Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Congressional research reportMay 13, 2026
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces:
Immigration Issues
Updated May 13, 2026
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R48163
SUMMARY
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces:
Immigration Issues
Enlistment and appointment in the U.S. Armed Forces is currently limited to U.S.
citizens and U.S. nationals, lawful permanent residents (LPRs), and residents of certain
Pacific Islands (Freely Associated States). The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) may
also authorize the enlistment of other categories of foreign nationals (aliens) under
certain circumstances, which was the basis for the now-suspended Military Accessions
Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI) program.
R48163
May 13, 2026
Holly Straut-Eppsteiner
Analyst in Immigration
Policy
As of February 2026, nearly 50,000 foreign nationals were serving in active and reserve components of the Armed
Forces. An estimated additional 125,000 foreign nationals residing in the United States in 2024 were veterans who
have previously served on active duty. This report focuses on immigration considerations related to foreign
nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces, including U.S. citizenship eligibility through military service and the removal
of foreign nationals who have served in the Armed Forces.
Foreign national servicemembers have long been able to become U.S. citizens under special provisions in law for
naturalization through military service. The Immigration and Nationality Act provides for expedited naturalization
through military service with requirements contingent on whether qualifying service was during peacetime or
designated periods of hostilities.
U.S. military veterans who have not naturalized as U.S. citizens may be subject to removal from the United
States. Instances of such removals have raised concerns among some Members of Congress and advocates.
Observers have also raised concerns regarding whether the potential removal of servicemembers’ immediate
relatives may pose a threat to military readiness. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has long used
its discretionary authority to consider military service as a mitigating factor in its enforcement actions. Specific
policy guidance has changed over time and under different administrations. In 2021, DHS and the Department of
Veterans Affairs introduced the Immigrant Military Members and Veterans Initiative (IMMVI). Under IMMVI,
DHS has implemented policies to facilitate access to naturalization for veterans residing abroad (including those
who have been removed) and implemented options for servicemembers and their qualifying relatives to return to
the United States to access veterans’ benefits and legal services, including through immigration parole.
In recent Congresses, some Members have introduced measures related to foreign national servicemembers and
veterans, including some that would expand enlistment to additional categories of non-U.S. nationals, such as
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) recipients. Some Members have also introduced measures
addressing the removals of servicemembers, veterans, and qualifying relatives. These include provisions that
would mitigate the possibility of removal for those with a military connection, establish greater oversight of
removal proceedings for such individuals, and facilitate deported veterans’ ability to return to the United States
and regularize their status. Some Members have opposed expansions of enlistment eligibility and raised concerns
regarding the possible return of foreign national veterans who were removed because they committed serious
offenses.
Congressional Research Service
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Citizenship and Immigration Status Requirements for Enlistment ................................................. 2
MAVNI Program ....................................................................................................................... 3
Data on Non-U.S. National Servicemembers and Veterans ............................................................ 5
U.S. Citizenship through Military Service ...................................................................................... 7
Peacetime Provision (INA §328)............................................................................................... 8
Wartime Provision (INA §329) ................................................................................................. 9
Naturalization Process for Servicemembers ........................................................................... 10
Military Naturalization Data ................................................................................................... 12
Posthumous Citizenship (INA §329A) .................................................................................... 15
Immigration Benefits for Surviving Relatives ........................................................................ 16
Removals of Foreign National Veterans ........................................................................................ 16
DHS Enforcement Discretion and Enforcement Actions Data ............................................... 17
Discretionary Options for Servicemembers and Qualifying Relatives ................................... 19
Parole in Place and Deferred Action (Individuals Residing Inside the
United States)................................................................................................................. 20
IMMVI Parole (Individuals Residing Outside the United States) .................................... 21
Issues for Congressional Consideration ........................................................................................ 23
Expanding Enlistment: Immigration Considerations .............................................................. 23
Addressing Veteran Removals and Facilitating Naturalization ............................................... 24
Figures
Figure 1. Foreign Nationals Serving in the U.S. Armed Forces, February 2026............................. 6
Figure 2. Military Naturalizations and Designated Periods of Hostilities, FY1918FY2024 ....................................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 3. Military Naturalization Applications Received and Approved, FY2016-FY2025 ......... 15
Figure 4. Former U.S. Servicemembers Arrested, Booked into Custody, and Removed,
FY2018-FY2024 ........................................................................................................................ 19
Tables
Table 1. Estimated Number and Percentage of Noncitizen Veterans by Service Period ................. 7
Table 2. Periods of Military Hostilities Designated for Naturalization under INA Section
329 ................................................................................................................................................ 9
Contacts
Author Information........................................................................................................................ 25
Congressional Research Service
1
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Introduction
Enlistment and appointment in the U.S. Armed Forces is currently limited to U.S. citizens and
U.S. nationals, lawful permanent residents (LPRs), and residents of certain Pacific Islands (Freely
Associated States).1 The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)2 may also authorize the enlistment
of other categories of foreign nationals (aliens)3 under certain circumstances. Most foreign
national males ages 18-25 residing in the United States must register with the Selective Service
System regardless of their immigration status.4
This report focuses on immigration considerations related to foreign nationals in and veterans of
the U.S. Armed Forces. Topics covered include U.S. citizenship eligibility through military
service and the removal of foreign nationals who have served in the Armed Forces.
Foreign national servicemembers have long been able to become U.S. citizens under special
provisions in law for naturalization through military service. Since the end of World War I,
approximately 818,000 foreign nationals have naturalized through military service, with
naturalizations clustered around periods of military hostilities.5 The Immigration and Nationality
Act (INA) provides for expedited naturalization through military service, with requirements
contingent on whether an individual’s qualifying service was during peacetime or a designated
period of hostilities. In the years since 2001, the most recent designated period of hostilities for
naturalization, approximately 148,000 foreign national servicemembers have naturalized (as of
FY2024).6
According to DOD data, as of February 2026, nearly 50,000 foreign nationals were serving in the
active and reserve components of the Armed Forces. Based on 2024 American Community
Survey (ACS) data, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimates an additional 125,440
foreign nationals residing in the United States have served on active duty in the past.7 An
unknown proportion of these individuals may be eligible to naturalize under INA provisions.
Some Members of Congress have introduced measures related to foreign national
servicemembers, including legislation that would expand enlistment to additional categories of
1 These include individuals covered under the Compacts of Free Association between the United States and the
Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and Palau. For more information on the Compacts
of Free Association, see CRS In Focus IF12194, The Compacts of Free Association.
2 The Department of Defense is “using a secondary Department of War designation,” under Executive Order 14347,
dated September 5, 2025.
3 As defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA §101(a)(3); 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)), alien means any person
not a citizen or national of the United States. This report uses the terms foreign nationals and aliens interchangeably to
refer to persons who are not citizens or nationals of the United States.
4 This includes LPRs; individuals granted refugee status, asylum, and parole; and unauthorized immigrants.
Nonimmigrants with temporary permission to be in the United States are excluded. For more information about the
Selective Service System, see CRS Report R44452, The Selective Service System and Draft Registration: Issues for
Congress.
5 FY1918-FY2023: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of Homeland Security Statistics, Yearbook of
Immigration Statistics 2023, Table 20. FY2024: DHS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS),
“Naturalization Statistics,” January 24, 2025. Periods of hostilities: DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I,
Chapter 3, “Military Service during Hostilities.”
6 Ibid. Elsewhere, USCIS has stated that it has naturalized more than 187,000 members of the U.S. military from 20022024. See USCIS, “Military Naturalization Statistics,” November 6, 2024, https://www.uscis.gov/military/militarynaturalization-statistics.
7 CRS analysis of the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), 2024 5-year sample. See footnote
32.
Congressional Research Service
1
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
non-U.S. nationals. Most of these measures would extend enlistment to individuals who arrived in
the United States as children, are not in lawful immigration status, and have been granted
temporary protection from deportation through Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
Others have opposed such expansions of enlistment eligibility, for example, citing national
security concerns.
As is the case for all aliens, foreign national U.S. military veterans who have not naturalized as
U.S. citizens may be subject to removal from the United States if they violate immigration laws.
Instances of such removals have raised concerns among some Member of Congress and
advocates. Observers have also contended that the potential removal of servicemembers’
immediate relatives may pose a threat to military readiness.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which is responsible for enforcing U.S.
immigration law, has long used its discretionary authority to consider military service as a
mitigating factor in its enforcement actions. DHS has provided discretionary options, on a caseby-case basis, to current and former servicemembers and certain relatives who may be removable
from the United States, or who have already been removed, to remain in or return to the country.
Some Members of Congress have proposed measures that would codify protections from removal
for current servicemembers and veterans and their qualifying relatives, facilitate the naturalization
of those residing outside the United States, and allow those who have been removed to return to
the country. Other Members have raised concerns regarding the potential return of individuals
who were removed from the United States because they committed serious criminal offenses.
Citizenship and Immigration Status Requirements
for Enlistment
Some positions in the Armed Forces require U.S. citizenship. Under the law, military officers
must be U.S. citizens.8 In addition, some positions require security clearances, for which U.S.
citizenship is required. However, qualified noncitizens may enter the Armed Forces as enlisted
members in occupations that do not require security clearances.9
Citizenship and residency requirements for enlistment in the U.S. Armed Forces are specified in
10 U.S.C. §504(b)(1).10 These categories include the following:
•
•
8
U.S. nationals—a category that includes U.S. citizens and noncitizen nationals
(i.e., American Samoans);
LPRs (sometimes known as green card holders), who have permission to live and
work permanently in the United States and may become U.S. citizens through the
naturalization process;11 and
10 U.S.C. §532(a)(1).
9 Such enlisted persons would undergo a Tier 1 Background Investigation (formerly known as a National Agency
Check with Inquiries [NACI]). The Tier 1 Background Investigation is the minimum level of investigation of a federal
employee’s background required for public trust positions that do not require access to classified national security
information. Applicants fill out a Standard Form (SF) 85, Questionnaire for Non-Sensitive Positions. See
https://www.dcsa.mil/Portals/128/Documents/pv/fso/Tier_Investigations.pdf?ver=
nNzQlrMiota71dcvYkCNAA%3D%3D.
