Northern States Power Co., et al., Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings
Federal RegisterJan 19, 1994
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER93-259-000, et al.]
Northern States Power Co., et al., Electric Rate and Corporate
Regulation Filings
January 11, 1994.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Northern States Power Company (Minnesota)
[Docket Nos. ER93-259-000 ER93-630-000]
Take notice that on December 29, 1993, Northern States Power
Company (Minnesota) (NSP) tendered for a proposed cost support formula
for the Municipal System Power Service Schedule contained in NSP's
Municipal Interconnection and Interchange Agreements with ten municipal
electric utilities (Cities) located in the states of Minnesota and
South Dakota. The Commission previously accepted the Agreements for
filing effective January 1, 1993. The proposed rates formula is
effective January 1, 1994; NSP requests that the first proposed rate
increase under the formula be allowed to be effective January 1, 1994.
The ten cities and their existing FERC Rate Schedule No. are as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
Customer city schedule
No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Ada, Minnesota........................................ 474
City of Buffalo, Minnesota.................................... 475
City of East Grand Forks, Minnesota........................... 476, 483
City of Fairfax, Minnesota.................................... 477
City of Kasota, Minnesota..................................... 478
City of Kasson, Minnesota..................................... 479
City of Kenyon, Minnesota..................................... 480
City of Madelia, Minnesota.................................... 481
City of Melrose, Minnesota.................................... 482
City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota............................. 413
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
2. Portland General Electric Company
[Docket Nos. ER93-462-000 and ER93-703-000]
Take notice that on December 30, 1993, Portland General Electric
Company (PGE) tendered for filing an amendment to its original filing
under Docket Nos. ER93-462-000 and ER93-703-000. The nature of the
amendment is a revision of tariff language and an update to costs
support for rate ceiling components in the tariff. Copies of this
filing have been served on the parties included in the distribution
list contained in the filing letter.
Pursuant to 18 CFR 35.11 and the Commission's order issued July 30,
1993, in Docket No. PL93-2-002, PGE respectfully requests that the
Commission grant waiver of the notice requirements of 18 CFR 35.3 to
allow the amended PGE-1 tariff and the service agreements with Vernon
and Chelan to become effective May 20, 1993; and to allow the service
agreement with Dreyfus to become effective July 10, 1993.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
3. Western Resources, Inc.; Kansas Gas and Electric Company
[Docket Nos. ER93-523-002 and ER93-533-002]
Take notice that on December 22, 1993, Western Resources, Inc.
(Western Resources) on its behalf and on behalf of its wholly owned
subsidiary Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E), tendered for filing
compliance tariff sheets in response to the Commission's October 22,
1993 order in these consolidated dockets. The tariff sheets tendered
are to become effective October 22, 1993.
Copies of the filing were served upon all parties of record in
these consolidated dockets.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
4. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation
[Docket No. ER93-732-000]
Take notice that on December 29, 1993, Central Hudson Gas and
Electric Corporation (CHG&E) tendered for filing an amendment to FERC
Docket No. ER93-732-000 which is the Marcy South Agreement between
CHG&E and the New York Power Authority (NYPA).
The amended filing includes Exhibit 14 through Exhibit 18 which
provide the following information: Diagrams of the Marcy South
Facilities, Summary of Materials Added to Build the Marcy South
Facilities, Description of the Cost by Source Amount and Summary of the
Annual Charges for the Period August 1, 1987 through July 1, 1993.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
5. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
[Docket No. ER94-139-000]
Take notice that on January 5, 1994, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E) tendered an amended filing under Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Docket No. ER94-139-000, regarding an agreement
between PG&E and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD).
PG&E's amended filing is made in response to FERC Staff's inquiry
regarding the need for the agreement filed in this docket.
Copies of this filing have been served upon SMUD and the California
Public Utilities Commission.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
6. Louis Dreyfus Electric Power Inc.
[Docket No. ER94-141-000]
Take notice that on January 5, 1994, Louis Dreyfus Electric Power
Inc. (LDEP) tendered for filing information in response to a request
from the Commission Staff.
LDEP requests an effective date of September 7, 1993.
