Proposed Settlement; Hilton Davis Chemical Co. Litigation

Federal RegisterSep 20, 1995

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

[[Page 48711]]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5298-9]

Proposed Settlement; Hilton Davis Chemical Co. Litigation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act

(``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement of Hilton

Davis Chemical Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency,

No. 94-3414 (6th Cir.).

This petition for judicial review involves a challenge to a Request

For Information (``RFI'') issued by EPA on February 15, 1994, that

inter alia required Hilton Davis to submit certain information to EPA

pursuant to section 114(a) of the Act.

For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication

of this notice, the EPA will receive written comments relating to the

proposed settlement from persons who were not named as parties to the

litigation in question. The Agency or the Department of Justice may

withhold or withdraw consent to the proposed settlement if the comments

disclose facts or circumstances that indicate that such consent is

inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the

requirements of the Act. Copies of the settlement are available from

Samantha Hooks, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of General

Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be sent

to Mark M. Kataoka at the above address and must be received by October

20, 1995.

Dated: September 5, 1995.

Jonathan Z. Cannon,

Assistant Administrator, (Acting General Counsel).

[FR Doc. 95-23326 Filed 9-19-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.