PacifiCorp, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. EC94-20-000, et al.]

PacifiCorp, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

July 15, 1994.

Take notice that the following filings have been made with the

Commission:

1. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. EC94-20-000]

Take notice that PacifiCorp on July 7, 1994, tendered for filing an

application seeking an order authorizing PacifiCorp to acquire from

Warm Springs Power Enterprises (Warm Springs) certain transmission

facilities located in Jefferson County, Oregon.

PacifiCorp requests that the Commission accept this application for

filing, to be effective forty-five (45) days after the date of filing.

Copies of this filing were supplied to Warm Springs and the Public

Utility Commission of Oregon.

Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

2. Southeastern Power Administration

[Docket No. EF94-3021-000]

Take notice that on June 30, 1994, The Secretary of the Department

of Energy confirmed and approved, on an interim basis effective

midnight July 1, 1994, Rate Schedules CBR-1-C, CSI-2-C, CEK-1-C, CC-1-

D, CM-1-C, CK-1-C and CTV-1-C for power from Southeastern Power

Administration's (Southeastern) Cumberland Basin Projects. The approval

extends through June 30, 1999.

The Deputy Secretary states that the Commission, by order issued

September 26, 1989, in Docket No. EF89-3021-000, confirmed and approved

Rate Schedules CBR-1-B, CSI-1-B, CEK-1-B, CC-1-C, CM-1-B, CK-1-B and

CTV-1-B.

Southeastern proposes in the instant filing to replace these Rate

Schedules.

Comment date: August 2, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

3. Electricidad De Cortes S. De R.L.

[Docket No. EG94-80-000]

Electricidad De Cortes S. De R.L. (``ELCOSA'') (c/o Lee M. Goodwin,

Reid & Priest, 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004)

filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application on

July 8, 1994 for determination of exempt wholesale generator status

pursuant to Part 365 of the Commission's Regulations.

ELCOSA is a Honduras company formed to own an electric generating

facility located on in Puerto Cortes, Honduras.

Comment date: August 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice. The Commission will limit its

consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or

accuracy of the application.

4. PSI Argentina, Inc.

[Docket No. EG94-81-000]

On July 8, 1994, PSI Argentina, Inc. (``Applicant''), 100 East Main

Street, Plainfield, Indiana 46868, filed with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission an application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission's

regulations.

Applicant, an Indiana corporation, is wholly-owned by PSI

Resources, Inc., an exempt public utility holding company within the

meaning of Section 3(a)(1) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of

1935. Applicant is currently indirectly engaged in owning the Costanera

Facility, a 1260 MW (gross) generating facility located in Buenos

Aires, Argentina, which has been determined to be an eligible facility,

and selling electric energy at wholesale. Applicant also intends to

indirectly own or operate, or both own and operate, the generating and

transmission facilities currently owned by Empresa de Generacion

Electrica de Lima, S.A., a nationally owned Peruvian corporation. These

facilities consist of five hydroelectric generating facilities and one

oil-fired generating facility having a combined total installed

capacity of 692.6 MW and approximately 576 Km of transmission lines,

which operate as radial lines to interconnect and deliver energy from

the generating units to the national grid in Peru.

Comment date: August 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice. The Commission will limit its

consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or

accuracy of the application.

5. CMS Generation Cebu Limited Duration

[Docket No. EG94-82-000]

On July 12, 1994, CMS Generation Cebu Limited Duration Company, 330

Town Center Drive, Suite 1000, Dearborn, Michigan 48126, filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for determination

of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to Part 365 of the

Commission's regulations.

CMS Generation Cebu Limited Duration Company is a Cayman Islands

limited duration company. CMS Generation Cebu Limited Duration Company

is an affiliate of CMS Generation Co., a Michigan corporation, which in

turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CMS Enterprises Company, a

Michigan corporation. CMS Enterprises Company is a wholly-owned

subsidiary of CMS Energy Corporation, also a Michigan corporation.

CMS Generation Cebu Limited Duration Company will acquire an

interest in Toledo Power Co., a Philippine partnership which will own

and operate two power plants with a combined maximum capacity of 140

MW. The plants will be located in Toledo City on the Island of Cebu in

the Philippines and the power generated by the plants will be sold to

the National Power Corporation and to Cebu Electric Cooperative III.

Coal and fuel oil will be burned by the plants.

Comment date: August 4, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice. The Commission will limit its

consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or

accuracy of the application.

6. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER92-595-000]

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER92-596-000]

Southern California Edison Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company,

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

[Docket No. ER92-626-005]

Take notice that on June 27, 1994, Southern California Edison

Company (Edison), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and San

Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) (collectively, the ``Companies''),

tendered for filing revisions to the ``Coordinated Operations Agreement

between Southern California Edison Company, Pacific Gas and Electric

Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, and Participants in the

California-Oregon Transmission Project'' (COA) in order to comply with

the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) May 26, 1994

Opinion Affirming in Part and Vacating in Part Initial Decision in

Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 67 FERC 61,239 (1994).

Comment date: August 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

7. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER92-595-003]

Take notice that on June 27, 1994, Pacific Gas and Electric Company

(PG&E) tendered a compliance filing in the form of a revised Rate

Schedule for the Interconnection of the California-Oregon Transmission

Project and the PG&E Electric System (CIRS), PG&E Rate Schedule FERC

No. 144. The CIRS provides for the initial and continuing

interconnection of PG&E's electric system with the California-Oregon

Transmission Project, a 500 kV facility extending from the California-

Oregon border to central California.

In Opinion No. 389, issued May 26, 1994 (67 FERC 61,239), the

Commission ordered PG&E to file a CIRS revised in accordance with the

terms of that opinion. The principal modifications to the CIRS are: (1)

Deletion of provisions addressing adverse impacts of interconnected

operations; (2) removal of certain entities as parties to the rate

schedule; (3) deletion of most provisions dealing with initial

interconnection, which has occurred; and (4) modification of

arrangements for transmission curtailments due to minimum load

conditions.

Comment date: July 29, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

8. CRSS Power Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94-142-002]

Take notice that CRSS Power Marketing, Inc. on July 12, 1994,

tendered its quarterly informational filing pursuant to the above-

captioned docket. Comments on the filing should be filed with the

Commission no later than July 29, 1994.

9. Central Maine Power Company

[Docket No. ER94-1153-000]

Take notice that on July 1, 1994, Central Maine Power Company

(CMP), tendered for filing a Second Amended Transmission Service

Agreement between CMP and Maine Public Service Company, Inc. (MPS),

dated as of April 18, 1994 (Second Amended Agreement). CMP will provide

MPS with non-firm transmission service over the CMP transmission system

for the purpose of transmitting Maine Yankee and/or MPS system non-firm

energy in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions of the Second

Amended Agreement.

Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

10. Florida Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER94-1227-000]

Take notice that on July 11, 1994, Florida Power Corporation

tendered for filing a Settlement Agreement and an Explanatory Statement

with the Cities of Florida.

Comment date: August 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

11. Duke Power Company

[Docket No. ER94-1429-000]

Take notice that on July 5, 1994, Duke Power Company (Duke) filed

an Interchange Contract (Contract) between Oglethorpe Power Corporation

(Oglethorpe) and Duke Power Company. The Contract provides for

interconnected operations between the two systems as well as

transactions involving Emergency Assistance, Short Term Power, and

Economy Interchange.

Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

12. Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation

[Docket No. ER94-1279-000]

Take notice that on July 5, 1994, Rochester Gas and Electric

Corporation tendered for filing an amendment to its May 19, 1994 filing

in the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: August 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

13. PacifiCorp

[Docket No. ER94-1412-000]

Take notice that on PacifiCorp July 12, 1994, tendered for filing

an amendment to its June 28, 1994 First Amendment to Transmission

Service and Operating Agreement between Utah Associated Municipal Power

Systems (UAMPS) and PacifiCorp.

PacifiCorp request that a waiver of prior notice be granted and

that an effective date of July 1, 1994 be assigned to the filing.

Copies of this amended filing were supplied to UAMPS, the Utah

Public Service Commission and the Public Utility Commission of Oregon.

Comment date: August 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

14. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

[Docket No. ER94-1430-000]

Take notice that on July 5, 1994, Pacific Gas and Electric Company

(PG&E) tendered for filing: (1) An agreement dated June 27, 1994,

between PG&E and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD),

Modesto Irrigation District (MID) and City of Santa Clara (Santa Clara)

entitled ``Superseding Agreement for the Coldwater Creek Geothermal

Power Plant Between Pacific Gas and Electric Company and CCPA No. 1

Member Utilities'' (CCPA Transmission Agreement); (2) an agreement

dated June 27, 1994, between PG&E and SMUD entitled ``Superseding

Agreement for Coldwater Creek Geothermal Power Plant Backbone

Transmission Service Between Pacific Gas and Electric Company and

Sacramento Municipal Utility District'' (SMUD Backbone Agreement); (3)

an agreement dated June 27, 1994, between PG&E and SMUD entitled

``Superseding Agreement for SMUDGEO 1 Interconnection and Transmission

Service Between Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Sacramento

Municipal Utility District'' (SMUDGEO 1 Agreement); and (4) proposed

changes in rates, effective July 1, 1994, developed using a rate

mechanism previously agreed to by the parties for Rate Schedules FERC

Nos. 82, 88, 91, 125 and 138 between PG&E and SMUD.

