Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

Federal RegisterMar 12, 1997

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL138-1a; FRL-5660-2]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA approves Illinois' May 5, 1995, May 26, 1995, and May

31, 1995, submittal of miscellaneous amendments to Illinois'' Volatile

Organic Material (VOM) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)

rules as requested revisions to Illinois' State Implementation Plan

(SIP) for ozone. VOM, as defined by the State of Illinois, is identical

to ``volatile organic compounds'' (VOC), as defined by EPA. These

amendments make certain clarifications to the State's VOM RACT rules,

and includes an exemption of certain polyethylene foam packaging

operations from these rules. In this action, EPA is approving the

requested SIP revision through a ``direct final'' rulemaking; the

rationale for this approval is set forth below. Elsewhere in this

Federal Register, EPA is proposing approval and soliciting comment on

this direct final action; if adverse comments are received, EPA will

withdraw the direct final rulemaking and address the comments received

in a new final rule; otherwise, no further rulemaking will occur on

this requested SIP revision.

DATES: This action will be effective May 12, 1997 unless adverse

comments not previously addressed by the State or EPA are received by

April 11, 1997. If the effective date of this action is delayed due to

adverse comments, timely notice will be published in the Federal

Register.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois, 60604.

Copies of the Illinois submittal are available for public review

during normal business hours, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., at the

above address.

A copy of this SIP revision is also available for inspection at:

Office of Air and Radiation (OAR), Docket and Information Center (Air

Docket 6102), Room 1500, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Palermo, Regulation

Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604.

Telephone: (312) 886-6082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On September 9, 1994 and October 21, 1996 (59 FR at 46562 and 61 FR

at 54556), the EPA approved VOM reasonably available control technology

(RACT) rules under 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) parts 218 and

219. Part 218 covers the Chicago ozone nonattainment area (Cook,

DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Will Counties and Aux Sable and Goose Lake

Townships in Grundy County and Oswego Township in Kendall County),

while part 219 covers the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area (Madison,

Monroe, and St. Clair Counties). These rules were submitted by Illinois

in order to comply with the RACT ``fix-up'' and ``catch-up''

requirements under sections 182(a)(2)(A) and 182(b)(2) of the Clean Air

Act (Act).

On September 12, 1994, and October 27, 1994, the Illinois

Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) filed proposed amendments to

parts 218 and 219 with the Illinois Pollution Control Board (Board).

These amendments were proposed in order to clarify certain

applicability provisions, control requirements, and compliance dates

contained within these rules. Also included in these proposed

amendments was an exemption for certain polyethylene foam packaging

operations from the rules'' RACT requirements. Public hearings on the

proposed amendments were held on November 4, December 2, December 15,

December 16, 1994, and January 9, 1995, in Chicago, Illinois. On April

20, 1995, the Board adopted Final Opinions and Orders for the proposed

amendments. The amendments became effective on May 9, 1995, and were

published in the Illinois Register on May 19, 1995. The IEPA formally

submitted the amendments to EPA in two submittals dated May 5, 1995, as

a revision to the Illinois SIP for ozone; supplemental

[[Page 11328]]

submittals were submitted on May 26, 1995, and May 31, 1995.

II. State Submittal

A summary of the rule amendments contained in the State's requested

SIP revision follows. Where the same change has been made in both Part

218 and Part 219, the change to both parts is discussed together.

Section 218.106

Section 218.106(e) affects coating operations on electromotive

diesels in Cook County, Illinois, by extending the compliance date for

meeting coating VOM content limits specified in sections 218.204(m) (2)

and (3) to March 25, 1995. Illinois has submitted this amendment to

make its rules consistent with a Chicago Federal Implementation Plan

(FIP) revision for General Motors Corporation's Electromotive Division

located in Cook County, Illinois promulgated on March 24, 1994 (59 FR

14110).

Sections 218.480 and 219.480

These amendments affect RACT rules under subpart T covering

pharmaceutical manufacturing in the Chicago and Metro East ozone

nonattainment areas. Sections 218/219.480(i) have been added to provide

that equipment and operations emitting VOM at a source subject to the

applicability provisions for pharmaceutical manufacturing under

sections 218/219 (a) or (c), and are used to produce pharmaceutical

products or a pharmaceutical-like product such as a hormone, enzyme, or

antibiotic, shall be deemed to be engaged in the manufacture of

pharmaceuticals for purposes of this Subpart.

These amendments clarify that equipment and processes which are

already subject to the VOM RACT requirements for pharmaceutical

manufacturing under subpart T are not additionally subject to subpart

RR, the requirements for miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing

processes, when manufacturing a pharmaceutical-like product such as a

hormone, enzyme, or antibiotic.

Section 218.686

This amendment affects aerosol can filling lines in the Chicago

ozone nonattainment area. Section 218.686(a)(2)(B) is revised to

clarify that a source only needs to demonstrate its inability to use

the through-the-valve filling method for a particular product by

meeting any one of the three factors listed, rather than all three. The

previous language incorrectly used the word ``and,'' instead of ``or,''

which inadvertently required the source to meet all three factors

instead of just one.

Section 218.966

Section 218.966(c) specifies control practices of components

leaking VOM at Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing Plants in

the Chicago ozone subject to Part 218, Subpart RR. A compliance date of

March 15, 1995, has been added to this subsection because Illinois

inadvertently omitted this compliance date when this subsection was

first adopted.

