Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Massachusetts; Emissions Banking, Trading, and Averaging Program Approval
Federal RegisterAug 8, 1996
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[FRL-5533-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Massachusetts;
Emissions Banking, Trading, and Averaging Program Approval
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving, in final, a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by Massachusetts. This revision establishes a
voluntary emissions banking, trading, and averaging program for
eligible sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides
(NOX), or carbon monoxide (CO). The goal of these regulations is
to encourage the creation, trading, and averaging of emission reduction
credits in order for facilities to comply with new source review
offsetting, netting, and reasonably available control technology (RACT)
requirements in the most cost-effective manner. The program was adopted
as a discretionary Economic Incentive Program, developed pursuant to
EPA's guidance. This revision includes provisions which EPA proposed to
approve in a document published on February 22, 1995.
DATES: This action is effective October 7, 1996, unless notice is
received by September 9, 1996 that adverse or critical comments will be
submitted. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be
published in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Susan Studlien, Deputy Director,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region I, JFK Federal Bldg., Boston, MA 02203. Copies of the State
submittal and EPA's technical support document are available for public
inspection during normal business hours, by appointment at the Office
of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
I, One Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston, MA, and the Division of Air
Quality Control, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection,
One Winter Street, 8th floor, Boston, MA 02108.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven A. Rapp, Environmental
Engineer, Air Quality Planning Unit (CAQ), United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 1, JFK Federal Building, Boston, MA 02203.
(617) 565-2773.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 7, 1994, EPA published final rules for Economic Incentive
Programs (59 FR 16690). The notice set forth Economic Incentive Program
(EIP) rules which could be adopted by certain ozone and carbon monoxide
nonattainment areas which were mandated by sections 182(g)(3),
182(g)(5), 187(d)(3), and 187(g) of the Clean Air Act (Act) to use or
consider EIPs. The notice also served as interim guidance for States to
develop discretionary EIPs for any criteria pollutant in all areas.
Massachusetts has developed emissions banking and trading, and
emissions averaging regulations as a discretionary EIP. The program was
developed pursuant to EPA's EIP guidance. These regulations establish a
voluntary emissions banking, trading, and averaging program for
eligible sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides
(NOX), or carbon monoxide (CO). The goal of these regulations is
to encourage the creation, trading, and averaging of emission reduction
credits in order for facilities to comply with new source review
offsetting, netting, and reasonably available control technology (RACT)
requirements in the most cost-effective manner.
II. State Submittal
Massachusetts submitted an emissions banking and trading, and
emissions averaging regulations in two separate SIP submittals. First,
on February 9, 1994, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection (MA DEP) submitted Sections 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(1), (2),
(3), and (5) as a revision to its SIP. These sections of the
regulations establish requirements for the certification of emission
reduction credits (ERCs), or ``banking,'' as well as for the trading of
the ERCs between facilities. On February 22, 1995, EPA proposed
approval of this submittal. Subsequently, on April 14, 1995, the EPA
received a request from the Massachusetts DEP to revise the SIP for
ozone, including amendments to 310 CMR 7.18 and 7.19, regarding
emissions averaging at VOC and NOX RACT sources, concurrent with
the addition of sections 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(4) and (6), which deal
with emissions averaging and public participation procedures,
respectively, in the EIP.
[[Page 41336]]
Additionally, on February 8, 1996, MA DEP submitted supplemental
information to EPA which provides a quantitative demonstration that the
use of ERCs certified under 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B, including the use
of credits created by one-time actions, or unused credits carried over
from year to year, i.e., the inter-temporal use of credits, will be
consistent with the requirements of the Massachusetts SIP, Reasonable
Further Progress (RFP) and Rate of Progress (ROP) plans, and area wide
RACT requirements.
The following is a description of the changes being approved in
this action:
A. 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(1), (2), (3), and (5)
Sections (1), (2), (3), and (5) of Appendix B establish a
discretionary economic incentive program (EIP) under Section 182 of the
Clean Air Act of emission banking and trading. The EIP rule classifies
EIPs into three broad categories: emission limiting, market response,
and directionally sound. Since this EIP will limit total mass emission,
related parameters, or specify levels of emission reductions from
eligible sources, it is classified as emission-limiting. Under this
EIP, individuals and companies can voluntarily reduce emissions at
eligible stationary sources (e.g., factories), mobile sources (e.g.,
automobiles), or area sources (e.g., residential heating systems) below
the level required by State and federal regulations and then ``bank''
the surplus reductions as credit. This program also establishes the
requirements for the transfer credits between eligible entities. Under
this program, stationary sources can use credits to comply with new
source review offsetting, netting, and reasonably available control
technology (RACT) requirements. These sections of the regulations
became effective in Massachusetts on September 10, 1993.