10 Title 10 of the U.S. Code was amended to include these uniform citizenship and residency requirements under the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2006 (P.L. 109-163, §542).
11 For information about pathways to LPR status, see CRS Report R42866, Permanent Legal Immigration to the United
States: Policy Overview.
Congressional Research Service
2
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
•
Citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands covered under the Compacts of Free Association (also known as
Freely Associated States).12
What is a U.S. National?
A U.S. national is someone who owes permanent allegiance to the United States, whether or not that person is a
U.S. citizen.13 All U.S. citizens are U.S. nationals, but not all U.S. nationals are U.S. citizens. Under the law,
individuals born in American Samoa are U.S. nationals, not U.S. citizens, at birth. However, they may become U.S.
citizens through the naturalization process. As U.S. nationals, American Samoans are eligible to enlist in the U.S.
Armed Forces regardless of whether they have naturalized as U.S. citizens. American Samoa, a U.S. territory, has a
high rate of military enlistment compared with other U.S. states and territories.14
In addition to the categories listed above, 10 U.S.C. §504(b)(2) allows the Service Secretaries to
authorize the enlistment of other persons “vital to the national interest.”15 This authority, in an
earlier form, was the basis for the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI)
program, which DOD authorized in 2008 and suspended in 2016.16 As of the cover date of this
report, the military departments were not using this authority.
MAVNI Program
DOD established MAVNI as a pilot program in 2008 to authorize the enlistment of (1) health care
professionals who could fill shortages of personnel in particular medical specialties, and (2)
individuals with particular language skills or cultural backgrounds.17 At that time, the text in 10
U.S.C. §504(b)(2) authorized the Service Secretaries to enlist persons other than those specified
in 10 U.S.C. §504(b)(1)—U.S. nationals, LPRs, and Freely Associated States migrants—“if the
[Service] Secretary determines that such enlistment is vital to the national interest.”
Qualified applicant categories included asylees, refugees, holders of Temporary Protected Status
(TPS), and certain nonimmigrants (individuals authorized to enter the United States on a
temporary basis for a specified purpose, such as foreign students).18 In 2014, DOD extended
12 For information about the Compacts of Free Association, see CRS In Focus IF12194, The Compacts of Free
Association.
13 INA §101(a)(21)-(22); 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21)-(22).
14 See, for example, “Military Service ‘Part of our Makeup as a Warrior People’,” Reserve National Guard Magazine,
June 10, 2022, and Tracey Leong, “American Samoans’ Strong Military Tradition,” KIRO 7 News, May 27, 2021.
15 This provision was also included in the Title 10 amendments in the FY2006 NDAA described in footnote 8.
16 MAVNI represented the first use of this statutory authority (Christopher Clifton, “Naturalizing through Military
Service: Who Decides?”, Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 36, no. 3 (Spring 2022), p. 1071.). In the 115th
Congress, in response to the MAVNI program, the statute was amended to require that such an enlistee possess a
“critical skill or expertise” that they will use in their “primary daily duties” in the Armed Forces (P.L. 115-232, §521).
17 DOD, “Military Accessions Vital to National Interest (MAVNI) Recruitment Pilot,” fact sheet, 2008, archived
December 11, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, https://web.archive.org/web/20081211214324/http://
www.defenselink.mil/news/mavni-fact-sheet.pdf (hereinafter, “DOD MAVNI Fact Sheet 2008”).
18 Eligible nonimmigrant visa categories included E (treaty traders and investors); F (academic students); H (temporary
workers); I (foreign media); J (exchange visitors); K (fiancé[e]s of U.S. citizens); L (intracompany transferees); M
(vocational students); O (persons with extraordinary ability in certain fields); P (athletes/entertainers); Q (cultural
exchange workers); R (religious workers); S (informants); T (trafficking victims); TC, TD, TN (U.S.-Mexico-Canada
Agreement professionals); U (crime victims); and V (spouses and children of LPRs awaiting immigrant visas). For
more information about these categories, see CRS Report R45938, Nonimmigrant and Immigrant Visa Categories:
Data Brief.
Congressional Research Service
3
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
eligibility to DACA beneficiaries.19 MAVNI applicants were required to have been in a qualifying
status (or statuses) for at least two years prior to enlistment, and without having left the United
States for a period of more than 90 days during that two-year period.
DOD initially set an annual cap of 1,000 accessions, which it later increased to 1,400.20 The Army
was allotted the largest number of accessions.21 MAVNI applicants were enlisted on a case-bycase basis and were required to commit to at least three years of active-duty service or six years
of service in the Selected Reserves.22 From 2008 to 2016, 10,400 individuals enlisted through the
MAVNI program.23
MAVNI was subject to national security concerns, including that some applicants were not
properly vetted and/or were enlisted under fraudulent bases, such as having received visas “to
attend universities that did not exist.”24 In September 2016, DOD issued a memorandum to renew
MAVNI through FY2017, but implemented additional background investigation and security
review requirements, which were required to be completed before any MAVNI applicant shipped
to basic training or served on active duty.25 These included a National Intelligence Agency Check,
CI-Security Interview, and Military Suitability Determination. The memorandum also required
continuous counterintelligence monitoring of MAVNI enlistees and related reporting. It
prohibited certain language/culture applicants from shipping to basic training or serving on active
duty “until the Military Service certifies in writing” to the relevant DOD undersecretaries “their
ability to meet administrative, security, and suitability protocols mandated herein.”26
In October 2017, DOD announced a new policy that required six months of active-duty service
that included completion of basic training to qualify for an honorable service determination (this
19 Jessica L. Wright, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, “Military Accessions Vital to the
National Interest Program Changes,” Memorandum for Secretary of the Army, Secretary of the Navy, and Secretary of
the Air Force, September 25, 2014. According to USCIS, in July 2017 820 DACA recipients were serving in the
military or had signed contracts to serve. DHS, USCIS, “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA) Recipients
Serving in the Military,” https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/DACA_Military_Data.pdf.
20 See DOD MAVNI Fact Sheet 2008, and Peter Levine, Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and
Readiness, “Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest Pilot Program Extension,” Memorandum for Secretary of
the Army, Secretary of the Navy, and Secretary of the Air Force, September 30, 2016 (hereinafter, “DOD MAVNI
2016 Pilot Program Extension Memorandum”).
21 For example, in 2016, the Army was allocated 1,200 of 1,400 total accessions. See DOD MAVNI 2016 Pilot
Program Extension Memorandum.
22 Initially, MAVNI required four years of active-duty service for language recruits. However, DOD later changed the
requirement to match that of health care professionals. See DOD, “Military Accessions Vital to National Interest
(MAVNI) Recruitment Pilot,” fact sheet, 2008; and DOD MAVNI 2016 Pilot Program Extension Memorandum.
23 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Immigration Enforcement: Actions Needed to Better Handle,
Identify, and Track Cases Involving Veterans, GAO-19-416, June 2019, p. 7 (citing DOD data).
24 Tara Copp, “MAVNI troops falsified records, were security risk, DoD says,” Military Times, July 17, 2018. See also
Muzaffar Chishti, Austin Rose, and Stephen Yale-Loehr, “Noncitizens in the U.S. Military: Navigating National
Security Concerns and Recruitment Needs,” Migration Policy Institute, May 2019 (hereinafter, “Chishti et al., 2019”);;
James Rosen, “Pentagon investigators find ‘security risks’ in government’s immigrant recruitment program,
‘infiltration’ feared,” Fox News, August 1, 2017.
25 DOD MAVNI 2016 Pilot Program Extension Memorandum.
26 DOD MAVNI 2016 Pilot Program Extension Memorandum. Eligible languages changed over time. As of the 2016
memo, languages were divided into two categories; Category 1 included Albanian, Bengali, Bulgarian, Cebuano,
Czech, Dhivehi, Haitian-Creole, Hungarian, Malayalam, Polish, Portuguese, Sinhalese, Tagalog, Tamil, and Thai.
Category 2 included Amharic, Arabic, Azerbaijani, Burmese, Cambodian-Khmer, French (nationals of African
countries only), Georgian, Hausa, Hindi, Igbo, Indonesian, Kashmiri, Kurdish, Lao, Malay, Moro, Nepalese, Pahari,
Punjabi, Pushto (Pashto), Serbo-Croatian, Sindhi, Somali, Swahili, Taji, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uzbek,
and Yoruba. This provision in the memo applied to Category 2 applicants only.
Congressional Research Service
4
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
policy was vacated in federal court in 2020).27 An honorable service determination is necessary to
apply for naturalization through provisions for military service (discussed further in the “U.S.
Citizenship through Military Service” section).