Sections 218.980 and Sections 219.980

Part 218/219, subpart TT contains non-Control Techniques Guidelines

(CTG) RACT requirements for various sources which do not fall under any

subpart of the rules. Sections 218/219.980(f), have been revised to add

polyethylene foam packaging operations to the list of units exempted

from the control requirements under subpart TT. This exemption would

affect only one source, Freeflow Packaging (Freeflow), located in the

Chicago ozone nonattainment area. Freeflow manufactures polyethylene

foam sheets that are used as a wrapping to prevent marring and

scratching during shipment of electronic equipment and cabinets. VOM

emissions from this operation come mainly from the blowing agent,

isobutane, which is used to expand polymeric resin to form the sheets.

Without this exemption, Freeflow would be required under sections 218/

219.986 to use either an emission capture and control techniques that

achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOC emissions of at least

81 percent from each emission unit, or comply with an equivalent

alternative control plan which has been approved by IEPA and EPA in a

federally enforceable permit or as a SIP revision.

In support of the rule exemption, Illinois submitted a November 25,

1996, RACT analysis which indicated that Freeflow's estimated control

cost to comply with the regulation, $10,260 to $11,370 per ton of VOM

emissions destroyed, is economically unreasonable for this particular

source. To further support the exemption, Illinois investigated other

state RACT regulations which covered polyethylene foam packaging. Two

California regulations were identified: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) Rule 4682, and South Coast Air

Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1175. Illinois found that

there were five polyethylene foam packaging operations covered under

SJVUAPCD Rule 4682. These five sources, however, do not manufacture

foam sheets such as Freeflow, and therefore utilize a different

operation, which involves the extrusion of pelletized resin using steam

or heat to form the final product without the need to employ VOM

containing blowing agents. As for SCAQMD Rule 1175, no affected

polyethylene foam packaging operations were identified by SCAQMD during

the rulemaking process. Therefore, Illinois could not find any

polyethylene foam packaging operation similar to Freeflow's operation

which is subject to RACT regulations. Because Illinois has found that

RACT control to be economically unreasonable for Freeflow's

polyethylene foam packaging operation, and that Freeflow's particular

type of operation is not covered under RACT in other states, Illinois

is requesting that EPA approve the addition of polyethylene foam

packaging operations to the list of operations exempted from control

under subpart TT.

III. Review of Submittal

The EPA finds that the amendments contained in 35 IAC sections

218.106, 218.480, 218.686, 218.966, and 219.480 are acceptable

clarifications to Illinois'' existing VOM RACT rules and represent no

deviation from RACT. EPA also finds that the RACT exemption for

polyethylene foam packaging operations contained in sections 218.980(f)

and 219.980(f) is adequately justified by Illinois. EPA, therefore,

approves these amendments as a revision to the Illinois SIP for ozone.

IV. Rulemaking Action

The EPA approves Illinois' May 5, 1995, May 26, 1995 and May 31,

1995, submittals requesting revisions to the Illinois SIP for ozone.

These revisions include 35 IAC sections 218.106, 218.480, 218.686,

218.966, 218.980, 219.480, and 219.980.

The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because

EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no

adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal

Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision

should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be

effective on May 12, 1997 unless, by April 11, 1997, adverse or

critical comments are received.

If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn

before the effective date by publishing a subsequent rulemaking that

will withdraw the final action. All public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a

proposed rule. The

[[Page 11329]]

EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this

time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this

action will be effective on May 12, 1997.

Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing

or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any

SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered

separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental

factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory

requirements.

V. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature

by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the

Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a

July 10, 1995, memorandum from Mary D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator

for Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has

exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. section 600 et seq.,

EPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact

of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. sections 603

and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a

significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small

entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,

and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than

50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act

do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements

that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP

approval does not impose any new requirements, the Administrator

certifies that it does not have a significant impact on any small

entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State

relationship under the Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would

constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of the

State action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions

concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. EPA., 427 U.S.

246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

C. Unfunded Mandates

Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995,

signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must undertake various actions

in association with any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal

mandate that may result in estimated costs to state, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate; or to the private sector, of $100 million

or more. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under

state or local law, and imposes no new Federal requirements.

Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, or tribal

governments, or the private sector, result from this action.

D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office

Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report

containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the

General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's

Federal Register. This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.

804(2).

E. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review

of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for

the appropriate circuit by May 12, 1997. Filing a petition for

reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect

the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does

it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be

filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.

This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its

requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference, Ozone, and Volatile organic compounds.

Dated: November 27, 1996.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is

amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Subpart O--Illinois

2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(123) to read

as follows:

Sec. 52.720 Identification of plan.

(c) * * *

(123) On May 5, 1995, May 26, 1995, and May 31, 1995, the State of

Illinois submitted miscellaneous revisions to its Volatile Organic

Material (VOM) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) rules

contained in 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 218: Organic Material

Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, and Part 219:

Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East

Area. These amendments clarify certain applicability provisions,

control requirements, and compliance dates contained within these

regulations. Also included in these amendments is an exemption for

certain polyethylene foam packaging operations from VOM RACT

requirements.

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title

35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I:

Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and

Limitations for Stationary Sources.

(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations

for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 218.106;

Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Section 218.480; Subpart DD:

Aerosol Can Filling, Section 218.686; Subpart RR: Miscellaneous Organic

Chemical Process, Section 218.966; Subpart TT: Other Emission Units,

Section 218.980. Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848; effective May 9, 1995.

(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations

for the Metro East Area, Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing,

Section 219.480; Subpart TT: Other Emission Units, Section 219.980.

Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.

[FR Doc. 97-6076 Filed 3-11-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.