Proposed Settlement Agreement; PM-10 SIP for the State of Arizona
Federal RegisterDec 3, 1996
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5658-1]
Proposed Settlement Agreement; PM-10 SIP for the State of Arizona
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act
(``Act''), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a
proposed settlement agreement concerning litigation instituted against
the Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') by Edward M. Ober, et
al., through his counsel Davis S. Baron of the Arizona Center for Law
in the Public Interest. The lawsuit concerns EPA's alleged failure to
perform a nondiscretionary duty with respect to promulgating a federal
implementation plan (``FIP'') controlling particulate matter (``PM-
10'') emissions in the Phoenix, Arizona Planning Area.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the settlement agreement. EPA or the Department of Justice may withhold
or withdraw consent to the proposed settlement agreement if the
comments disclose facts or circumstances that indicate that such
consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with
the requirements of the Act.
Copies of the settlement agreement are available from Phyllis
Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of General Counsel,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC
20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be sent to Michael A.
Prosper at the above address and must be submitted on or before January
2, 1997.
Dated: November 25, 1996.
Scott C. Fulton,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-30740 Filed 12-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.