The services subsequently suspended MAVNI. During the 115th Congress, the House Committee
on Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel reported on a July 2017 classified
briefing regarding a MAVNI investigation conducted by the DOD Inspector General:
The briefers provided an overview of the original purpose of the program, and how the
investigation uncovered several security issues, including the fact that several thousand
non-citizens were allowed to enter the military without completed background
investigations. As a result of the investigation, the Department of Defense suspended the
MAVNI program and tightened the policies related to background investigations. 28
Following the MAVNI program’s suspension, the John S. McCain National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 codified new security standards for individuals who enlist
under the 10 U.S.C. §504(b)(2) “vital to the national interest” provision. Such individuals may
not report to initial training “until after the Secretary concerned has completed all required
background investigations and security and suitability screening as determined by the Secretary
of Defense regarding that person.”29 The amended statute states that a Service Secretary may not
authorize more than 1,000 enlistments per military department in a calendar year without written
notice to Congress.30 This legislation also amended the statute to require that such enlistees
possess a “critical skill or expertise” that they will use in their “primary daily duties” in the
Armed Forces. As of the cover date of this report, DOD has not resumed the MAVNI program.
Data on Non-U.S. National Servicemembers and
Veterans
As of February 2026, 49,709 non-U.S. citizens were serving in the U.S. Armed Forces within
active and reserve components in DOD military departments (Figure 1).31 The Army (active
component) accounted for the largest proportion (just under one-third) of such servicemembers.
27 DOD, “DoD Announces Policy Changes to Lawful Permanent Residents and the Military Accessions Vital to the
National Interest (MAVNI) Pilot Program,” press release, October 13, 2017, https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/
Release/Article/1342317/dod-announces-policy-changes-to-lawful-permanent-residents-and-the-military-acc/; and
Patricia Kime and Richard Sisk, “Judge Strikes Down Minimum Service Requirement for Troops Applying for US
Citizenship,” Military.com, August 26, 2020, https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/08/26/judge-strikes-downminimum-service-requirement-troops-applying-us-citizenship.html.
28
U.S. Congress, House Committee on Armed Services, Report on the Activities of the Committee on Armed Services
for the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, 115th Cong., 2nd sess., December 21, 2018, 115-1100, p. 117. A redacted
version of the DOD Inspector General report is available at https://media.defense.gov/2022/Nov/14/2003114198/-1/-1/
1/DODIG-2017-089.PDF.
29 P.L. 115-232, §521, codified at 10 U.S.C. §504(b)(3). See also the “Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest
(MAVNI)” section in archived CRS Report R45343, FY2019 National Defense Authorization Act: Selected Military
Personnel Issues.
30 Ibid.
31 DOD reported an overall population of 2,022,141 servicemembers on active duty and in the selected reserves as of
2024. See DOD, Military OneSource, 2024 Demographics: Interactive Profile of the Military Community,
https://demographics.militaryonesource.mil/chapter-1-total-force-characteristics.
Congressional Research Service
5
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Figure 1. Foreign Nationals Serving in the U.S. Armed Forces, February 2026
Source: Defense Manpower Data Center data provided to CRS by DOD on May 4, 2026.
Notes: Not shown: Space Force (zero servicemembers). Includes DOD data only; does not include service by
non-U.S. nationals in the U.S. Coast Guard, which is within DHS.
In addition to those currently serving, there were an estimated 125,440 veterans residing in the
United States who were not U.S. citizens or U.S. nationals as of 2024, the most recent year for
which estimates could be made.32 This includes individuals who had ever served, but were not
currently serving at the time they were interviewed, on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces,
Reserves, or National Guard.33 This number does not include foreign nationals who may have
served and subsequently naturalized or were residing abroad.34
Table 1 shows the estimated number of foreign national veterans by period of service.35 Foreign
nationals residing in the United States (as of 2024) are estimated to have served in all periods of
32 CRS analysis of the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), 2024 5-year sample. This number
measures those who reported having served on active duty in the past and excludes U.S. nationals born in American
Samoa. By statute (38 U.S.C. §101(2)), veteran is defined as a “person who served in the active military, naval, air, or
space service, and who was discharged or released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable.” (For more
information, see CRS Report R47299, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: Who Is a Veteran?) “Veterans,” as
described in these estimates, may not meet this statutory definition because ACS data do not include information about
discharge status.
33 The estimate excludes those who served in the National Guard or Reserves and did not serve on active duty.
34 For a demographic analysis of all foreign-born veterans, including naturalized citizens, see Jeanne Batalova,
Immigrant Veterans in the United States, Migration Policy Institute, May 9, 2024, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/
article/immigrant-veterans-united-states.
35 This estimate is based on the number of individuals who reported to the ACS serving on active duty during specified
periods. Respondents could select more than one service period. CRS collapsed these categories into the five categories
presented in Table 1.
Congressional Research Service
6
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
military conflict since World War II.36 Approximately 46% of such veterans have served since
September 2001. Veterans who served during multiple periods are counted more than once.
Table 1. Estimated Number and Percentage of Noncitizen Veterans
by Service Period
(individuals serving during multiple periods are counted more than once)
Number of
Persons
Percentage
of Total
War on Terrorism (September 2001 or later)
57,778
46%
Gulf War Era (August 1990-August 2001)
38,481
31%
Vietnam Era
21,753
17%
Korean War or World War II
2,561
2%
Other service period(s)a
20,130
16%
125,440
100%
Period of Service
Total number who served during all service periods
Source: CRS analysis of U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), 2024 5-year sample.
Notes: Percentage is calculated as the number of servicemembers in a given period divided by the total number
of foreign national veterans (125,440). Some servicemembers served during multiple periods (e.g., both during
the War on Terrorism and the Gulf War Era); therefore, percentages do not add to 100%. These time periods,
as measured in the ACS, do not correspond exactly with the designated periods of hostilities for naturalization
purposes, which are defined in Table 2.
a. “Other service period(s)” include between the Gulf War period and Vietnam Era, between the Vietnam Era
and Korean War, and peacetime service before the Korean War.
U.S. Citizenship through Military Service
In general, an LPR may naturalize, or become a U.S. citizen, after five years of continuous U.S.
residence as an LPR, or three years of U.S. residence for the spouse of a U.S. citizen, with
physical presence in the country for at least half that period.37 The law also requires that
naturalization applicants demonstrate good moral character, knowledge of U.S. history and civics,
and English language ability.38 Eligible servicemembers may qualify to naturalize on an expedited
basis under special provisions in the INA. These provisions exempt individuals with qualifying
military service from certain requirements that are typically required of naturalization applicants.
Special naturalization provisions have provided foreign nationals with an expedited path to U.S.
citizenship through military service since at least the Civil War. In 1862, the 37th Congress passed
legislation allowing for alien enlistees and veterans to become U.S. citizens if they had at least
one year of U.S. residence.39 Such enlistees were also exempt from the requirement at that time to
file a declaration of intention for U.S. citizenship.40 Subsequent legislation has addressed the
naturalization of servicemembers during various periods of hostilities.41 For example, legislation
36 These estimates do not account for foreign nationals who are U.S. veterans and residing outside the United States.
37 INA §§316, 319; 8 U.S.C. §§1427, 1430.
38 Ibid. For more information about naturalization generally, see CRS Report R43366, U.S. Naturalization Policy.
39 Act of July 17, 1862, 12 Stat. 594, §21.
40 For more information about declarations of intention, see National Archives, “History of the Declaration of Intention
(1795-1952),” May 5, 2023, https://www.archives.gov/research/immigration/naturalization/history-dec-of-intent.
41 For an overview, see DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I, Appendix: “Legislation Assisting Military
Members and their Families Obtain Immigration Benefits.”
Congressional Research Service
7
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
in 1918 exempted servicemembers from a required five-year period of U.S. residency, the English
language requirement, and history and civics exams.42 In 1942, the Second War Powers Act
provided similar exemptions for foreign nationals serving in the U.S. Armed Forces in World War
II.43 Subsequent legislation also provided for expedited naturalization for service during
hostilities in Korea and Vietnam.44
Currently, the law contains two provisions for expedited naturalization through military service.
One provision pertains to service during peacetime; the other pertains to service during
designated periods of military hostilities.45
Peacetime Provision (INA §328)
INA Section 328 provides for the naturalization of those who serve during a period that has not
been designated as a period of military hostilities for naturalization purposes (peacetime). During
peacetime, servicemembers may qualify to naturalize if they have served honorably for at least
one year.46 Qualifying service includes active or reserve service in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps,
Air Force, Coast Guard, Space Force, and National Guard.47 The service branch determines
whether the service and discharge (if applicable) were under honorable conditions.48
As mentioned above, LPRs typically must have five years of continuous U.S. residence and 30
months of U.S. physical presence to be eligible to naturalize. Those who qualify to naturalize
under INA Section 328 are exempt from these requirements if they file an application for
naturalization while still in service or within six months after separation from service.49 Those
who file an application more than six months after separation must meet the five-year U.S.
residence requirement and 30 months physical presence requirement for naturalization and may
count honorable service within that period toward the requirements.50
Applicants must meet other requirements for naturalization under the INA, including showing
good moral character for at least five years prior to filing the application, demonstrating
knowledge of the English language and U.S. government and history, showing attachment to the
principles of the U.S. Constitution, and taking the Oath of Allegiance. Applicants must be at least
18 years old.
42 Act of May 9, 1918, 40 Stat. 512. See also DHS, USCIS, “Citizenship and Immigration During the First World
War,” https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/newsletters/WWI_18x24_USCIS.pdf.
43 Second War Powers Act, 1942, 50a U.S.C. §640.
44 P.L. 83-86 and P.L. 90-633, respectively.
45 For a side-by-side comparison of these requirements, see CRS Infographic IG10035, Expedited Naturalization
through Military Service.
46 Prior to 2003, naturalization under INA Section 328 (8 U.S.C. §1439) required three years of honorable service. The
FY2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, P.L. 108-136) reduced the required period of service to one year.
47 National Guard service must be at a time that the unit is federally recognized as a reserve component of the U.S.
Armed Forces. See DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I, Chapter 2, “One Year of Military Service during
Peacetime (INA 328).”
