Interstate Movement of Mexican-Origin Cattle; Certification Requirements
Federal RegisterFeb 21, 1995
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
9 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. 93-084-3]
Interstate Movement of Mexican-Origin Cattle; Certification
Requirements
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are withdrawing a proposed rule that would have amended the
regulations concerning the interstate transportation of animals to
require that all Mexican-origin cattle moved in interstate commerce be
accompanied by a certificate on which each animal is individually
identified. We are taking this action after reevaluating the proposed
rule in light of the comments we received following the publication of
the proposed rule.
DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn February 21, 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. James P. Davis, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary
Services, Cattle Diseases and Surveillance Staff, 4700 River Road Unit
36, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-4923.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 12, 1993, we published in the Federal Register (58 FR
59959-59962, Docket No. 93-084-1) a proposal to amend the regulations
concerning the interstate transportation of animals in 9 CFR part 71 to
require all Mexican-origin cattle moved in interstate commerce to be
accompanied by a certificate on which each animal is individually
identified. The certificate would have been issued by an Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) representative, State
representative, or accredited veterinarian in the State from which the
cattle were to be moved. We also proposed to make several
nonsubstantive changes to the regulations in part 71 for the sake of
clarity and accuracy.
We initially solicited comments concerning our proposal for 30 days
ending December 13, 1993. We received several requests for an extension
of the comment period to give interested parties additional time to
prepare comments on the proposal. In response to those requests, we
published in the Federal Register on December 22, 1993 (58 FR 67708-
67709, Docket No. 93-084-2), a document reopening and extending the
comment period until February 14, 1994.
We received a total of 41 comments by the close of the extended
comment period. The comments were submitted by State departments of
agriculture and animal health agencies, veterinarians, private
citizens, cattle industry associations, cattle-oriented businesses, and
a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. Eight commenters
supported the proposed rule as written, while another five commenters
offered some support but suggested changes. The remaining 28 commenters
opposed the proposed rule.
Some of the commenters questioned the need for individual
identification on a certificate, asserting that State veterinarians
could be notified by other means of the arrival of Mexican-origin
cattle in their States. Many commenters believed that the proposed rule
would place a huge new burden on the cattle industry, bringing
excessive paperwork requirements, increased labor costs, and expensive
time delays. Many of the commenters also believed that APHIS had
seriously underestimated the costs that would be associated with
completing, handling, and filing the certificates on which the cattle
would be individually identified.
We carefully considered all of the comments we received. In light
of the issues raised by many of the commenters, we have concluded that
additional research is necessary to determine if the proposed rule
would likely impose greater logistical and financial burdens on those
entities that [[Page 9633]] would be affected by its provisions than we
had initially anticipated. Therefore, we are withdrawing the November
12, 1993, proposed rule referenced above. The concerns and
recommendations of all the commenters will be considered during the
development of any new proposed regulations that would affect the
interstate movement of Mexican-origin cattle.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 111-113, 114a, 114a-1, 115-117, 120-126,
134b, and 134f; 7 CFR 2.17, 2.51, and 371.2(d).
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of February 1995.
Lonnie J. King,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 95-4179 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.