Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes
Federal RegisterJul 25, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 93-NM-183-AD; Amendment 39-8977; AD 94-15-06]
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, that
currently requires inspecting to detect cracking in certain lower lobe
lap joints, and repair, if necessary; reporting any findings of
discrepancies; replacing certain countersunk fasteners with protruding
head fasteners; and verifying that the airplanes do not have certain
countersunk fasteners. This amendment requires inspection of an
expanded area, deletion of the reporting requirement, and expansion of
the applicability to include additional airplanes. This amendment is
prompted by reports of cracking of the fuselage skin in certain areas
and findings of additional countersunk fasteners. The actions specified
by this AD are intended to prevent reduced structural integrity of the
fuselage.
DATES: Effective August 24, 1994.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 24, 1994.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules
Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven C. Fox, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2777; fax (206) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 90-01-07,
amendment 39-6440 (55 FR 255, January 4, 1990), which is applicable to
certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, was published in the Federal
Register on February 3, 1994 (59 FR 5139). The action proposed to
require inspection of an expanded area, deletion of the reporting
requirement, and expansion of the applicability.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
One commenter supports the proposed rule.
Two commenters request that proposed paragraph (e) be revised to
reduce the area of inspection to coincide with the area specified in
the service bulletin (Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2312, Revision 2,
dated October 8, 1992) referenced in the proposal as the appropriate
source of service information. The FAA does not concur. An FAA
investigation has revealed that countersunk fasteners may be installed
in areas other than those specified in the referenced service bulletin.
Therefore, the FAA has determined that a one-time inspection along the
entire lap joint of the skin panel must be accomplished to positively
confirm the exact location of these countersunk fasteners.
One commenter requests an extension to the proposed compliance time
of 11,000 total landings to conduct the high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspection required by paragraph (g) of the proposal. The
commenter states that the compliance time should coincide with the time
recommended in the service bulletin (Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
53A2312, Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992) referenced in the proposal
as the appropriate source of service information. The compliance time
in the service bulletin specifies that, for airplanes on which only the
minimum number of countersunk fasteners have been installed, the HFEC
inspection should commence at 20,000 total flight cycles. The commenter
notes that for airplanes on which only the minimum number of
countersunk fasteners have been installed, the potential for widespread
multi-site damage is significantly lessened than for airplanes on which
more than the minimum number of countersunk fasteners have been
installed.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request to extend the
compliance time. In developing an appropriate compliance time for this
action, the FAA considered the safety implications of any cracking in
this area. The FAA acknowledges that cracking in the upper row of
countersunk fasteners in the lap splice in the area adjacent to the
wing-to-body fairing intersection may not result in catastrophic
consequences; however, the FAA finds that any cracking in this area has
the potential for developing into an unsafe condition. This AD is
issued to address that unsafe condition, which may result in reduced
structural integrity of the fuselage of the airplane as a result of
cracking in these areas. Further, since cracking has been found in this
area on in-service airplanes that had accumulated less than 20,000
total flight cycles, the FAA has determined that 11,000 total landings
represent the maximum interval of time allowable wherein the inspection
can reasonably be accomplished and an acceptable level of safety can be
maintained.
One commenter requests clarification of the proposed compliance
time for reinspection of previously modified lap joints. The commenter
requests that the HFEC inspections required by proposed paragraph (k)
commence from the time the lap joint was modified in accordance with AD
90-01-07, rather than from the time the lap joint is modified in
accordance with proposed paragraph (j). The FAA finds that
clarification is warranted. Paragraph (k) of the final rule has been
revised to state that HFEC inspections are to be performed prior to the
accumulation of 10,000 total landings following modifications (of
locations where countersunk fasteners were found) accomplished in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2312, dated June 12,
1989, Revision 1, dated March 29, 1990, or Revision 2, dated October 8,
1992, which includes modifications accomplished in accordance with AD
90-01-07 or in accordance with paragraph (j) of this AD.
