Margarine; Standard of Identity To Permit Use of Any Form of Oil of Marine Species Affirmed as GRAS or Approved as a Food Additive for This Use
Federal RegisterMay 25, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
21 CFR Part 166
[Docket No. 90P-0025]
Margarine; Standard of Identity To Permit Use of Any Form of Oil
of Marine Species Affirmed as GRAS or Approved as a Food Additive for
This Use
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the U.S.
standard of identity for margarine to permit the use of any form of oil
of marine species that has been affirmed as generally recognized as
safe (GRAS) or approved as a food additive for this use. This action is
in response to a petition submitted by the National Fish Meal and Oil
Association (NFMOA). FDA believes that this action will provide
increased flexibility to manufacturers in the selection of lipid
ingredients in margarine and will promote honesty and fair dealing in
the interest of consumers.
DATES: Effective July 25, 1994. All products initially introduced or
initially delivered for introduction into interstate commerce shall
comply on or after this date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nannie H. Rainey, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-158), Food and Drug Administration,
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-5099.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. The Proposal
In the Federal Register of August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35439), FDA
published a proposal based on a petition from NFMOA, 1525 Wilson Blvd.,
suite 500, Arlington, VA 22209, to amend the U.S. standard of identity
for margarine (Sec. 166.110 (21 CFR 166.110)) to permit the use of any
form of marine oil that has been affirmed as GRAS or approved as a food
additive for this use as an additional optional edible fat or oil
ingredient in margarine. Interested persons were given until October
29, 1990, to submit comments.
II. The Tentative Final Rule
The NFMOA petition was filed under section 701(e) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 371(e)), which
requires formal rulemaking in any action for the amendment of a food
standard. However, in November 1990, the Nutrition Labeling and
Education Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-535) was signed into law, and it
removed food standard rulemaking proceedings, except for actions for
the amendment or repeal of food standards of identity for dairy
products or maple sirup, from the formal rulemaking proceedings of
section 701(e) of the act. Therefore, further action on the NFMOA
petition would be subject to the informal notice and comment rulemaking
proceedings of section 701(a) of the act. Thus, the agency published a
tentative final rule in the Federal Register of August 17, 1993 (58 FR
43580), under those procedures. Because there had been an opportunity
to comment on the proposal when it was published in 1990, the comment
period on that tentative final rule was 30 days.
III. Comments
FDA received one comment in response to the tentative final rule.
This comment, submitted by the petitioner, expressed support for the
rule and urged the agency to finalize the rule as soon as possible.
NFMOA also stated that it would like to make clear for the record that
its petition did not ask FDA to approve the use of any form of marine
oil but was instead restricted to ``any safe and suitable form of
menhaden oil.'' The comment stated that, nevertheless, it had no
objection to FDA's enlargement of the range of oils to be permitted by
the amended regulation, from menhaden oil to marine oil, provided that
this change does not result in any further delay in the rulemaking
proceeding.
The agency acknowledges that the petitioner only sought to provide
for safe and suitable forms of menhaden oil in margarine. However, FDA
believes that it is appropriate to provide for oil of any marine
species where such oil has been affirmed as GRAS or approved as a food
additive for this use. The broader provision in the standard of
identity will eliminate the need to amend the standard of identity for
margarine should other oils of marine species be found to be safe and
suitable for use in this food. FDA also notes that ingredient labeling
will inform consumers of the presence of such oils when used in
margarine.
Therefore, having received no adverse comments, the agency is
revising the margarine standard as proposed in the tentative final
rule. The agency believes that providing for optional oils of marine
species that have been affirmed as GRAS or listed as a food additive
for this use will increase manufacturers' options in the selection of
oil ingredients for margarine and will provide for a wider variety of
margarine products in the marketplace. Thus, the agency concludes that
the proposed change in the standard of identity for margarine will
promote honesty and fair dealing in the interest of consumers.
Accordingly, after consideration of the comments, the agency is
issuing this final rule to amend the standard of identity for margarine
in Sec. 166.110 as set forth below.
IV. Economic Impact
FDA has examined the economic implications of this final rule to
amend the standard of identity for margarine in 21 CFR part 166 as
required by Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (Pub. L. 96-354). E.O. 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net
benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health,
and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). The Regulatory
Flexibility Act requires that the agency analyze options for regulatory
relief for small businesses.
