Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F28 Mark 0100 Series Airplanes
Federal RegisterFeb 2, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 93-NM-193-AD]
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F28 Mark 0100 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Fokker Model F28 Mark 0100
series airplanes. This proposal would require inspections to detect
corrosion in the wheel axles of the main landing gear (MLG) sliding
members; and, if any corrosion is found, rework of corroded areas and
an inspection to detect cracks in the wheel axles; and, if any crack is
found, replacement of the cracked sliding member. This proposal is
prompted by a report that a MLG wheel axle failed during push back of
an in-service airplane from the terminal. The actions specified by the
proposed AD are intended to prevent failure of the MLG wheel axle due
to the problems associated with corrosion and cracking.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 29, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 93-NM-193-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location
between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Fokker Aircraft USA, Inc., 1199 North Fairfax Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314. This information may be examined at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206)
227-2141; fax (206) 227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 93-NM-193-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 93-NM-193-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
The Rijksluchtvaartdienst (RLD), which is the airworthiness
authority for the Netherlands, recently notified the FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on certain Fokker Model F28 Mark 0100 series
airplanes. The RLD advises that an operator of Model F28 Mark 0100
series airplanes reported the failure of a main landing gear (MLG)
wheel axle during push back of an in-service airplane from the
terminal. Subsequent non-destructive testing (NDT) inspection of the
operator's fleet of Model F28 Mark 0100 series airplanes revealed that
corrosion was present on most MLG wheel axles examined. Although no
cracks were found during this inspection, preliminary findings indicate
that the crack which led to the failed axle had initiated from a
corrosion pit located on the radius of the brake abutment flange on the
axle. Corrosion and cracking in a MLG wheel axle, if not detected and
corrected in a timely manner, could result in failure of the MLG wheel
axle.
Fokker has issued Service Bulletin SBF100-32-079, Revision 1, dated
October 4, 1993, that describes procedures for removal of the MLG
wheels and brakes, inspections of the wheel axles, and reinstallation
of MLG wheels and brakes. The Fokker service bulletin references Dowty
Aerospace Service Bulletin F100-32-63, Revision 2, dated September 23,
1993, as the appropriate source of service information for the wheel
axle inspection. The Dowty Aerospace service bulletin describes
procedures for a visual inspection to detect corrosion in the wheel
axles of the MLG sliding members; and, if any corrosion is found,
rework of corroded areas and an NDT inspection to detect cracks in the
wheel axles; and, if any crack is found, replacement of the cracked
sliding member.
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-32-080, dated October 4, 1993, and
Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin F100-32-64, dated September 23, 1993,
describe procedures for accomplishing the corresponding repetitive
actions described in the service bulletins discussed previously. The
RLD classified these service bulletins as mandatory and issued
Netherlands Airworthiness Directive BLA 93-108/2 (A), dated November 1,
1993, in order to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes
in the Netherlands.
This airplane model is manufactured in the Netherlands and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations and the applicable
bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
airworthiness agreement, the RLD has kept the FAA informed of the
situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the
RLD, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action
is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered
in the United States, the proposed AD would require repetitive visual
inspections to detect corrosion in the wheel axles of the MLG sliding
members; and, if any corrosion is found, rework of corroded areas and
an NDT inspection to detect cracks in the wheel axles; and, if any
crack is found, replacement of the cracked sliding member. The actions
would be required to be accomplished in accordance with the service
bulletins described previously.
The FAA estimates that 100 airplanes of U.S. registry would be
affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 14 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the
average labor rate is $55 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
recurring cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators (for four
inspections per year) is estimated to be $308,000 per year, or $3,080
per airplane per year. This total cost figure assumes that no operator
has yet accomplished the proposed requirements of this AD action.
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14
CFR part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C.
106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
FOKKER: Docket 93-NM-193-AD.
Applicability: Model F28 Mark 0100 series airplanes equipped
with Dowty Aerospace main landing gear (MLG) part number 201072011,
201072012, 201072013, 201072014, 201072015, or 201072016;
certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of the MLG wheel axle, accomplish the
following:
(a) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, remove
the MLG wheels and brakes and perform a visual inspection to detect
corrosion in the wheel axles of the MLG sliding members in
accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin F100-32-079, Revision 1,
dated October 4, 1993, and paragraph 2.A. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin F100-32-63,
Revision 2, dated September 23, 1993.
(b) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3 months in accordance with
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100-32-080, dated October 4, 1993, and
Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin F100-32-64, dated September 23,
1993.
(c) If any corrosion is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (a) or (b) of this AD, prior to further flight, rework the
affected area and perform a non-destructive testing (NDT) inspection
to detect cracks in the MLG wheel axles, in accordance with Appendix
A of Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin F100-32-63, Revision 2, dated
September 23, 1993 (if corrosion is found during the initial
inspection required by this AD); or Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin
F100-32-64, dated September 23, 1993 (if corrosion is found during a
repetitive inspection required by this AD); as applicable. After
rework, continue to perform repetitive inspections of the affected
area in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD.
(d) If any crack is found during the inspections required by
paragraph (c) of this AD, prior to further flight, replace the
affected sliding member with a serviceable sliding member in
accordance with Dowty Aerospace Service Bulletin F100-32-63,
Revision 2, dated September 23, 1993 (if any crack is found during
the initial inspection required by this AD); or Dowty Aerospace
Service Bulletin F100-32-64, dated September 23, 1993 (if any crack
is found during a repetitive inspection required by this AD); as
applicable. After replacement of the affected sliding member,
continue to perform the repetitive inspections in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this AD.
(e) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
a Dowty Aerospace MLG, part number 201072011, 201072012, 201072013,
201072014, 201072015, or 201072016, on any airplane unless the
requirements of this AD have been accomplished on that MLG.
Following its installation, the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (b) of this AD shall be accomplished on that MLG.
(f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113,
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager,
Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
Note: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
(g) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR
21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the
requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 27, 1994.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 94-2335 Filed 2-1-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.