B. 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(4)
The goal of this part of the regulations is to allow sources of
NOX and VOC to utilize emissions averaging, or ``bubbling'', in
order to comply with RACT requirements. The addition of 310 CMR 7.00
Appendix B(4), in combination to the changes made to 310 CMR 7.18 and
7.19, establishes a system by which facilities owned by the same
person(s) can average, or ``bubble'' emissions. These rule changes
became effective in Massachusetts on January 27, 1995. This means that
facilities which reduce emissions below the level required by State and
federal regulation at some emission sources, can control less at other
emission sources, provided that the net effect to the environment is as
if all the emission sources applied the otherwise required controls.
This regulation replaces the former 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B.
C. 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(6)
Section 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(6) was added to establish public
participation procedures which apply to applications processed under
310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B. These rule changes became effective in
Massachusetts on January 27, 1995. These provisions require that the MA
DEP propose publicly whether an application should be approved,
approved with conditions, or disapproved. Additionally, these
provisions require the MA DEP to make all non-confidential information
available to the public, to publish a public notice, to provide a 30
day public comment period, and conduct a public hearing. The inclusion
of these requirements, in combination with the other requirements of
310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B, will allow EPA to consider permits issued
consistent with Appendix B, for the certification, withdrawal,
transfer, or use of ERCs, to be considered federally enforceable
without the need for further EPA approval.
D. 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b)
The changes adopted to 310 CMR 7.18 consist of providing facility
owners with the option to utilize emissions averaging to comply with
VOC RACT emission limitations contained in 310 CMR 7.18 (3) through
(7), (10) through (12), and (14) through (16). Also, these provisions
require any facility utilizing emissions averaging to comply with the
requirements of 310 CMR 7.18 to be subject to the emissions averaging
requirements of 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(4).
E. 310 CMR 7.19(2)(d), (2)(g), and (14)
The changes adopted to 310 CMR 7.19 allow any source subject to the
NOX RACT requirements of 310 CMR 7.19 either to comply with a more
stringent limitation, in order to create emission reduction (ERCs)
credits or offsets, or to comply with the emission limitations of 310
CMR 7.19 by averaging emissions or by using ERCs. Section 310 CMR
7.19(14) allows emission units subject to the emission standards in 310
CMR 7.19(4), (5), (7), (8), or (12) to comply by emissions averaging.
Further, this section provides the conversion factors necessary for
averaging emissions between stationary reciprocating internal
combustion engines or stationary combustion turbines with boilers.
Additionally, this section requires such averaging emission units to
meet the testing, monitoring, record keeping, and reporting
requirements of 310 CMR 7.19(13)(b), (c), and (d), which includes the
requirements to use NOX CEMS on averaging units.
III. Analysis of State Submittal and Supporting Material
EPA has evaluated the Massachusetts emissions banking, trading, and
averaging regulations and supporting documentation against applicable
EPA guidance, including, the Economic Incentive Program rules (40 CFR
Sec. 51.490-494) and the EPA's June 28, 1989 guidance on requirements
of State implementation plans (54 FR 27274). EPA has determined that
all applicable requirements of these guidance documents have been met.
EPA has developed a technical support document (TSD) that contains a
detailed description of this analysis. The TSD is part of the docket
supporting this action and is available upon request.
IV. Issues
On February 22, 1995, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPR) proposing to approve portions of 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B as a
non-generic economic incentive program (60 FR 9810). In response to
that notice, EPA received four comments. The commenters raised two
major areas of concern. First, three of the commenters argued that EPA
should grant ``generic'' authority to Massachusetts to allow the State
to approve emissions trades without further EPA approval. Second, one
commenter asserted that this EIP could result in pollution ``spikes''
if facilities traded emission reduction credits such that they would
emit more during the summer ozone season than the underlying control
requirements would have allowed absent the EIP.
However, since the publication of that notice, Massachusetts
adopted a number of regulatory changes which address the deficiencies
outlined in the NPR, including providing for public notice and comment
on each trade or credit certification. Also, Massachusetts has
submitted a quantitative analysis showing that the use of credits under
310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(3), including the use of one-time or carry over
credits during time periods other than when they were generated (i.e.,
the inter-temporal use of credits), will be consistent with the
requirements of the Massachusetts SIP, RFP and ROP plans, and area wide
RACT requirements. EPA also performed an analysis of the potential
buffering effect inherent in implementation of the State's current
regulations. Based upon the regulatory
[[Page 41337]]
changes and additional analyses, EPA believes that the Massachusetts
emissions banking, trading program now fully meets the applicable EPA
guidance documents. Additionally, EPA has determined that the emissions
averaging portion of the program also meets the applicable EPA
guidance. Therefore, in lieu of finalizing the proposed final approval
of 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix B(1), (2), (3), and (5), and proposing
approval of the other provisions as a separate action, EPA is approving
all of 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B, as well as 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b), 310 CMR
7.19(2)(d), 7.19(2)(g), and 7.19(14), as a fully generic EIP. The TSD
provides a detailed explanation of how EPA is addressing the comments
received on its earlier proposal, and how this current submittal
responds to the concerns raised in those comments.
