Science Advisory Board; Meeting

Federal RegisterApr 5, 1996

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5454-4]

Science Advisory Board; Meeting

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463,

notice is hereby given that several committees of the Science Advisory

Board (SAB) will meet on the dates and times described below. All times

noted are Eastern Time. All meetings are open to the public. Due to

limited space, seating at meetings will be on a first-come basis; for

teleconference meetings, the number of available phone lines is

limited. For further information concerning specific meetings, please

contact the individuals listed below.

[[Page 15255]]

Documents that are the subject of SAB reviews are normally available

from the originating EPA office and are not available from the SAB

Office.

(1) Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee's (CASAC) Air Quality

Models Subcommittee (AQMS): The Air Quality Models Subcommittee will

continue its review of the technical aspects of the Agency's Air

Quality Models with a teleconference meeting on Friday, April 26, 1996

from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm. The AQMS formally began to review air quality

models as a component of the Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 812 Cost-

Benefit Study in a series of public teleconferences on October 1, 1993

and October 21, 1993, with a follow-up review meeting on December 2,

1993 (See 58 FR 49297, September 22, 1993, and 58 FR 60628, November

17, 1993). The Subcommittee is conducting this specialty review on air

quality models on behalf of the Clean Air Act Compliance Analysis

Council (CAACAC) as an activity required under Section 812 of the CAA.

This teleconference meeting is a continuation of the above reviews as

the Agency prepares its final report to Congress. The charge to the

Subcommittee is to review the analytical methodologies, data sources,

implementation, and results of the air quality modeling component of

the Section 812 Retrospective Analysis, and provide advice to the

CAACAC regarding the reasonableness, technical merits, and appropriate

interpretations of the modeling results.

The draft documents that are the subject of this review are

available from the originating EPA office as noted below. There are

eleven (11) draft documents being provided to the AQMS. Nine draft

documents are being provided as background (Items 1 through 9), while

the other two are being submitted for review (Items 10 and 11). These

documents are: Background Documents: (1) The Benefits and Costs of the

Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990--Report to Congress, Chapter 3: Emissions,

Draft, March 1996; (2) The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act,

1970 to 1990--Report to Congress, Appendix B: Emissions Modeling,

Draft, March 1996; (3) Retrospective Analysis of Ozone Air Quality in

the United States, Final Report, March 1996; (4) Retrospective Analysis

of Particulate Matter Air Quality in the United States, Draft Report,

September 1992; (5) PM Interpolation Methodology for the Section 812

Retrospective Analysis, Memo from J. Lansstaff to J. DeMocker, pending;

(6) Retrospective Analysis of Particulate Matter Air Quality in the

United States, Final Report, March, 1996; (7) Retrospective Analysis of

SO2, NOx, and CO Air Quality in the United States, Final

Report, November 1994; (8) Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of the

Clean Air Act of Urban Visibility in the Southwestern United States,

Final Report, October 1994; (9) Estimation of Regional Air Quality and

Deposition Changes Under Alternative Section 812 Emissions Scenarios

Predicted by the Regional Acid Deposition Model, RADM, Draft Report,

October 1995. Review Documents: (10) The Benefits and Costs of the

Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990--Report to Congress, Chapter 4: Air

Quality, Draft, March 1996, and (11) The Benefits and Costs of the

Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990--Report to Congress, Appendix C: Air

Quality Modeling, Draft, March 1996.

To discuss technical aspects of the above draft documents, please

contact Mr. James DeMocker, Office of Policy Analysis and Review (OPAR)

(MC 6103), US Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20460. Tel. (202) 260-8980; FAX (202) 260-9766, or via

the Internet at: [email protected]. To obtain single copies

of the draft documents, please contact Ms. Eileen Pritchard, Secretary,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning and

Evaluation (OPPE), Economic Analysis and Innovation Division (MC 2127),

401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460. Tel.(202) 260-8465.

To obtain copies of the teleconference agenda, please contact Mrs.

Diana L. Pozun, Secretary, Radiation Advisory Committee, Tel. (202)

260-6552; FAX (202) 260-7118; or via the Internet:

[email protected]). To discuss technical aspects of the draft

commentary, please contact Dr. K. Jack Kooyoomjian, Designated Federal

Official, Radiation Advisory Committee, Tel. (202) 260-2560; FAX (202)

260-7118; or via the Internet: [email protected]).

Members of the public who wish to make a brief oral presentation at

this teleconference should contact Mrs. Diana L. Pozun no later than

April 23, 1996.

(2) Radiation Advisory Committee (RAC): The Radiation Advisory

Committee (RAC) is meeting via teleconference on Tuesday, April 30,

1996 from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm. The RAC is planning to discuss its draft

commentary (``Commentary on the Scientific Basis for Apportioning of

Risk Among the ICRP Publication 66 Regions of the Respiratory Tract,''

dated March 27, 1996) concerning the new ICRP (International Commission

on Radiological Protection) Human Respiratory Tract Model for

Radiological Protection. The new ICRP model was designed to accommodate

the potentially large differences in the doses received and in the

radiation sensitivities of the various tissues comprising the

respiratory tract, as well as being compatible with the ICRP dosimetry

system.

To obtain copies of the teleconference agenda or the draft

commentary, please contact Mrs. Diana L. Pozun, Secretary, Radiation

Advisory Committee, Tel. (202) 260-6552; FAX (202) 260-7118; or via the

Internet: [email protected]. To discuss technical aspects of

the draft commentary, please contact Dr. K. Jack Kooyoomjian,

Designated Federal Official, RAC, Tel. (202) 260-2560; FAX (202) 260-

7118; or via the Internet: [email protected]. Members of

the public who wish to make a brief oral presentation at this

teleconference should contact Mrs. Diana L. Pozun no later than April

23, 1996.

Providing Oral or Written Comments at SAB Meetings

The Science Advisory Board expects that public statements presented

at its meetings will not be repetitive of previously submitted oral or

written statements. In general, opportunities for oral comment at

teleconference meetings will be usually limited to three minutes per

speaker and no more than fifteen minutes total. Written comments (at

least 35 copies) received in the SAB Staff Office sufficiently prior to

a meeting date (usually one week prior to a meeting), may be mailed to

the subcommittee prior to its meeting; comments received too close to

the meeting date will normally be provided to the subcommittee at its

meeting, except for teleconferences, where brief written materials may

be faxed to the participants, with more detailed or lengthy materials

received too close to the teleconference to be mailed to the

subcommittee or committee participants shortly after the

teleconference. Written comments may be provided up until the time of

the meeting.

Dated: March 27, 1996.

John R. Fowle III,

Acting Staff Director, Science Advisory Board.

[FR Doc. 96-8477 Filed 4-4-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.