Notice of Availability of the Draft Desert Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement, California

Federal RegisterJan 14, 2021

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[(LLCA930000.L13400000.DS0000.21X) MO#450014117]

Notice of Availability of the Draft Desert Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement, California

AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION:

Notice of availability.

SUMMARY:

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Draft Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), for an amendment to the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan and the Bakersfield and Bishop Resource Management Plans (RMPs). The Desert Plan Amendment Draft LUPA/EIS includes consideration of changes to the management or modification to the boundaries of 129 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs). By this notice, the BLM is announcing the availability of the Draft LUPA/EIS. In order to comply with Federal regulations, the BLM is also announcing a comment period on proposed changes to the ACECs within the planning area.

DATES:

To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive written comments on the Draft LUPA/EIS within 90 days following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its notice of the Draft LUPA/EIS in the

Federal Register

. The BLM will announce future meetings and any other public participation activities at least 15 days in advance through public notices, news releases, and/or mailings.

ADDRESSES:

The Desert Plan Amendment Draft LUPA/EIS are available on the BLM ePlanning project website at

https://go.usa.gov/x7hdj.

Click the “Documents” link on the left side of the screen to find the electronic version of these materials. Hard copies of the Desert Plan Amendment Draft LUPA and Draft EIS are also available for public inspection at the following BLM locations:

California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623, Sacramento, CA 95825;

California Desert District Office, 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos, Moreno Valley, CA 92553;

Barstow Field Office, 2601 Barstow Road, Barstow, CA 92311;

El Centro Field Office, 1661 S. 4th Street, El Centro, CA 92243;

Needles Field Office, 1303 S. Highway 95, Needles, CA 92363;

Ridgecrest Field Office, 300 S. Richmond Road, Ridgecrest, CA 93555;

Bakersfield Field Office, 3801 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, CA 93308; and

Bishop Field Office, 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 100, Bishop, CA 93514.

You may submit written comments related to the Desert Plan Amendment by either of the following methods:

•

Website: https://go.usa.gov/x7hdj.

•

Mail:

Bureau of Land Management, California State Office, Attn: Desert Plan Amendment, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623, Sacramento, CA 95825.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeremiah Karuzas, Renewable Energy Program Manager, telephone: 916-978-4644, email:

jkaruzas@blm.gov;

address Bureau of Land Management, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1623, Sacramento, CA 95825. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay

Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Karuzas during normal business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In September 2016, the BLM issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) LUPA, which amended the CDCA Plan, the Bishop RMP, and the Bakersfield RMP in the Mojave and Colorado/Sonoran Desert regions of southern California. The 2016 ROD was intended to address the streamlining of renewable energy development, conservation of desert resources, and to support multiple use and recreation on the nearly 11 million acres of BLM-managed public land in the planning area. In response to challenges that arose with the implementation of the 2016 DRECP LUPA, as well as in response to Executive Order 13783, Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, and Executive Order 13821 on Streamlining and Expediting Requests to Locate Broadband Facilities in Rural America, the BLM published a Notice of Intent in the

Federal Register

on February 2, 2018 (83 FR 4921) initiating a 45-day public comment period. The BLM sought comments on:

• The potential impacts that land use designations contained in the amended Land Use Plans will have on commercial-scale renewable energy projects, including wind, solar and geothermal energy;

• ACECs that were designated, including where private lands lie within the external boundaries of such designations, as well as comments on increasing opportunities for increased renewable energy development, recreational and off-highway vehicle access, mining access, and grazing; and

• The impact that land-use designations, land-disturbance limits (“disturbance caps”), and visual-management classifications contained in the plans may have on the deployment of future communications infrastructure.