Two commenters question the necessity for the inspections following
modification of the lap joints required by proposed paragraph (k). One
of these commenters does not see adequate justification for requiring
these inspections since AD 90-01-07 terminated the inspections after
accomplishment of the modification. The other commenter states that,
since other lap joints are not required to be inspected following
modification, this lap joint should not be inspected following
modification. From these comments, the FAA infers that these commenters
are requesting that the requirement to inspect following modification
be deleted. The FAA does not concur. An FAA evaluation of currently
available inspection techniques reveals that current technology may not
be able to adequately detect cracking beneath protruding head
fasteners. Further, in-service experience has demonstrated that
cracking has gone undetected beneath these protruding head fasteners.
Therefore, the FAA's intent in requiring these inspections following
the modification are to detect any cracking that may develop after
accomplishment of the modification and to repair any cracking prior to
it adversely affecting the structural integrity of the fuselage of the
airplane.
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously
described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
There are approximately 723 Boeing Model 747 series airplanes of
the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 183
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
The inspections that were previously required by AD 90-01-07, and
retained in this AD, take approximately 14 work hours per airplane to
accomplish, at an average labor rate of $55 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the total cost impact of these inspection requirements
of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $140,910, or $770 per
airplane, per inspection cycle.
The additional new inspections that are required by this AD will
take approximately 82 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an
average labor rate of $55 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
total cost impact of these inspection requirements of this AD on U.S.
operators is estimated to be $825,330, or $4,510 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
The modification required by this AD will take approximately 124
work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $55
per work hour. Required parts will be nominal in cost. Based on these
figures, the total cost impact of the modification requirements of this
AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,248,060, or $6,820 per
airplane.
Based on the above figures, the total cost impact of the inspection
and modification requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $2,214,300, or $11,407 per airplane.
The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on
assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the
requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish
those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
The FAA recognizes that the modification will require a large
number of work hours to accomplish. However, the 20,000-landings
compliance time specified in paragraph (j) of this AD should allow
ample time for the modification of all countersunk fasteners locations
to be accomplished coincidentally with scheduled major airplane
inspection and maintenance activities, thereby minimizing the costs
associated with special airplane scheduling.
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C.
106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-6440 (55 FR
255, January 4, 1990), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), amendment 39- , to read as follows:
94-15-06 BOEING: Amendment 39-8977. Docket 93-NM-183-AD. Supersedes
AD 90-01-07, Amendment 39-6440.
Applicability: Model 747 series airplanes, having line numbers
201 through 814 inclusive, certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent reduced structural integrity of the fuselage,
accomplish the following:
Restatement of Requirements of AD 90-01-07, Amendment 39-6440
(a) For airplanes having line numbers 201 through 765: Conduct a
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracking of
the lower lobe lap joints in the vicinity of the wing-to-body
fairing, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
53A2312, dated June 12, 1989; or Revision 1, dated March 29, 1990;
or Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992; at the time specified in
paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), or (a)(4) of this AD, as
applicable. Repeat this inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 4,000 landings until the inspection required by paragraph (e)
of this AD is accomplished.
(1) For airplanes that have accumulated less than 11,200 total
landings as of February 5, 1990 (the effective date of AD 90-01-07):
Prior to the accumulation of 11,000 total landings or within the
next 1,000 landings after February 5, 1990, whichever occurs later.
(2) For airplanes that have accumulated 11,200 or more total
landings but less than 15,201 total landings as of February 5, 1990
(the effective date of AD 90-01-07):
Within the next 1,000 landings after February 5, 1990, or prior
to the accumulation of 15,500 total landings, whichever occurs
earlier.
(3) For airplanes that have accumulated 15,201 or more total
landings but less than 18,200 total landings as of February 5, 1990:
Within the next 300 landings after February 5, 1990, or prior to the
accumulation of 18,250 total landings, whichever occurs earlier.
(4) For airplanes that have accumulated 18,200 or more landings
as of February 5, 1990: Within the next 50 landings after February
5, 1990.
