Credit for Increasing Research Activities

Federal RegisterJan 2, 1997

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

26 CFR Parts 1 and 602

[REG-209494-90]

RIN 1545-A051

Credit for Increasing Research Activities

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations under section 41

of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 describing when computer software

which is developed by (or for the benefit of) a taxpayer primarily for

the taxpayer's internal use can qualify for the credit for increasing

research activities. The proposed regulations reflect a change to

section 41 made by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. This document also

provides notice of a public hearing on these proposed regulations.

DATES: Comments and outlines of topics to be discussed at the public

hearing scheduled for May 13, 1997 must be received by April 22, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:DOM:CORP:R (REG-209494-90), room

5228, Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604, Ben Franklin Station,

Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered between the

hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. to: CC:DOM:CORP:R (REG-209494-90), Courier's

Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,

Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit comments

electronically via the Internet by selecting the ``Tax Regs'' option of

the IRS Home Page, or by submitting comments directly to the IRS

Internet site at: http://www.irs.ustreas.gov/prod/tax__regs/

comments.html. The public hearing will be held in the auditorium,

Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the regulations, Lisa J.

Shuman or Robert B. Hanson, 202-622-3120; concerning submissions and

the hearing, Christina Vasquez, 202-622-7180 (not toll-free numbers).

[[Page 82]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code provides a credit against

tax for increasing research activities. Eligibility for the credit is

determined in part on the definition of qualified research under

section 41(d)(1). Section 231 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the 1986

Act), 1986-3 C.B. 1, 87, established a new definition of qualified

research for purposes of the research credit. Qualified research was

narrowed to require that research be undertaken for the purpose of

discovering information that is technological in nature and the

application of which is intended to be useful in developing a new or

improved business component of the taxpayer. In addition, research is

eligible for the credit only if substantially all of the activities of

the research constitute elements of a process of experimentation for a

new or improved function, performance, or reliability or quality.

Treasury and the IRS request comments on the appropriate explanation of

the terms used in the definition of qualified research under the 1986

Act, in particular, the term process of experimentation.

Section 231 of the 1986 Act also specified that expenditures

incurred in certain research, research-related, and non-research

activities are to be excluded from eligibility for the credit without

reference to the general requirements for credit eligibility. Under

section 41(d)(4)(E) of the Code, except to the extent provided in

regulations, qualified research does not include research with respect

to computer software developed by (or for the benefit of) the taxpayer

primarily for the taxpayer's own use (internal-use software), other

than for use in (1) an activity which constitutes qualified research,

or (2) a production process whose development meets the requirements in

section 41(d)(1) for qualified research (as where the taxpayer is

developing robotics and software for the robotics for use in operating

a manufacturing process, and the taxpayer's research costs of

developing the robotics are eligible for the credit).

The legislative history indicates that Congress intended to limit

the credit for the costs of developing internal-use software to

software meeting a high threshold of innovation. In particular,

Congress intended that regulations would permit internal-use software

to qualify for the credit only if, in addition to satisfying the

general requirements for credit eligibility, the taxpayer can establish

that the following three-part test is satisfied: the software is

innovative (as where the software results in a reduction in cost, or

improvement in speed, that is substantial and economically

significant); the software development involves significant risk (as

where the taxpayer commits substantial resources to the development of

the software and there is substantial uncertainty, because of technical

risk, that such resources would not be recovered in a reasonable period

of time); and the software is not commercially available for use by the

taxpayer (as where the software cannot be purchased, leased, or

licensed and used for the intended purpose without modifications that

would satisfy the first two requirements). See H.R. Rep. No. 841, 99th

Cong., 2d Sess. II-73. Thus, Congress did not intend that the three-

part test in the legislative history would apply in lieu of the general

requirements for credit eligibility but, rather, intended that the

general requirements for credit eligibility of section 41(d) also would

have to be satisfied. See H.R. Rep. No. 841 at II-73.

The legislative history indicates, however, that Congress did not

intend the internal-use software exclusion in section 41(d)(4)(E) to

apply to research related to the development of a new or improved

package of software and hardware developed as a single product of which

the software is an integral part, and that is used directly by the

taxpayer in providing technological services to customers in its trade

or business (as where a taxpayer develops together a new or improved

high technology medical or industrial instrument containing software

that processes and displays data received by the instrument, or where a

telecommunications company develops a package of new or improved

switching equipment plus software to operate the switches). See H.R.

Rep. No. 841 at II-74.

Congress intended that regulations incorporating the three-part

test in the legislative history as an exception to the exclusion from

the definition of qualified research under section 41(d)(4)(E) would be

effective on the same date section 41(d)(4)(E) became effective. In

Notice 87-12 (1987-1 C.B. 432), the IRS stated that regulations to be

issued under section 41(d)(4)(E) would be effective for taxable years

beginning after December 31, 1985.

Explanation of Provisions

The proposed regulations follow the legislative history and provide

that internal-use software that meets the general requirements of

section 41(d), is innovative, involves significant economic risk, and

is not commercially available for use by the taxpayer is not excluded

from eligibility for the research credit under section 41(d)(4)(E).

Under the proposed regulations, this is a facts and circumstances test.

Treasury and the IRS request comments on facts and circumstances, other

than those factors enumerated in the legislative history, to be

considered in determining whether internal-use software satisfies the

three-part test.

Proposed Effective Dates

The amendments are proposed to be effective for taxable years

beginning after December 31, 1985.

Special Analyses

It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is

not a significant regulatory action as defined in EO 12866. Therefore,

a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined

that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.

chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because these

regulations do not impose a collection of information on small

entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not

apply. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required.

Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this notice

of proposed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for

Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact

on small business.

Comments and Public Hearing

Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,

consideration will be given to any comments that are submitted timely

(in the manner described in the ADDRESSES portion of this preamble) to

the IRS. All comments will be available for public inspection and

copying.

A public hearing has been scheduled for May 13, 1997, at 10 a.m. in

the auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue,

NW., Washington, DC. Because of access restrictions, visitors will not

be admitted beyond the building lobby more than 15 minutes before the

hearing starts.

The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing.

Persons that wish to present oral comments at the hearing must

submit (in the manner described in the ADDRESSES portion of this

preamble) comments and an outline of the topics to be discussed and the

time to be devoted to each topic by April 22, 1997.

[[Page 83]]

A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to each person for making

comments.

An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will be prepared

after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the

agenda will be available free of charge at the hearing.

List of Subjects

26 CFR Part 1

Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

26 CFR Part 602

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Proposed Amendments to the Regulations

Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 are proposed to be amended as

follows:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding

an entry in numerical order to read as follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805. * * *

Section 1.41-4 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 41(d)(4)(E). * * *

Par. 2. Section 1.41-0 is amended by revising the entry for

Sec. 1.41-4 to read as follows:

Sec. 1.41-0 Table of contents.

* * * * *

Sec. 1.41-4 Qualified research for taxable years beginning after

December 31, 1985.

(a) through (d) [Reserved].

(e) Internal-use computer software.

(1) General rule.

(2) Requirements.

(3) Computer software and hardware developed as a single

product.

(4) Primarily for internal use.

(5) Special rule.

(6) Application of special rule.

(7) Effective date.

* * * * *

Par. 3. Section 1.41-4 is revised to read as follows:

Sec. 1.41-4 Qualified research for taxable years beginning after

December 31, 1985.

(a) through (d) [Reserved].

(e) Internal-use computer software--(1) General rule. Research with

respect to computer software that is developed by (or for the benefit

of) the taxpayer primarily for the taxpayer's internal use is eligible

for the research credit only if the software satisfies the requirements

of paragraph (e)(2) of this section. Generally, research with respect

to computer software is not eligible for the research credit where

software is used internally, for example, in general and administrative

functions (such as payroll, bookkeeping, or personnel management) or in

providing noncomputer services (such as accounting, consulting, or

banking services).

(2) Requirements. The requirements of this paragraph (e)(2) are--

(i) The software satisfies the requirements of section 41(d)(1);

(ii) The software is not otherwise excluded under section 41(d)(4)

(other than section 41(d)(4)(E)); and

(iii) One of the following conditions is met--

(A) The taxpayer uses the software in an activity that constitutes

qualified research (other than the development of the internal-use

software itself);

(B) The taxpayer uses the software in a production process that

meets the requirements of section 41(d)(1); or

(C) The software satisfies the special rule of paragraph (e)(5) of

this section.

(3) Computer software and hardware developed as a single product.

This paragraph (e) does not apply to the development costs of a new or

improved package of computer software and hardware developed together

by the taxpayer as a single product, of which the software is an

integral part, that is used directly by the taxpayer in providing

technological services in its trade or business to customers. In these

cases, eligibility for the research credit is to be determined by

examining the combined hardware-software product as a single product.

(4) Primarily for internal use. All relevant facts and

circumstances are to be considered in determining if computer software

is developed primarily for the taxpayer's internal use. If computer

software is developed primarily for the taxpayer's internal use, the

requirements of this paragraph (e) apply even though the taxpayer

intends to, or subsequently does, sell, lease, or license the computer

software.

(5) Special rule. Computer software satisfies the special rule of

this paragraph (e)(5) only if the taxpayer can establish that--

(i) The software is innovative (as where the software results in a

reduction in cost, or improvement in speed, that is substantial and

economically significant);

(ii) The software development involves significant economic risk

(as where the taxpayer commits substantial resources to the development

and there is a substantial uncertainty, because of technical risk, that

such resources would be recovered within a reasonable period); and

(iii) The software is not commercially available for use by the

taxpayer (as where the software cannot be purchased, leased, or

licensed and used for the intended purpose without modifications that

would satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (e)(5) (i) and (ii) of

this section).

(6) Application of special rule. In determining if the special rule

of paragraph (e)(5) of this section is satisfied all of the facts and

circumstances are considered. The special rule allows the costs of

developing internal-use software to be eligible for the research credit

only if the software meets a high threshold of innovation. The facts

and circumstances analysis takes into account only the results

attributable to the development of the new or improved software

independent of the effect of any modifications to related hardware or

other software. The weight given to any fact or circumstance will

depend on the particular case.

(7) Effective date. This paragraph (e) is applicable for taxable

years beginning after December 31, 1985.

Secs. 1.41-0A through 1.41-8A [Removed]

Par. 4. Sections 1.41-0A through 1.41-8A and the undesignated

centerheading preceding these sections are removed.

PART 602--OMB CONTROL NUMBERS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT

Par. 5. The authority citation for part 602 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.

Par. 6. In Sec. 602.101, paragraph (c) is amended by removing the

following entries from the table:

Sec. 602.101 OMB Control numbers.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current OMB

CFR part or section where identified and described control No.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

1.41-4A.................................................... 1545-0074

1.41-4 (b) and (c)......................................... 1545-0074

* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Margaret Milner Richardson,

Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

[FR Doc. 96-32671 Filed 12-31-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.