Proposed Information Collection and Request for Comments
Federal RegisterAug 21, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[FERC-577]
Proposed Information Collection and Request for Comments
August 15, 1997.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed information collection and request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(a)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the information collection described below.
DATES: Comments are due October 20, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed collection of information can be
obtained from and written comments may be submitted to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, Attn: Michael Miller, Information
Services Division, ED-12.4, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at (202) 208-1415, by fax at (202) 273-0873, and by e-mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected under the
requirements of FERC-577 ``Gas Pipeline Certificates: Environmental
Impact Statement'' (OMB No. 1902-0128) is a filing requirement
pertaining to environmental assessment of pipeline and Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG) facility construction projects. The filing collects
data from all Natural Gas Act (NGA) jurisdictional pipeline companies
as well as companies whose Natural Gas Policy Act projects are reviewed
by the Commission. The Commission implements these filing requirements
in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) under 18 CFR Parts 2; 157;
284; 375 and 380. The information collected under the requirements of
FERC-577 is used by the Commission to implement the statutory
provisions of Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (Pub. L. 91-190) (1969). NEPA requires that all
Federal agencies must include in every recommendation or report on
proposals for legislation and other major Federal actions significantly
affecting the quality of human environment, a detail statement on: the
environmental impact of the proposed actions; any adverse environmental
effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented;
alternatives to the proposed action; the relationship between local
short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and
enhancement of long term productivity; and any irreversible and
irretrievable commitment of resources which would be involved in the
proposed action should it be implemented. The Commission uses the
pipeline's data to evaluate the environmental aspects of construction
proposals and may be used in the Commission staff's independent
preparation of Environmental Assessments or Environmental Impact
[[Page 44465]]
Statements. The staff examines and projects potential effects on soils,
geology, water resources, land use, recreation, aesthetics, air and
noise quality, vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources and pipeline
and liquefied natural gas (LNG) safety.
Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
current expiration date.
Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection is
estimated as:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total annual
Number of Number of Average burden burden hours
respondents responses per hours per (1) x (2) x
annually (1) respondent (2) response (3) (3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
70............... 16.9 154 182,182
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated cost burden to respondents: 182,182 hours divided by
2,087 hours per year times $110,000 per year equals $9,602,310. The
cost per respondent is equal to $137,176.
The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5)
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of
information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22204 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.