Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PREVACIDRegister

Federal RegisterJan 2, 1996

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 95E-0301]

Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent

Extension; PREVACID

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the

regulatory review period for PREVACID and is publishing this

notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the

determination because of the submission of an application to the

Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the

extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the

Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm.

1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health

Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration,-5600 Fishers Lane,

Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term

Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug

and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide

that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as

the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical

device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory

review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a

product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the

amount of extension an applicant may receive.

A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A

testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the

testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical

investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the

approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial

submission of an application to market the human drug product and

continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.

Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward

the actual amount of extension that the

[[Page 73]]

Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the

testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have

occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the

length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will

include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35

U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).

FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product

PREVACID (lansoprazole). PREVACID is indicated for

short-term treatment (up to 4 weeks) for healing and symptom relief of

active duodenal ulcer. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and

Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for

PREVACID (U.S. Patent No. 4,628,098) from Hiroshi Akimoto,

and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in

determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a

letter dated September 25, 1995, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark

Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review

period and that the approval of PREVACID represented the

first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly

thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA

determine the product's regulatory review period.

FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for

PREVACID is 2,870 days. Of this time, 2,328 days occurred

during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 542

days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were

derived from the following dates:

1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: July 3,

1987. FDA has verified the applicants's claim that the date that the

investigational new drug application (IND) became effective was July 3,

1987.

2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to

the human drug product under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug,

and Cosmetic Act: November 15, 1993. The applicant claims November 12,

1993, as the date the new drug application (NDA) for PREVACID

(NDA 20-406) was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate

that the applicant submitted NDA 20-406 on November 12, 1993, and FDA

received the NDA on November 15, 1993, which is considered to be the

NDA initially submitted date.

3. The date the application was approved: May 10, 1995. FDA has

verified the applicant's claim that NDA 20-406 was approved on May 10,

1995.

This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the

maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.

Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in

its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its

application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,706 days of

patent term extension.

Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is

incorrect may, on or before March 4, 1996, submit to the Dockets

Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a

redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA,

on or before July 1, 1996, for a determination regarding whether the

applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory

review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient

facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th

Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format

specified in 21 CFR 10.30.

Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets

Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that

individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket

number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and

petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m.

and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

Dated: December 21, 1995.

Stuart L. Nightingale,

Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.

[FR Doc. 95-31557 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.