Amendments to Egg Research and Promotion Order
Federal RegisterMar 22, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1250
RIN 0581-AB13
[Docket No. PY-94-001]
Amendments to Egg Research and Promotion Order
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service.
ACTION: Proposed Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would amend the Egg Research and Promotion
Order to exempt certain producers from the provisions of the Egg
Research and Consumer Information Act and to provide for certain
funding of research projects. The changes are required by amendments to
the Egg Research and Consumer Information Act, which was enacted
December 14, 1993.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 23, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Written comments are to be mailed to Janice L. Lockard,
Chief, Standardization Branch, Poultry Division, AMS, USDA, Room 3944-
South, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456. Comments received
may be inspected at this location between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. State that your comments refer to
Docket No. PY-94-001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice L. Lockard, 202-720-3506.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Orders 12866 and 12778
The Department is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with
Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 14 of the Act, a
person subject to an order may file a petition with the Secretary
stating that such order, any provisions of such order or any
obligations imposed in connection with such order are not in accordance
with law; and requesting a modification of the order or an exemption
therefrom. Such person is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After a hearing, the Secretary would rule on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any
district in which such person is an inhabitant, or has his principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's ruling on
the petition, if a complaint is filed within 20 days after date of the
entry of the ruling.
Effect on Small Entities
The Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service has
determined that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, as defined by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This proposed action would eliminate virtually all of the
regulatory requirements under the egg research and promotion program on
a major share of the egg producers currently subject to those
requirements and who certify their eligibility for the statutory
exemption. The proposal would substantially reduce the regulatory
burden on handlers as well. Approximately 618 producers are paying
assessments to the American Egg Board (AEB) at the rate of 5 cents per
30-dozen case of commercial eggs marketed or the equivalent thereof.
This action would exempt an estimated 253 small egg producers who own
75,000 or fewer laying hens from requirements of the egg research and
promotion program. These producers would no longer be required to pay
the assessment of 5 cents per 30-dozen case of commercial eggs.
Paperwork Reduction
Information collection requirements and recordkeeping provisions
contained in 7 CFR part 1250 have been previously approved by the
Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB Control No. 0581-0093
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
This proposed action should reduce, by approximately 70 percent,
the number of collecting handlers who would be required to file handler
reports on a monthly basis. Currently, there are approximately 399
collecting handlers under the research and promotion program. It is
estimated that 281 of these handlers would not be required to file
monthly handler reports. In addition, handlers would not have to
include production from exempted flocks in their monthly handler
reports. The 253 small egg producers who own 75,000 or fewer laying
hens would be required to file, through their handlers, an annual
certification of exemption.
Background and Proposed Changes
The Egg Research and Promotion Order (7 CFR 1250.301-1250.363)
established pursuant to the Egg Research and Consumer Information Act,
as amended (7 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), provides in section 1250.348 that
the following are to be exempt from paying assessments: ``(a) Any egg
producer whose aggregate number of laying hens at any time during a 3-
consecutive-month period immediately prior to the date assessments are
due and payable has not exceeded 30,000 laying hens, and (b) Any
producer owning a flock of breeding hens whose production of eggs is
primarily utilized for the hatching of baby chicks.'' Currently there
are 579 producers who come under the 30,000-laying-hen exemption.
Section 12(a)(1) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2711) was amended December 14,
1993 (Pub. L. 103-188), to exempt those producers whose aggregate
number of laying hens at any given time during a 3-consecutive month
period immediately prior to the date assessments are due and payable
has not exceeded 75,000 laying hens.
According to statistics of AEB, 253 producers owning 75,000 or
fewer laying hens currently pay mandatory assessments at 5 cents per
30-dozen case of commercial eggs or the equivalent thereof to finance
research, promotion, and education activities. Although producers in
this category represent 41 percent of the total producers covered by
the Act, they represent only 4 percent of the total assessment income
collected by AEB. Exempting producers owning 75,000 or fewer laying
hens, therefore, would exempt a number of smaller producers without
adversely impacting the capability of AEB to carry out the programs
authorized under the Act.
Section 8(d) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2707) was also amended (Pub. L.
103-188) to require that AEB, to the maximum extent practicable,
allocate a proportion of funds for research projects in the 1994 and
subsequent fiscal year budgets that is comparable to the amount
appropriated for research projects in the 1993 fiscal year budget.
Public Law 103-188 provides that the amendments proposed herein to
the Order shall be issued after public notice and opportunity for
comment in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553 and without regard to 5 U.S.C.
556 and 557 and shall be not be subject to a referendum.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1250
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Eggs and egg products, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Title 7, CFR Part 1250
is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1250--EGG RESEARCH AND PROMOTION
1. The authority citation of Part 1250 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-428, 88 Stat. 1171, as amended, 7 U.S.C.
2701-2718.
2. In section 1250.336, paragraph (c) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 1250.336 Duties.
* * * * *
(c) To prepare and submit to the Secretary for his approval budgets
on a fiscal-period basis of its anticipated expenses and disbursements
in the administration of this subpart, including probable cost of plans
and projects as estimated in the budget or budgets submitted to it by
prospective contractors, with the Board's recommendations with respect
thereto. In preparing a budget for each of the 1994 and subsequent
fiscal years, the Board shall, to the maximum extent practicable,
allocate a proportion of funds for research projects comparable to the
proportion of funds allocated for research projects in the Board's
fiscal year 1993 budget.
* * * * *
3. In section 1250.348, the introductory text is republished and
the first sentence of the introductory text of paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 1250.348 Exemptions.
The following shall be exempt from the specific provisions of the
Act:
(a) Any egg producer whose aggregate number of laying hens at any
time during a 3-consecutive-month period immediately prior to the date
assessments are due and payable has not exceeded 75,000 laying hens. *
* *
* * * * *
Dated: March 16, 1994.
Lon Hatamiya,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 94-6591 Filed 3-21-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.