
describe the nature of the information collections and their expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the current information collection--Motor
Carrier Assessment of Compliance Reviews--was published on July 29,
1998 [63 FR 40581] and on the proposed information collection--
Designation of Agent, Motor Carriers, Brokers and Freight Forwarders--
was published on June 4, 1998 [63 FR 30557].
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 16, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Arlene Kennedy, FHWA Information
Collection Clearance Officer at (202) 366-9458.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
(1) Title: Designation of Agents, Motor Carriers, Brokers and
Freight Forwarders.
OMB No.: 2125-0567.
Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Secretary of Transportation is authorized to register
for-hire motor carriers of regulated commodities under the provisions
of 49 U.S.C. 13903, surface freight forwarders under the provisions of
49 U.S. C. 13903, and property brokers under the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 13904. These persons may conduct transportation services only if
they are registered pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 13901. The Secretary has
delegated authority pertaining to these registrations to the FHWA.
Registered motor carriers, brokers, and freight forwarders must
designate (1) an agent on whom service of notices in proceedings before
the Secretary may be made (49 U.S.C. 13303); and (2) for every state in
which they operate, agents on whom process issued by a court may be
served in actions brought against the registered transportation entity
(49 U.S.C. 13304). Regulations governing the designation of process
agents are found at 49 CFR part 366. This designation is filed with the
FHWA on Form BOC-3.
Affected Public: Motor carriers, freight forwarders, and brokers.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,500.
(2) Motor Carrier Assessment of Compliance Reviews.
OMB No:. 2125-NEW.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The mission of the FHWA's Office of Motor Carriers (OMC)
is to promote safe transportation of passengers and goods on the
Nation's highways. In the performance of its duties, the OMC conducts
periodic compliance reviews with motor carriers in each State. The
reviews are normally held at the motor carrier's principal place of
business. Compliance reviews are investigations of the carrier's
operation to determine whether they meet the safety fitness standards.
To meet the safety fitness standards, a motor carrier must demonstrate
that it has adequate safety management controls in place which function
effectively to ensure acceptable compliance with applicable safety
requirements. Upon completion of a compliance review, FHWA assigns the
carrier either a satisfactory, conditional or unsatisfactory rating. A
satisfactory rating means the carrier has established and is using
adequate safety management controls that meet FHWA's safety fitness
standards. A conditional rating means a carrier has adequate controls
that could result in violations of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations. An unsatisfactory rating means that the carrier has
inadequate controls that have resulted in violations of the
regulations. Compliance reviews can result in enforcement actions
against a carrier for violations of safety
[[Page 55422]]
regulations. A civil fine is a primary enforcement tool used by the
FHWA to induce regulatory compliance.
A survey of selected review participants will provide the
information necessary for the OMC to assess these compliance reviews so
that ongoing improvements to the compliance review process can be
accomplished. The information will be collected on a standardized
questionnaire, via mail or by telephone. Respondents will be advised of
the purpose for the survey and the confidentiality of their responses,
either by an accompanying letter or orally by telephone. The
questionnaire will request respondents to provide information
pertaining to the compliance review process (i.e. notification, purpose
and length of the review). The information will be collected from motor
carriers shortly after FHWA or State officials complete a compliance
review.
Affected Public: Motor carrier employees who signed for receipt of
the compliance review.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 250.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention DOT Desk Officer. Comments
are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 8, 1998.
Vanester M. Williams,
Clearance Officer, United States Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 98-27665 Filed 10-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.