Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Illinois River, IL
Federal RegisterJun 30, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD02 93-036]
RIN 2115-AE47
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Illinois River, IL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing operation conditions for the
remote operation of the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company
railway bridge at Pekin, Illinois. This action is being taken at the
request of the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company of
Chicago, Illinois. The change to remote operation will permit more
efficient operation of the railway bridge, and still provide for the
reasonable needs of navigation.
EFFECTIVE DATES: This interim rule is effective on August 1, 1994.
Comments must be received on or before October 1, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Commander (ob), Second Coast Guard
District, 1222 Spruce Street, St. Louis, MO 63103-2832, Attention:
Docket CGD02 93-036. Comments may also be delivered to room 2.107B at
the above address between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. For information concerning comments, the
telephone number is (314) 539-3724.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger K. Wiebusch, Bridge Administrator, Second Coast Guard District,
(314) 539-3724.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
The Coast Guard encourages interested persons to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written data, views, or arguments. The
Coast Guard is soliciting comments until October 1, 1994, on the
operation of the new system during the initial implementation of this
rule. The Coast Guard will consider all comments received during the
comment period.
Drafting Information
The principal persons involved in drafting this document are Wanda
G. Renshaw, Project Officer, Bridge Branch, and Lieutenant Commander
Arne O. Denny, Project Attorney, Second Coast Guard District Legal
Office.
Publication History
On January 7, 1994, the Coast Guard published a proposed rule (59
FR 986) concerning this amendment. The Commander, Second Coast Guard
District, also published the proposal as a Public Notice dated January
14, 1994. Interested parties were given until February 22, 1994, to
submit comments. The Coast Guard received seven comments on the
proposal. A public meeting was requested and hosted by the Chairman of
the Tazewell County Board in Pekin, Illinois, on March 14, 1994.
Background and Purpose
The Chicago and Northwestern (C&NW) bridge at Pekin Illinois Bridge
is presently maintained in the open position and is closed by an on-
site bridge tender upon the approach of a train. C&NW will install
remote operating equipment and a control system, including radar,
infrared boat detector, high intensity lights and communications
equipment that will permit operation of the draw from the Chicago and
Northwestern office in Chicago, Illinois. Equipment will indicate any
malfunction in the bridge operation and enable the remote operator to
ascertain the position of the lift span at any time. The marine radio
system will receive and transmit on the VHF marine frequencies
authorized by the Federal Communications Commission. Additionally,
portable radiotelephone equipment will be provided to permit direct
communications with vessels when the bridge is operated at the bridge
site. A radar antenna will be installed on the fixed portion of the
bridge structure, and the received signal will be transmitted by fixed
lines and a microwave link to the Chicago and Northwestern office in
Chicago. The radar system is designed to scan upstream and downstream
of the bridge. Infrared scanners will be located on the upstream and
downstream ends of the channel span piers to detect vessels in the
channel span. If an obstruction is detected beneath the lift span
during the closing cycle before the span is seated and locked, the lift
span will be automatically stopped and immediately raised to the fully
open position until the channel is clear. During the bridge closing
cycle, an automatic, synthesized voice announcement will be broadcast.
At the appropriate times in the closing cycle, the broadcast will
announce that the bridge will close to navigation, that the bridge is
closed to navigation, or that the bridge has reopened to navigation.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
Seven comments were received in response to the Public Notice. One
comment addressed the dangerous location of the bridge, the distraction
of high intensity lights, the inability to discern by radar between
various types of vessels, the additional duties assigned to the
remotely located operator, and the safe passage of vessels if the
bridge operator cannot maintain visual and radio contact. The bridge
owner questioned the comment's reference to the dangerous location of
the bridge and reasoned that the proposed procedure will be more
favorable to river traffic than the current operation. The bridge owner
reported that current bridge operators are assigned non-bridge related
clerical duties in addition to operating the bridge for the six to
eight daily trains. The radar to be installed on the bridge is similar
to the radar equipment used on vessels, and operators will be trained
in its use. In response to the question about back-up power, the bridge
is equipped with a standby generator that would power all systems,
including the bridge itself, in case of a failure of commercial power.
If the infrared detectors fail, it will be physically impossible to
remotely lower the bridge. Standard Department of Transportation
traffic warning lights will be used in lieu of high intensity lights.
The Illinois River Carriers Association commented that it does not
object to the proposal as described, but questioned if the bridge could
accidentally be lowered on or in front of a tow. They also recommended
that a trial period, monitored by the Coast Guard, be established for a
specified time.
The bridge owner has no objection to the trial period and advises
they expect the Coast Guard will evaluate the operation. C&NW has
reported the remote operator cannot ``accidentally'' initiate the
lowering sequence. A series of commands from a dispatcher control
console must be entered; all the remote operator can do is initiate the
sequence for lowering the bridge. The system would have to run through
the 10 minute advance warning cycle before the drawspan would begin to
lower. If the infrared beam is broken, the lowering is automatically
aborted, and the span returns to the fully open position. The entire
lowering sequence, including the warning cycle, must be repeated before
span will again lower.
Divisions of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers in South
Pekin, Illinois, and Chicago, Illinois, commented that an on-site
bridge operator is needed to report collisions from barges to
maintenance personnel, and that withdrawal of bridge operators would
result in reduced maintenance and possible operation problems.
The Coast Guard has established a program requiring vessel
operators to report any contact with bridge structures. These incidents
are reported to the bridge owner for investigation to determine the
structural safety of the bridge. C&NW has responded that equipment
would enable the remote operator to detect any malfunction in the
operation of the lift span, resulting in maintenance personnel being
dispatched to the bridge site. If equipment at the bridge site were
vandalized, the bridge would not lower.