(b) For airplanes having line numbers 201 through 765:
Accomplish the requirements of paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this
AD.
(1) If any cracking is detected during the inspections required
by paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to further flight, repair in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2312, dated
June 12, 1989; or Revision 1, dated March 29, 1990; or Revision 2,
dated October 8, 1992.
(2) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total landings or within
the next 3,000 landings after February 5, 1990 (the effective date
of AD 90-01-07), whichever occurs later, modify the airplane by
replacing countersunk fasteners in the upper row of the lower lobe
lap joints in the vicinity of the wing-to-body fairing with
protruding head fasteners, in accordance with the procedures
described in the Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2312, dated
June 12, 1989; or Revision 1, dated March 29, 1990; or Revision 2,
dated October 8, 1992.
(c) For purposes of complying with paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this AD, the number of landings may be determined to equal the
number of pressurization cycles where the cabin pressure
differential was greater than 2.0 p.s.i.
(d) For Model 747SR airplanes only: Based on continued mixed
operation of lower cabin differentials, the inspection and
modification compliance times specified paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this AD may be multiplied by a 1.2 adjustment factor.
New Requirements of this AD
(e) Prior to the accumulation of 11,000 total landings, or
within 1,000 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, unless previously accomplished within the last 3,000
landings prior to the effective date of this AD, conduct a visual
inspection to determine if countersunk fasteners have been installed
in the area defined in either paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(2), as
applicable, in accordance with the procedures described in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-53A2312, Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992.
Accomplishment of this inspection terminates the inspection
requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD.
(1) For Model 747-100, -200, -300, -400, and 747SR series
airplanes: From body stations (BS) 741 to 1000 at Stringers (S-)34L,
S-34R, S-39L, S-39R, S-44L, and S-44R, and from BS 1480 to 1741 at
S-34L, S-34R, S-40L, and S-40R.
(2) For Model 747SP series airplanes: From BS 520 to 1000 at S-
34L, S-34R, S-39L, S-39R, S-44L, and S-44R, and from BS 1480 to 1741
at S-34L, S-34R, S-40L, and S-40R.
(f) If no countersunk fastener is found in the upper row of the
lap splice during the inspection required by paragraph (e) of this
AD, no further action is required by this AD.
(g) If any countersunk fastener is found in the upper row of the
lap splice during the inspection required by paragraph (e) of this
AD, prior to further flight, perform an HFEC inspection to detect
cracking at all locations where countersunk fasteners were found, in
accordance with the procedures described in Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53A2312, Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992.
(h) If no cracking is detected during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g), (h), and (k) of this AD, at any location where a
countersunk fastener was found, repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 4,000 landings, in accordance with the
procedures described in the Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2312,
Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992.
(i) If cracking is detected during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (k) of this AD, at any location where
a countersunk fastener was found, prior to further flight, repair
and modify that lap joint in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53A2312, Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992.
(j) Prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total landings or within
1,000 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, modify all locations where countersunk fasteners were found,
in accordance with the procedures described in Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53A2312, Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992. For
purposes of complying with the requirements of this paragraph,
locations that were previously modified in accordance with paragraph
(b) of this AD do not need to be modified again.
(k) Prior to the accumulation of 10,000 total landings following
modification of the locations where countersunk fasteners were
installed in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2312,
dated June 12, 1989, or Revision 1, dated March 29, 1990, or
Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992, perform an HFEC inspection at all
locations where countersunk fasteners were found, and repeat this
inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,000 landings, in
accordance with the procedures described in Boeing Service Bulletin
747-53A2312, Revision 2, dated October 8, 1992.
(l) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
(m) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(n) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-53A2312, including the ``ADDENDUM,'' Revision 2, dated
October 8, 1992. This incorporation by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial
Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.
Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
(o) This amendment becomes effective on August 24, 1994.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 13, 1994.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 94-17592 Filed 7-22-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.