Box Canyon, Papoose, and Squaw Creek Timber Sales; Targhee National Forest, Bonneville County, ID
Federal RegisterMay 15, 1998
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Box Canyon, Papoose, and Squaw Creek Timber Sales; Targhee
National Forest, Bonneville County, ID
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Supervisor of the Targhee National Forest gives
notice of the agency's intent to prepare an environmental impact
statement for the Box Canyon, Papoose, and Squaw Creek Timber Sales.
The proposed actions would harvest 1.8 million board feet of timber
from 600 acres. Three miles of temporary roads would be built. Easement
across private property would be required to access the Papoose and
Squaw Creek Sales. The Box Canyon timber sale is located three miles
south of Irwan, Idaho and the Papoose and Squaw Creek sales are located
three miles southwest of Swan Valley, Idaho. Alternatives will include
the proposed action, no action, and any alternatives that respond to
significant issues generated during the scoping process. A more
detailed description is available from the Palisades Ranger District;
see ADDRESSES below.
DATES: Send written comments and suggestions on the issues concerning
the proposed action by June 12, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Richard D. Dickemore, District
Ranger, Palisades Ranger District, 3659 East Ririe Highway, Idaho
Falls, Idaho 83401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dee Sessions, Interdisciplinary Team Leader, phone (208) 624-3151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Targhee National Forest Revised Land
Management Plan was approved in 1997. One of the decisions in the
revised Plan was to allow for the production and utilization of wood
fiber from certain areas of the Forest. The geographic areas where the
proposed actions would take place have primarily a prescription of
timber management with emphasis on no clear cutting, urban interface
fire management (5.1.3b) and elk summer range (5.4c). A prescription
for other lands in the area is described below.
Elk and Deer Winter Range (2.7a)--Management emphasis is directed
at providing quality elk and deer winter habitat. Habitats are managed
for multiple land use benefits, to the extent these land uses are
compatible with maintaining or improving elk and deer winter habitat.
Initial public involvement will include mailing maps and project
descriptions to interested parties to solicit comments on the proposal.
Preliminary issues include: Roadless area, threatened, endangered, and
sensitive plant and animal species, recreational traffic, easement
across private lands, big game habitat, water quality and aquatic
influence zones.
Additional opportunity to comment on the projects will occur on the
draft Environmental Impact Statement (draft EIS). The draft EIS is
expected to be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency and
available for public review in September 1998.
The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date
the Environmental Protection Agency's notice of availability appears in
the Federal Register. At the same time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected agencies, organizations, tribes,
and members of the public for their review and comment. It is very
important that those interested in the proposed action participate at
that time.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewers' position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S.
519,553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could have been
raised at the draft stage but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, (9th Circuit, 1986)
and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F.Supp 1334,1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that
those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of
the 45 day comment period so that substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can
meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the
Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed in December 1998. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments
received during the comment period that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the draft EIS and applicable laws,
regulations, and policies considered in making the decisions on this
proposal.
Responsible Official
Jerry B. Reese, Forest Supervisor, is the responsible official. As
responsible official, he will document the selected alternative for the
Box Canyon, Papoose, and Squaw Creek Timber Sales EIS and his rationale
in a Record of Decision.
The decision for the Box Canyon, Papoose, and Squaw Creek Timber
Sales project will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations (36
FR part 215).
Dated: May 6, 1998.
Jerry B. Reese,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-13036 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4031-99-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.