Submittals from the United Transportation Union, the Transportation
Communications International Union and divisions of the Brotherhood of
Locomotive Engineers in South Pekin, Illinois and Chicago, Illinois,
commented on railroad operations and personnel issues, which are not
within the scope of this regulation or the Coast Guard's jurisdiction.
The Chairman of the Tazewell County Board expressed the Board's
concerns for the safety of the operation if bridge is operated from a
remote location, and the loss of four jobs and the impact on the
involved families. A public meeting hosted by the Tazewell County Board
was held on March 14, 1994; representatives of Chicago and Northwestern
Railroad answered questions and addressed concerns about the
navigational and structural safety of the bridge, and railroad
operations and personnel issues.
The original proposal provided for installation of equipment that
would permit operation of the span by authorized railroad personnel at
either portal of the bridge. C&NW has decided to omit the ``portal''
controls, since, should it be necessary to lower the span at the bridge
site, the span could be operated from the bridge house on top of the
span, or from the signal bungalow south of the bridge. If the span is
operated from either bridge site location, the span would not be
lowered until the 10-minute warning period, including voice
announcements, had been completed, and the local operator had
confirmed, either visually or by radiotelephone, that no boats were
under or approaching the bridge.
Based on the owner's response to comments on the remote operation
of this bridge, the Coast Guard is publishing the requirements as
proposed.
Regulatory Evaluation
This regulation is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that order. It has been exempted from review by the Office of
Management and Budget under that order. It is not under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44
FR 11040; February 26, 1979).
The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this proposal to be
so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of
the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary because a
sample group of Illinois River users have expressed no objection to the
proposal.
Small Entities
After considering the submitted comments, the Coast Guard finds
that any impact on small entities, if any, is not substantial.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that this temporary
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Collection of Information
This rule contains no collection of information requirements under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Federalism Assessment
The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has determined that it
does not raise sufficient federalism implications to warrant
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Environmental Assessment
The Coast Guard has reviewed the environmental impact of this rule
and concluded that under section 2.B.2 of the NEPA Implementing
Procedures, COMDTINST M16475.1B this rule is categorically excluded
from further environmental documentation because promulgation of
changes to drawbridge regulations have been found to not have a
significant effect on the human environment. A Categorical Exclusion
Determination is available in the docket.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
amending Part 117 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows.
1. The authority citation for Part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g).
2. In Sec. 117.393 paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) are
redesignated as (a)(1) through (a)(5), respectively, the introductory
paragraph of Sec. 117.393 is redesignated as the introductory text of
paragraph (a) and a new paragraph (b) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 117.393 Illinois river.
(a) * * *
(b) The draw of the Chicago and Northwestern railroad bridge, Mile
151.2, at Pekin, Illinois, is operated by a remote operator located at
the Chicago and Northwestern offices in Chicago, Illinois, as follows:
(1) The draw is normally maintained in the fully open position,
displaying green mid-channel lights to indicate that the span is fully
open.
(2) The draw is equipped with the following:
(i) A radiotelephone link direct to the remote operator;
(ii) A horn for sound signals;
(iii) Eight high intensity amber warning lights, oriented upstream
and downstream, with two secured to the uppermost chord and two secured
to the lowermost chord of the drawspan;
(iv) A radar antenna on the lower portion of the drawspan capable
of scanning one mile upstream and one mile downstream; and
(v) Infrared scanners located on the upstream and downstream ends
of the channel span piers, to detect vessels or other obstructions
under the bridge.
(3) The remote operator shall maintain a radiotelephone watch for
mariners to establish contact as they approach the bridge to ensure
that the draw is open or that it remains open until passage is
complete.
(4) When a train approaches the bridge and the draw is in the open
position, the remote operator initiates a ten minute warning period
before closing the bridge. During this warning period, the amber lights
begin flashing and a signal of four short blasts sounds on a horn. The
four-blast signal will repeat after a five second interval. A
synthesized-voice message is broadcast over the radiotelephone as
follows: ``The Chicago and Northwestern railroad bridge at Mile 151.2,
Illinois River, will close to navigation in ten minutes.'' The
announcement is repeated every two minutes, counting down the time
remaining until closure.
(5) At the end of the ten minute warning period, the remote bridge
operator scans under the bridge using infrared detectors and the
upstream and downstream approaches to the bridge using radar to
determine whether any vessels are under or are approaching the bridge.
If any vessels are under or are approaching the bridge within one mile
as determined by infrared or radar scanning or by a radiotelephone
response, the remote operator shall not close the bridge until the
vessel or vessels have cleared the bridge.
(6) If no vessels are under or approaching the bridge, the mid-
channel navigation lights will change from green to red, the horn
signal of four short blasts will sound, twice, and the radiotelephone
message will change to: ``The Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Bridge
at Mile 151.2, Illinois River, is closed to navigation.'' The message
will repeat every two minutes and the amber lights will continue to
flash until the bridge is fully reopened.
(7) If the infrared scanners detect a vessel or other obstruction
under the bridge before the drawspan is fully lowered and locked, the
closing sequence is stopped, automatically, and the drawspan is raised
to its fully open position until the channel is clear. When obstruction
has cleared the navigation span, the remote operator confirms that the
channel is clear, and reinitiates the ten-minute warning cycle.
(8) After the train has cleared the bridge, the remote operator
initiates the lift span raising cycle. When the draw is raised to its
full height and locked in place, the flashing lights stop and the mid-
channel navigation lights change from red to green. The synthesized
voice announcement broadcasts at two minute intervals for ten minutes
that the bridge is reopened to navigation.
Dated: June 14, 1994.
Frank M. Chliszczyk,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Second Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 94-15955 Filed 6-29-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.