Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2000 Volvo C70 Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2004-17142]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2000 Volvo C70 Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION:

Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 2000 Volvo C70 passenger cars are eligible for importation.

SUMMARY:

This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 2000 Volvo C70 passenger cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for importation into the United States because (1) they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards, and (2) they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.

DATES:

The closing date for comments on the petition is March 26, 2004.

ADDRESSES:

Comments should refer to the docket number and notice number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.]. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the

Federal Register

published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit

http://dms.dot.gov

.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the

Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the

Federal Register

.

Barry W. Taylor Enterprises, Inc. of Richmond, California (“BTE”) (Registered Importer 01-280) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 2000 Volvo C70 passenger cars are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles which BTE believes are substantially similar are 2000 Volvo C70 passenger cars that were manufactured for importation into, and sale in, the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

The petitioner claims that it carefully compared non-U.S. certified 2000 Volvo C70 passenger cars to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most Federal motor vehicle safety standards.

BTE submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2000 Volvo C70 passenger cars, as originally manufactured, conform to many Federal motor vehicle safety standards in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.

Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2000 Volvo C70 passenger cars are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102

Transmission Shift Lever Sequence

, 103

Defrosting and Defogging Systems

, 104

Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems

, 105

Hydraulic Brake Systems

, 106

Brake Hoses

, 109

New Pneumatic Tires

, 110

Tire Selection and Rims

, 113

Hood Latch Systems

, 114

Theft Protection

, 116

Brake Fluid

, 124

Accelerator Control Systems

, 202

Head Restraints

, 203

Impact Protection for the Driver from the Steering Control System

, 204

Steering Control Rearward Displacement

, 205

Glazing Materials

, 206

Door Locks and Door Retention Components

, 207

Seating Systems

, 210

Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages

, 212

Windshield Retention

, 216

Roof Crush Resistance

, 219

Windshield Zone Intrusion

, 302

Flammability of Interior Materials

, and 401

Interior Trunk Release

.

Petitioner states that the vehicles also comply with the Bumper Standard found at 49 CFR part 581.

Petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated:

Standard No. 101

Controls and Displays

: replacement or conversion of the speedometer to read in miles per hour.

Standard No. 108

Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment

: (a) installation of U.S.-model headlight assemblies; (b) installation of amber sidemarker lights.

Standard No. 111

Rearview Mirror

: inscription of the required warning statement on the passenger side rearview mirror.

Standard No. 118

Power-Operated Window Systems:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that the vehicle does in fact comply with the standard.

Standard No. 135

Passenger Car Brake Systems:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that the vehicle does in fact comply with the standard.

Standard No. 201

Occupant Protection in Interior Impact:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that all the components on the vehicle that could affect compliance with the standard are identical to those found on the vehicle's U.S.-certified counterpart.

Standard No. 208

Occupant Crash Protection:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that the vehicle's crash protection system is identical to that found on the vehicle's U.S.-certified counterpart.

Standard No. 209

Seat Belt Assemblies:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that the vehicle is equipped with compliant seat belt assemblies.

Standard No. 213

Child Restraint Systems:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that the vehicle does in fact comply with the standard.

Standard No. 214

Side Impact Protection:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that the vehicle is equipped with door beams identical to those found on the vehicle's U.S.-certified counterpart.

Standard No. 225

Child Restraint Anchorage Systems:

inspection of all vehicles and modification, as necessary, to ensure compliance with the standard. The petitioner expressed the belief that the vehicle does in fact comply with the standard.

Standard No. 301

Fuel System Integrity:

installation of a rollover valve to achieve compliance with the standard.

The petitioner states that all vehicles must be inspected to ensure compliance with the Theft Prevention Standard at 49 CFR part 541, and that anti-theft marking must be added to vehicles that are not already so marked.

The petitioner also states that a vehicle identification plate must be affixed to the vehicles to meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 565, and that a certification label must be affixed to the driver's door pillar to meet the requirements of 49 CFR part 567.

Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.]. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.

All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the

Federal Register

pursuant to the authority indicated below.

Authority:

49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: February 19, 2004.

Kenneth N. Weinstein,

Associate Administrator for Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 04-4056 Filed 2-24-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P