The BLM used public scoping comments to help identify planning issues to formulate alternatives and frame the scope of analysis in the Draft LUPA/EIS. Issues considered in the Draft LUPA/EIS are management actions associated with conservation areas, biological resources (including special status species), cultural resources, renewable energy, minerals, livestock grazing, visual resources, air resources, water resources, and recreation. The LUPA also considers decisions regarding ACECs, California Desert National Conservation Lands (CDNCL), and management of lands with wilderness characteristics. The Desert Plan Amendment Draft LUPA/EIS evaluates the No Action Alternative and two action alternatives (Alternatives 1 and 2). The BLM identifies Alternative 1 as the Preferred Alternative. This alternative, however, does not represent the final agency direction. After the public comment period closes, the BLM will prepare a Proposed LUPA, which may reflect changes or adjustments based on information received during public comment on the Draft LUPA/EIS, new information, or changes in BLM policies or priorities.

The No Action Alternative would retain the decisions specified in the 2016 ROD for the DRECP LUPA, as recently modified by Public Law 116-9. Alternative 1 would reduce the number of ACECs from 129 to 97 thus reducing the acreage of the ACECs by approximately 1.8 million acres; reduce the areas identified as CDNCL by approximately 2.2 million acres; and result in an additional 450,000 acres of General Public Lands (GPL). Alternative 1 would also modify or eliminate 68 Conservation Management Actions (CMAs), which would also change the manner in which disturbance caps are implemented, including elimination of disturbance caps in CDNCL, as well as allowing renewable energy development in Special Recreation Management Areas (SRMA).

Alternative 2 would reduce the number of ACECs to 100, and reduce the acreage of the ACECs by approximately 1.5 million acres; reduce the areas identified as CDNCL by approximately 2.1 million acres; and result in an additional approximate 274,000 acres of General Public Lands (GPL). Alternative 2 would also modify or eliminate the same 68 CMAs, which would also change the manner in which disturbance caps are implemented similar to Alternative 1 but Alternative 2 would retain the one percent disturbance cap for CDNCL. Alternative 2 CMAs would be modified to only allow renewable energy development in a SRMA where there is overlap with Development Focus Areas (DFAs). All other land use allocation decisions and CMAs from the 2016 ROD would be retained in both Alternative 1 and Alternative 2.

As a result of proposed CMA changes, the resource use limitations of the 129 ACECs within the planning area will also change. Therefore, pursuant to 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b), this notice announces a concurrent public comment period on proposed management changes (including alteration or elimination of disturbance caps), and boundary modifications or elimination of the existing ACECs as identified in Table 1.

