Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the American Stock Exchange, Inc., Relating to the Off-Site Storage of Customer Options Account Information
Federal RegisterNov 4, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-34913; File No. SR-Amex-94-37]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the American Stock Exchange, Inc.,
Relating to the Off-Site Storage of Customer Options Account
Information
October 28, 1994.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ on September 12, 1994, the
American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'' or ``Exchange'') submitted to
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a
proposal to amend paragraph (b), ``Maintenance of Customer Records,''
of Amex Rule 922, ``Supervision of Accounts,'' to provide that the
customer information and account statements currently maintained at the
principal supervisor office may be maintained at a location other than
the principal supervisory office if the documents and information are
readily accessible and promptly retrievable.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
\2\17 CFR 240.19b-4 (1993).
\3\On October 27, 1994, the Amex submitted a letter indicating
that ``readily accessible and promptly retrievable'' means that the
requested information will be available within 24 hours. See Letter
from Claire P. McGrath, Managing Director and Special Counsel,
Derivative Securities, Amex, to Michael Walinskas, Branch Chief,
Derivatives Regulation, Division of Market Regulation, Commission,
dated October 24, 1994 (``October 24 Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal was published for comment in the Federal Register in
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34811 (October 7, 1994), 59 FR
52323 (October 17, 1994). No comments were received on the proposal.
Currently, Amex Rule 922(b) requires that background and financial
information of customers who have been approved for options
transactions be maintained at both the branch office servicing the
customer's account and at the principal supervisory office with
jurisdiction over the branch office. Amex Rule 922(b) also requires
that copies of account statements be maintained at both the branch
office supervising the accounts and at the principal supervisory office
with jurisdiction over the branch for the most recent six-month period.
The Amex proposes to amend Exchange Rule 922(b) to provide that the
customer information and account statements currently maintained at the
principal supervisory office may be maintained at a location other than
the principal supervisory office if the documents and information are
readily accessible and promptly retrievable.
The Amex states that the rules of all the options exchanges and the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'') uniformly
require that both the branch office servicing an options customer's
account and the principal supervisory office having jurisdiction over
the branch office retain account statements and other financial and
background information for the account for supervisory purposes. With
the advances in data storage and retrieval capability available through
optical disks, fax machines, microfiche and computers, coupled with the
escalating costs of storing records on-site, many Amex member
organizations prefer to store documents away from their principal
supervisory offices. In this connection, an increasing number of member
organizations have asked and received permission from the self-
regulatory organizations (``SROs'') to store the required customer
option account documents off-site so long as they are readily
accessible and promptly retrievable. In view of the number of requests
received by the SROs to store customer options information off-site,
the Options Self-Regulatory Council (``OSRC'')\4\ has asked each of the
options exchanges and the NASD to consider amending their rules to
permit the principal supervisory office to store customer account
information off-site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\The OSRC is a committee comprised of representatives from
each of the options exchanges and the NASD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that these off-site storage arrangements are
consistent with the record retention requirement rules, provided the
documents are readily accessible and promptly retrievable. In this
regard, the Amex states that the proposed rule will not compromise the
supervisory obligations of a member firm since the firm will still be
required to maintain customer option account documents and information
at the branch office servicing the customer's account. To ensure
compliance with the provisions of the rule, the Amex states that it
will periodically examine the document retrieval capabilities of member
firms using off-site document storage arrangements.
The Amex believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5), in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.
The Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) in that it is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
facilitate transactions in securities, and to protect investors and the
public interest.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) (1988).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, by allowing off-site storage of customer account
information maintained at supervisory offices, the Commission believes
that the proposal should provide the Amex's members with a cost-
effective means to utilize computers, facsimile machines, optical
disks, and other technology to store the required customer account
information off-site while ensuring that member firms will continue to
have easy access to all of the customer account information necessary
to discharge their supervisory responsibilities. In this regard, the
proposal provides that options customer account information stored off-
site must be ``readily accessible and promptly retrievable,''\6\
thereby preserving the Exchange's ability to access and investigate
customer account records. The Commission notes that the Amex plans to
periodically examine the document retrieval capabilities of member
firms using off-site storage arrangements. Thus, the Commission
believes that the proposal strikes a reasonable balance between the
Amex's interest in allowing member organizations to reduce the cost of
storing customer account information and ensuring that the information
continues to be available for supervisory purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\See October 24 Letter, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Commission believes that it is reasonable for the
Amex to allow off-site storage of customer account information
maintained at supervisory offices, but not of account information
stored at branch offices, because branch offices are responsible for
the day-to-day administration of customer accounts and require
immediate access to account information. For example, by continuing to
require branch offices to store customer account information on-site,
the proposal facilitates broker compliance with the suitability
requirements applicable to options customers.
The Commission finds good cause for approving the Amex's proposal
prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice of
filing thereof in the Federal Register because the proposal is
identical to proposals submitted by the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Inc. (``CBOE'') and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc., which were
subject to the full notice and comment period. The Commission received
no comments on those proposals, and the Commission has approved the
CBOE's proposal.\7\ Therefore, the Commission believes it is consistent
with Sections 6(b)(5) and 19(b)(2) of the Act to approve the Amex's
proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34899 (October 26,
1994) (order approving File No. SR-CBOE-94-30).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\8\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-Amex-94-37) is
approved.
\8\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-27359 Filed 11-3-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.