Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP97-318-000]

Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare

an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Taunton Municipal Lighting

Plant Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

June 19, 1997.

The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will

discuss the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of

the facilities, about 924 feet of 12-inch-diameter pipeline, a new

meter station and appurtenant facilities, proposed in the Taunton

Municipal Lighting Plant Project.\1\ This EA will be used by the

Commission in its decision-making process to determine whether the

project is in the public convenience and necessity.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ Algonquin Gas Transmission Company's application was filed

with the Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part

157 of the Commission's regulations.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of the Proposed Project

Algonquin Gas Transmission Company (Algonquin) proposes to expand

the capacity of its facilities in Massachusetts to transport an

additional 27,000 million British thermal units per day of natural gas

to the Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant (TMLP). Algonquin seeks

authority to construct and operate:

942 feet of 12-inch-diameter pipeline between the towns of

Berkley and Taunton, Massachusetts;

A new meter station on TMLP property in Taunton; and

A tap and valving in Berkley.

TMLP would construct about 150 feet of nonjurisdictional pipeline

to connect

[[Page 34253]]

the meter station to the existing Cleary Flood generating station.

The location of the project facilities is shown in appendix 1.\2\

If you are interested in obtaining procedural information please write

to the Secretary of the Commission.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being

printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the

Commissions Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 First

Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or call (202) 208-1371. Copies

of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this notice in

the mail.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

Construction of the proposed facilities would require about 1.17

acres of land. Following construction, about 0.58 acre would be

maintained as new permanent right-of-way. The remaining 0.59 acre of

land would be restored and allowed to revert to its former use.

The EA Process

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the

Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could

result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a

Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us

to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals.

We call this ``scoping''. The main goal of the scoping process is to

focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By

this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the

scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received

are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local

government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents

of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of

concern.

The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the

construction and operation of the proposed project under these general

headings:

Geology and soils

Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands

Vegetation and wildlife

Endangered and threatened species

Land use

Cultural resources

Air quality and noise

Hazardous waste

Public safety

We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project

or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen

or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.

Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending

on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be

published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public

interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners,

newspapers, libraries, and the Commissions official service list for

this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA

is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make

our recommendations to the Commission.

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

We have already identified several issues that we think deserve

attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and

the environmental information provided by Algonquin. This preliminary

list of issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.

Crossing of the Taunton River by directional drilling.

Location of the proposed directional drill target and pipe

make-up area near the residences on Candice Lane.

Location of a valve near the residences on Candice Lane.

A potential alternative route that would be located

entirely on the west side of the Taunton River.

Also, we have made a preliminary decision to not address the

impacts of the nonjurisdictional facilities. We will briefly describe

their location and status in the EA.

Public Participation

You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your

specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on

the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to

the proposal (including alternative routes), and measures to avoid or

lessen environmental impact. The more specific your comments, the more

useful they will be. Please follow the instructions below to ensure

that your comments are received and properly recorded:

Send two copies of your letter to: Lois Cashell,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., N.E.,

Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;

Reference Docket No. CP97-318-000; and

Mail your comments so that they will be received in

Washington, DC on or before July 21, 1997.

Becoming an Intervenor

In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want

to become an official party to the proceeding or become an

``intervenor''. Among other things, intervenors have the right to

receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by

other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its

filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you

must file a motion to intervene according to Rule 214 of the

Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see

appendix 2).

The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding

has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions

must show good cause, as required by section 385.214(b)(3), why this

time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed

as good cause for late intervention.

You do not need intervenor status to have your comments considered.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97-16581 Filed 6-24-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M