V. Final Action
EPA is approving all of 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B, as submitted to
date, as well as 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b), 310 CMR 7.19(2)(d), 7.19(2)(g),
and 7.19(14), as a fully generic EIP. Additionally, upon approval of
these regulations as part of the SIP, EPA will consider any emission
control plans or credit certifications issued according to the
requirements of 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B since January 27, 1995, i.e.,
the effective date of the modified regulations, as federally
enforceable without the need for further EPA approval. EPA is
publishing this action without prior proposal because the Agency views
this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal Register
publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision should
adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be effective
October 7, 1996 unless adverse or critical comments are received by
September 9, 1996.
If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn
before the effective date by simultaneously publishing a subsequent
notice that will withdraw the final action. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so at this time. If no such
comments are received, the public is advised that this action will be
effective on October 7, 1996.
VI. Procedural Background
Nothing in this action shall be construed as permitting or allowing
or establishing a precedent for any future request for a revision to
any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to the state
implementation plan shall be considered separately in light of specific
technical, economic, and environmental factors and in relation to
relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
VII. Regulatory Process
This action has been classified as a Table 3 action by the Regional
Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on
January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a July 10, 1995
memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation. A future document will inform the general public of these
tables. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
action from review under Executive Order 12866.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et. seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
EPA's action does not create any new requirements, but simply
approves requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore,
because the federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements,
I certify that it does not have a significant impact on any small
entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the federal-State
relationship under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility
analysis would constitute federal inquiry into the economic
reasonableness of State action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions
concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. USEPA, 427 US
246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).
Under sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22,
1995, EPA must assess whether various actions undertaken in association
with proposed or final regulations that include a Federal mandate that
may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private
sector, or to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
EPA has determined, as discussed earlier, that the finding that is
the subject of this final action does not impose any federal
intergovernment mandate, as defined in Sec. 101 of the Unfunded
Mandates Act. This action consists of factual determinations based upon
the State's adoption of a voluntary program. Accordingly, no additional
costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector
result from this action. This action also will not impose a mandate
that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to either
State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private
sector.
Under section 801(a)(1)(A) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Comptroller General of the General Accounting
Office prior to publication of this rule in today's Federal Register.
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by section 804(2) of the
APA as amended.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to
the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light
of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in
relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon Monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation
Plan for the State of Massachusetts was approved by the Director of
the Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
Dated: June 18, 1996.
John P. DeVillars,
Regional Administrator, Region I.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q
[[Page 41338]]
Subpart W--Massachusetts
2. Section 52.1120 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(112) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1120 Identification of plan.
* * * * * *
(c) * * *
(112) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on February 9,
1994, and April 14, 1995, concerning emissions banking, trading, and
averaging.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection dated February 9, 1994, and March 29, 1995, submitting
revisions to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Regulations 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(1); 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix
B(2); 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(3), except 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix
B(3)(e)5.h; and, 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(5); effective on January 1,
1994. Also, regulations 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(4); 310 CMR 7.00
Appendix B(6); 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b); 310 CMR 7.19(2)(d); 310 CMR
7.19(2)(g); and, 310 CMR 7.19(14); effective on January 27, 1995.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter and attachments from the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection dated February 8, 1996, submitting
supplemental information concerning the demonstration of balance
between credit creation and credit use.
3. In Sec. 52.1167, table 52.1167 is amended by removing the
existing entry for ``310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B'' and replacing it with
the new entry ``310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B, except for 310 CMR 7.00
Appendix B(3)(e)5.h''; and by adding new entries in numerical order to
existing state citations ``310 CMR 7.18'' and ``310 CMR 7.19'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1167 EPA-approved Massachusetts State regulations.
* * * * *
Table 52.1167.--EPA-Approved Massachusetts Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date submitted by Federal Register Comments/unapproved
State citation Title/subject State Date approved by EPA citation 52.1120(c) sections
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B (except Emissions Banking, 2/9/94 and......... Aug. 8, 1996.......... [FR citation from 112 Replaces earlier
310 CMR 7.00 Appendix Trading, and 3/29/95............ published date]. emissions averaging
B(3)(e)5.h). Averaging. rules with emissions
banking, trading, and
averaging.
* * * * * * *
310 CMR 7.18 (2)(b)............ Generic VOC bubble 3/29/95............ Aug. 8, 1996.......... [FR citation from 112 Replaces earlier
for surface published date]. emissions averaging
coaters. rules for surface
coaters.
* * * * * * *
310 CMR 7.19 (2)(d)............ Generic NOX 3/29/95............ Aug. 8, 1996.......... [FR citation from 112 Adds credit creation
bubbling and published date]. option for NOX RACT
trading for RACT sources.
sources.
310 CMR 7.19 (2)(g)............ Generic NOX 3/29/95............ Aug. 8, 1996.......... [FR citation from 112 Adds credit use option
bubbling and published date]. for NOX RACT sources.
trading for RACT
sources.
310 CMR 7.19 (14).............. Generic NOX 3/29/95............ Aug. 8, 1996.......... [FR citation from 112 Adds quantification,
bubbling for RACT published date]. testing, monitoring,
sources. record keeping,
reporting, and
emission control plan
requirements for
averaging NOX RACT
sources.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 96-20241 Filed 8-07-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.