Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey: Notice of Extension of Time Limits for Antidumping Duty First Administrative and New Shipper Reviews
Federal RegisterJan 28, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-818, A-489-805]
Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey: Notice of Extension of Time
Limits for Antidumping Duty First Administrative and New Shipper
Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 28, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Easton or John Brinkmann,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1777 and (202) 482-5288,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Postponement of Preliminary Results
A. First Administrative Reviews
On August 28, 1997, the Department initiated the first
administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on certain pasta
from Italy and Turkey, covering the period January 19, 1996 through
June 30, 1997 (62 FR 45621). The current deadline for the preliminary
results of these reviews is April 2, 1998. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(``the Act''), requires the Department to make a preliminary
determination in an administrative review within 245 days after the
last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is
requested. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review
within the time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) allows the Department to
extend this time period to up to 365 days.
We determine that it is not practicable to complete this review
within the original time frame because this review involves collecting
and analyzing information from a large number of companies and
examining allegations of sales below the cost of production for all
companies. Although section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows for an
extension of up to 120 days, we believe at this time that only a
limited extension of the deadline is necessary to analyze the complex
legal and methodological issues and coordinate verification of the
companies participating in these reviews. Accordingly, the Department
is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results
of these administrative reviews by 90 days, or
[[Page 4219]]
until July 1, 1998. We plan to issue the final results of these
administrative reviews within 120 days after publication of the
preliminary results.
B. New Shipper Review
On August 15, 1997, the Department initiated a new shipper review
relating to the antidumping duty order on certain pasta from Italy,
covering the period July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997 (62 FR 44643,
August 22, 1997). The current deadline for the preliminary results is
February 11, 1998. Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act requires the
Department to make a preliminary determination within 180 days after
the date on which the new shipper review was initiated. However, if the
Department concludes that the case is extraordinarily complicated, it
may extend the 180-day period to 300 days.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, the Department has
determined that this case is extraordinarily complicated given the
complex nature of the issues similar to those in the first
administrative reviews, including an allegation of sales below the cost
of production. In order to analyze the issues specific to this case and
to benefit from the analyses of similar issues in the administrative
reviews, we are extending the deadline for issuing the preliminary
results to no later than June 11, 1998. We plan to issue the final
results within 90 days after the date the preliminary results are
issued.
These extensions are in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv)
and 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Dated: January 22, 1998.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-2058 Filed 1-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.