Pelly Amendment to the Fishermen's Protective Act; Petition for Certification of the Republic of Korea; Conservation of Bears
Federal RegisterMay 5, 1997
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Pelly Amendment to the Fishermen's Protective Act; Petition for
Certification of the Republic of Korea; Conservation of Bears
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On February 7, 1997, the Department of the Interior received a
petition to certify the Republic of Korea (``South Korea'') under the
Pelly Amendment to the Fishermen's Protective Act for undermining the
effectiveness of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The petition asserts that: (1)
The Republic of Korea is the world's primary consumer of bear parts and
its nationals are the most active in illegal trade in bear parts; (2)
Illegally imported bear gall bladder is widely available in the
Republic of Korea; (3) Republic of Korea authorities have failed to
take measures to suppress the illegal trade in bears and bear parts;
(4) The Republic of Korea's domestic legislation does not adequately
implement CITES; and (5) Despite having acceded to CITES in 1993, the
Republic of Korea has failed to implement CITES. This notice requests
comments and information from the public on the following: Existence of
poaching, taking, smuggling, and trade in bears and bear parts by
Republic of Korea nationals; whether or not actions by Republic of
Korea nationals are undermining the effectiveness of CITES; any illegal
trade in bears and bear parts by nationals of other countries; and any
measures taken by the Republic of Korea to implement CITES with respect
to trade in bears and bear parts. This information will be taken into
account by the Service in determining what recommendations it should
make to the Secretary of the Interior on the disposition of the
petition.
DATES: The Fish and Wildlife Service will consider written information
and comments on these issues received by August 4, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, c/o Office of Management Authority, 4401 N. Fairfax
Drive, Room 420C, Arlington, VA 22203. Comments may also be sent via
fax to: (703) 358-2280.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Susan S. Lieberman or Theodora
Greanias, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management
Authority, telephone (703) 358-2093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing Address: [email protected]
Background
On February 7, 1997, the Department of the Interior received a
petition to certify the Republic of Korea (``South Korea'') under the
Pelly Amendment to the Fishermen's Protective Act for undermining the
effectiveness of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) is the lead agency in the Department of the Interior
responsible for implementation of CITES. The Pelly Amendment to the
Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967, 22 U.S.C. 1978(a)(2), provides that
the Secretary of the Interior shall make a certification to the
President if he determines that nationals of a foreign country,
directly or indirectly, are engaged in trade or taking which diminishes
the effectiveness of any international program for the conservation of
endangered or threatened species. CITES, a multi-lateral convention to
regulate international wildlife trade, is such a program.
The February 7, 1997 petition (petition) was submitted by Sierra
Club Legal Defense Fund on behalf of four organizations. The petition
asserts the following: (1) Republic of Korea nationals are engaging in
the illegal trade in and taking of bears and bear parts in many areas
of the world; (2) Pharmacies and traditional medicine stores in the
Republic of Korea continue to obtain and openly offer bear gall bladder
from other nations' Appendix I bear species, in direct violation of
CITES trade restrictions; (3) Even the few bear gall bladders that pass
through official channels in the Republic of Korea are not traded in
accordance with CITES; (4) The government has failed to seize bear gall
bladder or prosecute bear gall bladder smuggling in the Republic of
Korea; (5) Republic of Korea officials charged with policing the trade
are alleged to be benefiting from its continuation; (6) Republic of
Korea domestic legislation implementing CITES is inadequate and has not
been bolstered by the creation or training of wildlife enforcement
authorities, crackdowns on illegal trade, or public education
campaigns; (7) Since their own bear population has been all but
destroyed, Republic of Korea nationals regularly travel to China, Sri
Lanka, Ecuador, Viet Nam, Thailand, Russia, Canada, and the United
States to buy bear gall bladders; (8) Citizens of the Republic of Korea
engage in extensive trading in Appendix I bears in direct violation of
the protective provisions of CITES; (9) In violation of domestic laws
of range countries, Republic of Korea nationals continue to buy, sell
and smuggle large numbers of Appendix II bear parts, and have been
involved in the majority of cases of illegal bear gall trade in North
America; and (10) Despite its accession to CITES in July 1993, the
Republic of Korea has undermined and continues to undermine CITES with
respect to trade in bears and bear parts.