48 Having served under honorable conditions includes Honorable and General-Under Honorable Conditions as
acceptable discharge characterizations per DOD. See DHS, USCIS, “Naturalization Guidance for Alien Service
Members,” Policy Alert PA-2025-22, September 26, 2025.
49 INA §316(a); 8 U.S.C. §1427(a).
50 INA §328(d); 8 U.S.C. §1439(d).
Congressional Research Service
8
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Citizenship granted under INA Section 328 may be revoked if the person is separated from the
Armed Forces under other than honorable conditions before he or she has served honorably for a
period of five years.51
Wartime Provision (INA §329)
For service to qualify under INA Section 329, a period of hostilities for naturalization purposes
must be specified in the INA or by the President in an executive order. A period of hostilities for
naturalization purposes may also be terminated via executive order. Most recently, in 2002,
President George W. Bush designated a period of hostilities for expedited naturalization for
service in an active-duty status during the War on Terrorism beginning on September 11, 2001.
That executive order is still in effect (see Table 2).
Table 2. Periods of Military Hostilities Designated for Naturalization under
INA Section 329
Name
Qualifying Service Dates
Authority
World War I
April 6, 1917–November 11, 1918
INA §329(a), 8 C.F.R. §329.1
World War II
September 1, 1939–December 31, 1946
INA §329(a)
Korean War
June 25, 1950–July 1, 1955
INA §329(a)
Vietnam War
February 28, 1961–October 15, 1978
INA §329(a); Executive Order 12081a
Persian Gulf War
August 2, 1990–April 11, 1991
Executive Order 12939b
War on Terrorism
September 11, 2001–present
Executive Order 13269c
Source: DHS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I, Chapter 3,
“Military Service During Hostilities (INA 329).”
a. Executive Order 12081, “Termination of expeditious naturalization based on military service,” 43 Federal
Register 42237, September 18, 1978.
b. Executive Order 12939, “Expedited Naturalization of Aliens and Noncitizen Nationals Who Served in an
Active-Duty Status During the Persian Gulf Conflict,” 59 Federal Register 61231, November 29, 1994.
c. Executive Order 13269, “Expedited Naturalization of Aliens and Noncitizen Nationals Serving in an ActiveDuty Status During the War on Terrorism,” 67 Federal Register 45287, July 8, 2002.
Qualifying service during periods of hostilities includes active-duty service in the Army, Navy,
Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard, or service in the Selected Reserve of the
Ready Reserve.
Individuals who serve during a period of hostilities may apply to naturalize immediately upon
establishing honorable service, as designated by the service branch.52 Such individuals may
naturalize without being LPRs as long as they were present in the United States at the time of
enlistment.53 That is, if the services use their discretion to allow the enlistment of foreign
nationals other than LPRs (as they did during MAVNI), those individuals may become U.S.
citizens without having first been LPRs.
51 INA §328(f); 8 U.S.C. §1439(f).
52 Those who served during multiple periods may qualify to naturalize under the INA Section 329 requirements if they
have at least one qualifying period of service during military hostilities. See DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part
I, Chapter 3, “Military Service during Hostilities (INA 329).”
53 This includes being present in “the [Panama] Canal Zone, American Samoa, or Swains Island, or on board a public
vessel owned or operated by the United States for noncommercial service.” INA §329(a); 8 U.S.C. §1440(a).
Congressional Research Service
9
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Those applying to naturalize under INA Section 329 are exempt from the statutory U.S. residence
and physical presence requirements54 for naturalization and may be any age.55 They must
demonstrate good moral character for at least one year prior to filing their application. As under
the peacetime provision, applicants must demonstrate knowledge of the English language, U.S.
government, and history; show attachment to the principles of the U.S. Constitution; and take the
Oath of Allegiance.
As with those who serve during peacetime, INA Section 329 provides for the revocation of
citizenship if the servicemember separates from the Armed Forces under other than honorable
conditions before they have served honorably for a period of five years.56
Naturalization Process for Servicemembers
Upon meeting the eligibility criteria described above, servicemembers may apply to naturalize by
filing an Application for Naturalization (Form N-400) with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS).57 Unlike non-military naturalization applicants, servicemembers and veterans
applying to naturalize under INA Sections 328 and 329 do not pay filing fees.58
Both military naturalization provisions require the servicemember to have established honorable
service to be eligible to naturalize. Current servicemembers must submit USCIS Form N-426,
Request for Certification of Military or Naval Service, which must be completed by a certifying
official from the U.S. military branch in which they serve.59 The certifying official must attest to
the branch of service, date service started, whether the individual is currently serving honorably
or not honorably, and the type of service (i.e., Active Duty or Selected Reserve of the Ready
Reserve). Servicemembers may submit the N-426 after one day of service.60 Those who have
already separated from service must submit a copy of their official discharge document.61
Once candidates for naturalization have submitted their applications, USCIS conducts security
and background checks and collects fingerprints. As part of the background check process,
USCIS conducts a Defense Clearance Investigative Index query with DOD.62 P.L. 110-251,
enacted in 2008, requires USCIS to use enlistment fingerprints or fingerprints previously
54 Unlike the peacetime statute, under which applicants must apply while in service or within six months of discharge to
be exempt from U.S. residence and physical presence requirements, there is no time restriction on this exemption for
applicants who qualify under the wartime statute.
55 This allows for the naturalization of 17-year-olds, who may enlist with parental consent.
56 As enacted in the FY2004 NDAA (P.L. 108-136, §1701), INA §329(c); 8 U.S.C. §1440(c).
57 For a graphic representation of the naturalization application process for servicemembers, see GAO, Military
Naturalizations: Federal Agencies Assist with Naturalizations, but Additional Monitoring and Assessment Are Needed,
GAO-22-105021, September 2022, Figure 2, p. 12 (hereinafter, “GAO 2022”).
58 These fee exemptions were enacted in the FY2004 NDAA (P.L. 108-136). Currently, DOD reimburses USCIS for
military naturalization application processing costs. See DHS, USCIS, “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee
Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements,” 89 Federal Register 6205,
January 31, 2024.
59 See DHS, USCIS, “N-426, Request for Certification of Military or Naval Service,” https://www.uscis.gov/n-426.
60 For more information on the services’ policies for processing Form N-426, see GAO 2022, pp. 21-23.
61 DHS, USCIS, “Naturalization Through Military Service,” last updated October 11, 2024, https://www.uscis.gov/
military/naturalization-through-military-service.
62 See DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I, Chapter 6, “Required Background Checks.”
Congressional Research Service
10
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
submitted to it for this purpose.63 USCIS then schedules a naturalization interview, during which
a USCIS officer reviews the application and administers English and civics exams.
If USCIS approves the application, the applicant must take an Oath of Allegiance in a public
ceremony. USCIS allows servicemembers serving overseas, and their qualifying relatives, to
complete their interviews and oath ceremonies over video, a policy that began in 2021 during the
COVID-19 pandemic and remains in place.64
Servicemembers may receive information about naturalization and assistance with their
applications from the military services, including from judge advocates.65 A 2022 U.S.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that “the services offer assistance to
noncitizen servicemembers with the USCIS military naturalization process, but not all services
have processes to inform servicemembers of their ability to naturalize and what assistance is
available to them.”66 Specifically, GAO reported that the Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard had
processes in place to inform servicemembers of naturalization eligibility and available assistance,
the Army had “taken some steps,” and the Marine Corps did not have such processes in place.67
GAO recommended that DOD ensure that the military services developed and maintained such
processes.68 GAO documented the status of that recommendation as open/partially addressed as
of the cover date of this report, stating, “In December 2024, DOD reported that it plans to issue a
follow-on directive to the services requiring them to inform the Office of the Secretary of
Defense of their process for notifying noncitizens. DOD intends to fulfill this directive by the end
of March 2026. To fully address the intent of this recommendation, DOD would need to follow
through with its intention to issue the follow-on directive to the services. We will continue to
monitor DOD’s efforts to address this recommendation.”
DHS has stated that it has heard of instances in which veterans have not applied to naturalize
because they incorrectly assumed that they automatically acquired citizenship through their
military service and did not realize they needed to file an application, but that “DHS and DOD are
working to correct this misperception.”69 DHS has also recognized challenges that enlistees may
face in completing the naturalization process during basic training, when they may “not have the
capacity or time to request certification of their military service from their commanding officer,
gather evidence, file a complex application, and study for their naturalization exam.”70
63 However, this law permits the submission of new biometric information, including fingerprints, if it “would result in
more timely and effective adjudication of the individual’s naturalization application.”
64 DHS, USCIS, “USCIS Announces FY2021 Accomplishments,” news release, December 16, 2021, and CRS
communication with USCIS, April 3, 2026. USCIS’s Strategic Plan for FY2023-FY2026 includes a “scalable videobased solution” in which servicemembers can complete naturalization interviews and oath ceremonies from military
bases in the United States and overseas; DHS, USCIS, “FYs 2023-2026 Strategic Plan,” p. 15.
65 For more information, see GAO 2022.
66 Ibid., p. 45.
67 Ibid., p. 30.
68 GAO subsequently reported on the status of this recommendation: “DOD issued a policy in September 2022 that
provides guidance to provide proper notice of options for naturalization for noncitizen recruits and servicemembers
transitioning out of service.... The development of this policy is a positive step to help ensure noncitizen recruits and
servicemembers are informed of the military naturalization process and related resources. DOD stated that they plan to
issue a follow-on directive to the services requiring them to inform the Office of the Secretary of Defense of their
process for notifying noncitizens. DOD intends to fulfill this directive by the end of September 2024.” See
“Recommendations for Executive Action” in GAO 2022.
