Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Federal RegisterAug 15, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-5483-3]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared July 21, 1997 Through July
25, 1997 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under
Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202)
564-7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 4, 1997 (62 FR
16154).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-DOI-K40222-TT Rating EO2, Palau Compact Road
Construction, Implementation, Funding, Republic of Palau. Babeldaob
Island, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections due to wetland and
water quality impacts associated with developing quarry or coral dredge
sites. EPA requested additional information to demonstrate compliance
with the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines including mitigation to
compensate for the fill placed in 21 acres of wetlands.
ERP No. D-NPS-E61038-TN Rating LO, Stones River National
Battlefield General Management Plan and Development Concept Plan,
Implementation, Ruthford County, TN.
Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections for the proposed action.
ERP No. D-OSM-A01102-00 Rating EC2, Valid Existing Rights--Proposed
Revisions to the Permanent Program Regulations Implementing Section
522(E) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and
Proposed Rulemaking Clarifying the Applicability of Section 522(E) to
Subsidence from Underground Mining.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with the air quality
analysis, potential adverse impacts to water quality and mitigation
measures, adequate bonding, design and reclamation issues, indirect and
cumulative impacts and environmental justice and suggests these be
addressed in the final EIS.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-UAF-K11076-CA, Airborne Laser (ABL) Phase Program
Definition and Risk Reduction Phase, Proposed Locations: Home Base
Edwards Air Force Base; Diagnostic Test Range-White Sands Missile
Range, NM; and Expanded Area Test Range-Western Range (Vandenberg Air
Force Base and Point Mugu Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division),
CA and NM.
Summary: EPA previous concerns have been addressed, therefore EPA
had no objection to the action as proposed.
[[Page 43730]]
Dated: August 12, 1997.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 97-21723 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.