In the August 17, 1993, tentative final rule, FDA announced that it
had analyzed the economic impact of the new provision that FDA is
adopting under the previous E.O. 12291 and found that it would not have
a significant impact. E.O. 12291 compelled agencies to use cost-benefit
analysis as a component of decisionmaking. The agency also tentatively
concluded in the August 30, 1990, proposal that this action would not
result in a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Manufacturers may continue to produce margarine using
current formulations. Thus, no changes are required in formulations
unless manufacturers wish to reformulate their products. FDA has
received no new information or comments that would alter its tentative
finding that there is no substantive economic issue in this rulemaking.
Thus, FDA concludes that this is not a major rule as defined by E.O.
12291, nor is it a significant rule as defined by E.O. 12866. In
compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the agency certifies
that the final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small businesses.
V. Environmental Impact
In the preamble to the August 30, 1990, proposed rule, FDA reported
its finding that this action qualified for categorical exclusion under
21 CFR 25.24(b)(1) and that neither an environmental assessment (EA)
nor an environmental impact statement was required. As noted in the
tentative final rule, FDA received one comment on the proposed rule
that claimed that this action would result in increased fishing
pressure that could adversely affect the menhaden fishery, and that the
agency had not considered this potential impact prior to issuing the
proposed rule. Although the comment did not provide evidence to support
the contention that the menhaden fishery would be adversely affected,
FDA requested an EA from the petitioner. The decision to ask for an EA
takes into consideration the agency's assessment of this issue as part
of its previous action to affirm partially hydrogenated menhaden oil
and hydrogenated menhaden oil as GRAS for use as edible fats or oils
(54 FR 38219, September 15, 1989). The agency also has information
indicating that the market for menhaden oil as a component of margarine
is large, approximately 40 million pounds per year.
Based on information in the petitioner's EA submitted for the
current action and on the agency's analysis of the reports on the
menhaden fisheries issued subsequent to FDA approval of GRAS petition
(GRASP 6G0316 (54 FR 38219)), FDA concluded in the August 17, 1993,
tentative final rule that the proposed action would not have a
significant impact on the menhaden fishery. Amending the margarine
standard of identity will not increase the volume of crude menhaden oil
that is produced. The only change will be that crude menhaden oil will
more often be retained in the United States for further processing into
food grade products, instead of being shipped to Europe and elsewhere
for this same use.
Thus, FDA carefully considered the potential environmental effects
of this action, including the effects on the menhaden fishery and
concluded that the action will not have a significant impact on the
human environment, and that an environmental impact statement is not
required. The agency's finding of no significant impact, and the
evidence supporting that finding, which includes the petitioner's EA,
the finding of no significant impact for FDA's approval of GRASP 6G0316
(54 FR 38219), and a copy of ``National Marine Fisheries Service Final
Purse-seine Landings of Gulf and Atlantic Menhaden in the 1990 and 1991
Fishing Seasons'' have been placed on file in the Dockets Management
Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1-23, 12420
Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857, and may be seen by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The agency has not received any additional information that would
cause it to revise its finding of no significant impact on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is required.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 166
Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Margarine.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
166 is amended as follows:
PART 166--MARGARINE
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 166 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 201, 401, 403, 407, 409, 701, 721 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 343, 347,
348, 371, 379e).
2. Section 166.110 is amended by adding new headings for the
introductory text of paragraph (a) and paragraph (c), by revising
paragraph (a)(1), and in the introductory text of paragraph (b) and
paragraph (d) the headings ``Optional ingredients'' and ``Label
declaration'', respectively, are italicized to read as follows:
Sec. 166.110 Margarine.
(a) Description. * * *
(1) Edible fats and/or oils, or mixtures of these, whose origin is
vegetable or rendered animal carcass fats, or any form of oil from a
marine species that has been affirmed as GRAS or listed as a food
additive for this use, any or all of which may have been subjected to
an accepted process of physico-chemical modification. They may contain
small amounts of other lipids, such as phosphatides or unsaponifiable
constituents, and of free fatty acids naturally present in the fat or
oil.
* * * * *
(b) Optional ingredients. * * *
* * * * *
(c) Nomenclature. * * *
(d) Label declaration. * * *
Dated: May 16, 1994.
Michael R. Taylor,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 94-12804 Filed 5-24-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.