69 Testimony of DHS Director of IMMVI Debra Rogers, in U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on the Judiciary,
Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship, Oversight of Immigrant Military Members and Veterans, hearings,
117th Cong., 2nd sess., June 29, 2022 (hereinafter, “Debra Rogers 2022 hearing testimony”).
70 Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
11
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Servicemembers who do not naturalize may be subject to removal if they commit deportable
offenses (see the “Removals of Foreign National Veterans” section).
Military Naturalization Data
Figure 2 below shows annual military naturalizations from FY1918 (the earliest available data)
to FY2024. In total, 817,991 servicemembers naturalized through provisions for military service
during this period. Higher numbers of naturalizations generally corresponded to periods of
hostilities (including World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Persian Gulf War, and the
War on Terrorism); military naturalizations generally ebbed between periods of hostilities.
World War I accounted for the greatest number of naturalizations, with the largest annual number
of military naturalizations (over 128,000) occurring in FY1919 following the enactment of the
Naturalization Act of May 9, 1918 (P.L. 65-144), which allowed certain foreign national
servicemembers to naturalize without five years of U.S. residence. Service during the War on
Terrorism (the most recent period of hostilities, still designated as of this report’s cover date)
accounted for approximately 148,000 naturalizations.
Congressional Research Service
12
Figure 2. Military Naturalizations and Designated Periods of Hostilities, FY1918-FY2024
Sources: FY1918-FY2023: DHS, Office of Homeland Security Statistics, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2023, Table 20. FY2024: DHS, USCIS, “Naturalization Statistics,”
January 24, 2025. Periods of hostilities: DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I, Chapter 3, “Military Service during Hostilities.”
Notes: 1918 is the earliest available year of data. Provisions for military naturalizations expired or were suspended in 1925 and 1935.
CRS-13
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Figure 3 shows the last 10 fiscal years of military naturalization application data. The number of
military naturalization applications received by USCIS declined 72% from FY2017
(approximately 11,000) to FY2018 (3,000). GAO’s explanation of this decline in its 2022 report
cites 2017 DOD policy changes, including expanded background check requirements for LPRs
and MAVNI enlistees, the six-month requirement for honorable service (see the “MAVNI
Program” section), and a reduction in the number of noncitizens enlisting in the Armed Forces.71
In 2018, USCIS also suspended a “Naturalization at Basic Training” initiative, established in
2009, after MAVNI’s suspension.72 That program had allowed enlistees to provide biometrics,
complete their naturalization interview, and take the Oath of Allegiance on military installations
and naturalize before graduating from basic training.73
More recently, military naturalization applications have increased, reaching nearly 20,000 in
FY2025. This may reflect, in part, efforts under the Biden Administration to promote
naturalization;74 USCIS, DOD, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) strategies to assist
servicemembers and their families with the naturalization process;75 targeted recruitment of
noncitizens by some service branches;76 and increased immigration enforcement, which may have
incentivized some recruits because of the possibility of facilitating discretionary protection for
unauthorized relatives (see the “Discretionary Options for Servicemembers and
Qualifying Relatives” section).77
Congress has enacted provisions within the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
to require DOD to inform servicemembers of the availability of naturalization, including the
following:
•
•
•
FY2018 NDAA: required DOD to ensure that LPR servicemembers be informed
of naturalization availability.78
FY2020 NDAA: required the services to provide noncitizen servicemembers
with information on how to apply for naturalization.79
FY2022 NDAA: required each military department to notify noncitizen recruits
and servicemembers of naturalization availability upon enlistment and upon
71 GAO 2022, pp. 14-15.
72 Vera Bergengruen, “The US Army Promised Immigrants A Fast Track For Citizenship. That Fast Track Is Gone,”
BuzzFeed News, March 5, 2018; GAO 2022, p. 16.
73 DHS, USCIS, “Questions and Answers for Members of the Military” (archived), updated October 16, 2015,
https://www.uscis.gov/archive/questions-and-answers-for-members-of-the-military.
74 In February 2021, President Biden issued an executive order mandating an inter-agency working group and strategy
to promote naturalization, which directed federal agencies to “facilitate naturalization for eligible candidates born
abroad and members of the military, in consultation with the Department of Defense.” Executive Order 14012,
“Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New
Americans,” 86 Federal Register 8277, February 5, 2021 (hereinafter, “Executive Order 14012”).
75 GAO 2022; DHS, USCIS, “Interagency Strategy for Promoting Naturalization” (archived), https://www.uscis.gov/
archive/dhs-releases-interagency-strategy-for-promoting-naturalization; and DHS, “ImmVets,” https://www.dhs.gov/
immvets.
76 Lolita C. Baldor, “Join the military, become a US citizen: Uncle Sam wants you and vous and tu,” AP, June 11,
2023; Brigadier General Christopher Amrhein, Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Recruiting Media Roundtable With Service
Leaders, October 20, 2024, https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3952493/fiscal-year-2024-2025recruiting-media-roundtable-with-service-leaders/.
77 Greg Jaffe, “U.S. Citizens Are Joining the Military to Protect Undocumented Parents,” The New York Times, January
12, 2026.
78 P.L. 115-91, §530.
79 P.L. 116-92, §570D.
Congressional Research Service
14
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
separation. This included “prescrib[ing] regulations that ensure that a military
recruit, who is not a citizen of the United States, receives proper notice of options
for naturalization” under the INA.80
Figure 3. Military Naturalization Applications Received and Approved, FY2016FY2025
Source: DHS, USCIS, “Number of Service-wide Forms by Quarter, Form Status, and Processing Time,”
Immigration and Citizenship Data, multiple years.
Note: Applications are not necessarily adjudicated in the same fiscal year they are received, which is why
approvals exceed applications in certain years.
Posthumous Citizenship (INA §329A)
Posthumous citizenship is available to foreign national servicemembers who died as a result of
injury or disease incurred while serving honorably in active-duty status during periods of military
hostilities and had met the requirements of INA Section 329.81
A deceased servicemember’s next-of-kin, the Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary’s USCIS
designee may request a grant of posthumous citizenship by filing an Application for Posthumous
Citizenship (Form N-644) with USCIS, along with relevant documentation of the
servicemember’s release or discharge and death. The request must be filed within two years of the
servicemember’s death.
80 P.L. 117-81, §523.
81 The Posthumous Citizenship for Active Duty Service Act of 1989 (P.L. 101-249) was enacted in 1990; it amended
the INA to add Section 329A (8 U.S.C. §1440-1). See also DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part I, Chapter 8,
“Posthumous Citizenship (INA 329A).”
Congressional Research Service
15
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
If USCIS approves the request, the servicemember’s next-of-kin is issued a Certificate of
Citizenship stating that the servicemember is considered to have been a U.S. citizen at the time of
death.
Immigration Benefits for Surviving Relatives
Surviving spouses, children, and parents of U.S. citizen servicemembers, including those granted
posthumous citizenship, may qualify to naturalize under provisions enacted in the FY2004
NDAA.82 Spouses, children, and parents of deceased servicemembers who are LPRs and are
otherwise eligible to naturalize are exempt from U.S. residence and physical presence
requirements.83
Removals of Foreign National Veterans
Some Members of Congress and veterans’ advocates have expressed concern regarding removals
(commonly called deportations) of foreign national veterans who separated from service without
naturalizing.84 All foreign nationals who violate immigration laws may be subject to removal
from the United States. This includes individuals who have been lawfully admitted to the country
and been convicted of certain crimes that fall under the INA grounds of deportability, such as
crimes involving moral turpitude, multiple criminal convictions, aggravated felonies, controlled
substance offenses, and certain firearm offenses.85 Some have tied the crimes associated with the
removals of foreign national veterans with behavioral health issues connected to injury or trauma
during their service (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] and substance abuse disorders).86
Removal proceedings commence when DHS issues an individual a Notice to Appear (NTA)
charging document and files it with an immigration court (within the U.S. Department of Justice’s
Executive Office for Immigration Review).87 DHS’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) is generally responsible for immigration enforcement in the U.S. interior. During removal
82 P.L. 108-136, §1703.
83 INA §319(d); 8 U.S.C. §1430(d). Those who are not yet LPRs may self-petition to adjust to LPR status as immediate
relatives within two years of the servicemember’s death. Qualifying relatives may file USCIS Form I-360, Petition for
Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant. Unlike other family-based immigration categories, immediate relatives
(spouses, minor unmarried children, and parents of U.S. citizens) are not subject to annual numerical limits under the
INA.
84 See, for example, U.S. Congress, House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship,
Oversight of Immigrant Military Members and Veterans, hearings, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., June 29, 2022; Letter from
Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Tammy Duckworth, Senator Richard J. Durbin et al. to Kristi Noem, Secretary of
Homeland Security, Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, Rodney S. Scott, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Commissioner, Joseph B. Edlow, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director, and Todd M. Lyons, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Acting Director, September 2, 2025, https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/
media/doc/letter_from_lawmakers_to_dhs_dod_on_deportations_of_military_families.pdf.
85 INA §237(a)(2); 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(2). For more information, see CRS Report R45151, Immigration Consequences
of Criminal Activity.
86 See, for example, Suzanne Monyak, “Deported veterans who returned to US face uncertain futures,” Roll Call,
September 8, 2022; ACLU of Southern California, “Civil and Immigrants’ Rights Organizations Urge Federal
Clemency for Military Veterans Vulnerable to Deportation,” press release, January 18, 2024; Veterans Law Practicum,
UC Berkeley School of Law, Broken Promises: How America Deports its Veterans and Deprives them of Healthcare
and Benefits, March 2024; and Maria Sacchetti, “A U.S. Army veteran, deported almost 20 years ago, finds home,”
Washington Post, June 22, 2024.