Table 1—ACECs Proposed for Boundary Modification or Elimination

ACEC name

No action

acres

Alternative 1

acres

Alternative 2

acres

Afton Canyon

8,800

Alligator Rock

6,800

6,200

Amargosa North

114,000

72,760

Amargosa South

148,410

134,410

Amboy Crater

640

Avawatz Mountains WSA

49,900

Ayers Rock

1,500

Barstow Woolly Sunflower

19,100

Bedrock Spring

440

Bendire's Thrasher

9,800

Big Morongo Canyon

25,000

24,600

Big Rock Creek Wash

310

Bigelow Cholla

4,200

Black Mountain

51,300

Brisbane Valley Monkey Flower

11,700

Bristol

213,600

116,400

Cadiz Valley

191,200

67,600

Cady Mountains WSA

101,400

Calico Early Man Site

840

Carbonate Endemic Plants RNA

5,000

Castle Mountain

3,180

Cerro Gordo

10,400

9,700

Cerro Gordo WSA

630

Chemehuevi

864,200

578,600

Chuckwalla

512,300

319,400

Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi tortoise linkage

318,600

269,900

Chuckwalla Valley Dune Thicket

2,200

Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard

10,300

Conglomerate Mesa

1,700

Coolgardie Mesa

9,800

Corn Springs

2,500

900

Coyote Mountains Fossil Site

5,900

Cronese Basin

8,500

Dagget Ridge Monkey Flower

26,100

Dead Mountains

27,200

Death Valley 17 WSA

20,600

Denning Springs

390

Desert Lily Preserve

2,100

Desert Tortoise Research Natural Area

22,200

Dos Palmas

8,600

Eagles Flyway

10,900

East Mesa

88,500

38,200

88,500

El Paso to Golden

57,800

Fossil Falls

1,700

Fremont-Kramer

236,000

Granite Mountain Corridor

39,300

34,500

Great Falls Basin

10,300

Halloran Wash

1,700

Harper Dry Lake

490

Horse Canyon

1,500

Independence Creek WSA

6,500

Indian Pass

1,900

Ivanpah

78,600

63,900

78,600

Jawbone/Butterbredt

145,700

114,900

Juniper Flats

2,400

Kingston Range

18,900

15,200

Kingston Range WSA

40,000

Lake Cahuilla

8,600

Lake Cahuilla Shoreline

11,900

Last Chance Canyon

5,100

3,500

Manix

2,900

Manzanar

540

Marble Mountain Fossil Bed

230

McCoy Valley

26,200

McCoy Wash

6,400

Mesquite Hills/Crucero

5,000

Mesquite Lake

6,800

Middle Knob

17,800

Mohave Ground Squirrel

165,200

170,800

Mojave Fishhook Cactus

637

635

Mojave Fringe-toed Lizard

22,500

11,500

Mopah Spring

1,900

Mountain Pass Dinosaur Trackway

630

Mule McCoy Linkage

51,200

Mule Mountains

4,100

Northern Lucerne Wildlife Linkage

21,900

Ocotillo

14,600

Olancha Greasewood

25,600

19,500

Old Woman Springs Wildlife Linkage

55,600

43,200

55,600

Ord-Rodman

195,300

140,700

Owens Lake

10,200

Palen Dry Lake

3,600

Palen Ford

41,400

25,600

41,400

Panamint Lake

21,700

Panamints and Argus

102,900

71,500

Parish's Phacelia

560

Patton Military Camps

16,400

21,100

Picacho

183,500

133,600

Pilot Knob

860

Pinto Mountains

108,200

84,200

Pipes Canyon

8,700

4,600

Pisgah

46,600

Piute-Fenner

155,500

146,200

Plank Road

420

Rainbow Basin/Owl Canyon

4,100

Red Mountain Spring

700

Rodman Mountains Cultural Area

6,200

Rose Spring

840

Saline Valley

1,400

Salt Creek Hills

2,200

1,600

Salton Sea Hazardous ACEC

5,100

San Sebastian Marsh/San Felipe Creek

6,600

Sand Canyon

2,600

Santos Manuel

27,500

Shadow Valley

197,300

159,700

Short Canyon

750

Sierra Canyons

26,300

27,000

Singer Geoglyphs

2,000

Soda Mountains Expansion

16,700

Soda Mountains WSA

88,800

Soda Mountains

33,300

Soggy Dry Lake Creosote Rings

180

Southern Inyo WSA

2,700

Steam Well

Superior-Cronese

315,800

310,900

Surprise Canyon

4,600

Symmes Creek WSA

8,400

Trona Pinnacles

4,100

Turtle Mountains

50,400

Upper Johnson Valley Yucca Rings

330

Upper McCoy

37,400

Warm Sulfur Springs

350

West Mesa

82,500

18,700

82,500

West Paradise

240

Western Rand Mountains

30,400

Whipple Mountains

2,800

2,100

White Mountain City

820

White Mountains WSA

1,600

Whitewater Canyon

14,900

2,800

Yuha Basin

77,300

73,600

A more detailed description of all proposed ACEC modifications, including maps, is included in the Draft LUPA/EIS and Appendix B of the Draft LUPA/EIS.

The BLM will utilize and coordinate the NEPA process to help fulfill the public involvement process under the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 306108), as provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3). The BLM will continue to consult with Indian tribes on a government-to-government basis, in accordance with Executive Order 13175 and other policies. Tribal concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets and potential impacts to cultural resources, will continue to be given due consideration. Federal, State, and local agencies, along with tribes and other stakeholders that may be interested in or affected by the proposed action that the BLM is evaluating, are invited to participate in the comment period.

Please note that public comments and information submitted, including names, street addresses, and email addresses of persons who submit comments, will be available for public review and disclosure at the BLM California State Office (see

ADDRESSES

) during regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday, except holidays.

Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10)

Karen E. Mouritsen,

State Director, California.

[FR Doc. 2021-00579 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.