Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

Federal RegisterMar 21, 1995

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL79-2-6616B; FRL-5167-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USEPA proposes to approve requested revisions to the

Chicago ozone Federal Implementation Plan as it pertains to the

following sources: General Motors Corporation, [[Page 14921]] Minnesota

Mining and Manufacturing Corporation; Replogle Globes, Inc., Candle

Corporation of America, Nalco Chemical Company, Parisian Novelty

Company, Meyercord Corporation, Wallace Computer Services, Inc. and

General Packaging Products, Inc. This action lists the FIP revisions

USEPA is proposing to approve and provides an opportunity to request a

public hearing. A detailed rationale for approving these requests is

presented in the final rules section of this Federal Register, where

USEPA is approving the revision requests as a direct final rule without

prior proposal because USEPA views these as noncontroversial revisions

and anticipates no adverse comments. If no adverse comments or requests

for a public hearing are received in response to that direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed

rule. If USEPA receives adverse comments or a public hearing request,

the direct final rule will be withdrawn. The USEPA will institute a

second comment period on this notice only if a public hearing is

requested. Any parties interested in commenting on this notice should

do so at this time. If a request for a public hearing is received,

USEPA will publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing a public

hearing. The final rule on this proposed action will address all

comments received.

DATES: Comments on this proposal must be received by April 20, 1995. A

public hearing, if requested, will be held in Chicago, Illinois.

Requests for a public hearing should be submitted to J. Elmer Bortzer

by April 20, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests for a public hearing on this

proposed action should be addressed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief,

Regulation Development Section (AR-18J), Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Comments should be strictly limited to the subject matter of this

proposal.

DOCKET: Pursuant to section 307(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42

U.S.C. 7607(d)(1)(B), this action is subject to the procedural

requirements of section 307(d). Therefore, USEPA has established a

public docket for this action, A-94-39, which is available for public

inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through

Friday, at the following addresses. We recommend that you contact

Fayette Bright before visiting the Chicago location and Rachel Romine

before visiting the Washington, D.C. location. A reasonable fee may be

charged for copying.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5,

Regulation Development Branch, Eighteenth Floor, Southeast, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, (312) 886-6069.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Docket No. A-94-39,

Air Docket (LE-131), Room M1500, Waterside Mall, 401 M Street SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 245-3639.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven Rosenthal, Regulation Development Branch (AR-18J), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6052.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct

final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.

Dated: February 28, 1995.

Carol M. Browner,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95-6004 Filed 3-20-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.