The purpose of the superseding agreements is to provide for the

reduction of firm transmission service for power generated at the

Coldwater Creek Geothermal Power Plant and the SMUDGEO 1.

Copies of the filing have been served upon SMUD, Modesto Irrigation

District, Santa Clara, CCPA and the California Public Utilities

Commission.

Comment date: August 1, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

15. Jeb Corporation

[Docket No. ER94-1432-000]

Take notice that on July 1, 1994 JEB Corporation (JEB) tendered for

filing pursuant to Rule 205, 18 CFR 385.205, a petition for waivers and

blanket approvals under various regulations of the Commission and for

an order accepting its FERC Electric Rate Schedule No. 1.

JEB intends to engage in electric power and energy transactions as

a marketer and a broker. In transactions where JEB sells electric

energy it proposes to make such sales on rates, terms, and conditions

to be mutually agreed to with the purchasing party. JEB is not in the

business of generating, transmitting, or distributing electric power.

Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

16. PSI Energy, Inc.

[Docket No. ER94-1434-000]

Take notice that PSI Energy, Inc. on July 6, 1994, tendered for

filing an Interchange Agreement, dated June 1, 1994, between PSI and

Enron Power Marketing, Inc. (Enron).

The Interchange Agreement provides for the following service

between PSI and Enron:

1. Exhibit A--Power Sales by Enron

2. Exhibit B--Power Sales by PSI

Copies of the filing were served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.,

Texas Public Utility Commission and the Indiana Utility Regulatory

Commission.

Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

17. Carolina Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER94-1444-000]

Take notice that on July 13, 1994, Carolina Power & Light Company

tendered for filing Exhibit A to the Power Supply and Coordination

Agreement between CP&L and Public Works Commission of the City of

Fayetteville.

Comment date: July 29, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

18. Reading Municipal Light Department

[Docket No. TX94-6-000]

Take notice that on July 5, 1994, Reading Municipal Light

Department (RMLD) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an application requesting that the Commission order Bangor

Hydroelectric Company; Boston Edison Company; Town of Braintree

Electric Light Department; Central Maine Power Company; Commonwealth

Energy System; The Connecticut Light and Power Company; Eastern

Utilities Associates; Fitchburg Gas & Electric Light Company; City of

Holyoke Gas & Electric Department; Holyoke Water Power Company; New

England Electric System; Public Service Company of New Hampshire;

Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant; United Illuminating Company; Vermont

Electric Power Company; and Western Massachusetts Electric Company

(collectively, the ``PTF Owners'') to provide transmission services

pursuant to Section 211 of the Federal Power Act, a request for waiver

an alternative petition for declaratory relief (the ``Application'').

The transmission service sought by RMLD in the Application is:

1. Pool-Wide network transmission service, of precisely the same

kind and character as is presently available under Sec. 13.2(b) of the

NEPOOL Agreement;

2. Over transmission facilities rated 69 kV or above, previously or

hereafter constituting Pool Transmission Facilities (PTF) within the

definition presently contained in Section 13.1 of the NEPOOL Agreement;

3. At a pool-wide rate established in accordance with the

methodology set forth in Secs. 13.4, 13.5 and 13.9 of the NEPOOL

Agreement;

4. To be used for the transfer of an ownership interest or output

entitlement of RMLD in a generating unit having a gross rating of 25 MW

or higher, as to which the appropriate committee operating under the

NEPOOL Agreement has not unreasonably withheld such designation as may

be necessary to permit RMLD to acquire an ownership interest or output

entitlement consistent with the requirements of Mass. Gen. Laws. ch.

164A; and

5. With Economy Flow, Scheduled Outage, Unscheduled Outage,

Deficiency service and other hour-to-hour service provided by NEPEX

under the terms of the NEPOOL Agreement, as referenced in Sec. 13.2(a).

The initiation and termination dates for the service requested, and

the total amount of transmission service requested, are not presently

determinable with precision. The service sought will not become

effective unless the proposed Thirtieth Amendment to the NEPOOL

Agreement, currently pending before the Commission in Docket No. ER93-

985-000, becomes effective. If the Thirtieth Amendment becomes

effective, RMLD expects: (1) To require the availability of the service

requested in the Application within approximately five years; (2) that

the exact initiation and termination dates of the service will depend

on the nature of the ownership interest or output entitlement that RMLD

acquires in the generating unit or units described in item 4 above; and

(3) that the total amount of transmission capacity requested will be

within the range historically required by RMLD under Section 13.2(b) of

the NEPOOL Agreement.

Comment date: August 3, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph

E at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should

file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such

motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date.

Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants

parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must

file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 94-17964 Filed 7-22-94; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P