87 INA §240; 8 U.S.C. §1229a. For more information about removal proceedings, see CRS In Focus IF11536, Formal
Removal Proceedings: An Introduction, and CRS Infographic IG10022, Immigration Court Proceedings: Process and
Data.
Congressional Research Service
16
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
proceedings, an immigration judge determines whether the individual (called a respondent) is
removeable as charged, and whether that individual may be eligible for any forms of relief or
protection from removal. Counsel from ICE’s Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA)
represent DHS in proceedings; the respondent may obtain counsel at his or her own expense.
ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations is responsible for executing removal orders issued
by an immigration judge.
DHS Enforcement Discretion and Enforcement Actions Data
DHS has the authority to exercise discretion in its enforcement actions, including its decisions to
pursue the removals of foreign nationals (prosecutorial discretion).88 DHS and its predecessor
agency, the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, have long instructed agents to
consider military service when issuing NTAs. In a 2004 memorandum, ICE instructed its agents
to take into account military service when pursuing an enforcement action, including determining
whether servicemembers may be eligible for U.S. citizenship under INA Sections 328 and 329,
and, in cases where the individual is not eligible for naturalization, to consider “the alien’s overall
criminal history, as well as any evidence of rehabilitation, family and financial ties to the United
States, employment history, health, community service, specifics of military service, and other
relevant factors.”89
A 2019 GAO report found that ICE had not consistently followed its policies to consider military
service during enforcement actions.90 At that time, GAO found that ICE did not “maintain
complete electronic data” on encounters with veterans and could not consistently track the
number of veterans who had been placed in removal proceedings or removed. Using available
information, from FY2013-FY2018, GAO identified 250 veterans who had been placed in
removal proceedings, 92 of whom had been removed. Some media reports and advocates claim
that the actual number of veteran removals far exceeds this.91 GAO subsequently reported that
ICE had developed mechanisms for tracking veteran status in its systems.92 DHS has stated that
since November 2020, ICE databases have included a field for military association and ICE had
directed OPLA attorneys to document veteran status in its case management system.93
In May 2022, ICE issued a directive that superseded its 2004 guidance on considering military
service in enforcement actions.94 The 2022 directive states:
88 For more information about prosecutorial discretion, see CRS Legal Sidebar LSB10578, The Biden Administration’s
Immigration Enforcement Priorities: Background and Legal Considerations.
89 Marcy M. Forman, Acting Director, Office of Investigations, ICE, “Issuance of Notices to Appear, Administrative
Orders of Removal, or Reinstatement of a Final Removal Order on Aliens with United States Military Service,”
memorandum, June 21, 2004, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/foia/prosecutorial-discretion/aliens-us-military-service.pdf.
90 GAO, Immigration Enforcement: Actions Needed to Better Handle, Identify, and Track Cases Involving Veterans,
GAO-19-416, June 6, 2019, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-19-416.
91
See, for example, Sonner Kehrt, “He Served His Country. In Return, His Country Sent Him Into Exile 2024,” The
War Horse,” May 9, 2024 (“No one knows how many veterans have been deported over the years. Some estimates put
it in the hundreds; others in the thousands or even tens of thousands.”); and Camilo Montoya-Galvez, “Veteran returns
to the U.S. after 14-year exile under Biden effort to rectify ‘unjust’ deportations,” CBS News, April 21, 2023 (“The
U.S. government has no official accounting of how many deported veterans remain overseas, since it failed to record
these cases for many years. However, the number is believed to be at least in the hundreds.”)
92 See the “Recommendations” section of GAO, Immigration Enforcement: Actions Needed to Better Handle, Identify,
and Track Cases Involving Veterans, GAO-19-416, June 6, 2019, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-19-416.
93 Debra Rogers 2022 hearing testimony.
94 DHS, ICE, “Consideration of U.S. Military Service When Making Discretionary Determinations with Regard to
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
17
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
It is ICE policy to consider a noncitizen’s U.S. military service when deciding whether to
take civil immigration enforcement actions against them, what enforcement actions to take,
if any, whether to release an individual from ICE custody, in accordance with the law, and
the conditions of such release.
The directive instructed ICE officers and agents to ask about an individual’s military service
during intake interviews. It also stated that officers and agents “should generally not initiate
removal proceedings against noncitizens who are statutorily eligible for naturalization as a result
of their military service ... absent significant aggravating factors being present in the case.”95 The
directive also specified that active-duty service by a foreign national’s immediate relatives
(parents, spouses, or children) “is a significant mitigating factor” in enforcement decisions.96
In an April 2025 memorandum, ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons issued new guidance that
superseded the 2022 directive. Similar to the 2022 guidance, under the 2025 policy ICE generally
will not initiate removal proceedings against an active-duty service member “absent significant
aggravating factors,” or against veterans who “appear eligible” for naturalization under INA
Section 328 or Section 329. Unlike the 2022 directive, the 2025 memorandum does not mention
the active-duty service of an immediate family member as a mitigating factor for immigration
enforcement against servicemembers’ relatives. Media reports have documented recent instances
of enforcement actions against servicemembers’ and veterans’ immediate relatives amid ICE’s
increased focus on interior enforcement.97
ICE publishes data showing the annual numbers of immigration enforcement actions against
former servicemembers. The data include the number arrested, booked into immigration
detention, and removed from FY2018-FY2024 (Figure 4). During this seven-year period, 125
former servicemembers were arrested, 142 were detained, and 68 were removed.
In response to a congressional request, DHS separately reported enforcement actions against
servicemembers for the period beginning at the start of the second Trump Administration
(January 20, 2025) and ending January 26, 2026.98 These numbers indicate an uptick in the
number of enforcement actions against veterans, likely reflecting the broader increase in interior
immigration enforcement under the Administration. During that one-year period, 125 alien
veterans were arrested (the same number as were arrested between FY2018-FY2024), 73 were
detained, and 34 were issued an NTA and placed into removal proceedings (DHS did not provide
the number actually removed during that period).99 In the same response, DHS stated that while
ICE may arrest former servicemembers or family members of veterans, it is “rare” for active
Enforcement Actions against Noncitizens,” ICE Directive 10039.2, May 23, 2022, https://www.ice.gov/doclib/news/
releases/2022/10039.2.pdf (hereinafter, “ICE Directive 10039.2”).
95 The directive also instructs ICE Field Responsible Officials to consult with OPLA attorneys in instances when
removal proceedings were initiated by another DHS component (DHS components U.S. Customs and Border
Protection and USCIS may also issue NTAs.) OPLA attorneys may move to dismiss proceedings in immigration court.
96
ICE Directive 10039.2, p. 1.
97 See, for example, Miriam Jordan, “ICE Agents Detain Newlywed Spouse of Soldier Training to Deploy,” The New
York Times, April 5, 2026 and “He Raised Three Marines. His Wife Is American. The U.S. Wants to Deport Him,” The
New York Times, September 17, 2025; Shelby Bremer, “‘I kind of feel betrayed’: ICE arrests military spouses at San
Diego green card interviews,” NBC San Diego, November 28, 2025
98 Letter from Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, to Senator Elizabeth Warren, February 18, 2026,
https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
response_from_the_department_of_homeland_security_on_detention_of_noncitizen_veterans_and_family_members.p
df.
99 Detention management statistics data are provided for fiscal years (12 months, October through September) whereas
the other reported data cover 12 months January through January.
Congressional Research Service
18
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
servicemembers to be subject to removal and that “ICE does not statistically track active alien
service members.”100
Figure 4. Former U.S. Servicemembers Arrested, Booked into Custody, and
Removed, FY2018-FY2024
Source: DHS, ICE, Detention Management, “FY 2026 ICE Statistics.”
Notes: FY2024 is the most recent available year of data from the detention management statistics published by
DHS.
Discretionary Options for Servicemembers and
Qualifying Relatives
DHS has used discretionary authority to permit servicemembers and certain relatives to enter or
remain in the United States, including to facilitate family unity, adjustment to LPR status and
naturalization, and access to veterans’ benefits.101
100 Letter from Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, to Senator Elizabeth Warren, February 18, 2026,
https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
response_from_the_department_of_homeland_security_on_detention_of_noncitizen_veterans_and_family_members.p
df.
101 Eligible veterans, including those who live outside the United States, may be entitled to VA benefits regardless of
immigration status. See VA News, “The Immigrant Military Members and Veterans Initiative, and how VA supports
immigrant Veterans,” April 26, 2022.
Congressional Research Service
19
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Parole in Place and Deferred Action (Individuals Residing Inside the
United States)
The INA provides the DHS Secretary discretionary authority to parole individuals into the United
States on a case-by-case basis based on “urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public
benefit.”102 Parole provides official permission to enter and/or remain temporarily in the United
States for an authorized period, which may vary. Individuals granted parole may apply for
employment authorization.103
Under that authority, since 2010, USCIS has granted parole in place to servicemembers’
qualifying relatives who are present in the United States without admission (i.e., those who
entered the United States unlawfully).104 Under the statute, such individuals are considered
applicants for admission.105 Parole in place allows qualifying relatives who may otherwise be
subject to removal to remain in the country; DHS has granted it in one-year increments.
Qualifying relatives include spouses, widow(er)s, parents, sons, and daughters of active-duty
members of the U.S. Armed Forces, those serving in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve,
or veterans who were not dishonorably discharged.
