Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board; Relating to Recordkeeping and Record Retention Requirements Concerning Gifts and Gratuities
Federal RegisterJun 10, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-34162; File No. SR-MSRB-94-7]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board; Relating to
Recordkeeping and Record Retention Requirements Concerning Gifts and
Gratuities
June 6, 1994.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on May 26,
1994, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (``Board'' or ``MSRB'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The
purpose of the proposed rule change is to require municipal securities
dealers to keep records of gifts and gratuities given to others,
including issuer officials and employees, in relation to municipal
securities activities. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Board is filing amendments to rule G-8 and G-9, on
recordkeeping and record retention, that relate to rule G-20, on gifts
and gratuities concerning suitability of recommendations. The proposed
rule change requires dealers to keep records of gifts and gratuities
given to others, including issuer officials and employees, in relation
to municipal securities activities. The Board is requesting that the
rule change become effective 30 days after approval by the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose Of, and
Statutory Basis For, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Board included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose Of, and
Statutory Basis For, the Proposed Rule Change
Rule G-20 is intended to prevent commercial bribery. The rule has
three basic parts. First, rule G-20(a) prohibits dealers from, directly
or indirectly, giving or permitting to be given any thing or service of
value in excess of $100 per year to any person, other than to an
employee or partner of the dealer, in relation to municipal securities
activities of the person's employer.\1\ All gifts given by a dealer and
its associated persons are used to compute the $100 limitation. The
$100 limitation applies to gifts and gratuities to customers,
individuals associated with issuers, and employees of other dealers. In
addition, based on the rule's ``directly or indirectly'' language, if a
third party (e.g., a consultant hired by a dealer) gives a gift to any
such person at the request of the dealer, the value of the gift would
be included in the $100 limitation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\``Person'' has been interpreted by the Board in the context
of rule G-20 to apply only to natural persons because the intent of
the rule is to discourage dealers from inducing individual employees
to act in a manner inconsistent with their obligations to, or
contrary to the interests of, their employers. MSRB Interpretation
of March 19, 1980. MSRB Manual (CCH) 3571.24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, rule G-20(b) exempts certain payments from the $100 annual
limit set forth in paragraph (a). These payments are termed ``normal
business dealings'' and are defined as occasional gifts of meals or
tickets to theatrical, sporting, and other entertainments, as well as
the sponsoring of legitimate business functions that are recognized by
the IRS as deductible business expenses, and gifts or reminder
advertising. However, the rule also provides that such gifts cannot be
so frequent or so expensive as to raise a suggestion of unethical
conduct.
Finally, rule G-20(c) provides that contracts of employment with or
compensation for services rendered are not considered gifts or
gratuities subject to the $100 limitation. Such arrangements, however,
must be in writing and must include the nature of the proposed
services, the amount of the proposed compensation, and the written
consent of such person's employer.
In 1993, the municipal securities market came under increased
scrutiny because of concerns that municipal securities dealers were
influencing municipal securities issuers to hire such dealers for
municipal securities business through the payment of political
contributions and other monies to persons with influence over the
dealer selection process. While the Board addressed the issue of
political contributions through rule G-37, the Board was concerned that
other activities, such as excessive gifts, also might be viewed as
influencing the dealer selection process.
The proposed rule change requires dealers to keep and retain
specific records of all gifts and gratuities subject to paragraph (a)
of the rule.2 The proposed rule change also requires dealers to
keep and retain records of all contracts of employment or agreements
for compensation for services and all compensation paid as a result of
those agreements. These amendments are consistent with the rules of
other self-regulatory organizations. The Board believes that the
amendments to the recordkeeping and record retention requirements
related to gifts and gratuities will facilitate dealer compliance with
rule G-20, and assist enforcement agencies in monitoring for compliance
with the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\The proposed rule change also clarifies that dealers
complying with Rule 17a-3 of the Act are required to maintain this
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act, which provides that the Board's rules
shall be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in municipal securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market in
municipal securities, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Board does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
In January 1994, the Board published for comment the proposed rule
change.3 The Board received one comment letter that supported the
proposed amendments to rules G-8 and G-9 to strengthen the Board's
recordkeeping and record retention requirements.4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\MSRB Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1 (January 1994) at 11-12. The
request for comment also requested information and comment on a
number of specific questions regarding dealings with issuer
officials.
\4\In addition, the commenter acknowledged that business
entertainment practices present opportunities for abuse, but
believed that existing law and regulation, properly enforced,
provides sufficient protection against abuse in the area of business
entertainment and gift-giving in the municipal securities industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing
for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period: (i) As the Commission
may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as
to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions
should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549.
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
above-mentioned self-regulatory organization. All submissions should
refer to the file number in the caption above and should be submitted
by July 1, 1994.
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority, 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-14127 Filed 6-9-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.