Copies of the filing were served upon the WSPP Executive Committee.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
7. PacifiCorp
[Docket No. ER94-150-000]
Take notice that PacifiCorp, on January 3, 1994, tendered for
filing in accordance with 18 CFR 35 of the Commission's Rules and
Regulations, an amendment to its November 10, 1993 filing in this
Docket.
PacifiCorp renews its request that an effective date, sixty (60)
days from the date the original filing was received by the Commission,
be assigned to the Emergency Interconnection Agreement.
Copies of this filing were supplied to the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission, the Public Utilities Commission of Oregon and Fall River
Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
8. North American Energy Conservation, Inc.
[Docket Nos. ER94-152-000 and EL94-9-000]
Take notice that on December 28, 1993, North American Energy
Conservation, Inc. (NAEC) filed with the Commission additional
information requested by Commission Staff in regard to NAEC's filing of
November 12, 1993. NAEC renews its request for an effective date of
January 1, 1994 as set forth in its original application.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
9. Puget Sound Power & Light Company
[Docket No. ER94-200-000]
Take notice that on December 28, 1993, Puget Sound Power & Light
Company (Puget), tendered for filing supplemental information to its
original filing in the above-referenced docket.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
10. Puget Sound Power & Light Company
[Docket No. ER94-203-000]
Take notice that on December 23, 1993, Puget Sound Power & Light
Company (Puget) tendered for filing in the above-referenced docket an
initial rate schedule between the United States of America Department
of Energy acting by and through the Bonneville Power Administration
(Bonneville) and Puget (the Agreement).
In connection with that filing, Puget submitted a draft Notice for
publication in the Federal Register which erroneously stated the
Agreement's execution date as ``December 30, 1987''; the correct date,
as was indicated in the filing letter itself, is October 25, 1991.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
11. Portland General Electric Company
[Docket No. ER94-254-000]
Take notice that on December 30, 1993, Portland General Electric
Company (PGE) tendered for filing a Certificate of Concurrence under
Docket No. ER94-254-000, relating an agreement, with amendment, for
interconnection between PacifiCorp and Portland General Electric and a
supplemental agreement for temporary use of facilities. Copies of these
agreements and amendments have been served on the parties included in
the distribution list defined in the filing letter.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
12. Northwestern Public Service Company
[Docket No. ER94-274-000]
Take notice that on December 16, 1993, Northwestern Public Service
Company tendered for filing various agreements for interconnection,
emergency interconnection, wheeling and emergency type service, along
with associated certificates of concurrence involving Northwestern
Public Service Company, Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., West
Central Electric Cooperative, East River Electric Power Cooperative and
the United States Department of Energy--Western Area Power
Administration.
Comment date: January 24, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
13. PacifiCorp
[Docket No. ER94-280-000]
Take notice that PacifiCorp, on December 29, 1993, tendered for
filing, in accordance with Commission's Order an amendment to its
filing in the above referenced Docket No. ER94-280-000, an agreement
regarding the installation of capacitors at Jim Bridger and Kinport
substation dated August 6, 1992.
Copies of this filing were supplied to Idaho Power Company, the
Public Utility Commission of Oregon, the Utah Public Service
Commission, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission and the Wyoming
Public Service Commission.
Comment date: January 25, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
14. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
[Docket No. ER94-327-000]
Take notice that on December 20, 1993, Wisconsin Public Service
Corporation (``the Company'') of Green Bay Wisconsin, filed a proposed
Supplement No. 4 to Supplement No. 9 to the Company's Service Agreement
with WPPI which relates to WPPI peak shaving for the period January 1,
1996 through October 15, 1997.
WPPI is the only customer currently peak shaving under the
Company's W-1 full requirements tariff. WPPI supports the filing and
the proposed effective date of January 1, 1996.
The filing does not change the level of the Company's rates. The
Company states that it has furnished copies of the filing to WPPI, its
other customers who are served under the full requirements tariff, the
Michigan Public Service Commission and the Public Service Commission of
Wisconsin.
Comment date: January 24, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
15. Tiger Bay Limited Partnership
[Docket No. QF93-15-001]
On January 10, 1994, Tiger Bay Limited Partnership tendered for
filing an amendment to its initial filing in this docket.
The amendment pertains to the ownership structure of the
cogeneration facility. No determination has been made that the
submittal constitutes a complete filing.
Comment date: January 31, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date.
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-1233 Filed 1-18-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.