While parole in place itself does not provide a path to permanent status, a grant of parole in place
may facilitate such relatives’ ability to adjust to LPR status through a qualifying family
relationship (e.g., with a servicemember who is a U.S. citizen or LPR).106 Under the statute, aliens
who are “present in the United States without being admitted or paroled” are inadmissible and
generally, in order to apply for a green card, must leave the United States to be inspected at a U.S.
embassy or consulate.107 However, if such individuals have been present unlawfully in the United
States for more than 180 days, depart, and again seek admission to the United States within 3 or
10 years (depending on the period of unlawful presence), they will be inadmissible to the United
States.108 Parole in place allows such individuals, who otherwise meet the requirements to do so,
to adjust their status without departing the country and triggering inadmissibility.109 Moreover,
such individuals, who are present without admission or parole, are ineligible for adjustment of
status to that of an LPR because adjustment requires that the applicant be inspected and admitted
or paroled.110 A grant of parole in place results in the alien meeting the inspected and admitted or
paroled requirement.
102 INA §212(d)(5); 8 U.S.C. §1182(d)(5). For more information about parole, see CRS Report R46570, Immigration
Parole.
103 8 C.F.R. §274a.12(c)(11). For more information, see the “Work Authorization for Parolees” section of CRS Report
R46570, Immigration Parole.
104 Letter from Janet Napolitano, DHS Secretary, to Representative Zoe Lofgren, U.S. House of Representatives,
August 30, 2010; and DHS, USCIS, “Parole of Spouses, Children and Parents of Active Duty Members of the U.S.
Armed Forces, the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve, and Former Members of the U.S. Armed Forces or Selected
Reserve of the Ready Reserve and the Effect of Parole on Inadmissibility under Immigration and Nationality Act §
212(a)(6)(A)(i),” Policy Memorandum PM-602-0091, November 15, 2013.
105 INA §235(a)(1); 8 U.S.C. §1225(a)(1).
106 For more information on family-based immigration pathways, see CRS Report R43145, U.S. Family-Based
Immigration Policy.
107 INA §212(a)(6)(A)(i); 8 U.S.C. §1182(a)(6)(A)(i).
108 INA §212(a)(9)(B); 8 U.S.C. §1182(a)(9)(B).
109 For more information, see CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11102, Humanitarian Parole Authority: A Legal Overview and
Recent Developments; and American Immigration Council, “The Biden Administration’s Parole-In-Place
Announcement: Helping Mixed-Status Families Stay Together and Avoid Bureaucratic Traps,” fact sheet, June 18,
2024.
110 INA §245(a); 8 U.S.C. §1255(a).
Congressional Research Service
20
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
As justification for providing parole in place, a 2013 DHS memorandum states:
Military preparedness can potentially be adversely affected if active members of the U.S.
Armed Forces and individuals serving in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve, who
can be quickly called into active duty, worry about the immigration status of their spouses,
parents and children.
Similarly, our veterans, who have served and sacrificed for our nation, can face stress and
anxiety because of the immigration status of their family members in the United States. We
as a nation have made a commitment to our veterans, to support and care for them. It is a
commitment that begins at enlistment, and continues as they become veterans.111
Military spouses, widow(er)s, parents, sons, and daughters who were admitted to the United
States as nonimmigrants and stayed beyond their authorized stay (i.e., overstayed a visa) are not
eligible for parole in place, which is only available to individuals present in the United States
without admission. However, they may request deferred action, a form of prosecutorial discretion
that, if granted, protects them from removal for a specified period of time. If granted, the period
of deferred action is for up to two years. Those granted deferred action may apply for
employment authorization if they can establish “an economic necessity for employment.”112
IMMVI Parole (Individuals Residing Outside the United States)
In 2021, DHS, in collaboration with the VA and DOD, launched the Immigrant Military Members
and Veterans Initiative (IMMVI). The initiative responded to President Biden’s previously
mentioned 2021 executive order creating an inter-agency working group and strategy to promote
naturalization.113 IMMVI’s objectives include facilitating the return of those who have been
removed, establishing policies that take into account military service, tracking the outcomes of
military cases, improving access to naturalization and immigration services for servicemembers,
and engaging with relevant advocates and stakeholders.114
Under this initiative, DHS issued policy guidance in 2021 regarding naturalization for
servicemembers, including those who had been removed from the United States.115 Eligible
veterans residing outside the United States may file an Application for Naturalization together
with an Application for Travel Document to obtain a travel document allowing them to enter the
United States to attend a naturalization interview. During the Biden Administration, USCIS was
authorized to coordinate with DHS’s U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct
naturalization interviews for individuals qualifying under INA Section 329 at a land port of entry;
if such applicants were approved, they could be administered the Oath of Allegiance and become
naturalized citizens at the port of entry.116 In September 2025, USCIS issued guidance rescinding
111 DHS, USCIS, “Parole of Spouses, Children and Parents of Active Duty Members of the U.S. Armed Forces, the
Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve, and Former Members of the U.S. Armed Forces or Selected Reserve of the
Ready Reserve and the Effect of Parole on Inadmissibility under Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(a)(6)(A)(i),”
Policy Memorandum PM-602-0091, November 15, 2013.
112 8 C.F.R. §274a.12(c)(14); see also DHS, USCIS, “Discretionary Options for Military Members, Enlistees and Their
Families,” updated May 2, 2024.
113 Executive Order 14012.
114 Debra Rogers 2022 hearing testimony and DHS, “DHS, VA Announce Initiative to Support Noncitizen Service
Members, Veterans, and Immediate Family Members,” press release, July 2, 2021.
115 DHS, USCIS, “Policy Alert: Clarifying Guidance on Military Service Members and Naturalization,” November 12,
2021.
116 The initiative also established an email address to respond to urgent inquiries regarding immigration and veterans’
benefits and an online resource center (https://www.dhs.gov/immvets) that provides information about naturalization
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
21
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
the previous guidance on providing naturalization interviews and oath ceremonies at ports of
entry, based on Executive Order 14148,117 which was issued on the first day of the Trump
Administration. 118
Some deported veterans may be ineligible for naturalization. Under INA Sections 328 and 329,
applicants must demonstrate good moral character during the statutory period (five years or one
year prior to filing, respectively). The INA and federal regulations contain certain bars to good
moral character, such as violation of a controlled substance law during the statutory period.119
Some offenses bar a showing of good moral character even if they occurred before the statutory
period, such as the bar to good moral character for applicants convicted of aggravated felonies on
or after November 29, 1990.120 However, in some cases, individuals may have been issued
pardons that vacate their convictions,121 providing an opportunity to establish good moral
character if they meet requirements specified in the regulation.122
Since 2021, DHS has allowed for IMMVI-based parole requests for current and former
servicemembers and their qualifying relatives who reside outside the United States, including
those who have been removed. IMMVI parole allows these individuals to request a travel
document, which authorizes them to request parole at a U.S. port of entry. DHS has not specified
a standard period for IMMVI parole. The duration of the parole period is based on the purpose for
which it was granted.
According to DHS, this use of parole allows covered individuals “to better avail themselves of
U.S. legal counsel and systems and gain access to certain veterans’ benefits.”123 Regarding
qualifying relatives, DHS states, “Military service sacrifice is not limited to the alien current or
former service member alone” and that parole “recognize[s] that sacrifice and promote[s] family
unity.”124 Qualifying relatives include spouses and children of current and former
servicemembers.125 IMMVI parole requests are “adjudicated by immigration officers who have
received specialized training developed in coordination with the Department of Veterans Affairs”
and are “automatically processed with expedited handling.”126
and immigration services, VA benefits, DOD paperwork, and legal assistance. DHS, “DHS, VA Launch New Online
Services for Noncitizen Service Members, Veterans, and Their Families,” February 7, 2022; and Debra Rogers 2022
hearing testimony.
117 Executive Order 14148, “Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions,” 99 Federal Register,
January 28, 2025.
118 DHS, USCIS, Naturalization Guidance for Alien Service Members, Policy Alert, PA-2025-22, September 26, 2025.
119 8 C.F.R. §316.10(b)(2)(iii); also see generally 8 C.F.R. §316.10(b)(2).
120 INA §101(f)(8), 8 U.S.C. §1101(f)(8); 8 C.F.R. §316.10(b)(1)(ii).
121 See, for example, Amy Taxin, “Deported veteran sues to get naturalization interview in US,” AP, June 7, 2021; and
testimony by Howard Bailey, U.S. Congress, Senate Judiciary Committee, Immigration, Citizenship, and Border Safety
Subcommittee, Honoring Veterans and Military Families: An Examination of Immigration and Citizenship Policies for
US Military Service Members, Veterans, and their Families, 117th Cong., 1st sess., June 23, 2021.
122 See 8 C.F.R. §316.10(c)(2) and DHS, USCIS, Policy Manual, Vol. 12, Part F, Chapter 2, “Adjudicative Factors.”
123 DHS, USCIS, “Discretionary Options for Military Members, Enlistees and Their Families,” updated August 27,
2025.
124 Ibid.
125 Children include unmarried persons under age 21, as defined in INA §101(b); 8 U.S.C. §1101(b); unmarried sons
and daughters and their unmarried children under age 21 may also qualify.
126 DHS, USCIS, “Discretionary Options for Military Members, Enlistees and Their Families,” updated August 27,
2025.
Congressional Research Service
22
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Issues for Congressional Consideration127
Expanding Enlistment: Immigration Considerations
Some observers have argued that allowing additional categories of foreign nationals to enlist
would help DOD address recruitment challenges128 during periods of recruiting shortfalls.129
Some Members of Congress have introduced measures that would expand the categories of
foreign nationals eligible to enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces. These measures generally are aimed
at increasing the population of individuals eligible to enlist and/or providing pathways to
citizenship through military service.
