Proposed Settlement; Acid Rain Core Rules Litigation
Federal RegisterJan 19, 1995
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5141-3]
Proposed Settlement; Acid Rain Core Rules Litigation
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act
(``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed third partial
settlement of Environmental Defense Fund v. Carol M. Browner, et al.,
No. 93-1203 (and consolidated cases) (D.C. Cir.).
The case involves challenges by several parties to the acid rain
core rules published in the Federal Register on January 11, 1993, at 58
FR 3590 (January 11, 1993). The proposed settlement relates primarily
to the issue of how ownership of a jointly owned unit is apportioned
with respect to defining a dispatch system and to clarification of the
definition of a ``sulfur-free generation.''
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the settlement from persons who were not named as parties to the
litigation in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may withhold
or withdraw consent to the proposed settlement if the comments disclose
facts or circumstances that indicate that such consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the
requirements of the Act. Copies of the settlement are available from
Phyllis Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be sent
to Patricia A. Embrey at the above address and must be submitted on or
before February 21, 1995.
January 12, 1995.
Jean C. Nelson,
General Counsel
[FR Doc. 95-1251 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.