All bear species are listed in either CITES Appendix I or II, which
means they are either threatened with extinction (Appendix I), or may
become so unless their trade is subject to strict regulation (Appendix
II). In the case of Appendix I species, all primarily commercial trade
is in violation of the Convention. Commercial trade in Appendix II
species is allowed only if a permit is issued attesting that the trade
is not detrimental to the species' survival in the wild and that the
specimens were lawfully obtained. Law enforcement efforts are hindered
by the fact that no forensic methodology exists to distinguish between
Appendix I and Appendix II bear viscera, including gall bladders. This
creates an opening for the laundering of Appendix I bear parts, which
undermines CITES enforcement.
Worldwide, bear populations are at risk due to habitat loss,
coupled with a vigorous, mostly illegal trade in bears and bear parts
driven largely by the demand for traditional medicinals, especially
those containing bear bile.
[[Page 24503]]
Bear gall bladders and bile are among the most coveted ingredients in
traditional Asian medicine. To address this situation, CITES member
countries focussed on the bear trade during recent meetings of the
Animals Committee and Standing Committee. At its September 1996 meeting
in the Czech Republic, the Animals Committee adopted a decision
regarding the continued illegal trade in bear parts and derivatives, to
direct the CITES Secretariat to request certain information from range
States of bears and from countries of import, re-export, and
consumption of bear parts and derivatives. The Standing Committee
subsequently agreed to accept the recommendation of the Animals
Committee, and referred it to the CITES Secretariat for action. The
Secretariat issued a Notification to the Parties (No. 946) requesting
that all range states supply all available information on the status of
their wild bear populations, trade threats, and legislative and
regulatory controls on the killing of bears and on trade in their parts
and derivatives; and that all countries of import, re-export, and
consumption of bear parts and derivatives supply all information on
their enforcement efforts to interdict illegal shipments of bear parts
and derivatives, legislative and regulatory controls on trade in these
parts and derivatives, prosecutions relating to illegal trade in bear
parts or derivatives, the kinds of bear derivatives available on the
market, efforts to promote the use of substitutes in traditional
medicine, and education programs. At the 10th meeting of the Conference
of the Parties in Zimbabwe in June 1997, the CITES Parties will
consider two very similar proposals to transfer all Asian and European
populations of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) from CITES Appendix II to
Appendix I.
As part of its ongoing responsibility to implement CITES, the
Office of Management Authority of the Service monitors the trade in
species protected by CITES to determine whether or not any country is
diminishing the effectiveness of CITES. The Service has been assessing
information on the international bear trade for a number of years,
particularly its impact on North American bear populations. The Service
is aware that poaching of wild specimens can be extremely detrimental
to bear populations, and is cognizant of the important role of bear
species within an ecosystem. Further, the U.S. government supported
recent actions taken by the CITES Animals and Standing Committees to
address the international bear trade problem. The Service is aware
that, upon acceding to CITES in July 1993, the Republic of Korea took a
three-year reservation on Appendix II bear species, effectively
allowing unrestricted trade with non-Party countries. In October 1996,
after that reservation had expired, domestic trade in bear species was
banned, according to Korean English-language press reports. The Service
fully intends to examine closely all evidence submitted during the
comment period in order to assess the accuracy and implications of
these reports. The Service is currently reviewing and analyzing the
petition, as well as other information in the Service's files on trade
in bears and bear parts. After the close of the public comment period,
the Service will review all of the data in its administrative record
before submitting its recommendation to the Secretary of the Interior.
Request for Information and Comments
This notice requests comments and information from the public on
the following: (1) Existence of poaching, taking, smuggling, or trade
in bears, bear parts or bear products/derivatives by Republic of Korea
nationals; (2) The effect of take or trade in bears, bear parts or bear
products/derivatives on bear species' conservation status in the
Republic of Korea or elsewhere; (3) Whether or not actions of Republic
of Korea nationals are undermining the effectiveness of CITES; (4) Any
illegal trade in bear species, bear parts, or bear products/derivatives
by nationals of other countries; (5) Any affirmative measures taken by
the Republic of Korea to enhance CITES implementation, especially
measures to regulate trade in bears, bear parts or bear products/
derivatives, as well as evidence regarding the efficacy of these
measures. This information will be used by the Department of the
Interior in determining what actions should be taken.
Authors: This notice was prepared by Dr. Susan S. Lieberman and
Theodora Greanias, Office of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (703/358-2093; FAX 703/358-2280).
Dated: April 28, 1997.
John G. Rogers,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 97-11616 Filed 5-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.