Such measures would amend Title 10 of the U.S. Code to allow for the enlistment of additional
non-U.S. nationals—typically, certain unauthorized childhood arrivals, including those who have
been granted DACA.130 Often, these measures have included mechanisms to provide for
adjustment to LPR status for individuals who enlist under their provisions. Some measures would
use the “registry” provision of the INA to allow for adjustment for those who entered the United
States unlawfully and meet certain U.S. residence requirements.131 Others would direct the DHS
Secretary to adjust the status of such individuals. These measures have typically also included
provisions to rescind the LPR status of those who have separated from the Armed Forces under
other than honorable conditions prior to serving for a specified period. In addition to introducing
these proposals in standalone bills, some Members proposed including enlistment expansion
provisions as an amendment to the NDAA.132
More recently, measures have been introduced that propose to expand enlistment categories and
do not include an LPR mechanism.133 Such measures would not provide a path to naturalization
for individuals who serve during peacetime because qualifying servicemembers must be LPRs to
qualify for naturalization under INA Section 328 (see the “Peacetime Provision (INA §328)”
section). Provisions that amend Title 10 enlistment categories without also amending Title 8
immigration law could potentially result in circumstances in which foreign nationals may enlist in
and serve in the U.S. Armed Forces but would not eligible for U.S. citizenship.134
127 Legislation cited in these sections is not intended to be exhaustive.
128 See, for example, Gil Guerra, “Military enlistment is in crisis. Immigrant recruitment can help,” Niskanen Center,
October 25, 2023; Margaret Stock, “What the U.S. military needs is an infusion of immigrants,” Washington Post,
Opinion, May 25, 2022; and Chishti et al., 2019.
129 See CRS In Focus IF11147, Defense Primer: Active Component Enlisted Recruiting; and David Vergun, “DOD
Addresses Recruiting Shortfall Challenges,” DOD, December 13, 2023.
130 See, for example, H.R. 2377 and H.R. 435 in the 113th Congress; H.R. 1989, H.R. 3698, and S. 2160 in the 114th
Congress; H.R. 60 in the 115th Congress; H.R. 3400 in the 116th Congress; H.R. 9052, S.Amdt. 6145, S.Amdt. 6144,
and S.Amdt. 6143 in the 117th Congress; H.R. 1451, S. 2401, and S.Amdt. 339 in the 118th Congress; and H.R. 4316
and S. 2526 in the 119th Congress.
131
INA §249; 8 U.S.C. §1259. Currently, this provision requires aliens to have entered the country prior to 1972 (there
were 40 adjustments to LPR status under this provision in FY2023, the most recent available data). Measures that
would provide LPR status through military enlistment allow an exemption to this entry date. For more information
about registry, see archived CRS Report RL30578, Immigration: Registry as Means of Obtaining Lawful Permanent
Residence.
132 See, for example, Jeremy Herb and Seung Min Kim, “Dems Consider Immigration in NDAA,” Politico, May 2,
2014; and Emma Dumain, “Rep. Denham to Continue to Push for ENLIST Act in NDAA,” Roll Call, May 19, 2014.
133 See S.Amdt. 339 and S. 2401 in the 118th Congress.
134 Congress has also recently proposed to consolidate the military naturalization provisions by striking INA Section
328 and amending INA Section 329. Under this proposal, qualifying servicemembers could naturalize without first
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
23
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Conversely, under the current INA Section 329 requirements (see the “Wartime Provision (INA
§329)” section), foreign nationals who would be newly eligible to serve under proposed Title 10
amendments and serve during periods of hostilities would be eligible to naturalize without having
to adjust first to LPR status.
In addition to proposals to amend Title 10, some Members have encouraged DOD to review its
existing discretionary Title 10 authority (10 U.S.C. §504(b)(2)) with regard to enlisting DACA
recipients.135
Other Members of Congress and advocates for immigration restrictions have opposed measures
that would allow the enlistment of additional categories of foreign nationals, including DACA
recipients, and have questioned whether it is appropriate to include immigration provisions in
defense legislation such as the NDAA.136 Some Members opposed the inclusion of DACA
recipients in the former MAVNI program because such individuals were unauthorized U.S.
arrivals.137 Some Members have also cited national security concerns that have been associated
with the MAVNI program (see the “MAVNI Program” section).138
As mentioned previously in the “MAVNI Program” section, after MAVNI was suspended the
FY2019 NDAA codified new security standards for individuals who enlist under 10 U.S.C.
§504(b)(2) specifying that a service secretary may not authorize more than 1,000 enlistments per
military department in a calendar year without written notice to Congress, and requires that such
an enlistee possess a “critical skill or expertise” that they will use in their “primary daily duties”
in the Armed Forces.
Addressing Veteran Removals and Facilitating Naturalization
Some Members have also introduced bills in recent Congresses addressing the removals of
servicemembers, veterans, and qualifying relatives. These bills include provisions that would
mitigate the possibility of removal for those with a military connection, establish greater
oversight of removal proceedings for such individuals, and facilitate deported veterans’ ability to
return to the United States and regularize their status.
Some bills would require DHS to establish mechanisms to identify veteran status among those
subject to removal and maintain information about noncitizen veterans that could be shared
across DHS components involved with the removal process. DHS would be required to use this
information in its decisions to commence removal proceedings. These bills would also establish
advisory committees to review removal proceedings for servicemembers, veterans, and certain
military relatives and provide recommendations to DHS regarding whether prosecutorial
being LPRs during either wartime or peacetime. See S.Amdt. 1386, §3404, in the 118th Congress and H.R. 4393, §3115
in the 119th Congress.
135
See, for example, H.Res. 468 in the 116th Congress, H.Res. 520 in the 117th Congress, H.Res. 516 in the 118th
Congress, and H.R. 4316 in the 119th Congress.
136 See, for example, Seung Min Kim, “McKeon: No ENLIST act in NDAA,” Politico, April 28, 2014; Seung Min
Kim, “Cantor to block immigration on NDAA,” Politico, May 16, 2014; Emma Dumain, “Rep. Denham to Continue to
Push for ENLIST Act in NDAA,” Roll Call, May 19, 2014; Cristina Marcos, “Divided GOP rejects allowing illegal
immigrants in the military,” The Hill, May 14, 2015; and Heritage Action for America, “ENLIST Act (H.R. 60) Claims
and Responses,” blog, June 27, 2017, https://heritageaction.com/blog/enlist-act-h-r-60-claims-responses.
137 H.Amdt. 1199 and H.Amdt. 1200 in the 114th Congress,
138 See, for example, U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration and
Citizenship, Oversight of Immigrant Military Members and Veterans, hearings, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., June 29, 2022
and
Congressional Research Service
24
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
discretion is warranted (i.e., whether individuals should be removed or granted relief from
removal).139
Bills have also been introduced that would provide a special designation to certain alien veterans
(i.e., those discharged under honorable conditions and who have not been convicted of certain
crimes), prohibit their removal from the United States, provide for the return of those who have
already been removed, and facilitate their naturalization or admission as LPRs.140 Certain bills
would make naturalization examinations and oath ceremonies available at U.S. ports of entry and
U.S. embassies or consulates.141 Some bills contain proposals focused on servicemembers’
qualifying relatives, including limiting their removal from the United States and facilitating their
adjustment to LPR status.142
Some Members have raised concerns about the potential of preventing the removal of or
facilitating the return of veterans who have committed serious offenses.143 For example, some
Members have raised concerns about provisions in certain bills that would provide for the
admission to the United States of eligible veterans who were removed for a serious offense that is
not considered a crime of violence. Some Members have contended that this could allow foreign
nationals to re-enter the United States who have committed other serious offenses, like drug
trafficking, which were not crimes of violence.144
Author Information
Holly Straut-Eppsteiner
Analyst in Immigration Policy
Acknowledgments
Tamar Breslauer, CRS Senior Research Librarian; Sylvia L. Bryan, CRS Research Assistant; and Tilly
Finnegan-Kennel, CRS Research Librarian, provided research assistance for this report. Brion Long, CRS
Visual Information Specialist, developed the graphic in Figure 2.
139 See H.R. 5151 in the 116th Congress; S. 5055, S. 3212, H.R. 7946, H.R. 1183, and H.R. 1182 in the 117th Congress;
H.R. 4569 in the 118th Congress; and H.R. 5535 in the 119th Congress.
140 See H.R. 4382, H.R. 4137, and S. 2265 in the 117th Congress; H.R. 717 in the 118th Congress; and S. 3144 in the
119th Congress.
141
See H.R. 6797 and S. 3227 in the 117th Congress; and H.R. 8851 and S. 4377 in the 118th Congress.
142See H.R. 8704, H.R. 2382, and S. 4526 in the 117th Congress.
143 See, for example, U.S. Congress, Senate Judiciary Committee, Immigration, Citizenship, and Border Safety
Subcommittee, Honoring Veterans and Military Families: An Examination of Immigration and Citizenship Policies for
US Military Service Members, Veterans, and their Families, 117th Cong., 1st sess., June 23, 2021; and U.S. Congress,
Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship, Oversight of Immigrant Military
Members and Veterans, hearings, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., June 29, 2022.
144 See remarks by Senator John Cornyn in response to S. 1041 in the 116th Congress, in U.S. Congress, Senate
Judiciary Committee, Immigration, Citizenship, and Border Safety Subcommittee, Honoring Veterans and Military
Families: An Examination of Immigration and Citizenship Policies for US Military Service Members, Veterans, and
their Families, 117th Cong., 1st sess., June 23, 2021.
Congressional Research Service
25
Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Armed Forces: Immigration Issues
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
Congressional Research Service
R48163 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED
26
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.